CommentResponse:MS-6

From SPARQL Working Group
Jump to: navigation, search

Draft reply to: MS-6


Michael,

Thank you for your comment about the SPARQL Entailment Regimes document.

The WG has considered your comment and the D Entailment Regime has been changed to no longer prescribe a fixed datatype map. Instead, systems are required to provide a means to determine which datatype map they use, e.g., by stating that in the system documentation. The only requirement is that a canonical mapping must be defined, which is needed to ensure finiteness of the answers.

The current editor's draft is available at: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/entailment/xmlspec.xml

We would be grateful if you would acknowledge that your comment has been answered by sending a reply to this mailing list.

Birte, on behalf of the SPARQL-WG