Warning:
This wiki has been archived and is now read-only.
CommentResponse:DB-14b
From SPARQL Working Group
> I appreciate the WG's time constraints and I would be okay with a WG > decision to defer this to the next SPARQL release if the WG felt it > would cause too much delay to address it now, but I do not agree that > this functionality is not needed. Bnodes should have the same level of > support in SPARQL that all other RDF terms have.
The working group is capturing points as input for any future chartering process.
http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Future_Work_Items
We would be grateful if you would acknowledge that your comment has been answered by sending a reply to this mailing list.
Andy, On behalf of the SPARQL WG