From SPARQL Working Group
Our agenda will be focused around the function library. I'd like to resolve as much of this as possible.
- We'll use AndyS's emails - http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2010OctDec/0283.html and http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2010OctDec/0302.html - as a guide and try to settle on:
- the set of functions
- xsd:string vs. simple literal arguments to and return values from string functions
- concatenating literals with language tags (proposal for this and above at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2010OctDec/0303.html . See also http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2010OctDec/0308.html)
- spec'ing out RAND(X)
- do all new functions have keywords? do all new functions have URIs? what URIs?
- + for concatenation?
Thanks to Andy for summarizing many of these decisions here: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2010OctDec/0283.html See also Axel's summary mail: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2010OctDec/0252.html
Note: We scheduled our protocol working session for Wed. Dec. 8 at 11am US eastern time. (See http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2010OctDec/0285.html )