20:00:44 RRSAgent has joined #svg 20:00:44 logging to http://www.w3.org/2009/12/03-svg-irc 20:00:46 RRSAgent, make logs public 20:00:48 Zakim, this will be GA_SVGWG 20:00:48 ok, trackbot; I see GA_SVGWG()3:00PM scheduled to start now 20:00:49 Meeting: SVG Working Group Teleconference 20:00:49 Date: 03 December 2009 20:01:48 GA_SVGWG()3:00PM has now started 20:01:55 +[IPcaller] 20:02:26 Zakim, [IP is me 20:02:26 +ed; got it 20:02:57 +Shepazu 20:07:31 +??P3 20:07:42 Zakim, ??P3 is me 20:07:42 +anthony; got it 20:13:58 ChrisL has joined #svg 20:15:34 + +39.524.9.aaaa 20:16:21 Scribe: anthony 20:16:25 Chair: Erik 20:16:33 Topic: Next Face-to-face 20:17:14 ED: Currently JW may have problems traveling to Australia 20:17:27 ... looking at having the meeting in Europe 20:17:36 ... around Jan - Feb 20:18:20 CL: Will he be shifting around that time? 20:18:29 DS: Not before Feb 20:18:36 ... we could catch JW before he moves 20:20:56 ... He's currently near Amsterdam 20:22:01 ... Need to check if this is ok with him 20:23:27 Topic: Action Update 20:23:39 ED: I was doing a couple of actions 20:23:55 ... master to publish scripts don't seem to be giving me all the right firles 20:24:02 s/firles/files/ 20:24:12 ED: I think I fixed the Java bindings 20:24:28 ... have a couple of fixes that I would like to get into the publish version 20:24:43 ... working on extracting test cases for getIntersectionList 20:25:23 CL: ACTION-2664 I worked out what the transfer codes for RGB 20:25:34 ... I plotted those in SVG 20:26:11 ... if you have 8 bit resolution you can't see any differences between the different RGB gamuts 20:26:35 ... sending an email 20:27:29 AG: Need to complete the full page 20:27:32 email sent - http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-svg-wg/2009OctDec/0054.html 20:27:39 ... was going to use the Tiny script and modify it 20:27:49 ACTION-2203? 20:27:49 ACTION-2203 -- Doug Schepers to add to the 1.1 Full errata that the initial value for the root overflow property is scroll rather than hidden -- due 2008-09-30 -- PENDINGREVIEW 20:27:49 http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/track/actions/2203 20:28:06 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-svg-wg/2009OctDec/att-0054/sRGB3.svg 20:35:25 http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.1F2/errata/errata.xml#overflow_visible ? 20:38:25 CL: I've updated links in the spec relating to ACTION-2664 so they point to a PDF containing the information 20:40:11 DS: Any feedback on 'Overflow Visible' errata? 20:40:24 ED: What about reference gradients and patterns? 20:40:42 s/gradients/markers/ 20:41:26 ED: David was complaining about when you have an SVG inside another SVG 20:41:32 DS: No I think it was the reverse 20:41:52 ... I think the main change I made was to say that the root SVG element is 20:42:03 ... now visible as declared in CSS2 overflow 20:42:27 ... and then I said with a child element (including child SVG, pattern and marker) it's hidden 20:44:38 ... so that action is complete 20:44:52 CL: I did an update on ACTION-2682 20:44:53 Update on ACTION-2682' 20:45:01 http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.1F2/errata/implementation-report.html 20:45:17 CL: That's the latest update on the implementation report 20:46:07 ... Erik has an action relating to types-dom-02-f 20:46:29 ... For painting-stroke-10-t we could back out the change 20:46:30 painting-stroke-10-t is still an issue, stroking zero length paths. no imp does this yet 20:46:45 ... and leave it for the next version of the errata 20:47:10 ... this would be the only one to roll back assuming you split types-dom-02-f 20:47:28 ED: We get a pass from Opera and probably Batik 20:47:48 http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.1F2/test/svg/text-tref-02-b.svg 20:48:03 please run in webkit 20:48:36 crash! excellent 20:48:37 DS: Crashed webkit 20:49:05 CL: I didn't know what 'X' meant in the sheet 20:50:05 ☠ 20:50:14 ☠ 20:50:30 CL: Tests almost done 20:50:33 http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/wiki/Errata_in_SVG_1.1_Second_Edition 20:50:37 ED: Only 3 or 4 left to review 20:51:13 ... I will get to the intersection ones soon 20:51:35 s/intersection/IntersectionList/ 20:52:29 Topic: Params Feedback 20:52:37 DS: Dr Olaf sent in an email 20:53:03 ... 1. Suggested syntax for the params URL 20:53:34 ... It was a bit verbose, but we will have to do something like #params and name value pairs 20:53:51 ... First change is reasonable 20:54:23 ... 2. Rather than have explicit params to be laid out in a document. You allow the author to select and identify 20:54:36 ... any element and then change an attribute in that 20:54:57 ... But it's basically inventing CSS in a URL string 20:55:39 ... the idea of params is have structured documents with exposed attributes 20:55:48 ... and allow them to be changed by other documents 20:56:17 ... 3. He said it was too simple and he'd like to insert fragments into the whole document 20:56:43 ... I received similar feedback off list suggesting that params was too simple 20:56:53 ... But it's out of the scope of params 20:57:04 ... Should use XSLT to do stuff like that 20:57:29 ... I don't want to increase the complexity of the specification 20:57:41 ... These are my initial reactions to the feedback 20:58:09 CL: I think sticking CSS in a URI string is pretty weird. 20:58:21 DS: Although we had an idea of forcing a style sheet on something 20:58:33 CL: I wouldn't do that necessarily by URI 21:01:45 mysvg.svg#params({color1:blue; fade:0.5;}) 21:01:55 mysvg.svg#params(color1:blue; fade:0.5;) 21:02:12 ED: Something like that 21:03:09 DS: I think that idea is ok, because you can have a property bag 21:03:29 ... and it would be easy to pass in values 21:03:35 ... I'd be open to that idea 21:03:53 ... I don't really want to rely on the URL string only 21:04:30 ... CSS would probably like that syntax because it's probably the only way it can be done with CSS 21:05:25 AG: So 'params' would be a reserved word? 21:05:57 DS: Yes 21:06:47 ... I like the JSON syntax idea 21:07:12 ... with the property bag 21:07:33 ED: Would that be similar to what Dr. Olaf suggested? 21:07:49 DS: No different. A person wouldn't need a 'param' key word 21:08:16 ... they could access any element id 21:10:16 http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/Overview.html#attr-iframe-seamless 21:14:37 Topic: DOM3 Events Group 21:15:03 DS: We decided not to meet for the remainder of the year 21:15:37 ED: I don't mind having meetings in the next week 21:16:19 DS: What about saying we do the next two telcons then work on list 21:17:10 ... I never pushed integration spec 21:17:19 ... because there were too many bugs with it 21:17:36 ... I can push it before Christmas 21:18:20 ... The tables are pretty much ready 21:19:15 RESOLUTION: We agree to publish the Integration specification 21:22:38 DS: DOM 3 Events is thinking deprecating DOMActivate 21:23:00 ... because at this point 'click' pretty much does everything that DOMActive does anyway 21:23:11 ... having that complicates the model 21:23:31 ... so we are thinking of extending 'click' to cover DOMActivate completely 21:23:40 CL: I think it's a reasonable idea 21:23:56 ... in practice they've almost been the same thing 21:24:15 DS: We should simplify it to say just use 'click' 21:24:50 ... As long as you say 'click' just doesn't mean click 21:25:03 ... I believe Opera implemented DOMActivate 21:25:13 ED: I think we have code to handle it but we don't dispatch it 21:25:21 ... I don't object to the change 21:25:37 ... I'd be happy having it behave like 'click' 21:25:44 ... or have it replaced by 'click' 21:26:00 ... There is very little code that would break in practice if we did that 21:26:15 DS: I think you would find more on Mobile SVG content 21:27:11 RESOLUTION: SVG Working Group is ok with deprecating DOMActivate as long as the accessibility people are happy with this also 21:28:11 Topic: Christmas Break 21:28:22 DS: So we were meeting for telcons next 21:28:32 ... and then that's it until January 21:30:06 AG: Which date? 21:30:21 DS: Early. Anthony can you clarify which dates you get back from holidays 21:30:27 Topic: Charter 21:30:42 DS: I'm simplifying the charter 21:30:49 ... and I updated it 21:32:11 ... I will try to get the charter to you guys before the end of the year 21:32:28 ... I want to put it in front of the AC soonish 21:33:00 ... I've put my two deliverables in the charter 21:33:16 ... if there is anything else that you guys think of let me know 21:36:27 -anthony 21:36:29 -ed 21:36:47 trackbot, end telcon 21:36:47 Zakim, list attendees 21:36:47 As of this point the attendees have been [IPcaller], ed, Shepazu, anthony, +39.524.9.aaaa 21:36:48 RRSAgent, please draft minutes 21:36:48 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/12/03-svg-minutes.html trackbot 21:36:49 RRSAgent, bye 21:36:49 I see no action items