Agenda-2009-06-30

Call in details

When joining please don't identify yourself verbally; instead, identify yourself to Zakim on IRC

Date of Call: Tuesday June 30, 2009
Time of Call: 15:00 UK, 10:00 (East US)
Dial-In #: +1.617.761.6200 (Cambridge, MA)
Dial-In #: +33.4.89.06.34.99 (Nice, France)
Dial-In #: +44.117.370.6152 (Bristol, UK)
Participant Access Code: 77277# (SPARQ)
IRC Channel: irc.w3.org port 6665 channel #sparql ([irc:irc.w3.org:6665/sparql])
Web-based IRC (member-only): http://www.w3.org/2001/01/cgi-irc (Firefox IRC addon: chatzilla)
Duration: 60 minutes
Chair: Lee Feigenbaum
Scribe: Kjetil (Scribe List)
Link to Agenda: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Agenda-2009-06-30

Admin
- PROPOSED: Approve minutes at http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2009-06-23
- Next meeting: 2009-07-07 @ 15:00 BST / 10:00 EDT, SteveH to scribe (Scribe List)
Liaisons
- Anything to report?
- OWL WG (Bijan)
- HCLS (Eric)
- XQuery (Eric)
- RIF WG (Axel)
- RDB2RDF WG (Orri)
Action/issue status - via tracker: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/
F&R - ready for FPWD? http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/features/
- PROPOSED: Publish http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/features/ version 1.111@@ as First Public Working Draft
Service Descriptions - http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Feature:ServiceDescriptions
- Discuss progress/actions since last time.
  - Strawman on how to serve service descriptions? ACTION-37 (Jacek Kopecky), cf. http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Feature:ServiceDescriptions#Strawman_Proposals_for_Requesting_Service_Descriptions
  - Strawman on which features we standardize or not? ACTION-38 (Greg Williams), cf.

Time allowed: review progress on Update and Negation
- Negation:
  - mails on set based semantics of MINUS
  - http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2009AprJun/0394.html UNSAID/NOT EXISTS implemented in ARQ]
  - See this mail with proposal from AndyS http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2009AprJun/0433.html
- Update:
  - AndyS: discuss whether to start with the submission as the strawman for the update language. Are there alternatives to consider? (After strawman -- start throwing rocks at it to test it out)
Suggestion(s) for next week
- Discuss time-permitting features, e.g. SPARQL/OWL, see mail-thread started by Bijan.
- Circle back on open issues for aggregates, project expressions - any proposals?