CommentResponse:DB-14b

From SPARQL Working Group
Jump to: navigation, search
> I appreciate the WG's time constraints and I would be okay with a WG
> decision to defer this to the next SPARQL release if the WG felt it
> would cause too much delay to address it now, but I do not agree that
> this functionality is not needed.  Bnodes should have the same level of
> support in SPARQL that all other RDF terms have.

The working group is capturing points as input for any future chartering process.

http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Future_Work_Items

We would be grateful if you would acknowledge that your comment has been answered by sending a reply to this mailing list.

Andy, On behalf of the SPARQL WG