19:47:26 RRSAgent has joined #ssn 19:47:26 logging to http://www.w3.org/2009/12/08-ssn-irc 19:47:28 RRSAgent, make logs world 19:47:28 Zakim has joined #ssn 19:47:30 Zakim, this will be 7769 19:47:30 ok, trackbot; I see INC_SSN()3:00PM scheduled to start in 13 minutes 19:47:31 Meeting: Semantic Sensor Network Incubator Group Teleconference 19:47:31 Date: 08 December 2009 19:47:43 Chair: Holger 19:47:54 Regrets: Luis, Simon 19:48:03 agenda+ Roll call 19:48:12 agenda+ Ontology Development Process 19:48:21 agenda+ Use cases 19:48:29 agenda+ Semantic Markup 19:48:38 agenda+ AOB 19:50:02 Danh_DERI has joined #ssn 19:51:25 INC_SSN()3:00PM has now started 19:51:33 + +61.3.623.2.aaaa 19:51:53 zakim, +61.3.623.2.aaaa is me 19:51:53 +Holger; got it 19:52:47 Payam has joined #SSN 19:52:51 + +1.206.662.aabb 19:53:00 kelsey has joined #ssn 19:55:02 +??P1 19:55:28 i've just join the call 19:55:44 Hi Danh! 19:55:52 Hi Holger 19:57:50 +[IPcaller] 19:58:13 Zakim IPCaller is me 19:58:25 laurent_oz has joined #ssn 19:58:32 Zakim, IPcaller is me 19:58:32 +Payam; got it 19:59:03 +[IPcaller] 19:59:23 Just joined 19:59:36 Hi Laurent 19:59:52 kerry has joined #ssn 19:59:57 ocorcho has joined #ssn 20:00:26 Arthur has joined #ssn 20:01:11 +??P8 20:01:26 zakim, ??P8 is me 20:01:26 +Arthur; got it 20:01:27 +[IPcaller.a] 20:01:32 zakim, who's on the phone? 20:01:32 On the phone I see Holger, +1.206.662.aabb, ??P1, Payam, [IPcaller], Arthur, [IPcaller.a] 20:01:41 Regrets from Luis via ssn-xg mailing list 20:01:51 zakim, [IPcaller.a] is me 20:01:51 +ocorcho; got it 20:02:02 zakim, mute me 20:02:02 ocorcho should now be muted 20:02:24 + +1.267.481.aacc 20:03:05 zakim, who's making noise? 20:03:15 Holger, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: ??P1 (19%), Arthur (29%), +1.267.481.aacc (70%) 20:03:46 Holger, I can scribe 20:04:14 ScribeNick: laurent_oz 20:04:30 +??P11 20:04:34 krp has joined #ssn 20:04:52 michael has joined #ssn 20:06:10 agenda? 20:06:16 cory has joined #ssn 20:06:21 + +0775169aadd 20:06:27 +[IPcaller.a] 20:06:45 zakim, [IPcaller.a] is me 20:06:45 +michael; got it 20:06:56 zakim, +0775169aadd is me 20:06:56 +krp; got it 20:07:44 Luis to be here for the first 10 minutes 20:07:44 zakim, unmute me 20:07:44 ocorcho should no longer be muted 20:07:56 +[IPcaller.a] 20:08:05 zakim, unmute me 20:08:05 ocorcho was not muted, ocorcho 20:08:10 zakim, mute me 20:08:10 ocorcho should now be muted 20:09:00 Manfred_DERI has joined #ssn 20:09:14 Holger has set up the tracker 20:10:16 Holger: Process is to file change request via tracker (add link) 20:10:29 zakim, unmute me 20:10:29 ocorcho should no longer be muted 20:10:31 +q 20:10:49 zakim, who's making noise? 20:10:49 Holger: we need to precise which ontology we start from 20:10:50 +q 20:11:00 Holger, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: ??P1 (48%) 20:11:02 ack ocorcho 20:11:47 Oscar: Raul has added an extension but we should start with the one from Michael and process the changes from Raul through the tracker 20:12:15 zakim, mute me 20:12:15 ack Danh_DERI 20:12:17 ocorcho should now be muted 20:12:31 +q 20:12:48 Holger: decision to start with the one from Michael 20:13:05 Arthur: it is possible to set up WebProtege 20:13:29 +q 20:13:37 ack Arthur 20:13:41 Holger: webProtege is the preferred solution 20:14:05 +ssahoo2 20:14:25 Danh: wants more precision on the process: how do we start - do we make the changes in the ontology first or file request for changes first, 20:14:26 +q 20:15:08 Luis: possible to start the process from a version hosted on the MMI repository 20:15:32 +1 20:15:35 - +1.267.481.aacc 20:15:49 ack Danh_DERI 20:15:50 Luis: process is to publish issues, discuss then and then use the f2f meeting to approve them / approve the changes 20:16:47 Danh: use the tracker to add new concepts or suggestion for changes then it is discussed then the originator of the changes make the changes 20:17:16 +q 20:17:32 Michael: The process is more adapted to the cases where the ontology is hosted in MMI repository but we may not take advantage of the features of WebProtege 20:18:07 Michael: WebProtege may enable richer collaboration 20:18:13 zakim, unmute me 20:18:13 ocorcho should no longer be muted 20:18:17 -q 20:18:25 ack michael 20:18:35 Oscar asked to comment if it is possible to work with it live? 20:19:22 Oscar: It is possible to add annotations. Thinks using the MMI is sufficient to what we do. At some stage we can upgrade the process to WebProtege. 20:19:28 +q 20:19:30 zakim, mute me 20:19:30 ocorcho should now be muted 20:19:58 yes 20:20:19 Arthur: We plan to have a specific machine to support the SSN-XG tools. Will appreciate any advice from Oscar on how to install it 20:20:34 ack laurent_oz 20:21:08 Laurent: Q. Are we all using the same tools or not? 20:21:53 Holger: The free and the commercial edition of TopBraid changes the file structure. 20:21:54 +q 20:22:03 ack michael 20:22:47 Michael: We will have to accept that the versioning (the diff) won't necessary work. 20:23:52 +1 20:23:53 ok 20:23:54 + 20:23:56 +1 20:23:56 +1 20:24:01 +1 20:24:02 +1 20:24:03 +1 20:24:04 +1 20:24:07 +1 20:24:14 Holger: Let's do what we say. Start with Michael's version sent last week. Everyone to file changes through the tracker. Michael to file the changes. Does everyone agree? 20:24:28 agenda? 20:24:49 http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/ssn/wiki/Use_cases 20:24:54 zakim, unmute me 20:24:54 ocorcho should no longer be muted 20:25:16 zakim, mute me 20:25:16 ocorcho should now be muted 20:25:19 http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/ssn/wiki/Use_Case_Process_Provenance 20:25:28 Oscar not yet started 20:29:35 Laurent: Use cases contains the literature structured according to the group activity : ontology and markup 20:30:10 Tables differentiate between Sensor, Data and Process sub-uses cases (used separately or together) 20:30:44 Cory: for the markup we initially focus on the service annotations 20:30:51 -krp 20:33:08 +krp 20:33:17 Laurent (continued): Literature review list paper accordding to three main categories 20:35:05 +q 20:35:09 Laurent: Describes Use cases provenance first pass on the use cases description 20:35:22 ack Manfred_DERI 20:35:39 Laurent: difference between provenance and composition 20:36:38 -q 20:36:39 Manfred: in provenance (db-world) there is a different use of provenance (e.g. authenticity) Do not see 20:38:27 Laurent: use case focuses on scientific diagnose 20:39:24 Raul: the provenance information may also help the user to select the information, choose the sensor 20:39:26 http://delivery.acm.org/10.1145/1250000/1247646/p1171-buneman.pdf?key1=1247646&key2=7438030621&coll=GUIDE&dl=GUIDE&CFID=65822909&CFTOKEN=75280055 20:39:35 Peter Buneman 20:39:36 -michael 20:40:05 Peter Buneman one of the authority for provenance in databases. 20:41:10 Manfred: we should check wether the provenance defs used elsewehere are applicable (and sufficient) for the SSN-XG 20:41:20 Potentially also: http://openprovenance.org/ 20:41:31 +[IPcaller.aa] 20:41:33 michael has joined #ssn 20:41:46 zakim, who's making noise? 20:41:57 Holger, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: Holger (2%), [IPcaller.aa] (14%) 20:42:40 http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/ssn/wiki/Semantic_Mark_up 20:42:41 http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/ssn/wiki/Semantic_Markup_Draft_Deliverable 20:43:48 http://ksg.meraka.org.za/~aow2009/Lefort_AOW2009.ppt 20:47:00 Laurent: changes in the semantic markup pages (review of papers and their use of XLink) 20:47:17 See also the slides for the rest of the discussion 20:48:00 +q 20:48:00 Cory: identify where and why annotate first and then how 20:48:42 ack Payam 20:49:11 Payam: 3 different tasks: work on the ontology (content and present it) and last stage is of we use it ("map" it) 20:50:02 +q 20:50:14 Cory: Sem Markup to be driven by the use cases. Plan to reuse the same use cases: sensor discovery, data discovery. 20:50:34 ack Danh_DERI 20:50:41 Cory: We also look first at how to bring the data in RDF 20:51:32 Danh: Focus on the SWE standards - what if the data is externalised in a different approach (e.g. a REST service)? 20:52:01 +q 20:52:03 +q 20:52:43 Danh: There are approaches which don't use OGC specs: e.g. SensorPedia ... 20:54:57 Cory: We will not limit the work to SWE/SOS services. Group to suggest other example of services which should be considered 20:55:56 Danh: the methodology should be more general and supports other format like RSS (e.g. Yahoo Weather). Will the annotation methodology work on these cases? 20:56:03 +q 20:56:43 Cory: this is a question at the technical level: we look at what works on top of services using XML. 20:57:42 Danh: risk that the user will think their use cases are not covered by the ontology and the markup approach 20:58:17 Danh: need to add that we cover other requirements 20:58:35 Laurent: my paper covers any type of REST services 21:00:13 Yes, I agree with Cory. Most of the annotation techs can deal with most (all?) flavours of XML, and while the best practice will be general obviously the specific annotations will be specific - and we don't want to spread too thin. 21:00:50 -ocorcho 21:00:53 ack kerry 21:01:19 Kerry: the charter defines the work we do and it's the SWE context first. 21:01:29 ack Payam 21:02:12 ack krp 21:02:58 Kevin: it may not necessary to document multiple XML flavors 21:03:30 -ssahoo2 21:03:31 bye 21:03:31 -Payam 21:03:32 - +1.206.662.aabb 21:03:35 -[IPcaller.a] 21:03:35 bye 21:03:36 -Arthur 21:03:40 -??P11 21:03:42 -krp 21:03:43 Arthur has left #ssn 21:03:48 ye 21:04:01 zakim, bye 21:04:01 leaving. As of this point the attendees were Holger, +1.206.662.aabb, Payam, [IPcaller], Arthur, ocorcho, +1.267.481.aacc, michael, krp, ssahoo2 21:04:01 Zakim has left #ssn 21:04:18 rrsagent, make log public 21:04:28 rrsagent, draft minutes 21:04:28 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/12/08-ssn-minutes.html Holger 21:04:56 rrsagent, bye 21:04:56 I see no action items