ISSUE-56: Does HTTP PATCH affect either the SPARQL Protocol or the SPARQL Uniform etc. HTTP etc. Protocol?

Does HTTP PATCH affect either the SPARQL Protocol or the SPARQL Uniform etc. HTTP etc. Protocol?

State:
CLOSED
Product:
Raised by:
Opened on:
2010-03-25
Description:
How should UPDATE and the HTTP protocol document account for the (new) HTTP verb 'PATCH'
Related Actions Items:
No related actions
Related emails:
  1. Re: SPARQL TC 2010-12-21 Agenda (Merry Christmas edition) (from axel.polleres@deri.org on 2010-12-20)
  2. Re: SPARQL TC 2010-12-21 Agenda (Merry Christmas edition) (from alexandre.passant@deri.org on 2010-12-20)
  3. SPARQL TC 2010-12-21 Agenda (Merry Christmas edition) (from axel.polleres@deri.org on 2010-12-20)
  4. SPARQL TC 2010-12-21 Agenda (Merry Christmas edition) (from axel.polleres@deri.org on 2010-12-20)
  5. Re: Open issues in HTTP/Update protocol (for discussion) (from andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com on 2010-12-16)
  6. Re: Open issues in HTTP/Update protocol (for discussion) (from ogbujic@ccf.org on 2010-12-15)
  7. Re: Open issues in HTTP/Update protocol (for discussion) (from gearon@ieee.org on 2010-12-14)
  8. Re: Open issues in HTTP/Update protocol (for discussion) (from andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com on 2010-12-14)
  9. HTTP-update-ISSUES, feedback for next TC, all? (from axel.polleres@deri.org on 2010-12-14)
  10. Open issues in HTTP/Update protocol (for discussion) (from ogbujic@ccf.org on 2010-11-30)
  11. Re: SPARQL WG Agenda - Tues. Aug. 10, 2010 (from Souripriya.Das@oracle.com on 2010-08-09)
  12. SPARQL WG Agenda - Tues. Aug. 10, 2010 (from lee@thefigtrees.net on 2010-08-09)
  13. tomorrow's agenda (and initial open ISSUES summary.. ) (from axel.polleres@deri.org on 2010-07-26)
  14. ISSUE-56: Does HTTP PATCH affect either the SPARQL Protocol or the SPARQL Uniform etc. HTTP etc. Protocol? (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2010-03-25)

Related notes:

[sandro]: http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5789

25 Mar 2010, 19:01:15

Relevant ailing list entries: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2010JanMar/0601.html ,
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2010JanMar/0600.html ,
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2010JanMar/0602.html ,
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2010JanMar/0603.html ,
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2010JanMar/0604.html ,
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2010JanMar/0605.html

Ivan Herman, 25 Mar 2010, 19:04:42

ISSUE-56 can be closed from Protocol's point of view, but still open for http-rdf-update ? (TC 2010-12-14)

Axel Polleres, 14 Dec 2010, 15:19:31

[LeeF]: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2010-12-21#resolution_5

24 Dec 2010, 19:28:35

Display change log ATOM feed


Chair, Staff Contact
Tracker: documentation, (configuration for this group), originally developed by Dean Jackson, is developed and maintained by the Systems Team <w3t-sys@w3.org>.
$Id: 56.html,v 1.1 2013-03-28 18:39:09 brett Exp $