Agenda-2009-04-28

From SPARQL Working Group
Revision as of 15:34, 27 April 2009 by Lfeigenb (Talk | contribs)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search



Call in details



When joining please don't identify yourself verbally; instead, identify yourself to Zakim on IRC

Agenda

Note 90 minute duration.

  • Admin
  • Logistics
  • Liaisons
    • Anything to report?
    • OWL WG (Bijan)
    • HCLS (Eric)
    • XQuery (Eric)
    • RIF WG (Axel)
    • RDB2RDF WG (Orri)
  • Action/issue status - via tracker: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/
  • Face-to-face next week
    • Confirm attendees
    • Logistics questions?
      • Timing
    • Agenda
      • Suggested agenda:
        • 0.5 day discussing features
        • 0.5 day discussing feature 1
        • 0.5 day discussing feature 2
        • 0.5 day discussing feature 3
      • Suggested discussion points:
        • Naming (SPARQL 1.1 vs. SPARQL 2 vs. ???)
        • Survey of existing designs
        • Straw man designs
        • Test cases
  • Feature Survey http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35463/features/
    • Survey open until Friday, May 1
    • Current results are at http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35463/features/results
    • See Condorcet results from SteveH at http://plugin.org.uk/misc/votes.svg
    • Can we reach consensus on a few features? Current front-runners per Condorcet are:
      • Aggreagtes
      • Subselects
      • Update
    • Discussion around features with strong advocacy that seem "at risk"
      • SPARQL/OWL (Bijan)
      • LimitPerResource (Kjetil, Alex)
      • ParameterizedInference (Chime)
      • AccessingRdfLists (EricP)
      • SPARQLX (Bijan)
      • Others?


Regrets

  • Orri Erling