Warning:
This wiki has been archived and is now read-only.
Chatlog 2011-05-03
From SPARQL Working Group
See original RRSAgent log and preview nicely formatted version.
Please justify/explain all edits to this page, in your "edit summary" text.
13:56:40 <RRSAgent> RRSAgent has joined #sparql 13:56:40 <RRSAgent> logging to http://www.w3.org/2011/05/03-sparql-irc 13:56:44 <Zakim> Zakim has joined #sparql 13:56:54 <AxelPolleres> Zakim, this will be SPARQL 13:56:54 <Zakim> ok, AxelPolleres; I see SW_(SPARQL)10:00AM scheduled to start in 4 minutes 13:57:17 <AxelPolleres> agenda: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Agenda-2011-05-03 13:57:34 <AxelPolleres> any regrets? 13:57:46 <AxelPolleres> chair: Axel Polleres 13:58:20 <Zakim> SW_(SPARQL)10:00AM has now started 13:58:28 <Zakim> +??P5 13:58:30 <bglimm> bglimm has joined #sparql 13:58:37 <Zakim> +AxelPolleres 13:58:51 <Zakim> +[IPcaller] 13:58:58 <Zakim> +??P7 13:59:01 <NickH> Zakim, ??P5 is me 13:59:02 <Zakim> +NickH; got it 13:59:03 <AndyS> zakim, IPCaller is me 13:59:03 <Zakim> +AndyS; got it 13:59:11 <cbuilara> zakim, ??P7 is me 13:59:11 <Zakim> +cbuilara; got it 13:59:18 <Zakim> + +44.186.528.aaaa 13:59:21 <Zakim> +kasei 13:59:22 <NickH> The early bird gets the UK phone line 13:59:32 <bglimm> Zakim, +44.186.528.aaaa is me 13:59:32 <Zakim> +bglimm; got it 13:59:39 <Zakim> +pgearon 13:59:52 <kasei> bglimm, did you see my proposed service description changes for the entailment properties? 14:00:16 <bglimm> Greg, no, I didn't see it 14:00:21 <bglimm> Did you email? 14:00:24 <kasei> in email last night 14:00:37 <bglimm> Hm, I checked today, but mst have overlooked it 14:00:40 <bglimm> Will have a look now 14:01:10 <MattPerry> MattPerry has joined #sparql 14:01:29 <LeeF> AxelPolleres, SteveH and I discussed Dave Beckett's comments and do not believe that there are any substantive changes that arise from them 14:01:48 <AxelPolleres> Zakim, who is on the phone? 14:01:49 <Zakim> + +1.617.553.aabb 14:01:51 <Zakim> On the phone I see NickH, AxelPolleres, AndyS, cbuilara, bglimm, kasei, pgearon, +1.617.553.aabb 14:01:56 <LeeF> zakim, LeeF is aabb 14:01:59 <Zakim> sorry, LeeF, I do not recognize a party named 'LeeF' 14:02:02 <LeeF> zakim, aabb is LeeF 14:02:03 <Zakim> +LeeF; got it 14:02:09 <Zakim> + +1.603.897.aacc 14:02:23 <MattPerry> zakim, aacc is me 14:02:23 <Zakim> +MattPerry; got it 14:02:53 <Zakim> +[Sophia] 14:03:15 <alex_> alex_ has joined #sparql 14:03:32 <bglimm> Greg, I think what you propose in the mail is good 14:03:36 <bglimm> Zakim, mute me 14:03:36 <Zakim> bglimm should now be muted 14:03:50 <kasei> bglimm, ok, good. I think that was the last remaining issue. 14:03:59 <kasei> Zakim, who is talking? 14:04:10 <Zakim> kasei, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: LeeF (46%), AxelPolleres (25%), AndyS (3%) 14:04:26 <Zakim> + +3539149aadd 14:04:26 <Zakim> +sandro 14:04:39 <alexpassant> Zakim, +3539149aadd is me 14:04:39 <Zakim> +alexpassant; got it 14:04:43 <Zakim> +??P29 14:04:43 <NickH> Zakim, mute LeeF 14:04:45 <Zakim> LeeF should now be muted 14:04:45 <AxelPolleres> scribe: Alex Passant 14:04:55 <SteveH> Zakim, ??P29 is me 14:04:55 <Zakim> +SteveH; got it 14:05:24 <alexpassant> topic: admin 14:05:28 <AxelPolleres> PROPOSED: Approve minutes at http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2011-04-0 14:05:28 <alexpassant> AxelPolleres: approve the minutes from last time 14:05:29 <Zakim> +??P32 14:05:35 <AxelPolleres> PROPOSED: Approve minutes at http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2011-04-26 14:05:43 <SteveH> Zakim, ??P32 is me 14:05:43 <Zakim> +SteveH; got it 14:05:46 <Zakim> -SteveH 14:06:08 <AxelPolleres> RESOLVED: Approve minutes at http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2011-04-26 14:06:29 <alexpassant> ... next meeting - next week 14:06:48 <alexpassant> topic: Last call publications of documents 14:06:53 <AxelPolleres> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/To_Last_Call 14:07:09 <alexpassant> ... points to check for every documents, in the agenda 14:07:11 <alexpassant> ... start with query 14:07:16 <alexpassant> ... are editors ok for LC ? 14:07:40 <alexpassant> AndyS: yes, need to check the aggregate example with SteveH 14:07:54 <alexpassant> ... ready in terms of content 14:08:13 <alexpassant> SteveH: pubchecker 14:08:20 <LeeF> best effort is good enough for me! 14:08:25 <LeeF> i'm happy to wrestle with the rest of it 14:08:28 <alexpassant> ... except some wording, similar to other WD 14:08:31 <LeeF> ack me 14:08:31 <bglimm> I added 14:08:37 <bglimm> This document is a Last Call Working Draft. 14:08:37 <bglimm> Publication as a Last Call Working Draft indicates that the SPARQL Working Group believes it has 14:08:37 <bglimm> addressed all substantive issues and that the document is stable. The Working Group expects to advance this specification to Recommendation Status. 14:08:38 <bglimm> Comments on this document should be sent to public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org, a mailing list with 14:08:38 <bglimm> a public archive. Comments on this working draft are due on or before 14:08:38 <bglimm> 29 July 2011. 14:08:48 <bglimm> To make the pub rule checker happy 14:09:03 <alexpassant> LeeF: if pubrules is happy, I'm happy 14:09:10 <alexpassant> SteveH: changes between the previous WD and the current oen 14:09:18 <alexpassant> ... havent done anything about that now 14:09:38 <bglimm> pub rul cchecker want the keyword "Last Call Working Draft" and an end date for a review period 14:09:40 <alexpassant> sandro: would do a diff rather than CVS 14:10:20 <alexpassant> AxelPolleres: ask editors to do the changes section 14:10:25 <alexpassant> ... we can leave it out if not here 14:10:46 <alexpassant> ... happy to leave it out it no time 14:11:02 <alexpassant> ... would like to drop the CVS log 14:11:57 <pgearon> +1 for dropping the logs 14:12:08 <bglimm> I created pub rule checking 14:12:10 <bglimm> doc 14:12:23 <bglimm> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Pub-Process 14:12:24 <alexpassant> ... birte done a summary of pubrules 14:12:31 <bglimm> Zakim, unmute me 14:12:31 <Zakim> bglimm should no longer be muted 14:12:46 <chimezie> chimezie has joined #sparql 14:13:21 <alexpassant> ... any critical comments about Query ? 14:13:29 <alexpassant> ... only one I'm worried about is Dave Beckett comment 14:13:49 <Zakim> + +1.216.368.aaee 14:14:03 <alexpassant> SteveH: nothing that cause any publication problem 14:14:03 <chimezie> Zakim, +1.216.368.aaee is me 14:14:03 <Zakim> +chimezie; got it 14:14:09 <chimezie> Zakim, mute me 14:14:09 <Zakim> chimezie should now be muted 14:14:19 <alexpassant> SteveH: response has been updated 14:14:44 <bglimm> Zakim, mute me 14:14:44 <Zakim> bglimm should now be muted 14:15:19 <bglimm> Zakim, unmute me 14:15:19 <Zakim> bglimm should no longer be muted 14:15:35 <bglimm> Zakim, mute me 14:15:35 <Zakim> bglimm should now be muted 14:15:47 <LeeF> q+ to discuss dates 14:16:21 <alexpassant> LeeF: date to end the LC 14:16:30 <alexpassant> ... need some time to let people look at it 14:16:33 <alexpassant> ... min 6 weeks 14:16:40 <alexpassant> ... then running into the summer 14:16:45 <alexpassant> ... people slowing down 14:16:50 <bglimm> 29 July 14:17:06 <bglimm> Zakim, unmute me 14:17:06 <Zakim> bglimm should no longer be muted 14:17:19 <bglimm> Zakim, mute me 14:17:19 <Zakim> bglimm should now be muted 14:17:32 <alexpassant> ... third week of june for the minimum 14:17:45 <alexpassant> ... gives a slim change to publish other documents as LC and get them at the same time 14:17:51 <AxelPolleres> PROPOSED: publish SPARQL1.1 Query as Last call working draft with publication date May 12 and comments period until July 29 14:17:56 <alexpassant> ... include that date as part of the resolution 14:18:25 <LeeF> Do our reviewers support publishing as is? 14:18:47 <LeeF> +1 to pgearon's comment 14:18:56 <alexpassant> pgearon: oportunity to get feedback at semtech 14:19:28 <AndyS> Seconded 14:19:30 <AxelPolleres> PROPOSED: publish SPARQL1.1 Query as Last call working draft with publication date May 12 and comments period until July 29 14:19:34 <LeeF> +1 to publishing query LC 14:19:37 <SteveH> +1 14:19:38 <sandro> +1 (W3C) 14:19:38 <alexpassant> +1 14:19:38 <bglimm> +1 14:19:40 <cbuilara> +1 14:19:42 <OlivierCorby> +1 14:19:45 <AndyS> +1 (ASF) 14:19:46 <MattPerry> +1 (Oracle) 14:19:49 <chimezie> +1 (IE) 14:19:51 <kasei> +1 (RPI) 14:20:03 <pgearon> +1 14:20:32 <AndyS> zakim, who is on the phone? 14:20:32 <Zakim> On the phone I see NickH, AxelPolleres, AndyS, cbuilara, bglimm (muted), kasei, pgearon, LeeF, MattPerry, [Sophia], alexpassant, sandro, SteveH, chimezie (muted) 14:20:44 <LeeF> NickH? 14:20:49 <NickH> +1 (BBC) 14:20:50 <chimezie> i have 14:20:57 <LeeF> thanks! 14:21:28 <AxelPolleres> RESOLVED: publish SPARQL1.1 Query as Last call working draft with publication date May 12 and comments period until July 29 14:21:36 <LeeF> ...with no objections or abstentions 14:21:50 <alexpassant> AxelPolleres: next document: Update 14:22:48 <SteveH> it's a capitalisation issue 14:22:55 <AxelPolleres> q? 14:22:58 <SteveH> "Th�is", not "this" 14:22:58 <pgearon> generated HTML for Update is: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/update-1.1/Overview.html 14:22:59 <LeeF> ack 14:23:02 <LeeF> ack me 14:23:02 <Zakim> LeeF, you wanted to discuss dates 14:23:24 <LeeF> SteveH, where? 14:23:35 <SteveH> LeeF, in the title "Status of This Document" 14:23:41 <SteveH> our XSLT produces "this" 14:23:50 <LeeF> wow 14:23:51 <SteveH> I fixed it in the query-1.1 one 14:23:53 <LeeF> how dumb 14:23:54 <LeeF> :-) 14:24:22 <SteveH> well, someone had to draw a line somwhere :) 14:24:33 <alexpassant> AxelPolleres: dont see intractions between USING and USING NAME 14:24:42 <alexpassant> ... just a macro for graphs around unnamed patterns 14:24:52 <alexpassant> s/NAME/NAMED 14:25:44 <alexpassant> ... ok with the current wording ? 14:26:41 <alexpassant> kasei: I'm happy with the changes 14:27:09 <alexpassant> there's the "do we need USING DEFAULT -- PROPOSED: move that to "Postponed Issues"" 14:27:36 <AxelPolleres> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2011Jan/0000.html 14:28:13 <AxelPolleres> draft rtesponse here... http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:HK-2 14:29:15 <AxelPolleres> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:MS-1 14:30:43 <alexpassant> AxelPolleres: commentfrom MS, critical for LC ? 14:30:52 <alexpassant> alexpassant: no, no crotical 14:31:01 <alexpassant> s/crotical/critical 14:31:20 <AxelPolleres> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:ST-1 14:31:28 <LeeF> pgearon, let's get this wording straightened out, and then I'll fix the status stuff in the generated HTML 14:31:43 <AxelPolleres> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:RN-1 14:31:50 <pgearon> LeeF: ok 14:32:30 <alexpassant> AxelPolleres: need to be sure that the comments are not critical 14:32:56 <AxelPolleres> ACTION: Axel to confirm with Paul and Alex that open comments don't contain LC critical parts that are still open 14:32:56 <trackbot> Created ACTION-453 - Confirm with Paul and Alex that open comments don't contain LC critical parts that are still open [on Axel Polleres - due 2011-05-10]. 14:33:40 <bglimm> q+ to ask about links of federated query and json 14:34:07 <bglimm> Zakim, unmute me 14:34:07 <Zakim> bglimm should no longer be muted 14:34:25 <bglimm> http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-federation/ 14:34:32 <bglimm> http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-federated-query/ 14:34:33 <alexpassant> bglimm: some broken links to other documents 14:34:42 <bglimm> http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-results-json/ 14:35:37 <alexpassant> ... 404 links 14:35:41 <alexpassant> ... which one to chose for JSON 14:36:24 <LeeF> I suggest removing reference to JSON document and adding it back in at some point in the future 14:37:11 <alexpassant> AxelPolleres: let the JSON doc aside for the moment 14:37:20 <LeeF> We can keep it in unlinked also, I don't really care. 14:37:32 <alexpassant> AndyS: lets make it unlinked 14:38:32 <bglimm> Zakim, mute me 14:38:32 <Zakim> bglimm should now be muted 14:38:42 <NickH> Zakim, who is talking? 14:38:44 <alexpassant> AxelPolleres: update wording of the WITH, one more person to review 14:38:53 <Zakim> NickH, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: AxelPolleres (86%) 14:39:20 <AxelPolleres> ACTION: Andy to approve rewording for WITH in update if any 14:39:20 <trackbot> Created ACTION-454 - Approve rewording for WITH in update if any [on Andy Seaborne - due 2011-05-10]. 14:39:48 <alexpassant> ... sorting that with paul after the call 14:39:54 <alexpassant> ... go ahead with proposal to LC 14:40:50 <AxelPolleres> PROPOSED: publish SPARQL1.1 Update as Last call working draft with publication date May 12 and comments period until July 29 modulo completion of ACTION-454 and ACTION-453 14:41:13 <LeeF> I'm OK with that 14:41:57 <SteveH> +1 (Garlik) 14:42:02 <kasei> +1 (RPI) 14:42:03 <sandro> +1 (W3C) 14:42:04 <AndyS> +1 (ASF) 14:42:05 <LeeF> +1 (Cambridge Semanics) 14:42:06 <chimezie> +1 (IE) 14:42:06 <bglimm> +1 (The University of Oxford) 14:42:08 <OlivierCorby> +1 (INRIA) 14:42:11 <pgearon> +1 14:42:11 <MattPerry> +1 (Oracle) 14:42:11 <cbuilara> +1 (UPM) 14:42:18 <alexpassant> +1 (DERI) 14:42:48 <AxelPolleres> Zakim, who is on the phone? 14:42:48 <Zakim> On the phone I see NickH, AxelPolleres, AndyS, cbuilara, bglimm (muted), kasei, pgearon, LeeF, MattPerry, [Sophia], alexpassant, sandro, SteveH, chimezie (muted) 14:42:51 <NickH> +1 (BBC) 14:43:26 <AxelPolleres> RESOLVED: publish SPARQL1.1 Update as Last call working draft with publication date May 12 and comments period until July 29 modulo completion of ACTION-454 and ACTION-453 14:43:43 <AxelPolleres> ... with no objections and no abstentions 14:44:04 <alexpassant> AxelPolleres: next, SD 14:44:11 <alexpassant> ... ready ? 14:44:44 <alexpassant> kasei: request to add use of entailement in the examples 14:44:53 <alexpassant> ... so that SD can describe entailement 14:45:08 <alexpassant> ... and samepl SD shown in Turtle, in addition to RDF/XML 14:45:18 <bglimm> Yes 14:46:08 <alex_> alex_ has joined #sparql 14:46:20 <AxelPolleres> ACTION: greg to add use of entailement in the examples and sample SD shown in Turtle 14:46:21 <trackbot> Created ACTION-455 - Add use of entailement in the examples and sample SD shown in Turtle [on Gregory Williams - due 2011-05-10]. 14:46:44 <AxelPolleres> ACTION: Birte to approve completion of ATION-455 14:46:44 <trackbot> Created ACTION-456 - Approve completion of ATION-455 [on Birte Glimm - due 2011-05-10]. 14:47:38 <alex_> kasei: no major issues in open comments. 2 comments from Rob Vesse, mostly editorial 14:47:54 <alex_> Zakim: scribe is alex_ 14:48:32 <alexpassant> AxelPolleres: all comments addressed from reviewers 14:48:36 <LeeF> +1 14:49:10 <AxelPolleres> PROPOSED: publish SPARQL1.1 Service Description as Last call working draft with publication date May 12 and comments period until July 29 modulo completion of ACTION-456 14:49:36 <bglimm> +1 (The University of Oxford) 14:49:38 <kasei> +1 (RPI) 14:49:39 <LeeF> +1 (Cambridge Semantics) 14:49:39 <OlivierCorby> +1 (INRIA) 14:49:40 <AndyS> +1 (ASF) 14:49:40 <cbuilara> +1 (UPM) 14:49:42 <MattPerry> +1 (Oracle) 14:49:44 <NickH> +1 (BBC) 14:49:45 <alexpassant> +1 (DERI) 14:49:48 <pgearon> +1 (Revelytix) 14:49:50 <sandro> +0 (W3C) 14:50:05 <chimezie> +1 (IE) 14:50:35 <sandro> (Nothing big -- I'm just not a fan of this whole design.... Certainly not opposed, just not a fan.) 14:51:30 <kasei> sandro, not a fan of the SD thing in general? or something specific about this specific design? 14:51:51 <AxelPolleres> RESOLVED: publish SPARQL1.1 Service Description as Last call working draft with publication date May 12 and comments period until July 29 modulo completion of ACTION-456, no objections, one abstention 14:52:54 <bglimm> Zakim, unmute me 14:52:54 <Zakim> bglimm should no longer be muted 14:53:18 <AxelPolleres> topic: entailment 14:53:49 <sandro> kasei, I think SD is being used to solve problems (like selecting entailment) that would be better done in other ways. 14:55:10 <AxelPolleres> q? 14:55:19 <AxelPolleres> ack bglimm 14:55:19 <Zakim> bglimm, you wanted to ask about links of federated query and json 14:55:54 <AxelPolleres> PROPOSED: publish SPARQL1.1 Entailment Regimes as Last call working draft with publication date May 12 and comments period until July 29 14:56:14 <AndyS> +1 (ASF) 14:56:15 <bglimm> +1 (The University of Oxford) 14:56:15 <LeeF> +1 (Cambridge Semantics) 14:56:16 <chimezie> +1 (IE) 14:56:17 <cbuilara> +1 (UPM) 14:56:18 <OlivierCorby> +1 (INRIA) 14:56:18 <MattPerry> +1 (Oracle) 14:56:18 <kasei> +1 (RPI) 14:56:19 <alexpassant> +1 (DERI) 14:56:25 <SteveH> +1 (Garlik) 14:56:27 <pgearon> +1 (Revelytix) 14:57:00 <sandro> +1 (W3C) --- assuming RIF-in-RDF stuff in this is fixed, as per email between me and Axel 14:57:00 <NickH> +1 (BBC) 14:57:45 <bglimm> So we have to update the entailment doc with a new RIF-in-RDF URL? 14:57:46 <AxelPolleres> ACTION: sandro to fix RIF-in RDF note, publish it, and fix reference in the entailemt doc 14:57:46 <trackbot> Created ACTION-458 - Fix RIF-in RDF note, publish it, and fix reference in the entailemt doc [on Sandro Hawke - due 2011-05-10]. 14:58:33 <sandro> This includes fixing a couple minor errors in the example. 14:58:56 <AxelPolleres> PROPOSED: publish SPARQL1.1 Entailment Regimes as Last call working draft with publication date May 12 and comments period until July 29 modulo completion of ACTION-458 14:59:07 <sandro> +1 (W3C) 14:59:07 <kasei> +1 (RPI) 14:59:09 <NickH> +1 (BBC) 14:59:10 <pgearon> +1 (Revelytix) 14:59:11 <LeeF> +1 (Cambridge Semantics) 14:59:12 <AndyS> +1 (ASF) 14:59:12 <MattPerry> +1 (Oracle) 14:59:13 <cbuilara> +1 (UPM) 14:59:14 <SteveH> +1 (Garlik) 14:59:15 <OlivierCorby> +1 (INRIA) 14:59:17 <chimezie> +1 (IE) 14:59:20 <bglimm> +1 (The University of Oxford) 14:59:51 <alexpassant> +1 (DERI) 14:59:57 <AxelPolleres> RESOLVED: publish SPARQL1.1 Entailment Regimes as Last call working draft with publication date May 12 and comments period until July 29 modulo completion of ACTION-458 15:00:41 <LeeF> graph store protocol 15:00:54 <chimezie> Zakim, unmute me 15:00:54 <Zakim> chimezie should no longer be muted 15:01:37 <bglimm> Zakim, mute me 15:01:37 <AndyS> q+ 15:01:39 <Zakim> bglimm should now be muted 15:02:18 <bglimm> +1 15:02:33 <NickH> can stay 15:02:39 <alexpassant> can't stay 15:02:49 <alexpassant> can someone take the scribe role? 15:03:14 <chimezie> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:KK-6 15:03:21 <sandro> RESOLVED: Extend the meeting to discuss other two documents 15:04:55 <Zakim> -alexpassant 15:04:59 <AxelPolleres> PROPOSED: publish SPARQL 1.1 Graph Store HTTP Protocol as Last call working draft with publication date May 12 and comments period until July 29 15:05:13 <bglimm> +1 (The University of Oxford) 15:05:16 <NickH> +1 (BBC) 15:05:18 <chimezie> +1 (IE) 15:05:18 <MattPerry> +1 (Oracle) 15:05:20 <cbuilara> +1 (UPM) 15:05:21 <kasei> +1 (RPI) 15:05:21 <AndyS> +1 (ASF) 15:05:22 <LeeF> +1 (Cambridge Semantics) 15:05:23 <SteveH> +1 (Garlik) 15:05:24 <AxelPolleres> +1 (DERI) 15:05:25 <OlivierCorby> +1 (INRIA) 15:05:30 <sandro> +1 (W3C) 15:05:30 <pgearon> +1 (Revelytix) 15:05:57 <AndyS> zakim, who is on the phone? 15:05:57 <Zakim> On the phone I see NickH, AxelPolleres, AndyS, cbuilara, bglimm (muted), kasei, pgearon, LeeF, MattPerry, [Sophia], sandro, SteveH, chimezie 15:06:21 <AxelPolleres> RESOLVED: publish SPARQL 1.1 Graph Store HTTP Protocol as Last call working draft with publication date May 12 and comments period until July 29, no objections, no abstentions 15:07:06 <LeeF> thanks to all of the editors for all of the hard work getting this far! 15:07:26 <LeeF> and congratulations to the whole group for getting this far 15:07:41 <AxelPolleres> adjourned 15:07:44 <Zakim> -[Sophia] 15:07:47 <Zakim> -chimezie 15:07:48 <chimezie> later 15:07:50 <Zakim> -SteveH 15:07:53 <NickH> well done everyone! 15:07:53 <Zakim> -bglimm 15:07:55 <MattPerry> bye 15:07:56 <Zakim> -cbuilara 15:08:00 <Zakim> -kasei 15:08:02 <Zakim> -MattPerry 15:08:06 <Zakim> -NickH 15:09:39 <AxelPolleres> ACTION: Axel to send request for publication as soon as "modulo" actions are completed (and poke responsibles to complete before 6th) 15:09:39 <trackbot> Created ACTION-459 - Send request for publication as soon as "modulo" actions are completed (and poke responsibles to complete before 6th) [on Axel Polleres - due 2011-05-10]. 15:12:15 <Zakim> -LeeF 15:12:16 <Zakim> -sandro 15:12:17 <Zakim> -AxelPolleres 15:12:35 <sandro> AxelPolleres, LeeF --- great job you guys.... and everyone :-) 15:13:29 <AxelPolleres> rrsagent, make records public 15:13:47 <SteveH> SteveH has joined #sparql 15:13:58 <AxelPolleres> THanks to everyone! and let's take that spin to also finish the other docs in the coming weeks! ;-) # SPECIAL MARKER FOR CHATSYNC. DO NOT EDIT THIS LINE OR BELOW. SRCLINESUSED=00000367