16:59:30 RRSAgent has joined #soap-jms 16:59:30 logging to http://www.w3.org/2009/12/01-soap-jms-irc 16:59:32 RRSAgent, make logs public 16:59:32 Zakim has joined #soap-jms 16:59:34 Zakim, this will be SJMS 16:59:34 ok, trackbot; I see WS_SOAP-JM()12:00PM scheduled to start in 1 minute 16:59:35 Meeting: SOAP-JMS Binding Working Group Teleconference 16:59:35 Date: 01 December 2009 17:00:44 + +1.512.918.aabb 17:01:13 padams2 has joined #soap-jms 17:02:17 peaston has joined #soap-jms 17:02:28 + +1.708.246.aacc 17:02:38 zakim, who's here? 17:02:38 On the phone I see alewis, padams2, +1.708.246.aacc 17:02:39 On IRC I see peaston, padams2, Zakim, RRSAgent, mphillip, alewis, trackbot 17:02:44 + +0196287aadd 17:02:45 Derek has joined #soap-jms 17:02:57 zakim, aadd is mphillip 17:02:57 +mphillip; got it 17:03:29 +Peter_Easton 17:03:30 mphillip has changed the topic to: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2009Dec/0000.html 17:03:51 zakim, who's here? 17:03:51 On the phone I see alewis, padams2, derek, mphillip, Peter_Easton 17:03:53 On IRC I see Derek, peaston, padams, Zakim, RRSAgent, mphillip, alewis, trackbot 17:04:06 Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2009Dec/0000.html 17:04:33 TOPIC: Appointment of the scribe 17:04:39 Scribe: mphillip 17:04:44 Chair: Peter 17:04:53 TOPIC: Approval of prior meeting minutes 17:05:03 http://www.w3.org/2009/11/17-soap-jms-minutes.html 17:05:29 No objections - minutes approved 17:05:47 TOPIC: Review the agenda 17:05:59 Agenda approved with no amendments 17:06:08 TOPIC: Review action items 17:06:27 http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/actions/open 17:07:02 No progress on action 32 17:07:20 Derek has written up action 68 17:07:24 close action-68 17:07:24 ACTION-68 Draft words on what you can do with non-normative MEPs like RIO for publication in an FAQ closed 17:07:44 No progress on actions 108 and 112 17:08:52 Phil has completed actions 121, and 121 17:08:58 close action-121 17:08:58 ACTION-121 Make the changes recorded under the proposed resolution for Issue 15 closed 17:09:00 close action-122 17:09:00 ACTION-122 Make the changes proposed by Eric under issue 16 closed 17:09:46 Phil has completed actions 124 17:09:49 close action-124 17:09:49 ACTION-124 Reply to Eric's email with a counter-proposal for sections 2.6.1 and 2.6.2 closed 17:10:05 No progress on 123 and 125 17:10:16 TOPIC: URI specification 17:10:23 No progress 17:10:30 TOPIC: Raised Issues 17:10:39 No Raised Issues 17:11:02 TOPIC:Accepting proposals to close open issues 17:11:04 7) Accepting proposals to close open issues http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/issues/open 17:11:35 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2009Dec/0001.html 17:13:14 http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2008/ws/soapjms/soapjms.html.diff?r1=1.67&r2=1.68&f=h 17:18:54 All reviewed and accepted the changes 17:19:21 RESOLUTION: Issue 15 is ready to be closed 17:20:33 action peter to close out the issues we resolve in this call 17:20:33 Created ACTION-126 - Close out the issues we resolve in this call [on Peter Easton - due 2009-12-08]. 17:20:50 Issue 16 : 17:20:52 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2009Dec/0002.html 17:21:26 http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2008/ws/soapjms/soapjms.html.diff?r1=1.68&r2=1.69&f=h 17:22:25 http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2008/ws/soapjms/soapjms.html?rev=1.69&content-type=text/html&f=h 17:23:32 see section 3.4.5 17:25:28 All reviewed and accepted the changes for issue 16 17:25:33 RESOLUTION: Issue 16 is ready to be closed 17:27:31 Issues 17 and 18 still pending 17:30:27 All accept the proposed resolution for Issue 19 17:30:40 action Phil to apply the resolution for Issue 19 17:30:40 Created ACTION-127 - Apply the resolution for Issue 19 [on Phil Adams - due 2009-12-08]. 17:31:30 Issue 20 : http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/issues/20 17:32:39 All accept the proposed resolution for Issue 20 17:32:42 action Phil to apply the resolution for Issue 20 17:32:42 Created ACTION-128 - Apply the resolution for Issue 20 [on Phil Adams - due 2009-12-08]. 17:33:02 TOPIC: Accepting applied resolutions: 17:33:18 Issue: 4 17:33:18 Created ISSUE-21 - 4 ; please complete additional details at http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/issues/21/edit . 17:33:35 Resolution for Issue 4 : http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2009Nov/0009.html 17:36:54 HTML Diff: http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2008/ws/soapjms/soapjms.html.diff?r1=1.66&r2=1.67&f=h 17:38:41 All accept the proposed resolution for Issue 4 17:38:54 RESOLUTION: Issue 4 is ready to be closed 17:39:25 Issue 14: http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/issues/14 17:39:42 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2009Oct/0006.html 17:40:43 http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2008/ws/soapjms/soapjms.html?rev=1.65&content-type=text/html&f=h 17:45:50 All accept the proposed resolution for Issue 14 17:45:54 RESOLUTION: Issue 14 is ready to be closed 17:46:33 TOPIC: FAQ 17:46:49 Derek has proposed new material based on action 68 17:47:11 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2009Dec/0006.html 17:47:13 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2009Dec/0006.html 17:47:56 action peter to update the FAQ with the changes proposed by action 68 17:47:56 Created ACTION-129 - Update the FAQ with the changes proposed by action 68 [on Peter Easton - due 2009-12-08]. 17:48:15 TOPIC: Testing 17:48:41 TOPIC: Implementations 17:49:28 TOPIC: AOB? 17:49:30 None 17:49:36 TOPIC: Testing 17:49:52 Discussion: How do we define/describe the WSDL test cases? 17:51:07 Phil: We need to decide logistically how we document the WSDL tests in conjunction with the non-WSDL tests 17:51:53 Phil: Making it clear that they are separate tests - only required if an implementation is claiming conformance to the optional WSDL portion of the spec. 17:54:08 Phil: Existing test cases do not include an executable test suite just documentation - suggest similar approach to WSDL tests 17:54:41 Amy: Agreed - we could just provide a set of WSDL, which would give us substantial WSDL base coverage 17:56:01 Phil: We could either 1) Add WSDL to existing base tests as an optional part of the test, or 2) Mirror the existing tests with a new set of WSDL specific tests 17:56:52 Amy: Agreed - optional 1) would be quick, but option 2) would make the optional parts clearer, and it would be easier to omit those tests which are not relevant to WSDL. I favour option 2 17:57:01 Phil: Yes, option 2 would be preference 17:57:37 Phil: Volunteers to prototype a WSDL test case 17:57:48 action: Phil to prototype a WSDL test case 17:57:48 Created ACTION-130 - Prototype a WSDL test case [on Phil Adams - due 2009-12-08]. 17:58:14 Chair next week is Phil 17:58:39 -alewis 17:58:40 -derek 17:58:40 -padams2 17:58:42 -mphillip 17:58:43 Regrets: Eric 17:58:46 -Peter_Easton 17:58:47 WS_SOAP-JM()12:00PM has ended 17:58:49 rrsagent, make minutes 17:58:49 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/12/01-soap-jms-minutes.html mphillip 17:58:50 Attendees were +1.919.663.aaaa, alewis, +1.512.918.aabb, +1.708.246.aacc, padams2, +0196287aadd, mphillip, derek, Peter_Easton 17:59:00 padams has left #soap-jms 17:59:34 rrsagent, make minutes 17:59:34 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/12/01-soap-jms-minutes.html mphillip 19:17:33 mphillip has joined #soap-jms 19:24:41 Zakim has left #soap-jms 21:08:14 mphillip has joined #soap-jms