ISSUE-29: Should negation be done via a binary operator on subqueries, a binary operator within graph patterns, or a filter+subquery?

Should negation be done via a binary operator on subqueries, a binary operator within graph patterns, or a filter+subquery?

State:
CLOSED
Product:
Raised by:
Opened on:
2009-05-19
Description:
Related Actions Items:
No related actions
Related emails:
  1. Re: issue round-up, part 1 (from axel.polleres@deri.org on 2010-05-18)
  2. Re: issue round-up, part 1 (from axel.polleres@deri.org on 2010-05-18)
  3. Re: SPARQL TC 2010-05-18 Agenda (from axel.polleres@deri.org on 2010-05-17)
  4. [wbs] response to 'How should SPARQL 1.1 resolve ISSUE-29, the handling of negation?' (from webmaster@w3.org (WBS Mailer on behalf of ogbujic@ccf.org) on 2010-05-17)
  5. Re: Web survey to resolve ISSUE-29 on negation (from birte.glimm@comlab.ox.ac.uk on 2010-05-09)
  6. Re: Web survey to resolve ISSUE-29 on negation (from birte.glimm@comlab.ox.ac.uk on 2010-05-09)
  7. Re: Web survey to resolve ISSUE-29 on negation (from andy.seaborne@talis.com on 2010-05-07)
  8. Re: Web survey to resolve ISSUE-29 on negation (from lee@thefigtrees.net on 2010-05-07)
  9. Re: Web survey to resolve ISSUE-29 on negation (from birte.glimm@comlab.ox.ac.uk on 2010-05-07)
  10. Web survey to resolve ISSUE-29 on negation (from lee@thefigtrees.net on 2010-05-07)
  11. Resolving negation (MINUS / NOT EXISTS) (from lee@thefigtrees.net on 2010-04-19)
  12. Re: Agenda SPARQL TC 2010-02-09 (from axel.polleres@deri.org on 2010-02-09)
  13. Re: Agenda SPARQL TC 2010-02-09 (from andy.seaborne@talis.com on 2010-02-09)
  14. Agenda SPARQL TC 2010-02-09 (from axel.polleres@deri.org on 2010-02-08)
  15. Re: ISSUE-29: MINUS / NOT EXISTS (from steve.harris@garlik.com on 2010-02-03)
  16. Re: ISSUE-29: MINUS / NOT EXISTS (from andy.seaborne@talis.com on 2010-02-03)
  17. Re: ISSUE-29: MINUS / NOT EXISTS (from steve.harris@garlik.com on 2010-02-03)
  18. Re: ISSUE-29: MINUS / NOT EXISTS (from steve.harris@garlik.com on 2010-02-03)
  19. Re: ISSUE-29: MINUS / NOT EXISTS (from lee@thefigtrees.net on 2010-02-03)
  20. ISSUE-29: MINUS / NOT EXISTS (from andy.seaborne@talis.com on 2010-02-03)
  21. Re: Summary of open issues on query. (from lee@thefigtrees.net on 2010-02-03)
  22. Prioritized issues / Query (from andy.seaborne@talis.com on 2010-02-03)
  23. Summary of open issues on query. (from andy.seaborne@talis.com on 2010-02-03)
  24. [ISSUE-29] Negation: looking for equivalence (from andy.seaborne@hp.com on 2009-08-04)
  25. Re: More on MINUS vs. UNSAID (from eric@w3.org on 2009-07-28)
  26. Re: More on MINUS vs. UNSAID (from lee@thefigtrees.net on 2009-07-27)
  27. RE: More on MINUS vs. UNSAID (from eric@w3.org on 2009-07-27)
  28. Correction ISSUE-29 (from bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk on 2009-05-19)

Related notes:

[LeeF]: See http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Design:Negation

29 Sep 2009, 03:27:13

[LeeF]: Resolved via clear majority from http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35463/Negation/results

18 May 2010, 14:46:43

Display change log ATOM feed


Chair, Staff Contact
Tracker: documentation, (configuration for this group), originally developed by Dean Jackson, is developed and maintained by the Systems Team <w3t-sys@w3.org>.
$Id: 29.html,v 1.1 2013-03-28 18:39:07 brett Exp $