BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
X-WR-CALNAME:SPARQL Working Group Actions for Axel Polleres
PRODID:-//W3C//Tracker//EN
X-WR-TIMEZONE:US/Eastern
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
BEGIN:VTODO
DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20110705
DUE;VALUE=DATE:20110712
DTSTAMP:20120217T080838Z
SUMMARY: Setup a wiki page for creating a WG note on how RDF expected changes affect SPARQL 1.1 (ACTION-486 for SPARQL Working Group)
UID:http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/actions/486
URL:http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/actions/486
END:VTODO
BEGIN:VTODO
DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20110726
DUE;VALUE=DATE:20110802
DTSTAMP:20120217T080838Z
SUMMARY: Contaxt sandro on whether we're allowed to change xsl in place in the course of errata (ACTION-503 for SPARQL Working Group)
UID:http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/actions/503
URL:http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/actions/503
END:VTODO
BEGIN:VTODO
DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20110913
DUE;VALUE=DATE:20110920
DTSTAMP:20120217T080838Z
SUMMARY: Check update comments (with paul/alex) and summarize critical issues, if any on mail (ACTION-530 for SPARQL Working Group)
UID:http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/actions/530
URL:http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/actions/530
END:VTODO
BEGIN:VTODO
DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20110920
DUE;VALUE=DATE:20110927
DTSTAMP:20120217T080838Z
SUMMARY: Look into where we take it from ACTION-504 (need someone to update schema files as well) (ACTION-535 for SPARQL Working Group)
UID:http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/actions/535
URL:http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/actions/535
END:VTODO
BEGIN:VTODO
DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20111108
DUE;VALUE=DATE:20111115
DTSTAMP:20120217T080838Z
SUMMARY: Review entailment regimes document. (ACTION-552 for SPARQL Working Group)
UID:http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/actions/552
URL:http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/actions/552
END:VTODO
BEGIN:VTODO
DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20111206
DUE;VALUE=DATE:20111213
DTSTAMP:20120217T080838Z
SUMMARY: Check with Lee and sandro about CR minimum comments period, and also about standard text we could put into LCs that might NOT go through CR. "this doc has already implementations as follows and might go directly to PR... " (ACTION-569 for SPARQL Working Group)
UID:http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/actions/569
URL:http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/actions/569
END:VTODO
BEGIN:VTODO
DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20111206
DUE;VALUE=DATE:20111213
DTSTAMP:20120217T080838Z
SUMMARY: Check RFC wording for MUST SHOULD, MAY across docs. (ACTION-570 for SPARQL Working Group)
UID:http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/actions/570
URL:http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/actions/570
END:VTODO
BEGIN:VTODO
DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20120103
DUE;VALUE=DATE:20120110
DTSTAMP:20120217T080838Z
SUMMARY: Draft a reply to NL-1 pointing to stay on the basic level for the CONSTRUCT WHERE shortcut, and that there's the full form for more complex cases    (ACTION-572 for SPARQL Working Group)
UID:http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/actions/572
URL:http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/actions/572
END:VTODO
BEGIN:VTODO
DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20120117
DUE;VALUE=DATE:20120124
DTSTAMP:20120217T080838Z
SUMMARY: Propose a negative syntax test for turtle bnodes in DELETE DATA (ACTION-577 for SPARQL Working Group)
UID:http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/actions/577
URL:http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/actions/577
END:VTODO
BEGIN:VTODO
DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20120207
DUE;VALUE=DATE:20120214
DTSTAMP:20120217T080838Z
SUMMARY: Mail sandro about loss of UK number (ACTION-586 for SPARQL Working Group)
UID:http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/actions/586
URL:http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/actions/586
END:VTODO
BEGIN:VTODO
DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20120207
DUE;VALUE=DATE:20120214
DTSTAMP:20120217T080838Z
SUMMARY: Summarize option 1 and 2 in email (ACTION-587 for SPARQL Working Group)
UID:http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/actions/587
URL:http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/actions/587
END:VTODO
END:VCALENDAR