ACTION-618: Propose fix in definition of "in-scope" for BIND, cf. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2012AprJun/0120.html

Propose fix in definition of "in-scope" for BIND, cf. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2012AprJun/0120.html

State:

closed

Person:

Axel Polleres

Due on:

May 22, 2012

Created on:

May 15, 2012

Related emails:

1. Re: Attemt to tackle in-scope BIND issue (ACTION-618 - part 1) (from andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com on 2012-05-26)
2. RE: Attemt to tackle in-scope BIND issue (ACTION-618 - part 1) (from axel@polleres.net on 2012-05-26)
3. RE: Attemt to tackle in-scope BIND issue (ACTION-618 - part 1) (from axel.polleres@siemens.com on 2012-05-23)
4. RE: Editorial remarks on the definition of in-scope (ACTION-618 - part 2) (from axel.polleres@siemens.com on 2012-05-23)
5. Re: Attemt to tackle in-scope BIND issue (ACTION-618 - part 1) (from andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com on 2012-05-23)
6. Re: Editorial remarks on the definition of in-scope (ACTION-618 - part 2) (from andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com on 2012-05-23)
7. Editorial remarks on the definition of in-scope (ACTION-618 - part 2) (from axel.polleres@siemens.com on 2012-05-23)
8. Attemt to tackle in-scope BIND issue (ACTION-618 - part 1) (from axel.polleres@siemens.com on 2012-05-23)
9. Re: SPARQL TC 2012-05-15 Agenda (from cbuil@fi.upm.es on 2012-05-15)

Related notes:

No additional notes.

Display change log.