IRC log of ssn on 2009-12-16
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 19:49:31 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #ssn
- 19:49:31 [RRSAgent]
- logging to http://www.w3.org/2009/12/16-ssn-irc
- 19:49:33 [trackbot]
- RRSAgent, make logs world
- 19:49:33 [Zakim]
- Zakim has joined #ssn
- 19:49:35 [trackbot]
- Zakim, this will be 7769
- 19:49:36 [trackbot]
- Meeting: Semantic Sensor Network Incubator Group Teleconference
- 19:49:36 [trackbot]
- Date: 16 December 2009
- 19:49:36 [Zakim]
- ok, trackbot; I see INC_SSN()3:00PM scheduled to start in 11 minutes
- 19:50:05 [kerry]
- agenda+ actions from last meting
- 19:50:22 [kerry]
- agenda+ tracker voting
- 19:50:53 [kerry]
- agenda+ xg deliverables & extension
- 19:51:07 [kerry]
- agenda+ AOB
- 19:51:27 [kerry]
- ?agenda
- 19:51:34 [kerry]
- agenda?
- 19:51:50 [kerry]
- chair: kerry
- 19:52:12 [kerry]
- Cair: kerry
- 19:52:18 [kerry]
- Chair: kerry
- 19:54:33 [Zakim]
- INC_SSN()3:00PM has now started
- 19:54:42 [Zakim]
- + +61.4.097.8.aaaa
- 19:55:24 [laurent_oz]
- laurent_oz has joined #ssn
- 19:55:28 [Zakim]
- +??P6
- 19:55:40 [Payam]
- zakim ??P6 is me
- 19:55:53 [Payam]
- zakim, ??P6 is me
- 19:55:53 [Zakim]
- +Payam; got it
- 19:57:40 [Zakim]
- +??P7
- 20:01:29 [Zakim]
- +[IPcaller]
- 20:01:49 [Arthur]
- Arthur has joined #ssn
- 20:01:55 [Manfred_DERI]
- Manfred_DERI has joined #ssn
- 20:02:34 [Zakim]
- +??P9
- 20:02:48 [Arthur]
- zakim, ??P9 is me
- 20:02:48 [Zakim]
- +Arthur; got it
- 20:03:04 [krp]
- krp has joined #ssn
- 20:03:50 [michael]
- michael has joined #ssn
- 20:04:20 [Zakim]
- +krp
- 20:04:33 [Zakim]
- + +1.202.408.aabb
- 20:04:48 [Zakim]
- +Prateek
- 20:05:03 [Bermudez_Luis]
- Bermudez_Luis has joined #ssn
- 20:05:22 [Zakim]
- +[IPcaller.a]
- 20:05:43 [michael]
- zakim, P{caller.a] is me
- 20:05:43 [Zakim]
- sorry, michael, I do not recognize a party named 'P{caller.a]'
- 20:07:06 [AmitSheth]
- AmitSheth has joined #ssn
- 20:08:00 [kerry]
- agenda?
- 20:08:32 [Zakim]
- + +1.650.450.aacc
- 20:08:44 [michael]
- zakim, [IPcaller.a] is me
- 20:08:44 [Zakim]
- +michael; got it
- 20:09:30 [kerry]
- ScribeNick: Bermudez_Luis
- 20:10:24 [Bermudez_Luis]
- Topic: Actions from Last Meeting
- 20:11:09 [Arthur]
- http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/ssn/track/issues/
- 20:13:34 [Bermudez_Luis]
- ...no concrete actions
- 20:13:58 [Bermudez_Luis]
- Topic: Tracker Voting
- 20:14:47 [Manfred_DERI]
- The tracker URL is not working for me
- 20:14:53 [Bermudez_Luis]
- Topic: Issue object properties
- 20:15:29 [Manfred_DERI]
- no worrieds
- 20:15:47 [krp]
- Working for me too (but you need a W3C login)
- 20:15:50 [michael]
- do you have to log into w3c website?
- 20:15:54 [Manfred_DERI]
- yes
- 20:16:03 [Manfred_DERI]
- Login and the rest works fine
- 20:16:04 [Bermudez_Luis]
- Kerry: Vote about issue http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/ssn/track/issues/1
- 20:16:56 [Manfred_DERI]
- Ok works now
- 20:17:02 [Manfred_DERI]
- took 5min ...
- 20:17:15 [Arthur]
- if I remember right there is also an tracker-agent for IRC, we can invite
- 20:17:33 [krp]
- there's a trackbot on the channel
- 20:19:32 [michael]
- +1
- 20:19:35 [Payam]
- +1
- 20:19:37 [krp]
- +1
- 20:19:37 [Bermudez_Luis]
- +1
- 20:19:38 [laurent_oz]
- +1
- 20:19:38 [Manfred_DERI]
- +1
- 20:19:45 [Arthur]
- +1
- 20:19:46 [kerry]
- +1
- 20:20:57 [Bermudez_Luis]
- ACTION: Michael: make changes to ontology
- 20:20:58 [trackbot]
- Created ACTION-1 - Make changes to ontology [on Michael Compton - due 2009-12-23].
- 20:21:41 [Bermudez_Luis]
- ACTION: Michael: make changes to ontology close issue 1
- 20:21:42 [trackbot]
- Created ACTION-2 - Make changes to ontology close issue 1 [on Michael Compton - due 2009-12-23].
- 20:23:07 [Manfred_DERI]
- The comments are also on http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/ssn/track/issues/2
- 20:23:57 [Bermudez_Luis]
- Topic: System and Process - Issue 2- http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/ssn/track/issues/2
- 20:24:50 [krp]
- The emails have all been in the last half hour... (I was having dinner!)
- 20:24:55 [Manfred_DERI]
- click on louis's original issue, in the window which comes then, you have have also the other emails and they are accessible
- 20:25:35 [krp]
- +q
- 20:25:40 [laurent_oz]
- +q
- 20:25:51 [Manfred_DERI]
- +q
- 20:26:15 [kerry]
- ack krp
- 20:26:40 [Bermudez_Luis]
- ACTION: Luis: separate Issue 2 in 3 issues
- 20:26:40 [trackbot]
- Created ACTION-3 - Separate Issue 2 in 3 issues [on Luis Bermudez - due 2009-12-23].
- 20:26:53 [kerry]
- ack laurent_oz
- 20:27:40 [michael]
- +q
- 20:28:14 [Bermudez_Luis]
- Kerry:have not looked at the recent thread related to issue 2
- 20:28:17 [krp]
- sorry, that wasn't the unmute button was it :-/
- 20:28:22 [Bermudez_Luis]
- Michael :have not looked at the recent thread related to issue 2
- 20:28:23 [graybeal]
- graybeal has joined #ssn
- 20:29:08 [Manfred_DERI]
- I would like to comment on issue 2 as well.
- 20:29:41 [Manfred_DERI]
- I think John made a very good comment: We should come up with a set of definitions. This will help us to understand each other better and simplify interactions and coming up with an agreement. And additionally, we can use these definitions to explain the ontology to other people as they then have the possibility to understand our thinking.
- 20:29:43 [graybeal]
- +q
- 20:30:33 [kerry]
- trackbot: +manfred_DERI
- 20:30:33 [trackbot]
- Sorry, kerry, I don't understand 'trackbot: +manfred_DERI'. Please refer to http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/irc for help
- 20:30:49 [Bermudez_Luis]
- Kevin: Relation between sensor and devices ?
- 20:30:56 [kerry]
- ack Manfred_DERI
- 20:31:32 [krp]
- I agree... on agreeing about terms
- 20:31:37 [Payam]
- +1
- 20:31:51 [krp]
- I put a possible starting point on the wiki before the f2f: http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/ssn/wiki/SWE_terms
- 20:31:56 [Bermudez_Luis]
- Manfred: Need definitions and process of conveying to these definitions
- 20:32:56 [Bermudez_Luis]
- Kerry: Kevin responded to this
- 20:33:20 [Bermudez_Luis]
- Kevin: List of terms and definitions are already on the wiki.
- 20:34:29 [kerry]
- ack michael
- 20:34:34 [laurent_oz]
- Agree with Manfred on the care to take to explain where the ontology come from
- 20:34:36 [Bermudez_Luis]
- Manfred: rationale is very important for system implementers and for improving the acceptance
- 20:35:32 [krp]
- +1 I also don't think all sensors are devices - I think we need the different concepts that Michael mentions
- 20:36:46 [krp]
- Though I'm not too bothered what either is called ;) As long as the concepts are separate.
- 20:37:05 [Manfred_DERI]
- When conceptualize, we should also give examples.
- 20:37:20 [Manfred_DERI]
- Examples help the understanding tremendously because you understand the otherwise quite abstract terms.
- 20:38:04 [krp]
- From said wiki page... Sensor: An entity capable of observing a phenomenon and returning an observed value.
- 20:38:30 [Arthur]
- why not leave sensor and device independent, than we still can create a combination like Sensor-device which inherits from both
- 20:39:32 [kerry]
- ack graybeal
- 20:39:33 [Bermudez_Luis]
- Michael: Device and Sensors are conceptually different. Device is a physical thing. Sensor produces a value for a property, not neccesarly a device..
- 20:41:26 [Bermudez_Luis]
- graybeal: Make difference between meaning of the words and meaning of the concepts within the ontology
- 20:41:57 [krp]
- How about with use the tracker to start with, and suggest changes to: http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/ssn/wiki/SWE_terms
- 20:43:13 [Manfred_DERI]
- +q
- 20:43:34 [kerry]
- ack Manfred DERI
- 20:43:40 [Bermudez_Luis]
- graybeal: Possible solutions - create definitions and then we think about the label
- 20:44:56 [Payam]
- +q
- 20:45:16 [Manfred_DERI]
- -q
- 20:45:23 [Bermudez_Luis]
- Manfred_DERI: we should not be limited to our specific area. Spend more time in looking at the larger picture
- 20:45:26 [AmitSheth]
- It may be worth considering an upport ontology appproach
- 20:45:29 [kerry]
- ack Payam
- 20:46:30 [krp]
- +q
- 20:46:33 [graybeal]
- We don't have to worry about aligning our use of the Sensor concept exactly with other uses (for one thing other uses are contradictory; for another our use is within the context of our ontology)
- 20:46:37 [Bermudez_Luis]
- AmitSheth: design to extend is important
- 20:47:24 [Bermudez_Luis]
- Payam: Use Resource in a general sense
- 20:48:10 [graybeal]
- By pursuing the idea of a glossary offline we can work on the meaning-first vs names-first during that process
- 20:48:27 [Manfred_DERI]
- +q
- 20:48:51 [Bermudez_Luis]
- Kerry: We agree on start working on definitions, starting with SWE terms, and working on definitions first. John proposal ?
- 20:49:22 [Zakim]
- -Prateek
- 20:50:06 [krp]
- I suggest if anyone wants changes to the wiki glossary we take them to the tracker.
- 20:50:21 [Manfred_DERI]
- I think the Wiki is easier
- 20:50:37 [Bermudez_Luis]
- John: Suggestion: pursue wiki definitions. Need to come to an agreement about concepts and specific terms
- 20:50:37 [krp]
- Where changes are: term modifications, or term removals
- 20:50:45 [Manfred_DERI]
- +q
- 20:50:50 [laurent_oz]
- +q
- 20:50:54 [Bermudez_Luis]
- +q
- 20:53:19 [kerry]
- ack krp
- 20:53:29 [Bermudez_Luis]
- kerry:have an editor to apply changes.. comments in the wiki...
- 20:53:37 [kerry]
- ack Manfred_DERI
- 20:53:49 [laurent_oz]
- Use cases review points to "categories" : need to split also the terms defs
- 20:53:49 [laurent_oz]
- SWE terms corresponds to the Sensor/Observations (Observatories) not necessary to Semantic Sensor Networks and Grids
- 20:53:57 [kerry]
- ack laurent_oz
- 20:54:05 [Bermudez_Luis]
- Manfred_DERI: wiki +
- 20:54:22 [graybeal]
- +1 on having an editor be the coordinator of the process of developing definitions
- 20:54:42 [laurent_oz]
- http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/ssn/wiki/Use_cases
- 20:54:47 [kerry]
- ack Bermudez_Luis
- 20:54:56 [graybeal]
- any process is OK, but it is important to have an editor to align everyone's process
- 20:55:26 [Manfred_DERI]
- +q
- 20:55:56 [kerry]
- ack Manfred_DERI
- 20:55:59 [graybeal]
- having the editor specify the process: +1
- 20:56:01 [Bermudez_Luis]
- kerry: need to find out who is the editor..
- 20:56:28 [Manfred_DERI]
- -q
- 20:56:42 [Bermudez_Luis]
- Manfred_DERI: Proposing Luis...
- 20:57:18 [Bermudez_Luis]
- kerry: This person will be organizing the process etc..
- 20:57:46 [krp]
- Well, O&M and SensorML
- 20:58:47 [krp]
- So I could do it if Luis doesn't want to (though the next two weeks aren't good!)
- 21:00:07 [michael]
- +1
- 21:00:11 [Manfred_DERI]
- +1
- 21:00:12 [Bermudez_Luis]
- kerry: vote Luis role as editor of the glossar of terms and developed the process through the wiki and comming with issues to the meeting
- 21:00:12 [krp]
- +1
- 21:00:27 [kerry]
- +1
- 21:00:28 [Payam]
- +1
- 21:00:28 [laurent_oz]
- +1 with kevin as co-editor?
- 21:00:43 [graybeal]
- +1
- 21:00:50 [Bermudez_Luis]
- +1 for Kevin as co-editor
- 21:01:00 [Manfred_DERI]
- +1 for Kevin as co-editor
- 21:01:18 [Arthur]
- +1
- 21:02:06 [Bermudez_Luis]
- ACTION; Luis and Kevin editors of the glossary and will start the process of moving it forward
- 21:02:09 [laurent_oz]
- Kevin do you want me to do the use case you were lined up against with Oscar?
- 21:02:38 [Bermudez_Luis]
- Topic: xg deliverables & extension
- 21:03:10 [krp]
- laurent_oz: Feel free to start on something. We're really run off our feet at the moment (as expected), so I haven't even had the chance to discuss it with Oscar yet.
- 21:04:42 [Bermudez_Luis]
- kerry: Not straightforward. Need to do draft report
- 21:05:02 [Bermudez_Luis]
- ... deliverable onotology on March..
- 21:06:15 [laurent_oz]
- +q
- 21:06:35 [Bermudez_Luis]
- ... we have progress on markup.. not clear on semantic annotation progress
- 21:06:48 [kerry]
- ack laurent_oz
- 21:07:25 [Bermudez_Luis]
- laurent_oz: activity presented at the OGC meeting at the U Munster related to the markup task
- 21:08:20 [Zakim]
- - +1.650.450.aacc
- 21:09:09 [Bermudez_Luis]
- kerry: next meeting is next week
- 21:09:36 [krp]
- Advance apologies, I very much doubt I can make next week.
- 21:09:45 [michael]
- thanks
- 21:09:49 [Zakim]
- -michael
- 21:09:49 [michael]
- michael has left #ssn
- 21:09:53 [Manfred_DERI]
- thank you, bye
- 21:10:05 [Zakim]
- -Payam
- 21:10:07 [Payam]
- bye
- 21:10:09 [Zakim]
- -[IPcaller]
- 21:10:12 [Zakim]
- -Arthur
- 21:10:16 [kerry]
- bye
- 21:10:16 [Arthur]
- Arthur has left #ssn
- 21:10:21 [Zakim]
- - +61.4.097.8.aaaa
- 21:10:25 [Manfred_DERI]
- Manfred_DERI has left #ssn
- 21:10:25 [Zakim]
- - +1.202.408.aabb
- 21:10:26 [Zakim]
- -??P7
- 21:10:26 [Zakim]
- -krp
- 21:10:26 [Zakim]
- INC_SSN()3:00PM has ended
- 21:10:27 [Zakim]
- Attendees were +61.4.097.8.aaaa, Payam, [IPcaller], Arthur, krp, +1.202.408.aabb, Prateek, +1.650.450.aacc, michael
- 21:10:30 [Bermudez_Luis]
- bye
- 21:10:35 [kerry]
- zakim, bye
- 21:10:35 [Zakim]
- Zakim has left #ssn
- 21:10:55 [kerry]
- rrsagent make log public
- 21:11:07 [kerry]
- rrsagent draft minutes
- 21:11:23 [kerry]
- rrsagent, bye
- 21:11:23 [RRSAgent]
- I see 3 open action items saved in http://www.w3.org/2009/12/16-ssn-actions.rdf :
- 21:11:23 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Michael: make changes to ontology [1]
- 21:11:23 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/12/16-ssn-irc#T20-20-57
- 21:11:23 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Michael: make changes to ontology close issue 1 [2]
- 21:11:23 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/12/16-ssn-irc#T20-21-41
- 21:11:23 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Luis: separate Issue 2 in 3 issues [3]
- 21:11:23 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/12/16-ssn-irc#T20-26-40