20:00:41 RRSAgent has joined #svg 20:00:41 logging to http://www.w3.org/2009/12/10-svg-irc 20:00:43 RRSAgent, make logs public 20:00:43 Zakim has joined #svg 20:00:45 Zakim, this will be GA_SVGWG 20:00:45 ok, trackbot; I see GA_SVGWG()3:00PM scheduled to start now 20:00:46 Meeting: SVG Working Group Teleconference 20:00:46 Date: 10 December 2009 20:00:50 GA_SVGWG()3:00PM has now started 20:00:51 +Shepazu 20:02:01 +[IPcaller] 20:02:10 Zakim, [IP is me 20:02:10 +ed; got it 20:06:28 +??P12 20:06:50 Zakim, ??P12 is me 20:06:50 +anthony; got it 20:11:00 Scribe: anthony 20:11:05 Chair: Erik 20:11:36 Topic: Next Telcon 20:11:45 DS: The next Telcon will be the 6th 20:12:16 ... no wait 20:12:22 .. Monday January 4th 2010 20:12:46 AG: I might not be there for that telcon 20:12:54 ... flying back from Townsville 20:15:23 ACTION: Erik to Email the SVG Working Group list informing members when the next telcon is going to be (after the break) 20:15:23 Created ACTION-2704 - Email the SVG Working Group list informing members when the next telcon is going to be (after the break) [on Erik Dahlström - due 2009-12-17]. 20:15:55 agenda+ DOM3 Event TransformX/Y 20:16:06 agenda+ Collaboration with CSS 20:16:22 Topic: Face-to-face 20:16:54 DS: We do not have quorum for meeting in Sydney 20:17:03 ... so will have to cancel that 20:17:29 AG: So when will the next F2F be? 20:17:35 ... or will it still be around that time? 20:17:50 ED: When is Libre graphics? 20:18:54 http://libregraphicsmeeting.org/2010/index_static.html 20:18:55 DS: AKA LGM, is Belgium 20:19:07 ED: 26th to 29th May 2010 20:19:16 DS: If we are going to have a meeting before then 20:19:26 ... JWatt said Feb works for him 20:19:44 http://www.fosdem.org/2010/ 20:19:57 ED: There is also Fosdem 20:20:09 6-7 feb 2010 20:20:15 also brussels 20:20:31 ... JWatt didn't want a conflict with 20:20:54 DS: So anytime around then works for me 20:21:03 ... and I guess we'll be going to Europe 20:21:07 ... if we going to have one at all 20:21:35 ... I've been thinking about a DOM API summit 20:21:41 ... get a bunch of people together 20:21:49 ... for a couple of days 20:21:56 ... and work out a good API 20:22:03 ... get a bunch of requirements 20:22:18 ... have people put forward proposals 20:22:32 ... then have a discussion and hopefully come up with a model 20:22:39 ... that can be used 20:23:01 ... some major browser vendors have offered to host it 20:25:12 DS: Erik can you fly to the US in Jan/Feb? 20:25:22 ... or March? 20:25:29 ED: March would be fine 20:25:38 DS: It wouldn't be exclusively SVG 20:25:55 ... if we had it on the West coast, it might help JWatt 20:26:21 ... This might be a fruitful alternative to an SVG F2F 20:26:47 AG: Have this as an alternative? 20:27:01 DS: Have 2 or 3 days SVG F2F and then a DOM Summit 20:28:15 ... Might even have more days than that - 5 days depending how long people can attend for 20:28:40 ACTION: Doug to Look into details of a DOM summit/SVG meeting 20:28:40 Created ACTION-2705 - Look into details of a DOM summit/SVG meeting [on Doug Schepers - due 2009-12-17]. 20:30:47 DS: I guess we can't really decide right now where the next F2F will be 20:31:51 Zakim, takeup agendum 2 20:31:51 I don't understand 'takeup agendum 2', anthony 20:32:09 Zakim, take up agendum 2 20:32:09 agendum 2. "Collaboration with CSS" taken up [from anthony] 20:33:07 DS: I spoke with a Designer on the CSS WG - Tab Atkins 20:33:21 ... he's the editor on the CSS Gradients specification 20:34:18 http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-images/Overview.html 20:34:31 ... it's actually CSS Image Values 20:34:37 ... we talked about his proposal 20:34:47 ... there are some things that seem very funky to me 20:34:52 ... with the syntax 20:35:09 ... somethings you can do that you can't do with SVG gradients 20:36:46 ... We agreed that we want the models as similar as possible 20:36:51 ... including the syntax 20:37:15 ... how would you guys feel about forming a task force with CSS Working Group 20:37:20 ... and working on some things with them 20:37:33 ... It would part of the Paint Servers work 20:38:28 AG: As long as it can be extend at some point 20:38:42 ED: There's also text shadow as well 20:39:12 DS: These are some of things we should be collaborating on 20:39:27 ... making sure they have the same syntax will be a real win for authors 20:39:34 ... I propose we act on it 20:40:34 ... I asked PLH about this 20:42:11 ... He supported the idea as long as the deliverable is in the Charter 20:42:21 ... a Taskforce is something the Chairs set up 20:42:28 ... and had nothing to do with the Team 20:42:41 DS: So Erik is it possible to do this 20:42:46 ED: Sounds likes a good idea 20:43:14 DS: You will have to write to the CSS WG with a formal proposal 20:48:39 AG: Just looking at the CSS Gradients 20:48:54 ... it looks like the geometry of the gradient is modified according to the bounding box of the gradient 20:49:03 ... well at least it can be specified to behave that way 20:49:34 ... wouldn't be hard to do in SVG, just need another parameter 20:50:19 DS: They can specify a start point and an angle rather than an end point 20:50:24 AG: That's also not a bad idea 20:51:26 DS: So there's a lot of points that we can collaborate on 20:52:07 ... and CSS WG has designers which might be able to help us 20:53:24 Zakim, take up agendum 1 20:53:24 agendum 1. "DOM3 Event TransformX/Y" taken up [from anthony] 20:53:41 DS: We all no this problem 20:53:48 ... if you write a drag and drop script 20:54:03 ... as soon as you introduce transforms or a viewBox and you try to drag it 20:54:16 ... X/Y are offset from where the mouse pointer is 20:54:21 ... and it is really painful 20:54:32 ... JWatt proposed putting this into DOM 3 Events 20:54:41 ... since CSS has proposed Transforms 20:54:47 ... they will run into the same problems 20:54:52 ... as well will 20:55:07 s/well will/we did/ 20:55:18 ... I'm proposing for DOM 3 Events 20:55:25 ... we have Tx/Ty 20:55:31 ... Transform X and Transform Y 20:56:01 ... and it unwinds the transformation matrix to get the actual viewPort X and Y 20:56:26 ... client X and client Y would be good if they had the right algorithms behind them but they don't 20:57:21 AG: If we have to unwind the matrix 20:57:29 ... we'd have to get the inverse matrix 20:57:39 ... is that right ED? 20:57:54 ED: Yes, can't always get the inverse 20:58:16 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Invertible_matrix 20:59:06 AG: The idea has merit but there some cases where it will fail 20:59:10 DS: Where abouts? 20:59:13 ED: Scale 0 20:59:29 ... trying to think of other cases 21:00:15 DS: If there are predictable cases you could specify don't do calculations on these cases 21:00:42 ED: You can do a a cheap calculation to determine if you can get an inverse 21:00:47 ... but you may not want to do that all the time 21:00:58 DS: I'll show you both the script I'm working on 21:01:04 ... and you can give me feedback over email 21:01:47 ACTION: Doug to Send in details to the list on DOM 3 Transform X/Y for feedback 21:01:47 Created ACTION-2706 - Send in details to the list on DOM 3 Transform X/Y for feedback [on Doug Schepers - due 2009-12-17]. 21:03:09 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Determinant 21:03:22 ED: If you want the math behind it, you can calculate the determinant 21:03:38 for a 3x3 matrix: det (A) = aei − afh + bfg − bdi + cdh − ceg. 21:03:43 ... which will tell you if the matrix is invertable 21:03:50 if that's 0 it's noninvertible 21:05:12 ED: Are you suggesting to have properties on that? 21:05:27 s/on that/on the Event interface/ 21:05:37 DS: Yes, on any event that has mouse event interface 21:05:44 ... you'd also have Tx, Ty 21:06:03 ... that would be the value in the transformation space of the element 21:06:36 s/on any event that has mouse event interface/on any event that has x, y attributes, like the mouse event interface event types 21:07:42 DS: Any place we have transform it would be nice to have the individual attributes 21:07:53 ... Translate X, Translate Y, etc 21:08:57 ... It would be nice to just have those individual transforms and have a predefined order they are applied in 21:12:01 Topic: SVG 1.1 21:12:27 ED: Converting Opera internal intersection list tests 21:12:33 ... to use the W3C template 21:12:48 ... and reviewing the tests that Cameron wrote 21:13:02 ... there are two or three tests on my to-do list 21:13:21 DS: There's a couple of actions I can do 21:13:25 AG: Same 21:13:27 http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/track/products/1 21:13:44 ED: The Java bindings appendix is done 21:14:29 ... pending review 21:14:47 ... the other one I'm doing is intersection list and clarification for that 21:14:54 ... I might be able to take on more actions 21:15:06 ... if people are having trouble with 21:15:52 ... was thinking of taking ACTION-2676 21:16:43 ACTION: Anthony to Send Doug the location of the tables for the integration specification 21:16:43 Created ACTION-2707 - Send Doug the location of the tables for the integration specification [on Anthony Grasso - due 2009-12-17]. 21:17:40 Happy Holidays everyone! 21:18:16 -ed 21:18:19 -Shepazu 21:18:20 -anthony 21:18:21 GA_SVGWG()3:00PM has ended 21:18:22 Attendees were Shepazu, [IPcaller], ed, anthony 21:24:06 sorry to miss the call gus, i had a transition call to do, standing in for plh 21:24:25 ed_ has joined #svg 21:25:26 Zakim, bye 21:25:26 Zakim has left #svg 21:25:32 RRSAgent, make minutes 21:25:32 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/12/10-svg-minutes.html anthony 23:40:46 eseidel has joined #svg 23:52:55 eseidel_ has joined #svg