SPARQL Working Group Teleconference

Minutes of 20 November 2012

Agenda
http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Agenda-2012-11-20
Seen
Andy Seaborne, Axel Polleres, Birte Glimm, Chimezie Ogbuji, Gregory Williams, Matthew Perry, Paul Gearon, Sandro Hawke
Chair
Axel Polleres
Scribe
Paul Gearon
IRC Log
Original and Editable Wiki Version
Resolutions
  1. Approve minutes at http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2012-10-30 link
  2. Approve minutes at http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2012-11-13 link
  3. approve all 34 protocol tests listed at http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/implementations/ as of today. link
Topics
  1. admin

  2. RDF liaison

  3. anything new from RDF?

  4. comments

  5. CR documents

    1. entailment regimes

  6. AOB about RDF-WG and entailment regimes

  7. schedule and deadlines

  8. GSP

  9. protocol

    next time we should approve the GSP test cases, and progress on RIF test cases if possible, and in two week we want to vote for PR on remaining docs

15:01:27 <RRSAgent> logging to http://www.w3.org/2012/11/20-sparql-irc

RRSAgent IRC Bot: logging to http://www.w3.org/2012/11/20-sparql-irc

15:01:29 <trackbot> RRSAgent, make logs world

Trackbot IRC Bot: RRSAgent, make logs world

15:01:31 <trackbot> Zakim, this will be 77277

Trackbot IRC Bot: Zakim, this will be 77277

15:01:31 <Zakim> ok, trackbot; I see SW_(SPARQL)10:00AM scheduled to start now

Zakim IRC Bot: ok, trackbot; I see SW_(SPARQL)10:00AM scheduled to start now

15:01:32 <trackbot> Meeting: SPARQL Working Group Teleconference
15:01:32 <trackbot> Date: 20 November 2012
15:03:01 <AxelPolleres> Zakim, who is on the phone?

Axel Polleres: Zakim, who is on the phone?

15:03:02 <Zakim> I notice SW_(SPARQL)10:00AM has restarted

Zakim IRC Bot: I notice SW_(SPARQL)10:00AM has restarted

15:03:02 <Zakim> On the phone I see ??P4, kasei, +1.603.897.aaaa, +49.897.aabb

Zakim IRC Bot: On the phone I see ??P4, kasei, +1.603.897.aaaa, +49.897.aabb

15:03:03 <Zakim> +[IPcaller]

Zakim IRC Bot: +[IPcaller]

15:03:13 <AndyS> zakim, IPCaller is me

Andy Seaborne: zakim, IPCaller is me

15:03:13 <Zakim> +AndyS; got it

Zakim IRC Bot: +AndyS; got it

15:03:15 <MattPerry> zakim, aaaa is me

Matthew Perry: zakim, aaaa is me

15:03:15 <Zakim> +MattPerry; got it

Zakim IRC Bot: +MattPerry; got it

15:03:23 <bglimm> Zakim, ??P4 is me

Birte Glimm: Zakim, ??P4 is me

15:03:23 <Zakim> +bglimm; got it

Zakim IRC Bot: +bglimm; got it

15:03:28 <Zakim> + +1.216.694.aacc

Zakim IRC Bot: + +1.216.694.aacc

15:03:36 <chimezie_> Zakim, +1.216.694.aacc is me

Chimezie Ogbuji: Zakim, +1.216.694.aacc is me

15:03:36 <Zakim> +chimezie_; got it

Zakim IRC Bot: +chimezie_; got it

15:03:38 <AxelPolleres> Zakim, aabb is probably me

Axel Polleres: Zakim, aabb is probably me

15:03:38 <Zakim> +AxelPolleres; got it

Zakim IRC Bot: +AxelPolleres; got it

15:03:51 <chimezie_> Zakim, mute me

Chimezie Ogbuji: Zakim, mute me

15:03:51 <Zakim> chimezie_ should now be muted

Zakim IRC Bot: chimezie_ should now be muted

15:03:56 <AxelPolleres> Zakim, who is on the phone?

Axel Polleres: Zakim, who is on the phone?

15:03:56 <Zakim> On the phone I see bglimm, kasei, MattPerry, AxelPolleres, AndyS, chimezie_ (muted)

Zakim IRC Bot: On the phone I see bglimm, kasei, MattPerry, AxelPolleres, AndyS, chimezie_ (muted)

15:04:13 <AxelPolleres> agenda: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Agenda-2012-11-20
15:04:19 <AxelPolleres> chair: AxelPolleres
15:04:34 <AxelPolleres> anybody volunteering to scribe?

Axel Polleres: anybody volunteering to scribe?

15:04:39 <Zakim> +pgearon

Zakim IRC Bot: +pgearon

15:04:45 <pgearon> OK, I'll do it

Paul Gearon: OK, I'll do it

15:05:02 <AxelPolleres> scribe: paul gearon

(Scribe set to Paul Gearon)

15:05:20 <AxelPolleres> topic: admin

1. admin

15:05:39 <AxelPolleres> PROPOSED: Approve minutes at http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2012-10-30

PROPOSED: Approve minutes at http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2012-10-30

15:05:39 <pgearon> minutes from last 2 meetings, because of glitch with last meeting

minutes from last 2 meetings, because of glitch with last meeting

15:06:05 <AxelPolleres> RESOLVED: Approve minutes at http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2012-10-30

RESOLVED: Approve minutes at http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2012-10-30

15:06:14 <AxelPolleres> Zakim, who is on the phone?

Axel Polleres: Zakim, who is on the phone?

15:06:14 <Zakim> On the phone I see bglimm, kasei, MattPerry, AxelPolleres, AndyS, chimezie_ (muted), pgearon

Zakim IRC Bot: On the phone I see bglimm, kasei, MattPerry, AxelPolleres, AndyS, chimezie_ (muted), pgearon

15:06:46 <pgearon> AxelPolleres: greg - was link for approval which is now fixed

Axel Polleres: greg - was link for approval which is now fixed

15:06:51 <AxelPolleres>  PROPOSED: Approve minutes at http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2012-11-13

Axel Polleres: PROPOSED: Approve minutes at http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2012-11-13

15:07:14 <AxelPolleres> RESOLVED: Approve minutes at http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2012-11-13

RESOLVED: Approve minutes at http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2012-11-13

15:07:39 <AxelPolleres> topic: RDF liaison

2. RDF liaison

15:07:44 <pgearon> topic: anything new from RDF?

3. anything new from RDF?

15:08:01 <pgearon> AndyS: nothing specific. Test suite under discussion for TTL

Andy Seaborne: nothing specific. Test suite under discussion for TTL

15:08:20 <pgearon> AndyS: generally speaking, switching to finishing things off due to time pressures

Andy Seaborne: generally speaking, switching to finishing things off due to time pressures

15:08:32 <Zakim> +Sandro

Zakim IRC Bot: +Sandro

15:09:16 <AxelPolleres> topic: comments

4. comments

15:09:19 <pgearon> AxelPolleres: today we have 2 comments to do, and look at CR documents again

Axel Polleres: today we have 2 comments to do, and look at CR documents again

15:09:46 <AxelPolleres> JW-1

Axel Polleres: JW-1

15:10:12 <pgearon> AxelPolleres: problem of not having an explicit load from FROM clause

Axel Polleres: problem of not having an explicit load from FROM clause

15:10:43 <pgearon> AxelPolleres: suggest add a note of how to access data with FROM clause

Axel Polleres: suggest add a note of how to access data with FROM clause

15:10:53 <AxelPolleres> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2012OctDec/0147.html

Axel Polleres: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2012OctDec/0147.html

15:12:16 <pgearon> AxelPolleres: AndyS commented that parenthetical comment on relative IRIs was not necessary

Axel Polleres: AndyS commented that parenthetical comment on relative IRIs was not necessary

15:12:27 <pgearon> AndyS: this is just normal IRI processing

Andy Seaborne: this is just normal IRI processing

15:12:59 <pgearon> AxelPolleres: want something to address concern or it stays open

Axel Polleres: want something to address concern or it stays open

15:13:27 <pgearon> AxelPolleres: is it OK without the section in parentheses?

Axel Polleres: is it OK without the section in parentheses?

15:14:01 <pgearon> AndyS: yes. Though it's not about SPARQL 1.1. It's the same as SPARQL 1.0 and we don't want to open things up that might lead to problems

Andy Seaborne: yes. Though it's not about SPARQL 1.1. It's the same as SPARQL 1.0 and we don't want to open things up that might lead to problems

15:14:39 <AxelPolleres> ACTION: axel to add remark to README and draft a reply to JW-1.

ACTION: axel to add remark to README and draft a reply to JW-1.

15:14:39 <trackbot> Created ACTION-715 - Add remark to README and draft a reply to JW-1. [on Axel Polleres - due 2012-11-27].

Trackbot IRC Bot: Created ACTION-715 - Add remark to README and draft a reply to JW-1. [on Axel Polleres - due 2012-11-27].

15:15:06 <AxelPolleres> q?

Axel Polleres: q?

15:15:47 <pgearon> kasei: JS-1 is the one that last week I said I needed to respond to. This does not involve any substantive issues

Gregory Williams: JS-1 is the one that last week I said I needed to respond to. This does not involve any substantive issues

15:16:15 <pgearon> kasei: was going to respond without formal process from the group, because this issue is mostly just a misunderstanding

Gregory Williams: was going to respond without formal process from the group, because this issue is mostly just a misunderstanding

15:16:41 <pgearon> kasei: will fill in the appropriate links on the comments page for it

Gregory Williams: will fill in the appropriate links on the comments page for it

15:17:07 <pgearon> AxelPolleres: can be informal response, but if it's noted on the page then it should be fine

Axel Polleres: can be informal response, but if it's noted on the page then it should be fine

15:17:27 <pgearon> topic: CR documents

5. CR documents

15:17:48 <pgearon> AxelPolleres: 3 documents still in CR because we need more implementations

Axel Polleres: 3 documents still in CR because we need more implementations

15:17:27 <pgearon> subtopic: entailment regimes

5.1. entailment regimes

15:18:06 <pgearon> AxelPolleres: entailment regime had a discussion last week

Axel Polleres: entailment regime had a discussion last week

15:18:12 <bglimm> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/data-sparql11/entailment/Overview.htm

Birte Glimm: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/data-sparql11/entailment/Overview.htm

15:18:20 <pgearon> AxelPolleres: mostly on track

Axel Polleres: mostly on track

15:18:56 <pgearon> bglimm: that is the URL of the overview of the entailment test doc

Birte Glimm: that is the URL of the overview of the entailment test doc

15:19:29 <pgearon> bglimm: we don't cover all SPARQL features, as we mainly focus on what is special for SPARQL entailment regimes

Birte Glimm: we don't cover all SPARQL features, as we mainly focus on what is special for SPARQL entailment regimes

15:19:53 <chimezie_> Zakim, unmute me

Chimezie Ogbuji: Zakim, unmute me

15:19:53 <Zakim> chimezie_ should no longer be muted

Zakim IRC Bot: chimezie_ should no longer be muted

15:19:56 <pgearon> sandro: problem with RIF is that we have just 1 test that says, "Does RIF work or not?"

Sandro Hawke: problem with RIF is that we have just 1 test that says, "Does RIF work or not?"

15:20:08 <pgearon> sandro: in some sense that's all that we need, but it looks wrong

Sandro Hawke: in some sense that's all that we need, but it looks wrong

15:20:41 <pgearon> bglimm: we can't test all of OWL reasoning, and all of SPARQL

Birte Glimm: we can't test all of OWL reasoning, and all of SPARQL

15:20:49 <pgearon> bglimm: we do most of RDF/RDFS

Birte Glimm: we do most of RDF/RDFS

15:20:57 <AxelPolleres> sandro: was there a principled way for coverage in the test cases

Sandro Hawke: was there a principled way for coverage in the test cases [ Scribe Assist by Axel Polleres ]

15:21:11 <pgearon> bglimm: for OWL it's a bit random what we cover

Birte Glimm: for OWL it's a bit random what we cover

15:21:38 <AxelPolleres> birte: we cover a couple of entailments all entailments and exhaustive coverage of SPARQL features would be overkill

Birte Glimm: we cover a couple of entailments all entailments and exhaustive coverage of SPARQL features would be overkill [ Scribe Assist by Axel Polleres ]

15:22:28 <sandro> http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wiki/Category:Core_Test

Sandro Hawke: http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wiki/Category:Core_Test

15:22:58 <AxelPolleres> sandro: idea could be to take the RIF Core test suite as a basis.

Sandro Hawke: idea could be to take the RIF Core test suite as a basis. [ Scribe Assist by Axel Polleres ]

15:23:02 <pgearon> bglimm: some of those can be converted to entailment tests

Birte Glimm: some of those can be converted to entailment tests

15:24:14 <AxelPolleres> sandro: we probably don't need to cover consistency tests

Sandro Hawke: we probably don't need to cover consistency tests [ Scribe Assist by Axel Polleres ]

15:24:15 <pgearon> sandro: some of these are logical consistency, and they wouldn't apply very well

Sandro Hawke: some of these are logical consistency, and they wouldn't apply very well

15:24:49 <AndyS> q+ to add AOB about RDF-WG and entailment regimes.

Andy Seaborne: q+ to add AOB about RDF-WG and entailment regimes.

15:24:53 <pgearon> AxelPolleres: were you in touch with Mike Dean on this?

Axel Polleres: were you in touch with Mike Dean on this?

15:25:16 <pgearon> sandro: Mike has done some, but not done any more. Have been in touch, but haven't heard back yet

Sandro Hawke: Mike has done some, but not done any more. Have been in touch, but haven't heard back yet

15:26:11 <AxelPolleres> ACTION: chime to add more RIF test cases based on http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wiki/Category:Core_Test

ACTION: chime to add more RIF test cases based on http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wiki/Category:Core_Test

15:26:11 <trackbot> Created ACTION-716 - Add more RIF test cases based on http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wiki/Category:Core_Test [on Chimezie Ogbuji - due 2012-11-27].

Trackbot IRC Bot: Created ACTION-716 - Add more RIF test cases based on http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wiki/Category:Core_Test [on Chimezie Ogbuji - due 2012-11-27].

15:26:14 <bglimm> We could also close my ACTION-714 Make a spreadsheet on entailment tests (which regimes they apply to) (document link is above)

Birte Glimm: We could also close my ACTION-714 Make a spreadsheet on entailment tests (which regimes they apply to) (document link is above)

15:26:15 <pgearon> chimezie_: I can look at these tests, and sync up with whatever Mike Dean has

Chimezie Ogbuji: I can look at these tests, and sync up with whatever Mike Dean has

15:27:02 <chimezie_> Zakim, mute me

Chimezie Ogbuji: Zakim, mute me

15:27:02 <Zakim> chimezie_ should now be muted

Zakim IRC Bot: chimezie_ should now be muted

15:27:14 <AxelPolleres> topic: AOB  about RDF-WG and entailment regimes

6. AOB about RDF-WG and entailment regimes

15:27:43 <pgearon> AndyS: RDF WG proposing to re-explain all the different entailment regimes. Does it make sense for RDF, and Ivan pointed out that this is about SPARQL

Andy Seaborne: RDF WG proposing to re-explain all the different entailment regimes. Does it make sense for RDF, and Ivan pointed out that this is about SPARQL

15:28:20 <pgearon> AndyS: trying to figure out "which bucket", and that dictates if it will be done in RDF or just to have an explanation

Andy Seaborne: trying to figure out "which bucket", and that dictates if it will be done in RDF or just to have an explanation

15:28:58 <AxelPolleres> topic: schedule and deadlines

7. schedule and deadlines

15:29:05 <pgearon> AndyS: We may finish before they get around to finishing the discussion on this :-)

Andy Seaborne: We may finish before they get around to finishing the discussion on this :-)

15:29:37 <pgearon> AxelPolleres: review period ends no the 29th

Axel Polleres: review period ends no the 29th

15:30:09 <AxelPolleres> in two weeks would be the first possible date to proceed to PR with the remaining 3 CRs.

Axel Polleres: in two weeks would be the first possible date to proceed to PR with the remaining 3 CRs.

15:30:11 <pgearon> sandro: voting process can be Dec 4

Sandro Hawke: voting process can be Dec 4

15:30:55 <pgearon> sandro: don't need to have rec out before WG expires, but we have to vote

Sandro Hawke: don't need to have rec out before WG expires, but we have to vote

15:31:14 <pgearon> sandro: have to get it done before end of year

Sandro Hawke: have to get it done before end of year

15:31:47 <AxelPolleres> topic: GSP

8. GSP

15:31:51 <chimezie_> Zakim, unmute me

Chimezie Ogbuji: Zakim, unmute me

15:31:51 <Zakim> chimezie_ should no longer be muted

Zakim IRC Bot: chimezie_ should no longer be muted

15:32:05 <pgearon> AxelPolleres: GSP = Graph Store Protocol

Axel Polleres: GSP = Graph Store Protocol

15:32:21 <pgearon> chimezie_: one test left outstanding

Chimezie Ogbuji: one test left outstanding

15:32:21 <chimezie_> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2012OctDec/0146.html

Chimezie Ogbuji: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2012OctDec/0146.html

15:33:06 <pgearon> chimezie_: agree that multipart mixed should not be tested explicitly

Chimezie Ogbuji: agree that multipart mixed should not be tested explicitly

15:33:47 <pgearon> AndyS: having trouble generating multipart mixed as well. Browsers don't generate this

Andy Seaborne: having trouble generating multipart mixed as well. Browsers don't generate this

15:34:16 <AxelPolleres> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/data-sparql11/http-rdf-update/tests.txt

Axel Polleres: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/data-sparql11/http-rdf-update/tests.txt

15:34:29 <chimezie_> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/data-sparql11/http-rdf-update/

Chimezie Ogbuji: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/data-sparql11/http-rdf-update/

15:35:45 <pgearon> AndyS: if Chimezie has fixed issues then that was the only one that was left

Andy Seaborne: if Chimezie has fixed issues then that was the only one that was left

15:35:54 <AxelPolleres> ACTION: chime to prepare a list of tst cases from http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/data-sparql11/http-rdf-update/ by next Telco which at least 2implementations pass.

ACTION: chime to prepare a list of tst cases from http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/data-sparql11/http-rdf-update/ by next Telco which at least 2implementations pass.

15:35:54 <trackbot> Created ACTION-717 - Prepare a list of tst cases from http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/data-sparql11/http-rdf-update/ by next Telco which at least 2implementations pass. [on Chimezie Ogbuji - due 2012-11-27].

Trackbot IRC Bot: Created ACTION-717 - Prepare a list of tst cases from http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/data-sparql11/http-rdf-update/ by next Telco which at least 2implementations pass. [on Chimezie Ogbuji - due 2012-11-27].

15:37:16 <pgearon> chimezie_: when might you be able to do the validator?

Andy Seaborne: when might you be able to do the validator?

15:37:33 <pgearon> s/chimezie_/AndyS/
15:39:03 <pgearon> chimezie_: validator doesn't currently send multipart/mixed. So you don't be getting multipart/mixed, and won't be documenting it

Chimezie Ogbuji: validator doesn't currently send multipart/mixed. So you don't be getting multipart/mixed, and won't be documenting it

15:39:36 <pgearon> chimezie_: should be able to run the validator at any point now

Chimezie Ogbuji: should be able to run the validator at any point now

15:39:50 <AxelPolleres> ACTION: Axel to change the link in README.html to http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/data-sparql11/http-rdf-update/

ACTION: Axel to change the link in README.html to http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/data-sparql11/http-rdf-update/

15:39:50 <trackbot> Created ACTION-718 - Change the link in README.html to http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/data-sparql11/http-rdf-update/ [on Axel Polleres - due 2012-11-27].

Trackbot IRC Bot: Created ACTION-718 - Change the link in README.html to http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/data-sparql11/http-rdf-update/ [on Axel Polleres - due 2012-11-27].

15:40:17 <chimezie_> Zakim, mute me

Chimezie Ogbuji: Zakim, mute me

15:40:17 <Zakim> chimezie_ should now be muted

Zakim IRC Bot: chimezie_ should now be muted

15:40:19 <pgearon> topic: protocol

9. protocol

Summary: next time we should approve the GSP test cases, and progress on RIF test cases if possible, and in two week we want to vote for PR on remaining docs

15:40:25 <AxelPolleres> https://github.com/kasei/sparql11-protocolvalidator

Axel Polleres: https://github.com/kasei/sparql11-protocolvalidator

15:40:55 <pgearon> kasei: never approved the tests, though have agreement at this point

Gregory Williams: never approved the tests, though have agreement at this point

15:41:32 <pgearon> AxelPolleres: can write mail indicating what we can approve please? (all of them)

Axel Polleres: can write mail indicating what we can approve please? (all of them)

15:41:46 <kasei> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/implementations/

Gregory Williams: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/implementations/

15:41:54 <AxelPolleres> PROPOSED: approve all protocol tests listed at https://github.com/kasei/sparql11-protocolvalidator

PROPOSED: approve all protocol tests listed at https://github.com/kasei/sparql11-protocolvalidator

15:42:33 <pgearon> kasei: 34 tests

Gregory Williams: 34 tests

15:43:18 <AxelPolleres> PROPOSED: approve all 34 protocol tests listed at http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/implementations/ as of today.

PROPOSED: approve all 34 protocol tests listed at http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/implementations/ as of today.

15:43:27 <kasei> +1

Gregory Williams: +1

15:43:42 <bglimm> 0 (I didn't check them)

Birte Glimm: 0 (I didn't check them)

15:43:53 <chimezie_> +1

Chimezie Ogbuji: +1

15:44:00 <sandro> +1 (trusting process)

Sandro Hawke: +1 (trusting process)

15:44:08 <AndyS> +1

Andy Seaborne: +1

15:44:13 <MattPerry> +1

Matthew Perry: +1

15:44:18 <pgearon> 0 (didn't check)

0 (didn't check)

15:44:22 <AxelPolleres> RESOLVED: approve all 34 protocol tests listed at http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/implementations/ as of today.

RESOLVED: approve all 34 protocol tests listed at http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/implementations/ as of today.

15:45:11 <kasei> FYI, the "as of today" link for the protocol test documentation is https://github.com/kasei/sparql11-protocolvalidator/blob/8cade0ac8e6ecd74706419d140a86841b881d49f/README.md

Gregory Williams: FYI, the "as of today" link for the protocol test documentation is https://github.com/kasei/sparql11-protocolvalidator/blob/8cade0ac8e6ecd74706419d140a86841b881d49f/README.md

15:45:27 <AxelPolleres> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/data-sparql11/protocol/manifest.ttl

Axel Polleres: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/data-sparql11/protocol/manifest.ttl

15:45:55 <AxelPolleres> ACTION: greg to mark test cases for protocol as approved as per resolution

ACTION: greg to mark test cases for protocol as approved as per resolution

15:45:55 <trackbot> Created ACTION-719 - Mark test cases for protocol as approved as per resolution [on Gregory Williams - due 2012-11-27].

Trackbot IRC Bot: Created ACTION-719 - Mark test cases for protocol as approved as per resolution [on Gregory Williams - due 2012-11-27].

15:46:20 <pgearon> kasei: believe we still have unapproved test in update, as well as the ones discussed in graph store protocol and entailment

Gregory Williams: believe we still have unapproved test in update, as well as the ones discussed in graph store protocol and entailment

15:46:44 <pgearon> OK, will look

OK, will look

15:47:03 <AxelPolleres> ACTION: paul to write a mail summarizing unapproved update test cases

ACTION: paul to write a mail summarizing unapproved update test cases

15:47:03 <trackbot> Created ACTION-720 - Write a mail summarizing unapproved update test cases [on Paul Gearon - due 2012-11-27].

Trackbot IRC Bot: Created ACTION-720 - Write a mail summarizing unapproved update test cases [on Paul Gearon - due 2012-11-27].

15:48:33 <pgearon> AxelPolleres: next time should approve GSP test cases, and RIF if possible

Axel Polleres: next time should approve GSP test cases, and RIF if possible

15:48:41 <AxelPolleres> summary: next time we should approve the GSP test cases, and progress on RIF test cases if possible, and in two week we want to vote for PR on remaining docs
15:48:46 <pgearon> AxelPolleres: and in 2 weeks, vote for PR on remaining documents

Axel Polleres: and in 2 weeks, vote for PR on remaining documents

15:49:28 <pgearon> bglimm: lots of other entailment tests that we have not yet approved. I can make a list of the ones that are still to be approved

Birte Glimm: lots of other entailment tests that we have not yet approved. I can make a list of the ones that are still to be approved

15:49:53 <AxelPolleres> topic ACTION review

Axel Polleres: topic ACTION review

15:49:53 <AxelPolleres> ACTION: Birte to make a list of unapproved Entailment test cases passed by at least two implementations.

ACTION: Birte to make a list of unapproved Entailment test cases passed by at least two implementations.

15:49:53 <trackbot> Created ACTION-721 - Make a list of unapproved Entailment test cases passed by at least two implementations. [on Birte Glimm - due 2012-11-27].

Trackbot IRC Bot: Created ACTION-721 - Make a list of unapproved Entailment test cases passed by at least two implementations. [on Birte Glimm - due 2012-11-27].

15:50:28 <bglimm> ACTION-701 Check all docs for the correct XML Schema datatypes reference

Birte Glimm: ACTION-701 Check all docs for the correct XML Schema datatypes reference

15:50:34 <AxelPolleres> close ACTION-701

Axel Polleres: close ACTION-701

15:50:34 <trackbot> ACTION-701 Check all docs for the correct XML Schema datatypes reference closed

Trackbot IRC Bot: ACTION-701 Check all docs for the correct XML Schema datatypes reference closed

15:50:42 <AxelPolleres> close ACTION-702

Axel Polleres: close ACTION-702

15:50:43 <trackbot> ACTION-702 Mark these 3 regimes AT-RISK in entailment doc closed

Trackbot IRC Bot: ACTION-702 Mark these 3 regimes AT-RISK in entailment doc closed

15:50:46 <bglimm> ACTION-702 Mark these 3 regimes AT-RISK in entailment doc

Birte Glimm: ACTION-702 Mark these 3 regimes AT-RISK in entailment doc

15:51:13 <AxelPolleres> close ACTION-707

Axel Polleres: close ACTION-707

15:51:13 <trackbot> ACTION-707 Transfer Update changes since LC from mailinglist and other changes to other docs (where not already done) closed

Trackbot IRC Bot: ACTION-707 Transfer Update changes since LC from mailinglist and other changes to other docs (where not already done) closed

15:51:14 <bglimm> ACTION-714 Make a spreadsheet on entailment tests (which regimes they apply to)

Birte Glimm: ACTION-714 Make a spreadsheet on entailment tests (which regimes they apply to)

15:51:41 <bglimm> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/data-sparql11/entailment/Overview.htm

Birte Glimm: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/data-sparql11/entailment/Overview.htm

15:51:48 <AxelPolleres>  ACTION-714:  http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/data-sparql11/entailment/Overview.htm

Axel Polleres: ACTION-714: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/data-sparql11/entailment/Overview.htm

15:51:48 <trackbot> ACTION-714 Make a spreadsheet on entailment tests (which regimes they apply to) notes added

Trackbot IRC Bot: ACTION-714 Make a spreadsheet on entailment tests (which regimes they apply to) notes added

15:51:55 <AxelPolleres> close ACTION-714

Axel Polleres: close ACTION-714

15:51:55 <trackbot> ACTION-714 Make a spreadsheet on entailment tests (which regimes they apply to) closed

Trackbot IRC Bot: ACTION-714 Make a spreadsheet on entailment tests (which regimes they apply to) closed

15:52:16 <pgearon> AxelPolleres: any other actions we can close?

Axel Polleres: any other actions we can close?

15:52:30 <AxelPolleres> close ACTION-712

Axel Polleres: close ACTION-712

15:52:30 <trackbot> ACTION-712 Mark :agg-empty-group as unapproved and :agg-empty-group2 as approved in http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/data-sparql11/aggregates/manifest.ttl pointing to the resp. resolution from the minutes. closed

Trackbot IRC Bot: ACTION-712 Mark :agg-empty-group as unapproved and :agg-empty-group2 as approved in http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/data-sparql11/aggregates/manifest.ttl pointing to the resp. resolution from the minutes. closed

15:52:36 <bglimm> Add references to other specs to http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-query/#conformance (in the Editors' draft)

Birte Glimm: Add references to other specs to http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-query/#conformance (in the Editors' draft)

15:52:43 <bglimm> ACTION-710

Birte Glimm: ACTION-710

15:52:49 <AxelPolleres> close ACTION-710

Axel Polleres: close ACTION-710

15:52:49 <trackbot> ACTION-710 Add references to other specs to http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-query/#conformance (in the Editors' draft) closed

Trackbot IRC Bot: ACTION-710 Add references to other specs to http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-query/#conformance (in the Editors' draft) closed

15:53:03 <bglimm> ACTION-709 Check back with Sandro whether [XSDT] reference to XML Schema 1.0 is ok in Query

Birte Glimm: ACTION-709 Check back with Sandro whether [XSDT] reference to XML Schema 1.0 is ok in Query

15:53:05 <AxelPolleres> close ACTION-708

Axel Polleres: close ACTION-708

15:53:05 <trackbot> ACTION-708 Check whether references in Query are up-to-date closed

Trackbot IRC Bot: ACTION-708 Check whether references in Query are up-to-date closed

15:53:24 <AxelPolleres> close ACTION-709

Axel Polleres: close ACTION-709

15:53:25 <trackbot> ACTION-709 Check back with Sandro whether [XSDT] reference to XML Schema 1.0 is ok in Query closed

Trackbot IRC Bot: ACTION-709 Check back with Sandro whether [XSDT] reference to XML Schema 1.0 is ok in Query closed

15:53:38 <bglimm> ACTION-704 Notify Birte about ACTION-702

Birte Glimm: ACTION-704 Notify Birte about ACTION-702

15:54:10 <AxelPolleres> close ACTION-704

Axel Polleres: close ACTION-704

15:54:10 <trackbot> ACTION-704 Notify Birte about ACTION-702 closed

Trackbot IRC Bot: ACTION-704 Notify Birte about ACTION-702 closed

15:54:13 <chimezie_> my actions that are done: ACTION-496, ACTION-667

Chimezie Ogbuji: my actions that are done: ACTION-496, ACTION-667

15:54:15 <bglimm> ACTION-703 Notify editors about Changes Since LC section

Birte Glimm: ACTION-703 Notify editors about Changes Since LC section

15:54:24 <AxelPolleres> close ACTION-703

Axel Polleres: close ACTION-703

15:54:24 <trackbot> ACTION-703 Notify editors about Changes Since LC section closed

Trackbot IRC Bot: ACTION-703 Notify editors about Changes Since LC section closed

15:54:34 <AxelPolleres> close ACTION-496

Axel Polleres: close ACTION-496

15:54:35 <trackbot> ACTION-496 Think about how test cases for graph store protocol could look like. closed

Trackbot IRC Bot: ACTION-496 Think about how test cases for graph store protocol could look like. closed

15:54:44 <AxelPolleres> close ACTION-667

Axel Polleres: close ACTION-667

15:54:44 <trackbot> ACTION-667 Put together the tests as outlined in this teleconference closed

Trackbot IRC Bot: ACTION-667 Put together the tests as outlined in this teleconference closed

15:54:58 <chimezie_> ACTION-677, ACTION-697

Chimezie Ogbuji: ACTION-677, ACTION-697

15:55:08 <bglimm> ACTION-688 Check Birte's README edits on entailment tests

Birte Glimm: ACTION-688 Check Birte's README edits on entailment tests

15:55:19 <AxelPolleres> close ACTION-688

Axel Polleres: close ACTION-688

15:55:19 <trackbot> ACTION-688 Check Birte's README edits on entailment tests closed

Trackbot IRC Bot: ACTION-688 Check Birte's README edits on entailment tests closed

15:55:32 <bglimm> ACTION-685 Review entailment tests which have at least one pass, such that we can approve them nexty week

Birte Glimm: ACTION-685 Review entailment tests which have at least one pass, such that we can approve them nexty week

15:55:53 <AxelPolleres> close ACTION-700

Axel Polleres: close ACTION-700

15:55:53 <trackbot> ACTION-700 Review changes as per ACTION-698 closed

Trackbot IRC Bot: ACTION-700 Review changes as per ACTION-698 closed

15:56:03 <AxelPolleres> close ACTION-698

Axel Polleres: close ACTION-698

15:56:03 <trackbot> ACTION-698 Implement errata on XMLres and bring it in format for proposed edited recommendation closed

Trackbot IRC Bot: ACTION-698 Implement errata on XMLres and bring it in format for proposed edited recommendation closed

15:56:51 <pgearon> AxelPolleres: can continue the closing next time

Axel Polleres: can continue the closing next time

15:57:06 <pgearon> AxelPolleres: most important thing is to concentrate on the items to get to PR

Axel Polleres: most important thing is to concentrate on the items to get to PR

15:57:20 <chimezie_> bye

Chimezie Ogbuji: bye

15:57:22 <AxelPolleres> adjourned

Axel Polleres: adjourned

15:57:24 <AndyS> bye

Andy Seaborne: bye

15:57:24 <Zakim> -chimezie_

Zakim IRC Bot: -chimezie_

15:57:26 <Zakim> -Sandro

Zakim IRC Bot: -Sandro

15:57:27 <Zakim> -MattPerry

Zakim IRC Bot: -MattPerry

15:57:29 <Zakim> -AndyS

Zakim IRC Bot: -AndyS

15:57:30 <Zakim> -kasei

Zakim IRC Bot: -kasei

15:57:33 <AxelPolleres> rrsagent, make records public

Axel Polleres: rrsagent, make records public

15:58:00 <Zakim> -pgearon

Zakim IRC Bot: -pgearon

15:58:15 <Zakim> -AxelPolleres

Zakim IRC Bot: -AxelPolleres



Formatted by CommonScribe


This revision (#1) generated 2012-11-20 16:18:46 UTC by 'apollere2', comments: None