SPARQL Working Group Teleconference

Minutes of 01 May 2012

Agenda
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2012AprJun/0086.html
Seen
Andy Seaborne, Arthur Keen, Axel Polleres, Chimezie Ogbuji, Gregory Williams, Matthew Perry, Paul Gearon, Sandro Hawke, Steve Harris
Chair
Axel Polleres
Scribe
Matthew Perry
IRC Log
Original and Editable Wiki Version
Resolutions
  1. approve minutes form last week at http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2012-04-24 link
Topics
14:00:26 <RRSAgent> logging to http://www.w3.org/2012/05/01-sparql-irc

RRSAgent IRC Bot: logging to http://www.w3.org/2012/05/01-sparql-irc

14:00:28 <trackbot> RRSAgent, make logs world

Trackbot IRC Bot: RRSAgent, make logs world

14:00:30 <trackbot> Zakim, this will be 77277

Trackbot IRC Bot: Zakim, this will be 77277

14:00:30 <Zakim> ok, trackbot; I see SW_(SPARQL)10:00AM scheduled to start now

Zakim IRC Bot: ok, trackbot; I see SW_(SPARQL)10:00AM scheduled to start now

14:00:31 <trackbot> Meeting: SPARQL Working Group Teleconference
14:00:31 <trackbot> Date: 01 May 2012
14:02:57 <AxelPolleres> Zakim, who is on the phone?

Axel Polleres: Zakim, who is on the phone?

14:02:57 <Zakim> I notice SW_(SPARQL)10:00AM has restarted

Zakim IRC Bot: I notice SW_(SPARQL)10:00AM has restarted

14:02:59 <Zakim> On the phone I see +1.512.651.aaaa, SteveH, Sandro, kasei, AndyS, MattPerry, AxelPolleres

Zakim IRC Bot: On the phone I see +1.512.651.aaaa, SteveH, Sandro, kasei, AndyS, MattPerry, AxelPolleres

14:04:07 <Zakim> +pgearon

Zakim IRC Bot: +pgearon

14:04:25 <Zakim> +Chimezie

Zakim IRC Bot: +Chimezie

14:04:30 <sandro> Zakim, aaaa is Arthur_Keen

Sandro Hawke: Zakim, aaaa is Arthur_Keen

14:04:30 <Zakim> +Arthur_Keen; got it

Zakim IRC Bot: +Arthur_Keen; got it

14:04:34 <chimezie> Zakim, mute me

Chimezie Ogbuji: Zakim, mute me

14:04:34 <Zakim> Chimezie should now be muted

Zakim IRC Bot: Chimezie should now be muted

14:05:21 <AxelPolleres> agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2012AprJun/0086.html
14:05:42 <AxelPolleres> scribe: matt

(Scribe set to Matthew Perry)

14:05:45 <AxelPolleres> chair: axelpolleres
14:06:19 <AxelPolleres> topic: admin

1. admin

14:06:46 <AxelPolleres> PROPOSED: approve minutes form last week at http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2012-04-24

PROPOSED: approve minutes form last week at http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2012-04-24

14:07:20 <AxelPolleres> RESOLVED: approve minutes form last week at http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2012-04-24

RESOLVED: approve minutes form last week at http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2012-04-24

14:07:47 <MattPerry> AxelPolleres: anything from RDF WG

Axel Polleres: anything from RDF WG

14:07:51 <MattPerry> AndyS: nothing to report

Andy Seaborne: nothing to report

14:08:11 <AxelPolleres> topic: publication advertisement/announcement

2. publication advertisement/announcement

14:08:36 <MattPerry> Sandro: Just waiting for the webmaster should go out soon

Sandro Hawke: Just waiting for the webmaster should go out soon

14:08:54 <MattPerry> ... we should do the normal mailing list announcements

... we should do the normal mailing list announcements

14:09:15 <MattPerry> AxelPolleres: I will do the announcement

Axel Polleres: I will do the announcement

14:09:50 <MattPerry> Sandro: I gave the text for the W3C news page

Sandro Hawke: I gave the text for the W3C news page

14:11:16 <AxelPolleres> topic: test cases

3. test cases

14:11:30 <MattPerry> AxelPolleres: can somebody summarize?

Axel Polleres: can somebody summarize?

14:11:49 <MattPerry> ... I understand some property path tests fail now

... I understand some property path tests fail now

14:12:15 <MattPerry> kasei: You pretty much captured it, property path tests need to be updated

Gregory Williams: You pretty much captured it, property path tests need to be updated

14:12:26 <MattPerry> AxelPolleres: do we need more coverage now

Axel Polleres: do we need more coverage now

14:12:40 <MattPerry> kasei: I think we're pretty good

Gregory Williams: I think we're pretty good

14:12:57 <MattPerry> AxelPolleres: I added another test case from comment JP5

Axel Polleres: I added another test case from comment JP5

14:13:23 <MattPerry> kasei: I will add one more test too

Gregory Williams: I will add one more test too

14:13:36 <MattPerry> AxelPolleres: more test cases are welcome

Axel Polleres: more test cases are welcome

14:13:55 <AxelPolleres> pp36 +pp37 still need approval

Axel Polleres: pp36 +pp37 still need approval

14:14:10 <AndyS> tests/data-sparql11/bindings/* will need more tests.  Ditto syntax-query/

Andy Seaborne: tests/data-sparql11/bindings/* will need more tests. Ditto syntax-query/

14:14:10 <kasei> q+ to mention SD tests

Gregory Williams: q+ to mention SD tests

14:15:05 <AndyS> What's missing?

Andy Seaborne: What's missing?

14:15:31 <MattPerry> kasei: service description tests need to be finalized

Gregory Williams: service description tests need to be finalized

14:15:51 <MattPerry> ... I committed a manifest for the current SD tests that uses a web service validator

... I committed a manifest for the current SD tests that uses a web service validator

14:16:00 <MattPerry> ... It needs to be documented

... It needs to be documented

14:16:17 <AxelPolleres> ACTION: Greg to document SD test cases in README.html

ACTION: Greg to document SD test cases in README.html

14:16:17 <trackbot> Created ACTION-613 - Document SD test cases in README.html [on Gregory Williams - due 2012-05-08].

Trackbot IRC Bot: Created ACTION-613 - Document SD test cases in README.html [on Gregory Williams - due 2012-05-08].

14:16:27 <kasei> ack kasei

Gregory Williams: ack kasei

14:16:27 <Zakim> kasei, you wanted to mention SD tests

Zakim IRC Bot: kasei, you wanted to mention SD tests

14:16:36 <MattPerry> AxelPolleres: any other test cases that need actions?

Axel Polleres: any other test cases that need actions?

14:16:37 <AxelPolleres> q?

Axel Polleres: q?

14:16:59 <MattPerry> AndyS: will need to update bindings and syntax tests

Andy Seaborne: will need to update bindings and syntax tests

14:17:43 <AxelPolleres> topic: comments

4. comments

14:17:56 <AxelPolleres> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Comments

Axel Polleres: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Comments

14:18:56 <AndyS> For WW-1, see email http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2012AprJun/0072.html

Andy Seaborne: For WW-1, see email http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2012AprJun/0072.html

14:18:59 <MattPerry> AxelPolleres: Some new ones unnassigned

Axel Polleres: Some new ones unnassigned

14:19:28 <MattPerry> AxelPolleres: I can take DB21

Axel Polleres: I can take DB21

14:20:27 <MattPerry> ... all others seem to be answered or assigned

... all others seem to be answered or assigned

14:20:28 <AndyS> awaiting approval: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:SA-2

Andy Seaborne: awaiting approval: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:SA-2

14:20:43 <MattPerry> AndyS: I've got 2 outstanding responses

Andy Seaborne: I've got 2 outstanding responses

14:21:05 <MattPerry> ... WW1 and SA2

... WW1 and SA2

14:21:56 <MattPerry> AndyS: Response basically says there's a balance to be struck with property paths

Andy Seaborne: Response basically says there's a balance to be struck with property paths

14:22:16 <MattPerry> ... have to be careful with analogies using string matching

... have to be careful with analogies using string matching

14:22:37 <MattPerry> ... syntactic short forms are different from connectivity operators

... syntactic short forms are different from connectivity operators

14:22:57 <MattPerry> ... email summarizes ... would appreciate comments

... email summarizes ... would appreciate comments

14:23:34 <MattPerry> AxelPolleres: we have to send official response ... let's discuss on mailing list

Axel Polleres: we have to send official response ... let's discuss on mailing list

14:23:55 <MattPerry> AndyS: SA-2 is for new functions for UUIDs

Andy Seaborne: SA-2 is for new functions for UUIDs

14:24:04 <kasei> I'm relatively happy to add the UUID functions, but would want to know if anyone thinks it's one function too many w.r.t. depedency chains, etc.

Gregory Williams: I'm relatively happy to add the UUID functions, but would want to know if anyone thinks it's one function too many w.r.t. depedency chains, etc.

14:24:32 <MattPerry> AxelPolleres: does everyone agree?

Axel Polleres: does everyone agree?

14:24:47 <MattPerry> ... we don't want to just add all funtions that people want

... we don't want to just add all funtions that people want

14:24:55 <AndyS> SA-2 see http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2012AprJun/0075.html for the relationship of the two functions.

Andy Seaborne: SA-2 see http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2012AprJun/0075.html for the relationship of the two functions.

14:25:08 <MattPerry> ... would like to see more support than just a comment

... would like to see more support than just a comment

14:25:20 <kasei> +1 (took me ~5 minutes to implement)

Gregory Williams: +1 (took me ~5 minutes to implement)

14:25:23 <AndyS> +1 (implemented)

Andy Seaborne: +1 (implemented)

14:25:26 <pgearon> +1

Paul Gearon: +1

14:25:42 <MattPerry> 0

0

14:25:51 <AndyS> zakim, who is on the phone?

Andy Seaborne: zakim, who is on the phone?

14:25:51 <Zakim> On the phone I see Arthur_Keen, SteveH, Sandro, kasei, AndyS, MattPerry, AxelPolleres, pgearon, Chimezie (muted)

Zakim IRC Bot: On the phone I see Arthur_Keen, SteveH, Sandro, kasei, AndyS, MattPerry, AxelPolleres, pgearon, Chimezie (muted)

14:25:54 <sandro> 0 not qualified to comment  :-)

Sandro Hawke: 0 not qualified to comment :-)

14:25:58 <MattPerry> SteveH: no opinion

Steve Harris: no opinion

14:26:07 <kasei> I think it's got value in not steering people towards creating lots of new bnodes.

Gregory Williams: I think it's got value in not steering people towards creating lots of new bnodes.

14:26:11 <chimezie> +1 (haven't implemented in SPARQL specifically, however)

Chimezie Ogbuji: +1 (haven't implemented in SPARQL specifically, however)

14:26:41 <MattPerry> ... they seem useful but a bit concerned about interaction with BIND

... they seem useful but a bit concerned about interaction with BIND

14:27:24 <MattPerry> AndyS: for BIND we get different UUID for each row

Andy Seaborne: for BIND we get different UUID for each row

14:28:24 <SteveH> +1 I guess

Steve Harris: +1 I guess

14:28:55 <MattPerry> AxelPolleres: need to mark all these changes clearly in the next release

Axel Polleres: need to mark all these changes clearly in the next release

14:29:06 <AxelPolleres> let's go forward with adding UUID.

Axel Polleres: let's go forward with adding UUID.

14:29:34 <AxelPolleres> response to SA-2 can be sent.

Axel Polleres: response to SA-2 can be sent.

14:30:12 <MattPerry> AxelPolleres: what is the publication schedule for query?

Axel Polleres: what is the publication schedule for query?

14:30:24 <AxelPolleres> topic: publication plan query

5. publication plan query

14:30:51 <AxelPolleres> andy: 3 sections to change, ..., some consistencies to be solved.

Andy Seaborne: 3 sections to change, ..., some consistencies to be solved. [ Scribe Assist by Axel Polleres ]

14:31:12 <MattPerry> AndyS: timeframe: soon

Andy Seaborne: timeframe: soon

14:31:47 <MattPerry> AndyS: What about the blog post?

Andy Seaborne: What about the blog post?

14:32:10 <MattPerry> Sandro: that is more about W3C process that SPARQL WG in particular

Sandro Hawke: that is more about W3C process that SPARQL WG in particular

14:32:33 <MattPerry> ... would be nice to set the record straight, but don't want to offend

... would be nice to set the record straight, but don't want to offend

14:33:01 <MattPerry> AxelPolleres: I think we should just point them back to the comments

Axel Polleres: I think we should just point them back to the comments

14:33:28 <MattPerry> AndyS: Sandro, do you want to sort this out off list

Andy Seaborne: Sandro, do you want to sort this out off list

14:35:08 <MattPerry> Sandro: I will check with management

Sandro Hawke: I will check with management

14:36:18 <MattPerry> topic: bindings

6. bindings

14:36:54 <MattPerry> AndyS: on going discussion on the list ... we haven't officially decided to add this yet but no one is arguing against it

Andy Seaborne: on going discussion on the list ... we haven't officially decided to add this yet but no one is arguing against it

14:38:10 <MattPerry> AxelPolleres: question do we still leave BINDINGS at end of query

Axel Polleres: question do we still leave BINDINGS at end of query

14:38:19 <kasei> q+

Gregory Williams: q+

14:38:22 <MattPerry> ... any opinions

... any opinions

14:38:37 <AndyS> ack kasei

Andy Seaborne: ack kasei

14:38:42 <MattPerry> kasei: I think dropping it is a mistake w.r.t. federation

Gregory Williams: I think dropping it is a mistake w.r.t. federation

14:39:09 <MattPerry> AndyS: I agree

Andy Seaborne: I agree

14:40:01 <MattPerry> AndyS: there are 2 use cases here: (1) Federation, (2) Constrain values inside a query

Andy Seaborne: there are 2 use cases here: (1) Federation, (2) Constrain values inside a query

14:40:23 <MattPerry> AxelPolleres: same syntax?

Axel Polleres: same syntax?

14:40:50 <AxelPolleres> BIND VALUES ?

Axel Polleres: BIND VALUES ?

14:40:57 <MattPerry> AndyS: have been working on the syntax

Andy Seaborne: have been working on the syntax

14:41:28 <kasei> q+ to ask about effect on federation document

Gregory Williams: q+ to ask about effect on federation document

14:41:41 <AxelPolleres> ack kasei

Axel Polleres: ack kasei

14:41:41 <Zakim> kasei, you wanted to ask about effect on federation document

Zakim IRC Bot: kasei, you wanted to ask about effect on federation document

14:41:47 <MattPerry> ... I would rather change it even though it's more work on early implementors

... I would rather change it even though it's more work on early implementors

14:42:18 <kasei> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/fed/service.xml

Gregory Williams: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/fed/service.xml

14:42:26 <MattPerry> kasei: if we change it, do we need second LC for federation doc

Gregory Williams: if we change it, do we need second LC for federation doc

14:42:53 <AxelPolleres> federation doc is also affected from the syntax change, but only in informative section.

Axel Polleres: federation doc is also affected from the syntax change, but only in informative section.

14:43:31 <AxelPolleres> Axel: we can change informative sections

Axel Polleres: we can change informative sections [ Scribe Assist by Axel Polleres ]

14:43:36 <MattPerry> Sandro: we shouldn't change anything that breaks implementations after LC

Sandro Hawke: we shouldn't change anything that breaks implementations after LC

14:45:18 <MattPerry> Axel: why not use BINDINGS syntax everywhere?

Axel Polleres: why not use BINDINGS syntax everywhere?

14:45:50 <MattPerry> AndyS: VALUES is used inside query

Andy Seaborne: VALUES is used inside query

14:46:22 <MattPerry> ... question is rather BINDINGS at end stays or goes

... question is rather BINDINGS at end stays or goes

14:46:44 <sandro> +1 take the pain now, for a better longer-term design

Sandro Hawke: +1 take the pain now, for a better longer-term design

14:46:57 <MattPerry> AxelPolleres: It's awkward to me to have 2 different keywords

Axel Polleres: It's awkward to me to have 2 different keywords

14:47:41 <MattPerry> AndyS: I would prefer 1 keyword

Andy Seaborne: I would prefer 1 keyword

14:49:05 <MattPerry> ... I will write up the options and send to mailing list

... I will write up the options and send to mailing list

14:49:40 <AxelPolleres> ACTION: Andy to write up the different design options on BINDINGS/VALUES to the mailing list for voting

ACTION: Andy to write up the different design options on BINDINGS/VALUES to the mailing list for voting

14:49:41 <trackbot> Created ACTION-614 - Write up the different design options on BINDINGS/VALUES to the mailing list for voting [on Andy Seaborne - due 2012-05-08].

Trackbot IRC Bot: Created ACTION-614 - Write up the different design options on BINDINGS/VALUES to the mailing list for voting [on Andy Seaborne - due 2012-05-08].

14:49:57 <AxelPolleres> topic: aob

7. aob

14:50:01 <AxelPolleres> q?

Axel Polleres: q?

14:50:20 <AxelPolleres> adjourned

Axel Polleres: adjourned

14:50:21 <Zakim> -SteveH

Zakim IRC Bot: -SteveH

14:50:22 <Zakim> -Chimezie

Zakim IRC Bot: -Chimezie

14:50:22 <Zakim> -MattPerry

Zakim IRC Bot: -MattPerry

14:50:24 <Zakim> -AndyS

Zakim IRC Bot: -AndyS

14:50:25 <Zakim> -Sandro

Zakim IRC Bot: -Sandro

14:50:26 <Zakim> -pgearon

Zakim IRC Bot: -pgearon

14:50:26 <Zakim> -Arthur_Keen

Zakim IRC Bot: -Arthur_Keen

14:50:31 <Zakim> -kasei

Zakim IRC Bot: -kasei

14:50:37 <AxelPolleres> thanks matt for scribing

Axel Polleres: thanks matt for scribing

14:50:42 <AxelPolleres> rrsagent, make records public

Axel Polleres: rrsagent, make records public

14:51:14 <AxelPolleres> matt will you do theminuts formatting on commonscribe?

Axel Polleres: matt will you do theminuts formatting on commonscribe?

14:51:19 <Zakim> -AxelPolleres

Zakim IRC Bot: -AxelPolleres

14:51:20 <Zakim> SW_(SPARQL)10:00AM has ended

Zakim IRC Bot: SW_(SPARQL)10:00AM has ended

14:51:20 <Zakim> Attendees were +1.512.651.aaaa, Sandro, SteveH, kasei, AndyS, MattPerry, AxelPolleres, pgearon, Chimezie, Arthur_Keen

Zakim IRC Bot: Attendees were +1.512.651.aaaa, Sandro, SteveH, kasei, AndyS, MattPerry, AxelPolleres, pgearon, Chimezie, Arthur_Keen

14:51:40 <sandro> BTW the specs were published 40 minutes ago.

Sandro Hawke: BTW the specs were published 40 minutes ago.



Formatted by CommonScribe


This revision (#1) generated 2012-05-01 14:56:15 UTC by 'mperry', comments: None