Warning:
This wiki has been archived and is now read-only.
Agenda-2010-02-23
From SPARQL Working Group
Call in details
When joining please don't identify yourself verbally; instead, identify yourself to Zakim on IRC
- Date of Call: Tuesday February 23, 2010
- Time of Call: 15:00 UK, 10:00 (East US)
- Dial-In #: +1.617.761.6200 (Cambridge, MA)
- Dial-In #: +33.4.26.46.79.03 (France)
- Dial-In #: +44.203.318.0479 (UK)
- Participant Access Code: 77277# (SPARQ)
- IRC Channel: irc.w3.org port 6665 channel #sparql ([irc:irc.w3.org:6665/sparql])
- Web-based IRC (member-only): http://www.w3.org/2001/01/cgi-irc (Firefox IRC addon: chatzilla)
- Duration: 60 minutes
- Chair: Lee Feigenbaum
- Scribe: kasei (Scribe List)
- Link to Agenda: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Agenda-2010-02-23
Agenda
- Admin
- PROPOSED: Approve minutes at http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2010-02-16
- Next meeting: 2010-03-02 @ 15:00 UK / 10:00 EST (scribe: Sandro Hawke)
- Comment handling - see http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Comments
- Liaisons - Is there anything to report of relevance to the SPARQL WG?
- RIF WG (Sandro)
- RDB2RDF WG (Orri)
- eGov (Sandro)
- Update - open issues
- Plesae come prepared to offer strong feelings on any of these issues. Issues without strong feelings will be left to the wisdom of the editor.
- DELETE syntax is ambiguous. should statements be separable with optional semicolons? Or is another syntax option better?
- I believe consensus was noted around Andy's summary at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2010JanMar/0298.html (shortcut form is DELETE WHERE { quadtemplate })
- Earlier: See Axel's summary at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2010JanMar/0107.html and surrounding thread
- Earlier: See also http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2010JanMar/0084.html on allowing FILTERs in syntax shortcut
- I believe consensus was noted around Andy's summary at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2010JanMar/0298.html (shortcut form is DELETE WHERE { quadtemplate })
- ISSUE-20
- Paul says: Are there differences between an empty graph and a non-existent graph? I like to think so, but didn't see a consensus. This issue affects the need for CREATE and DROP graph operations, and controls whether or not INSERT/DELETE control graph existence.
- Do we have a resolution to the question of whether blank nodes are permissible in the template for DELETE?
- See http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2010JanMar/0146.html & surrounding thread
- ISSUE-51 Shall dataset clauses be allowed in SPARQL/Update?
- See Lee's message at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2010JanMar/0165.html and surrounding thread & links
- (Other issues are not demanding of teleconference time at the moment.)
- To Last Call
- Protocol (next week?)
- HTTP Update Protocol
- Property Paths
- Query
- Entailment
Regrets
- Alexandre Passant