From SPARQL Working Group
Jump to: navigation, search
> I appreciate the WG's time constraints and I would be okay with a WG
> decision to defer this to the next SPARQL release if the WG felt it
> would cause too much delay to address it now, but I do not agree that
> this functionality is not needed.  Bnodes should have the same level of
> support in SPARQL that all other RDF terms have.

The working group is capturing points as input for any future chartering process.

We would be grateful if you would acknowledge that your comment has been answered by sending a reply to this mailing list.

Andy, On behalf of the SPARQL WG