20:27:21 RRSAgent has joined #ws-ra 20:27:21 logging to http://www.w3.org/2009/12/01-ws-ra-irc 20:27:23 RRSAgent, make logs public 20:27:23 Zakim has joined #ws-ra 20:27:25 Zakim, this will be WSRA 20:27:25 ok, trackbot; I see WS_WSRA()3:30PM scheduled to start in 3 minutes 20:27:26 Meeting: Web Services Resource Access Working Group Teleconference 20:27:26 Date: 01 December 2009 20:27:32 WS_WSRA()3:30PM has now started 20:27:35 chair: Bob Freund 20:27:39 +Doug_Davis 20:28:03 + +984999aaaa 20:28:56
  • li has joined #ws-ra 20:29:15 Sreed has joined #ws-ra 20:29:41 +Bob_Freund 20:29:49 + +1.908.696.aabb 20:29:58 + +39.331.574.aacc 20:30:03 Vikas has joined #ws-ra 20:30:13
  • zakim, aabb is li 20:30:13 +li; got it 20:30:24 Zakim, aacc is asoldano 20:30:24 +asoldano; got it 20:30:57 scribenick: asoldano 20:31:04 +??P5 20:31:08 + +0125660aadd 20:31:17 +??P7 20:31:30 Katy has joined #ws-ra 20:32:05 +Tom_Rutt 20:32:21 DaveS has joined #ws-ra 20:32:24 gpilz has joined #ws-ra 20:32:43 -??P7 20:34:00 +[Microsoft] 20:34:08 +Yves 20:34:26 asir has joined #ws-ra 20:34:51 agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-resource-access/2009Dec/0002.html 20:35:15 Agenda agreed 20:35:17 + +1.408.642.aaee 20:35:50 q+ 20:35:53 asir has joined #ws-ra 20:35:53 minutes of 17th Nov approved 20:36:00 ack dug 20:36:58 notes for f2f meeting location to be sent to participants 20:37:23 Ram has joined #ws-ra 20:37:46 q+ 20:38:20 ack ram 20:38:35 Gil tries to make us jealous :-) 20:38:51 +??P10 20:39:24 new snapshots to be reviewed, next meeting we'll check where we are with them 20:40:17 lol 20:40:20 Bob: are there any specific new issues requiring more info 20:40:26 ... before accepting them all ? 20:40:28 Vikas1 has joined #ws-ra 20:40:34 q+ 20:40:41 ack asir 20:40:50 -Tom_Rutt 20:41:17 can take those issue/questions to the mailing list 20:41:17 +Tom_Rutt 20:41:22 asir: aren't we chaingin the way to proceed here? 20:42:37 asir requiring more info on 8167 8284 20:43:24 who is speaking? 20:44:36 and he's a bit sick 20:46:30 getting up at 4:00 am for conference calls and flying around on freezing cold airplanes - wonder why I'm sick? 20:46:58 q+ Tom 20:48:51 8284 is understandable and is accepted 20:49:43 8167 requires checking past minutes 20:49:54 ack tom 20:51:19 all the new issues except 8167 are accepted 20:51:30 q+ 20:51:37 TOPIC: Issue 8031 20:52:07 q+ 20:52:21 q- 20:53:38 8031 is related to 7986 20:55:55 TOPIC: Issue 6463 20:56:12 ack asir 20:56:25 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-resource-access/2009Nov/0047.html 20:56:30 -??P10 20:57:11 -Tom_Rutt 20:57:26 Ram2 has joined #ws-ra 20:57:37 +Tom_Rutt 21:00:39 Bob: are you ok with the direction in Katy's email? 21:00:52 http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/ra/edcopies/wsmex.html#Bootstrapping-Metadata-Retrieval 21:00:54 ???: proposing some followup.. 21:01:19 s/???/Asir 21:01:34 gpilz has joined #ws-ra 21:02:01 + +1.408.642.aaff 21:02:18 q? 21:03:13 - +1.408.642.aaee 21:05:11 \nickname Ram 21:05:13 ACTION: Katy to produce detail example for 6463 before next call 21:05:14 Created ACTION-124 - Produce detail example for 6463 before next call [on Katy Warr - due 2009-12-08]. 21:05:30 zakim, ??aaee is gpilz 21:05:30 sorry, gpilz, I do not recognize a party named '??aaee' 21:05:40 TOPIC: 7728 21:05:53 zakim, aaee is gpilz 21:05:53 sorry, gpilz, I do not recognize a party named 'aaee' 21:06:41 7728 discussion postponed 21:06:47 TOPIC: 7911 21:06:48 Latest proposal: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=7911#c8 21:07:17 Ram has joined #ws-ra 21:07:24 q+ 21:07:32 ack ram 21:07:34 Yves ok with the latest proposal 21:08:39 Ram's proposal: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-resource-access/2009Nov/0077.html 21:09:43 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-resource-access/2009Nov/0078.html 21:09:46 q+ 21:09:56 ack dug 21:10:34 q+ 21:10:39 q- 21:11:51 q+ 21:12:02 ack ram 21:12:23 q+ 21:12:52 q+ 21:13:35 ack gpi 21:13:52 q+ 21:14:18 ack dug 21:14:59 ack ram 21:15:12 Dug's proposal 8 is intended to address all operations 21:15:17 - +984999aaaa 21:15:27 q+ 21:15:52 + +91.98.49.99.aagg 21:17:09 q+ 21:18:17 I would note that comment #8 is no longer about dispatching 21:18:22 Hard to understand the value offered by these words 21:18:35 ack dug 21:19:08 +1 to Dug's statement that the first sentence is simply setting the context. 21:19:09 q+ 21:19:11 The specification should be based on W3C Recommendations (SOAP Version 1.2, WS-Addressing 1.0, WSDL2.0, WS-Policy 1.5) and *aligned with ISO 29361:2008 (WS-I BP 1.1)*. 21:19:16 ack gpi 21:19:32 q+ 21:19:34 BP 1.1 is unaware of WS- 21:19:36 q+ 21:19:45 thank you Dave - its just setting the context - nicely put 21:19:45 s/WS-/WS-Addressing/ 21:22:04 q+ 21:22:08 However, the Working Group should also consider conformance to the forthcoming profiles WS-I is finalizing assuming they achieve WS-I "Final Material" status before the Working Group completes its deliverables. 21:22:19 This is part of BP 1.2/2.0 21:24:29 Proposal: 21:24:53 ram2 has joined #ws-ra 21:25:03 ;) 21:25:13 Proposal: 21:25:36 An implementation can examine [Action] property, the QName of the [Body] child, or a combination of both. 21:25:41 An implementation can examine [Action] property, the QName of the [Body] child, or a combination of both. 21:25:49 An implementation can examine [Action] property, the QName of the [Body] child, or a combination of both. 21:26:31 An implementation can examine [Action] property, the QName of the [Body] child, or a combination of both. An implementation that 21:26:31 examines just one of those values, but at multiple points during the entire processing of the message, are advised to ensure that the values that are used each time are consistent. 21:27:23 When determining the operation associated with a particular message, an implementation can examine the [Action] property, the QName of the [Body] child or a combination of both. An implementation... 21:27:25 q+ 21:28:02 ack ram 21:28:08 ack dug 21:28:29 yves? 21:28:33 sounds ok 21:28:57 I didn't mention dispatching 21:29:13 dispatching was in earlier text but not in text #8 21:29:22 yeah but the words are effectively about dispatching 21:29:26 q+ 21:29:37 ack asir 21:29:46 q+ 21:29:48 I don't see the word dispatching 21:30:20 text #8 is aobut action signature, so figuring out the action, no dispatching involved 21:30:43 q+ 21:30:48 ack gp 21:30:56 ack asi 21:31:02 q+ 21:31:10 q- 21:31:13 q+ 21:32:11 ack yves 21:32:13 q- 21:33:35 When determining the operation associated with a particular message, an implementation can examine the [Action] property, the QName of the [Body] child or a combination of both. 21:33:41 -Tom_Rutt 21:34:11 it doesn't say why you're trying to figure out what the op is. 21:34:31 +Tom_Rutt 21:35:43 When determining the operation associated with a particular message, an implementation can examine the [Action] property, the QName of the [Body] child or a combination of both. An implementation that examines just one of those values, but at multiple points during the entire processing of the message, are advised to ensure that the values that are used each time are consistent. 21:35:57 q+ 21:36:07 ack gpi 21:36:26 q+ 21:36:41 [repeating for the record: looks good to me] 21:39:33 ack asir 21:41:16 q+ 21:41:40 ack dav 21:42:27 RESOLUTION: 7911 closed with no action 21:43:04 TOPIC: 8201 21:43:34 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-resource-access/2009Nov/0079.html 21:43:36 q+ 21:43:57 q+ 21:44:01 q+ 21:44:18 ack dug 21:45:28 ack ram 21:45:34 Dug: the specs need clarification 21:45:47 .. so close with no action is not that a good solution 21:45:57 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-resource-access/2009Nov/0073.html 21:46:20 q+ 21:46:49 ack dug 21:47:01 q+ 21:47:27 +1 to msg 79 21:47:30 ack ram 21:47:45 q+ 21:47:59 q+ 21:48:14 q- 21:49:43 q+ 21:49:48 ack dave 21:50:19 q- 21:50:51 s/compliant implementation/compliant event source/ .... 21:50:52 q+ 21:51:22 ack dug 21:53:37 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-resource-access/2009Nov/0079.html + change 'compliant implementation' to "compliant event source...." 21:54:03 That is the pattern 21:54:07 Ram has joined #ws-ra 21:54:15 The editorial team needs to transcribe the table into sentences 21:54:20 RESOLUTION: 8201 solved with the text in message 79 + editorial issues above 21:55:01 TOPIC: 8291 21:55:29 its just the last line that's changed - I think 21:55:36 good one 21:55:49 RESOLUTION: 892 solved as proposed 21:56:01 s/829/8291 21:56:24 I like diffs :-) 21:56:51 TOPIC: 8203 21:57:27 RESOLUTION: 8203 solved as proposed 21:57:37 TOPIC: 8300 21:57:59 more time required 21:58:04 that's all for today 21:58:10 -li 21:58:11 -??P5 21:58:11 -[Microsoft] 21:58:12 -asoldano 21:58:12 -Yves 21:58:14 -Doug_Davis 21:58:16 -Tom_Rutt 21:58:16 -Bob_Freund 21:58:20 - +1.408.642.aaff 21:58:21 rrsagent, generate minutes 21:58:21 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/12/01-ws-ra-minutes.html Bob 21:58:24 - +0125660aadd 21:59:12 - +91.98.49.99.aagg 21:59:13 WS_WSRA()3:30PM has ended 21:59:14 Attendees were Doug_Davis, +984999aaaa, Bob_Freund, +1.908.696.aabb, +39.331.574.aacc, li, asoldano, +0125660aadd, Tom_Rutt, [Microsoft], Yves, +1.408.642.aaee, +1.408.642.aaff, 21:59:16 ... +91.98.49.99.aagg 23:12:06 gpilz has left #ws-ra