SPARQL Working Group Teleconference

Minutes of 09 October 2012

Agenda
http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Agenda-2012-10-02 + http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2012OctDec/0061.html
Seen
Andy Seaborne, Axel Polleres, Birte Glimm, Carlos Buil Aranda, Chimezie Ogbuji, Gregory Williams, Lee Feigenbaum, Matthew Perry, Paul Gearon, Sandro Hawke, Steve Harris
Regrets
Lee Feigenbaum
Chair
Axel Polleres
Scribe
Birte Glimm
IRC Log
Original and Editable Wiki Version
Resolutions
  1. Approve minutes at http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2012-10-02 link
  2. Publish http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/update-1.1/Overview.xml as PR link
  3. approve entailment test cases as per http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2012OctDec/0062.html link
  4. Publish http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/entailment/ as CR link
  5. publish SPARQL1.1 protocol as CR link
  6. publish SPARQL1.1 Service Description as PR contingent completion of ACTION-696 link
  7. Publish http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/fed/service.xml as PR link
  8. Publish http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/http-rdf-update/ as CR link
  9. Publish Proposed Edited Recommendation (stage before "Recommendation, Second Edition") of http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-XMLres/ with errata addressed, cross-links updated, and mentioning other results format documents (JSON, CSV, TSV). Contingent on completion of ACTION-698, ACTION-699, and ACTION-700. link
Topics
13:57:51 <AxelPolleres> trackbot, start meeting

Axel Polleres: trackbot, start meeting

13:57:54 <trackbot> RRSAgent, make logs world

Trackbot IRC Bot: RRSAgent, make logs world

13:57:56 <trackbot> Zakim, this will be 77277

Trackbot IRC Bot: Zakim, this will be 77277

13:57:56 <Zakim> ok, trackbot; I see SW_(SPARQL)10:00AM scheduled to start in 3 minutes

Zakim IRC Bot: ok, trackbot; I see SW_(SPARQL)10:00AM scheduled to start in 3 minutes

13:57:57 <trackbot> Meeting: SPARQL Working Group Teleconference
13:57:57 <trackbot> Date: 09 October 2012
13:58:17 <AxelPolleres> agenda: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Agenda-2012-10-02 + http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2012OctDec/0061.html
13:58:33 <Zakim> SW_(SPARQL)10:00AM has now started

Zakim IRC Bot: SW_(SPARQL)10:00AM has now started

13:58:42 <Zakim> +pgearon

Zakim IRC Bot: +pgearon

13:59:06 <AxelPolleres> chair: AxelPolleres
13:59:11 <AxelPolleres> regrets: LeeF
13:59:23 <Zakim> +[IPcaller]

Zakim IRC Bot: +[IPcaller]

13:59:29 <AndyS> zakim, IPCaller is me

Andy Seaborne: zakim, IPCaller is me

13:59:29 <Zakim> +AndyS; got it

Zakim IRC Bot: +AndyS; got it

13:59:38 <AndyS> zakim, who is on the phone?

Andy Seaborne: zakim, who is on the phone?

13:59:38 <Zakim> On the phone I see pgearon, AndyS

Zakim IRC Bot: On the phone I see pgearon, AndyS

13:59:49 <Zakim> + +49.897.aaaa - is perhaps AxelPolleres?

Zakim IRC Bot: + +49.897.aaaa - is perhaps AxelPolleres?

13:59:58 <Zakim> +kasei

Zakim IRC Bot: +kasei

14:00:00 <AxelPolleres> Zakim, aaaa is me

Axel Polleres: Zakim, aaaa is me

14:00:00 <Zakim> sorry, AxelPolleres, I do not recognize a party named 'aaaa'

Zakim IRC Bot: sorry, AxelPolleres, I do not recognize a party named 'aaaa'

14:00:04 <Zakim> +??P12

Zakim IRC Bot: +??P12

14:00:10 <AxelPolleres> Zakim, who is on the phone?

Axel Polleres: Zakim, who is on the phone?

14:00:10 <Zakim> On the phone I see pgearon, AndyS, AxelPolleres, kasei, ??P12

Zakim IRC Bot: On the phone I see pgearon, AndyS, AxelPolleres, kasei, ??P12

14:00:14 <bglimm> Zakim, ??P12 is bglimm

Birte Glimm: Zakim, ??P12 is bglimm

14:00:14 <Zakim> +bglimm; got it

Zakim IRC Bot: +bglimm; got it

14:00:59 <Zakim> +MattPerry

Zakim IRC Bot: +MattPerry

14:01:16 <Zakim> +Sandro

Zakim IRC Bot: +Sandro

14:01:19 <AxelPolleres> scribe: bglimm

(Scribe set to Birte Glimm)

14:01:42 <AxelPolleres> zakim, who is on the phone?

Axel Polleres: zakim, who is on the phone?

14:01:42 <Zakim> On the phone I see pgearon, AndyS, AxelPolleres, kasei, bglimm, MattPerry, Sandro

Zakim IRC Bot: On the phone I see pgearon, AndyS, AxelPolleres, kasei, bglimm, MattPerry, Sandro

14:01:45 <Zakim> +??P11

Zakim IRC Bot: +??P11

14:01:45 <Zakim> +??P18

Zakim IRC Bot: +??P18

14:01:50 <cbuilara> zakim, ??P18 is me

Carlos Buil Aranda: zakim, ??P18 is me

14:01:50 <Zakim> +cbuilara; got it

Zakim IRC Bot: +cbuilara; got it

14:01:52 <SteveH_> Zakim, ??P11 is me

Steve Harris: Zakim, ??P11 is me

14:01:52 <Zakim> +SteveH_; got it

Zakim IRC Bot: +SteveH_; got it

14:02:14 <AxelPolleres> chime, are you dialing in?

Axel Polleres: chime, are you dialing in?

14:02:34 <AxelPolleres> topic: admin

1. admin

14:02:39 <AxelPolleres> PROPOSED: Approve minutes at http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2012-10-02

PROPOSED: Approve minutes at http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2012-10-02

14:02:47 <bglimm> AxelPolleres: Let us try to approve last week's minutes

Axel Polleres: Let us try to approve last week's minutes

14:02:54 <bglimm> ... any support?

... any support?

14:03:03 <pgearon> +1

Paul Gearon: +1

14:03:06 <pgearon> to support

Paul Gearon: to support

14:03:09 <bglimm> (no objections)

(no objections)

14:03:11 <bglimm> +1

+1

14:03:14 <AxelPolleres> RESOLVED: Approve minutes at http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2012-10-02

RESOLVED: Approve minutes at http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2012-10-02

14:03:29 <AxelPolleres> Next regular meeting: 2012-10-16 @ 15:00 UK / 10:00 EST (scribe: cf. scribe_list)

Axel Polleres: Next regular meeting: 2012-10-16 @ 15:00 UK / 10:00 EST (scribe: cf. scribe_list)

14:03:34 <bglimm> ... next reg. meeting: next week 16th Oct

... next reg. meeting: next week 16th Oct

14:03:39 <AxelPolleres> regrets for next time.

Axel Polleres: regrets for next time.

14:03:40 <bglimm> ... regrets from Axel

... regrets from Axel

14:03:52 <bglimm> ... Lee might not be available, but Sandro can jump in

... Lee might not be available, but Sandro can jump in

14:04:14 <AxelPolleres> topic: 1) checking in contingent votes from last week

2. 1) checking in contingent votes from last week

14:04:16 <bglimm> ... Let's quickly go through the votes from last week

... Let's quickly go through the votes from last week

14:04:30 <Zakim> -cbuilara

Zakim IRC Bot: -cbuilara

14:05:09 <bglimm> ... looking at the minutes we wanted to publish the Query spec modulo some small changes

... looking at the minutes we wanted to publish the Query spec modulo some small changes

14:05:15 <bglimm> ... changes have been done

... changes have been done

14:05:29 <bglimm> ... overview also needed changes to the references, that's also done

... overview also needed changes to the references, that's also done

14:05:51 <Zakim> +??P26

Zakim IRC Bot: +??P26

14:05:59 <bglimm> ... sending the response to RV-10 and getting response was also a prerequisite for publishing

... sending the response to RV-10 and getting response was also a prerequisite for publishing

14:06:01 <cbuilara> zakim, ??P26 is me

Carlos Buil Aranda: zakim, ??P26 is me

14:06:01 <Zakim> +cbuilara; got it

Zakim IRC Bot: +cbuilara; got it

14:06:21 <bglimm> .... but Rob told me he does not have the time to send an acknowledgement, but seems ok

.... but Rob told me he does not have the time to send an acknowledgement, but seems ok

14:06:27 <sandro> +1 rephrase resolution to publish, without RV-10 bit

Sandro Hawke: +1 rephrase resolution to publish, without RV-10 bit

14:06:30 <Zakim> +Chimezie

Zakim IRC Bot: +Chimezie

14:06:30 <bglimm> .... we should go back to that resolution

.... we should go back to that resolution

14:06:53 <bglimm> .... the other actions also have been done (692 and 693)

.... the other actions also have been done (692 and 693)

14:07:12 <bglimm> ... let's close them

... let's close them

14:07:12 <AxelPolleres> close ACTION-692

Axel Polleres: close ACTION-692

14:07:12 <trackbot> ACTION-692 Approve the change re: banning multiple same blank node label in update requests closed

Trackbot IRC Bot: ACTION-692 Approve the change re: banning multiple same blank node label in update requests closed

14:07:15 <chimezie> Zakim, mute me

Chimezie Ogbuji: Zakim, mute me

14:07:15 <Zakim> Chimezie should now be muted

Zakim IRC Bot: Chimezie should now be muted

14:07:20 <AxelPolleres> close ACTION-693

Axel Polleres: close ACTION-693

14:07:20 <trackbot> ACTION-693 Update wording in update document to be consistent wiht change re: blank node labels in query doc closed

Trackbot IRC Bot: ACTION-693 Update wording in update document to be consistent wiht change re: blank node labels in query doc closed

14:07:35 <AxelPolleres> close ACTION-691

Axel Polleres: close ACTION-691

14:07:35 <trackbot> ACTION-691 Make change to rq25 to reflect banning use of the same bNode label across operations. Notify WG when done. closed

Trackbot IRC Bot: ACTION-691 Make change to rq25 to reflect banning use of the same bNode label across operations. Notify WG when done. closed

14:07:43 <bglimm> ... we can also close the action on Andy to implement the changes (691)

... we can also close the action on Andy to implement the changes (691)

14:08:10 <bglimm> .... I propose to publish the Update doc without waiting for Rob's response

.... I propose to publish the Update doc without waiting for Rob's response

14:08:11 <AxelPolleres> PROPOSED: Publish http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/update-1.1/Overview.xml as PR

PROPOSED: Publish http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/update-1.1/Overview.xml as PR

14:08:20 <sandro> +1

Sandro Hawke: +1

14:08:22 <bglimm> +1

+1

14:08:23 <AndyS> +1

Andy Seaborne: +1

14:08:25 <AxelPolleres> +1 (siemens)

Axel Polleres: +1 (siemens)

14:08:26 <MattPerry> +1

Matthew Perry: +1

14:08:26 <cbuilara> +1

Carlos Buil Aranda: +1

14:08:29 <AndyS> +1 (ASF)

Andy Seaborne: +1 (ASF)

14:08:33 <kasei> +1

Gregory Williams: +1

14:08:34 <SteveH_> +1

Steve Harris: +1

14:08:35 <chimezie> +1

Chimezie Ogbuji: +1

14:08:37 <pgearon> +1

Paul Gearon: +1

14:08:44 <AxelPolleres> Zakim, who is on the phone?

Axel Polleres: Zakim, who is on the phone?

14:08:44 <Zakim> On the phone I see pgearon, AndyS, AxelPolleres, kasei, bglimm, MattPerry, Sandro, SteveH_, cbuilara, Chimezie (muted)

Zakim IRC Bot: On the phone I see pgearon, AndyS, AxelPolleres, kasei, bglimm, MattPerry, Sandro, SteveH_, cbuilara, Chimezie (muted)

14:09:02 <AxelPolleres> RESOLVED: Publish http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/update-1.1/Overview.xml as PR

RESOLVED: Publish http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/update-1.1/Overview.xml as PR

14:09:03 <bglimm> ... it seems everybody agreed

... it seems everybody agreed

14:09:28 <AxelPolleres> ... no objections, no abstentions.

Axel Polleres: ... no objections, no abstentions.

14:09:45 <AxelPolleres> topic: 2) remaining docs

3. 2) remaining docs

14:09:47 <bglimm> ... now let us go through the remaining docs

... now let us go through the remaining docs

14:10:17 <bglimm> ... let us start with entailment

... let us start with entailment

14:10:19 <AxelPolleres> subtopic: Entailment: we will try to approve at least some test cases and propose to vote for CR

3.1. Entailment: we will try to approve at least some test cases and propose to vote for CR

14:10:39 <bglimm> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2012OctDec/0018.html

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2012OctDec/0018.html

14:11:03 <bglimm> ... we could proceed to CR with a preliminary test suite

... we could proceed to CR with a preliminary test suite

14:11:26 <bglimm> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2012OctDec/0058.html

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2012OctDec/0058.html

14:11:38 <bglimm> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2012OctDec/0062.html

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2012OctDec/0062.html

14:12:24 <bglimm> ... I suggest to approve the test cases in the first mail plus the new test paper-sparqldl-Q1-rdfs

... I suggest to approve the test cases in the first mail plus the new test paper-sparqldl-Q1-rdfs

14:12:29 <AxelPolleres> PROPOSED: approve entailment test cases as per http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2012OctDec/0062.html

PROPOSED: approve entailment test cases as per http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2012OctDec/0062.html

14:13:03 <bglimm> ... Birte's implementation passes these, but we don't have a second implementation yet

... Birte's implementation passes these, but we don't have a second implementation yet

14:13:15 <AxelPolleres> +1

Axel Polleres: +1

14:13:21 <sandro> +1

Sandro Hawke: +1

14:13:22 <chimezie> +1

Chimezie Ogbuji: +1

14:13:25 <pgearon> +1

Paul Gearon: +1

14:13:26 <cbuilara> +1

Carlos Buil Aranda: +1

14:13:27 <bglimm> .... we also added a new RDFS test case adapted from an OWL test

.... we also added a new RDFS test case adapted from an OWL test

14:13:28 <bglimm> +1

+1

14:13:31 <kasei> 0 (haven't had time to review)

Gregory Williams: 0 (haven't had time to review)

14:13:32 <SteveH_> 0 - not run them

Steve Harris: 0 - not run them

14:13:39 <AndyS> 0 (have not looked/run them I'm afraid - apologies)

Andy Seaborne: 0 (have not looked/run them I'm afraid - apologies)

14:13:45 <MattPerry> 0 (haven't reviewed them)

Matthew Perry: 0 (haven't reviewed them)

14:14:11 <AxelPolleres> RESOLVED: approve entailment test cases as per http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2012OctDec/0062.html

RESOLVED: approve entailment test cases as per http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2012OctDec/0062.html

14:14:37 <AxelPolleres> ACTION: birte to mark approved tests in http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/data-sparql11/entailment/manifest.ttl

ACTION: birte to mark approved tests in http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/data-sparql11/entailment/manifest.ttl

14:14:37 <trackbot> Created ACTION-694 - Mark approved tests in http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/data-sparql11/entailment/manifest.ttl [on Birte Glimm - due 2012-10-16].

Trackbot IRC Bot: Created ACTION-694 - Mark approved tests in http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/data-sparql11/entailment/manifest.ttl [on Birte Glimm - due 2012-10-16].

14:15:12 <bglimm> ... From my POV we could vote for publishing the Entailment Regimes as CR

... From my POV we could vote for publishing the Entailment Regimes as CR

14:15:18 <AxelPolleres> PROPOSED: Publish http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/entailment/ as CR

PROPOSED: Publish http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/entailment/ as CR

14:15:27 <bglimm> +1 (UUlm)

+1 (UUlm)

14:15:32 <chimezie> +1

Chimezie Ogbuji: +1

14:15:32 <sandro> +1

Sandro Hawke: +1

14:15:33 <AxelPolleres> +1 (siemens)

Axel Polleres: +1 (siemens)

14:15:34 <AndyS> +1 (ASF)

Andy Seaborne: +1 (ASF)

14:15:35 <pgearon> +1

Paul Gearon: +1

14:15:36 <cbuilara> +1

Carlos Buil Aranda: +1

14:15:39 <MattPerry> +1 (Oracle)

Matthew Perry: +1 (Oracle)

14:15:39 <kasei> +1

Gregory Williams: +1

14:15:42 <SteveH_> +1 (Experian)

Steve Harris: +1 (Experian)

14:16:16 <AxelPolleres> RESOLVED: Publish http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/entailment/ as CR

RESOLVED: Publish http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/entailment/ as CR

14:16:29 <AxelPolleres> ... no objections, no abstentions.

Axel Polleres: ... no objections, no abstentions.

14:16:45 <bglimm> .... next docs are SD and Protocol

.... next docs are SD and Protocol

14:18:05 <AxelPolleres> subtopic: Protocol and SD

3.2. Protocol and SD

14:18:55 <bglimm> ... there were some mails in which Chime said there are some disambiguities between SD requests and protocol, which were not made explicit in the spec

... there were some mails in which Chime said there are some disambiguities between SD requests and protocol, which were not made explicit in the spec

14:18:56 <AxelPolleres> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2012OctDec/0066.html

Axel Polleres: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2012OctDec/0066.html

14:19:20 <bglimm> ... I think there were 2 proposed changes, not sure if implemented already

... I think there were 2 proposed changes, not sure if implemented already

14:19:26 <bglimm> Chime: No, not yet implemented

Chimezie Ogbuji: No, not yet implemented

14:19:45 <chimezie> Zakim, unmute me

Chimezie Ogbuji: Zakim, unmute me

14:19:45 <Zakim> Chimezie should no longer be muted

Zakim IRC Bot: Chimezie should no longer be muted

14:20:18 <bglimm> kasei: I believe the wording in protocol is more correct, so I'll try to align SD with that

Gregory Williams: I believe the wording in protocol is more correct, so I'll try to align SD with that

14:20:38 <AxelPolleres> ACTION: Greg to align wording of SD and protocol wrt. terminology and implement wording as per http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2012OctDec/0066.html

ACTION: Greg to align wording of SD and protocol wrt. terminology and implement wording as per http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2012OctDec/0066.html

14:20:38 <trackbot> Created ACTION-695 - Align wording of SD and protocol wrt. terminology and implement wording as per http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2012OctDec/0066.html [on Gregory Williams - due 2012-10-16].

Trackbot IRC Bot: Created ACTION-695 - Align wording of SD and protocol wrt. terminology and implement wording as per http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2012OctDec/0066.html [on Gregory Williams - due 2012-10-16].

14:21:04 <bglimm> AxelPolleres: Chime, can you review the change?

Axel Polleres: Chime, can you review the change?

14:21:09 <chimezie> Sure

Chimezie Ogbuji: Sure

14:21:11 <bglimm> Chimezie: Yes

Chimezie Ogbuji: Yes

14:21:21 <AxelPolleres> ACTION: chime to review changes as per ACTION-695

ACTION: chime to review changes as per ACTION-695

14:21:22 <trackbot> Created ACTION-696 - Review changes as per ACTION-695 [on Chimezie Ogbuji - due 2012-10-16].

Trackbot IRC Bot: Created ACTION-696 - Review changes as per ACTION-695 [on Chimezie Ogbuji - due 2012-10-16].

14:22:06 <AxelPolleres> PROPOSED: publish SPARQL1.1 protocol as CR contingent completion of ACTION-696

PROPOSED: publish SPARQL1.1 protocol as CR contingent completion of ACTION-696

14:23:11 <bglimm> kasei: There are no changes in Protocol, only in SD

Gregory Williams: There are no changes in Protocol, only in SD

14:23:28 <AxelPolleres> PROPOSED: publish SPARQL1.1 protocol as CR

PROPOSED: publish SPARQL1.1 protocol as CR

14:23:32 <bglimm> AxelPolleres: We don't need to consider changes for Protocol then

Axel Polleres: We don't need to consider changes for Protocol then

14:23:40 <bglimm> +1 (UUlm)

+1 (UUlm)

14:23:45 <kasei> +1 (RPI)

Gregory Williams: +1 (RPI)

14:23:46 <AndyS> +1 (ASF)

Andy Seaborne: +1 (ASF)

14:23:48 <cbuilara> +1

Carlos Buil Aranda: +1

14:23:48 <AxelPolleres> +1 (siemens)

Axel Polleres: +1 (siemens)

14:23:50 <MattPerry> +1 (Oracle)

Matthew Perry: +1 (Oracle)

14:23:57 <chimezie> +1

Chimezie Ogbuji: +1

14:24:16 <sandro> +1

Sandro Hawke: +1

14:24:39 <AxelPolleres> RESOLVED: publish SPARQL1.1 protocol as CR

RESOLVED: publish SPARQL1.1 protocol as CR

14:24:46 <bglimm> AxelPolleres: I think Paul is not here at the moment

Axel Polleres: I think Paul is not here at the moment

14:25:11 <AxelPolleres> no objections, no abstentions (paul absent)

Axel Polleres: no objections, no abstentions (paul absent)

14:25:13 <pgearon> sorry, back now

Paul Gearon: sorry, back now

14:25:23 <pgearon> +1

Paul Gearon: +1

14:25:31 <AxelPolleres> no objections, no abstentions

Axel Polleres: no objections, no abstentions

14:26:08 <bglimm> ... Next one is SD, voting contingent on action 696

... Next one is SD, voting contingent on ACTION-696

14:26:20 <SteveH_>  +1 (Experian) - sorry late respone for query

Steve Harris: +1 (Experian) - sorry late respone for query

14:26:23 <AxelPolleres> PROPOSED: publish SPARQL1.1 Service Description as PR contingent completion of ACTION-696

PROPOSED: publish SPARQL1.1 Service Description as PR contingent completion of ACTION-696

14:26:26 <bglimm> ... we have sufficient implementation, so we can publish as PR

... we have sufficient implementation, so we can publish as PR

14:26:33 <kasei> +1 (RPI)

Gregory Williams: +1 (RPI)

14:26:38 <chimezie> +1 (IE)

Chimezie Ogbuji: +1 (IE)

14:26:39 <AxelPolleres> +1 (siemens)

Axel Polleres: +1 (siemens)

14:26:41 <AndyS> +1 (ASF)

Andy Seaborne: +1 (ASF)

14:26:43 <cbuilara> +1

Carlos Buil Aranda: +1

14:26:44 <MattPerry> +1 (Oracle)

Matthew Perry: +1 (Oracle)

14:26:46 <SteveH_> +1 (Experian)

Steve Harris: +1 (Experian)

14:26:51 <pgearon> +1 (Revelytix)

Paul Gearon: +1 (Revelytix)

14:26:57 <bglimm> +1 (UUlm)

+1 (UUlm)

14:27:02 <AxelPolleres> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/actions/696

Axel Polleres: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/actions/696

14:27:44 <sandro> +1

Sandro Hawke: +1

14:27:52 <AxelPolleres> RESOLVED: publish SPARQL1.1 Service Description as PR contingent completion of ACTION-696

RESOLVED: publish SPARQL1.1 Service Description as PR contingent completion of ACTION-696

14:28:09 <bglimm> AxelPolleres: no objections, no abstentions

Axel Polleres: no objections, no abstentions

14:28:21 <bglimm> ... next is federated query

... next is federated query

14:28:22 <AxelPolleres> subtopic: federated query

3.3. federated query

14:28:32 <bglimm> ... Carlos are you on the call?

... Carlos are you on the call?

14:28:34 <bglimm> (silence)

(silence)

14:28:53 <AxelPolleres> PW-1 comment

Axel Polleres: PW-1 comment

14:29:13 <AxelPolleres> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2012Oct/0008.html acknowledgement

Axel Polleres: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2012Oct/0008.html acknowledgement

14:29:22 <bglimm> Zakim, unmute cbuilara

Zakim, unmute cbuilara

14:29:22 <Zakim> cbuilara was not muted, bglimm

Zakim IRC Bot: cbuilara was not muted, bglimm

14:29:24 <cbuilara> yes, I can hear you

Carlos Buil Aranda: yes, I can hear you

14:29:42 <cbuilara> I think we are ok too

Carlos Buil Aranda: I think we are ok too

14:29:47 <bglimm> AxelPolleres: CAn you type if something is still open?

Axel Polleres: CAn you type if something is still open?

14:29:51 <cbuilara> yes, that's right

Carlos Buil Aranda: yes, that's right

14:29:52 <bglimm> ... we cannot here you

... we cannot here you

14:30:10 <AxelPolleres> PROPOSED: Publish http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/fed/service.xml as PR

PROPOSED: Publish http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/fed/service.xml as PR

14:30:20 <sandro> +1

Sandro Hawke: +1

14:30:22 <kasei> +1 (RPI)

Gregory Williams: +1 (RPI)

14:30:23 <cbuilara> +1

Carlos Buil Aranda: +1

14:30:26 <AxelPolleres> +1 (siemens)

Axel Polleres: +1 (siemens)

14:30:30 <MattPerry> +1 (Oracle)

Matthew Perry: +1 (Oracle)

14:30:30 <bglimm> +1 (UUlm)

+1 (UUlm)

14:30:34 <chimezie> +1 (IE)

Chimezie Ogbuji: +1 (IE)

14:30:38 <AndyS> +1 (ASF)

Andy Seaborne: +1 (ASF)

14:30:43 <pgearon> +1 (Revelytix)

Paul Gearon: +1 (Revelytix)

14:30:56 <SteveH_> +1 (Experian)

Steve Harris: +1 (Experian)

14:31:07 <chimezie> Zakim, who is speaking?

Chimezie Ogbuji: Zakim, who is speaking?

14:31:18 <Zakim> chimezie, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: AxelPolleres (10%), cbuilara (48%)

Zakim IRC Bot: chimezie, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: AxelPolleres (10%), cbuilara (48%)

14:31:36 <AxelPolleres> RESOLVED: Publish http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/fed/service.xml as PR

RESOLVED: Publish http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/fed/service.xml as PR

14:31:53 <AxelPolleres> subtopic: GSP

3.4. GSP

14:31:57 <bglimm> AxelPolleres: The last doc is GSP

Axel Polleres: The last doc is GSP

14:32:13 <AndyS> No tests.

Andy Seaborne: No tests.

14:32:13 <bglimm> ... Chime we wanted to check back whether CR or PR

... Chime we wanted to check back whether CR or PR

14:32:34 <bglimm> CHIMEZIE: WE DO HAVE A TEST, BUT NO FRAMEWORK FOR RECORDING THEM

Chimezie Ogbuji: WE DO HAVE A TEST, BUT NO FRAMEWORK FOR RECORDING THEM

14:32:41 <bglimm> ups upper case

ups upper case

14:32:49 <AxelPolleres> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/README.html#graphstoreprotocoltests

Axel Polleres: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/README.html#graphstoreprotocoltests

14:33:01 <AxelPolleres> links to http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/data-sparql11/http-rdf-update/tests.txt

Axel Polleres: links to http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/data-sparql11/http-rdf-update/tests.txt

14:33:05 <bglimm> AndyS: the last message said draft tests (email discussions)

Andy Seaborne: the last message said draft tests (email discussions)

14:33:20 <bglimm> Sandro: we don't have approved tests that means?

Sandro Hawke: we don't have approved tests that means?

14:33:40 <bglimm> AxelPolleres: We point to something(?) from the readme

Axel Polleres: We point to something(?) from the readme

14:33:42 <AndyS> "Initial draft"

Andy Seaborne: "Initial draft"

14:33:47 <bglimm> ... but we didn't approve anything

... but we didn't approve anything

14:33:59 <bglimm> ... are there any implementations that have run these tests?

... are there any implementations that have run these tests?

14:34:05 <AxelPolleres> Are there two implementations which have run those tests?

Axel Polleres: Are there two implementations which have run those tests?

14:34:16 <bglimm> AndyS: I haven't run them

Andy Seaborne: I haven't run them

14:34:37 <bglimm> ... it doesn't make much difference whether we go to CR or PR

... it doesn't make much difference whether we go to CR or PR

14:35:01 <bglimm> ... it seems to be rushing it to approve the tests

... it seems to be rushing it to approve the tests

14:35:09 <sandro> andy: It would seem to be rushing it to approve the tests today, and go to PR today

Andy Seaborne: It would seem to be rushing it to approve the tests today, and go to PR today [ Scribe Assist by Sandro Hawke ]

14:35:10 <bglimm> ... anyone run the tests?

... anyone run the tests?

14:35:18 <SteveH_> I've not run the tests, but would like to

Steve Harris: I've not run the tests, but would like to

14:35:32 <bglimm> Chimezie: I did, apart from one (GET PUT and POST I ran)

Chimezie Ogbuji: I did, apart from one (GET PUT and POST I ran)

14:36:09 <sandro> sandro: yes, I think we're ready to go to CR

Sandro Hawke: yes, I think we're ready to go to CR [ Scribe Assist by Sandro Hawke ]

14:36:09 <bglimm> AxelPolleres: We have a doc that describes the test cases, but not yet enough implementations that ran them. Is that ok for CR?

Axel Polleres: We have a doc that describes the test cases, but not yet enough implementations that ran them. Is that ok for CR?

14:36:15 <bglimm> Sandro: Yes

Sandro Hawke: Yes

14:36:30 <bglimm> ... Chime, you will make some code available to run these, right?

... Chime, you will make some code available to run these, right?

14:36:45 <bglimm> Chimezie: Code to run and generate EARL?

Chimezie Ogbuji: Code to run and generate EARL?

14:37:10 <bglimm> Sandro: Yes. Since the tests are not machine readable, it would help

Sandro Hawke: Yes. Since the tests are not machine readable, it would help

14:37:23 <bglimm> ... it is more like a validator instead of machine-readable tests

... it is more like a validator instead of machine-readable tests

14:37:31 <AxelPolleres> ACTION: chime to set up a validator for GSP tests

ACTION: chime to set up a validator for GSP tests

14:37:31 <trackbot> Created ACTION-697 - Set up a validator for GSP tests [on Chimezie Ogbuji - due 2012-10-16].

Trackbot IRC Bot: Created ACTION-697 - Set up a validator for GSP tests [on Chimezie Ogbuji - due 2012-10-16].

14:37:48 <AxelPolleres> PROPOSED: Publish http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/http-rdf-update/ as CR

PROPOSED: Publish http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/http-rdf-update/ as CR

14:37:54 <sandro> +1

Sandro Hawke: +1

14:37:58 <AxelPolleres> +1 (siemens)

Axel Polleres: +1 (siemens)

14:38:01 <SteveH_> +1 (Experian)

Steve Harris: +1 (Experian)

14:38:04 <pgearon> +1 (Revelytix)

Paul Gearon: +1 (Revelytix)

14:38:05 <cbuilara> +1

Carlos Buil Aranda: +1

14:38:06 <bglimm> +1 (UUlm)

+1 (UUlm)

14:38:10 <AndyS> +1 (ASF)

Andy Seaborne: +1 (ASF)

14:38:11 <MattPerry> +1 (Oracle)

Matthew Perry: +1 (Oracle)

14:38:11 <kasei> +1 (RPI)

Gregory Williams: +1 (RPI)

14:38:12 <chimezie> +1 (IE)

Chimezie Ogbuji: +1 (IE)

14:38:56 <AxelPolleres> RESOLVED: Publish http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/http-rdf-update/ as CR

RESOLVED: Publish http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/http-rdf-update/ as CR

14:38:58 <sandro> q+ to ask about XML Results Format

Sandro Hawke: q+ to ask about XML Results Format

14:39:05 <bglimm> no objections, no abstentions

no objections, no abstentions

14:39:24 <bglimm> Sandro: we talked after the last meeting about XML results format

Sandro Hawke: we talked after the last meeting about XML results format

14:39:25 <sandro> PROPOSED: Publish Proposed Edited Recommendation (stage before "Recommendation, Second Edition") of http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-XMLres/ with errata addressed, cross-links updated, and mentioning other results format documents (JSON, CSV, TSV).

PROPOSED: Publish Proposed Edited Recommendation (stage before "Recommendation, Second Edition") of http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-XMLres/ with errata addressed, cross-links updated, and mentioning other results format documents (JSON, CSV, TSV).

14:39:43 <bglimm> ... we could publish as PR with some errata fixed and pointers to the new specs

... we could publish as PR with some errata fixed and pointers to the new specs

14:40:12 <AndyS> Do we need a short name vote?

Andy Seaborne: Do we need a short name vote?

14:40:26 <bglimm> AxelPolleres: We could action you to do these changes and then resolve today

Axel Polleres: We could action you to do these changes and then resolve today

14:41:06 <bglimm> AndyS: For the other docs we chose short names for SPARQL 1.1

Andy Seaborne: For the other docs we chose short names for SPARQL 1.1

14:41:14 <AxelPolleres> ACTION: sandro to implement errata on XMLres and bring it in format for proposed edited recommendation

ACTION: sandro to implement errata on XMLres and bring it in format for proposed edited recommendation

14:41:15 <trackbot> Created ACTION-698 - Implement errata on XMLres and bring it in format for proposed edited recommendation [on Sandro Hawke - due 2012-10-16].

Trackbot IRC Bot: Created ACTION-698 - Implement errata on XMLres and bring it in format for proposed edited recommendation [on Sandro Hawke - due 2012-10-16].

14:41:42 <bglimm> Sandro: That's only important for Rec, I'll see what other groups do and what is required

Sandro Hawke: That's only important for Rec, I'll see what other groups do and what is required

14:41:44 <AndyS> e.g. /sparql11-results-json/ "SPARQL 1.1 Query Results JSON Format"

Andy Seaborne: e.g. /sparql11-results-json/ "SPARQL 1.1 Query Results JSON Format"

14:42:02 <AxelPolleres> ACTION: sandro to clarify shortname for XMLres edited rec with W3C team

ACTION: sandro to clarify shortname for XMLres edited rec with W3C team

14:42:02 <trackbot> Created ACTION-699 - Clarify shortname for XMLres edited rec with W3C team [on Sandro Hawke - due 2012-10-16].

Trackbot IRC Bot: Created ACTION-699 - Clarify shortname for XMLres edited rec with W3C team [on Sandro Hawke - due 2012-10-16].

14:42:30 <bglimm> AxelPolleres: I would like somebody to review the changes on the results format doc

Axel Polleres: I would like somebody to review the changes on the results format doc

14:42:39 <bglimm> ... any volunteers?

... any volunteers?

14:42:55 <AndyS> (the boiler plate in some/all docs points to XML results at /TR/rdf-sparql-XMLres/)

Andy Seaborne: (the boiler plate in some/all docs points to XML results at /TR/rdf-sparql-XMLres/)

14:42:55 <bglimm> ... I'll do it myself

... I'll do it myself

14:43:08 <AxelPolleres> ACTION: axel to review changes as per ACTION-698

ACTION: axel to review changes as per ACTION-698

14:43:08 <trackbot> Created ACTION-700 - Review changes as per ACTION-698 [on Axel Polleres - due 2012-10-16].

Trackbot IRC Bot: Created ACTION-700 - Review changes as per ACTION-698 [on Axel Polleres - due 2012-10-16].

14:43:23 <sandro> PROPOSED: Publish Proposed Edited Recommendation (stage before "Recommendation, Second Edition") of http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-XMLres/ with errata addressed, cross-links updated, and mentioning other results format documents (JSON, CSV, TSV).   Contingent on completion of ACTION-698, ACTION-699, and ACTION-700.

PROPOSED: Publish Proposed Edited Recommendation (stage before "Recommendation, Second Edition") of http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-XMLres/ with errata addressed, cross-links updated, and mentioning other results format documents (JSON, CSV, TSV). Contingent on completion of ACTION-698, ACTION-699, and ACTION-700.

14:43:49 <bglimm> +1 (UUlm)

+1 (UUlm)

14:43:57 <sandro> +1

Sandro Hawke: +1

14:44:02 <kasei> +1 (RPI)

Gregory Williams: +1 (RPI)

14:44:03 <cbuilara> +1

Carlos Buil Aranda: +1

14:44:04 <AndyS> +1 (ASF)

Andy Seaborne: +1 (ASF)

14:44:09 <MattPerry> +1 (Oracle)

Matthew Perry: +1 (Oracle)

14:44:10 <SteveH_> +1 (Experian)

Steve Harris: +1 (Experian)

14:44:16 <pgearon> +1 (Revelytix)

Paul Gearon: +1 (Revelytix)

14:44:19 <AxelPolleres>  PROPOSED: Publish Proposed Edited Recommendation (stage before "Recommendation, Second Edition") of http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-XMLres/ with errata addressed, cross-links updated, and mentioning other results format documents (JSON, CSV, TSV). contingent completion of ACTION-698, ACTION-697, ACTION-700

Axel Polleres: PROPOSED: Publish Proposed Edited Recommendation (stage before "Recommendation, Second Edition") of http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-XMLres/ with errata addressed, cross-links updated, and mentioning other results format documents (JSON, CSV, TSV). contingent completion of ACTION-698, ACTION-697, ACTION-700

14:44:29 <AndyS> (as "second edition" -- least change -- is also Ok by me)

Andy Seaborne: (as "second edition" -- least change -- is also Ok by me)

14:44:32 <AxelPolleres> +1 (siemens)

Axel Polleres: +1 (siemens)

14:44:48 <AxelPolleres> RESOLVED: Publish Proposed Edited Recommendation (stage before "Recommendation, Second Edition") of http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-XMLres/ with errata addressed, cross-links updated, and mentioning other results format documents (JSON, CSV, TSV).   Contingent on completion of ACTION-698, ACTION-699, and ACTION-700.

RESOLVED: Publish Proposed Edited Recommendation (stage before "Recommendation, Second Edition") of http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-XMLres/ with errata addressed, cross-links updated, and mentioning other results format documents (JSON, CSV, TSV). Contingent on completion of ACTION-698, ACTION-699, and ACTION-700.

14:44:57 <AxelPolleres> no objections, no abstentions.

Axel Polleres: no objections, no abstentions.

14:45:25 <bglimm> AxelPolleres: Do we need anything from the editors?

Axel Polleres: Do we need anything from the editors?

14:45:43 <bglimm> Sandro: I assume every draft has a section that lists changes since LC?

Sandro Hawke: I assume every draft has a section that lists changes since LC?

14:45:51 <bglimm> AndyS: Yes

Andy Seaborne: Yes

14:45:55 <bglimm> bglimm: yes

Birte Glimm: yes

14:46:14 <bglimm> AxelPolleres: I am not sure we have that everywhere?

Axel Polleres: I am not sure we have that everywhere?

14:46:29 <AndyS> sandro -- If you need anything doing, drop the list an email and I'll do it ASAP.

Andy Seaborne: sandro -- If you need anything doing, drop the list an email and I'll do it ASAP.

14:46:31 <bglimm> ... can we add that we missing, possibly during the pub process?

... can we add that we missing, possibly during the pub process?

14:46:34 <bglimm> Sandro: Yes

Sandro Hawke: Yes

14:46:56 <AxelPolleres> Sandro, lee, Axel will check "Updates since LC" sections in all docs.

Axel Polleres: Sandro, lee, Axel will check "Updates since LC" sections in all docs.

14:47:06 <AxelPolleres> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/implementations/

Axel Polleres: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/implementations/

14:47:08 <bglimm> ... Do we have a list of implementations? Or just the test results page?

... Do we have a list of implementations? Or just the test results page?

14:47:12 <AndyS> There is the namespace page for functions.

Andy Seaborne: There is the namespace page for functions.

14:47:43 <cbuilara> I have the section about the changes, but there is none, the only change was editorial (change BINDINGS for VALUES)

Carlos Buil Aranda: I have the section about the changes, but there is none, the only change was editorial (change BINDINGS for VALUES)

14:47:53 <sandro> that

Sandro Hawke: that

14:47:55 <bglimm> Sandro: We don't have emails from people about their implementations?

Sandro Hawke: We don't have emails from people about their implementations?

14:47:58 <sandro> that's fine cbuilara

Sandro Hawke: that's fine cbuilara

14:48:25 <bglimm> AxelPolleres: I don't think we have that

Axel Polleres: I don't think we have that

14:48:36 <bglimm> Sandro: I think we should be ok

Sandro Hawke: I think we should be ok

14:48:58 <bglimm> ... this implementation page is regenerated when there are new test results?

... this implementation page is regenerated when there are new test results?

14:49:06 <bglimm> kasei: Yes

Gregory Williams: Yes

14:49:17 <AxelPolleres> sandro will make a static copy of http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/implementations/ (or take it from CVS)

Axel Polleres: sandro will make a static copy of http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/implementations/ (or take it from CVS)

14:49:25 <bglimm> Sandro: I'll make a copy just to record the current status when moving to PR

Sandro Hawke: I'll make a copy just to record the current status when moving to PR

14:50:01 <chimezie> Zakim, who is talking?

Chimezie Ogbuji: Zakim, who is talking?

14:50:12 <Zakim> chimezie, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: AndyS (74%), bglimm (80%), Sandro (9%)

Zakim IRC Bot: chimezie, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: AndyS (74%), bglimm (80%), Sandro (9%)

14:50:29 <AxelPolleres> Birte: we still have to fix references to XML schema 1.1 in all docs!

Birte Glimm: we still have to fix references to XML schema 1.1 in all docs! [ Scribe Assist by Axel Polleres ]

14:51:03 <bglimm> bglimm: we should change the ref for XML schema datatypes

Birte Glimm: we should change the ref for XML schema datatypes

14:51:10 <AxelPolleres> ACTION: Birte to check all docs for the correct XML Schema datatypes reference

ACTION: Birte to check all docs for the correct XML Schema datatypes reference

14:51:10 <trackbot> Created ACTION-701 - Check all docs for the correct XML Schema datatypes reference [on Birte Glimm - due 2012-10-16].

Trackbot IRC Bot: Created ACTION-701 - Check all docs for the correct XML Schema datatypes reference [on Birte Glimm - due 2012-10-16].

14:51:15 <AxelPolleres> q?

Axel Polleres: q?

14:51:31 <AxelPolleres> ack sandro

Axel Polleres: ack sandro

14:51:31 <Zakim> sandro, you wanted to ask about XML Results Format

Zakim IRC Bot: sandro, you wanted to ask about XML Results Format

14:51:57 <bglimm> AxelPolleres: Sandro, how do we go ahead now?

Axel Polleres: Sandro, how do we go ahead now?

14:52:04 <bglimm> ... will you ask within W3C

... will you ask within W3C

14:52:15 <bglimm> Sandro: We send a transition request to the management and the chairs

Sandro Hawke: We send a transition request to the management and the chairs

14:52:20 <sandro> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Transition_Request_Oct_2012

Sandro Hawke: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Transition_Request_Oct_2012

14:52:25 <bglimm> ... after a week there should be a transition meeting

... after a week there should be a transition meeting

14:52:45 <bglimm> ... Axel, are you available to help with this?

... Axel, are you available to help with this?

14:53:26 <bglimm> ... I am available today, but maybe not end of the week (? Thu, Fr)

... I am available today, but maybe not end of the week (? Thu, Fr)

14:54:03 <kasei> sandro?

Gregory Williams: sandro?

14:54:07 <pgearon> thanks all

Paul Gearon: thanks all

14:54:07 <Zakim> -Chimezie

Zakim IRC Bot: -Chimezie

14:54:09 <Zakim> -Sandro

Zakim IRC Bot: -Sandro

14:54:10 <bglimm> AxelPolleres: Thanks all

Axel Polleres: Thanks all

14:54:10 <Zakim> -MattPerry

Zakim IRC Bot: -MattPerry

14:54:11 <sandro> yes, kasei ?

Sandro Hawke: yes, kasei ?

14:54:11 <Zakim> -SteveH_

Zakim IRC Bot: -SteveH_

14:54:14 <Zakim> -AndyS

Zakim IRC Bot: -AndyS

14:54:15 <bglimm> ... meeting adjourned

... meeting adjourned

14:54:16 <Zakim> -cbuilara

Zakim IRC Bot: -cbuilara

14:54:17 <AxelPolleres> Sandro & Axel take care of sending out the transition request

Axel Polleres: Sandro & Axel take care of sending out the transition request

14:54:18 <Zakim> -pgearon

Zakim IRC Bot: -pgearon

14:54:24 <AxelPolleres> big thanks to everybody!!

Axel Polleres: big thanks to everybody!!

14:54:26 <kasei> do you want me to re-run the implementation report today so that you know you have a current copy to preserve?

Gregory Williams: do you want me to re-run the implementation report today so that you know you have a current copy to preserve?

14:54:32 <Zakim> -kasei

Zakim IRC Bot: -kasei

14:54:35 <AxelPolleres> rrsagent, make records public

Axel Polleres: rrsagent, make records public

14:54:46 <sandro> sure, as long as the result still look good!

Sandro Hawke: sure, as long as the result still look good!

14:54:56 <bglimm> RRSAgent, make records public

RRSAgent, make records public

14:55:09 <AxelPolleres> oh, oh. we have lost rrsagent?

Axel Polleres: oh, oh. we have lost rrsagent?

14:55:17 <bglimm> Hm, we didn't have RRSAgent, make records public

Hm, we didn't have RRSAgent, make records public

14:55:19 <AndyS> ADJOURNED

Andy Seaborne: ADJOURNED

14:56:54 <Zakim> SW_(SPARQL)10:00AM has ended

Zakim IRC Bot: SW_(SPARQL)10:00AM has ended

14:56:54 <Zakim> Attendees were pgearon, AndyS, +49.897.aaaa, kasei, bglimm, MattPerry, Sandro, cbuilara, SteveH_, Chimezie

Zakim IRC Bot: Attendees were pgearon, AndyS, +49.897.aaaa, kasei, bglimm, MattPerry, Sandro, cbuilara, SteveH_, Chimezie



Formatted by CommonScribe


This revision (#3) generated 2012-10-09 15:19:17 UTC by 'bglimm2', comments: None