15:54:49 RRSAgent has joined #rif 15:54:49 logging to http://www.w3.org/2009/11/24-rif-irc 15:55:28 Zakim has joined #rif 15:56:20 zakim, this will be rif 15:56:20 ok, ChrisW; I see SW_RIF()11:00AM scheduled to start in 4 minutes 15:56:25 Chair: Chris Welty 15:56:37 Meeting: RIF Telecon 24-Nov-09 15:57:51 Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rif-wg/2009Nov/0009.html 15:58:04 mdean has joined #rif 15:58:05 ChrisW has changed the topic to: 24 Nov RIF Telecon Agenda http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rif-wg/2009Nov/0009.html 15:58:37 rrsagent, make minutes 15:58:37 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/11/24-rif-minutes.html ChrisW 15:58:45 SW_RIF()11:00AM has now started 15:58:52 +Mike_Dean 15:58:58 Harold has joined #rif 15:59:33 +??P5 15:59:36 +Sandro 15:59:59 zakim, ??p5 is me 16:00:00 +ChrisW; got it 16:00:47 +[NRCC] 16:01:08 josb has joined #rif 16:01:11 + +39.047.101.aaaa 16:01:12 zakim, [NRCC] is me 16:01:13 +Harold; got it 16:01:20 StellaMitchell has joined #rif 16:01:59 LeoraMorgenstern has joined #rif 16:02:00 + +1.606.784.aabb 16:02:14 zakim, aabb is me 16:02:14 +StellaMitchell; got it 16:02:37 Scribe: StellaMitchell 16:02:46 hak has joined #rif 16:03:11 +Hassan_Ait-Kaci 16:03:31 +Leora_Morgenstern 16:03:47 last meeting minutes: http://www.w3.org/2009/10/27-rif-minutes.html 16:03:56 PROPOSED: accept last meeting minutes 16:04:03 RESOLVED: accept last meeting minutes 16:04:14 I just sent out the minutes of the november 10 meeting. 16:04:40 TOPIC: Liason 16:04:59 csma has joined #rif 16:05:26 cw: Sandro is the SPARQL team contact 16:05:34 +??P2 16:05:53 zakim, ??P2 is me 16:05:53 +csma; got it 16:06:03 zakim, mute me 16:06:03 csma should now be muted 16:06:05 sandro: SPARQL is specifying how to use inference with SPARQL, but they are considering OWL-type inference 16:06:17 zakim, who is on the phone? 16:06:17 On the phone I see Mike_Dean, ChrisW, Sandro, Harold, josb (muted), StellaMitchell, hak (muted), Leora_Morgenstern, csma (muted) 16:06:37 Sandro, could you paste a link to the draft? 16:06:54 MichaelKifer has joined #rif 16:07:35 yes! 16:07:52 zakim, unmute me 16:07:52 csma should no longer be muted 16:07:55 + +1.631.833.aacc 16:08:10 zakim, aacc is me 16:08:10 +MichaelKifer; got it 16:08:29 zakim, mute me 16:08:29 csma should now be muted 16:08:40 Gary has joined #rif 16:09:13 cw: if people in this WG want RIF-style inference in SPARQL, they will need to get involved 16:09:25 + +1.503.533.aadd 16:09:29 mk: I'll take a look at SPARQL 16:09:46 http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wiki/Extension_Request_2009b 16:09:47 cw: We requested to extend the working group 16:10:05 zakim, aadd is me 16:10:05 +Gary; got it 16:10:40 ...extending WG to March to reach recommendation status 16:11:09 Leora has joined #rif 16:11:26 ...goal is to get out of CR by middle of January 16:12:00 ....after out of CR and vote to go to PR, the group won't have much work to do 16:12:23 PROPOSED: Request WG extension as specified at http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wiki/Extension_Request_2009b 16:12:36 zakim, unmute me 16:12:36 csma should no longer be muted 16:12:41 q 16:12:47 q+ 16:13:30 q- 16:13:37 zakim, unmute me 16:13:37 csma was not muted, csma 16:13:42 zakim, mute me 16:13:42 csma should now be muted 16:13:46 "... the CR Exit Criteria do not appear to be met" might sound a bit too weak. 16:13:53 DaveReynolds has joined #rif 16:14:01 It's also ungrammatical 16:14:58 +1 16:15:03 +1 16:15:04 +1 16:15:04 sandro has joined #rif 16:15:05 +1 16:15:05 +1 16:15:06 +1 16:15:08 +1 16:15:10 +1 16:15:11 +1 16:15:11 +1 16:15:13 +1 16:15:23 (I find it amusing that Chris sounds kind of like God in films) 16:15:46 RESOLVED: Request WG extension as specified at http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wiki/Extension_Request_2009b 16:15:50 God with the flu, actually 16:16:12 TOPIC: Action Review 16:16:22 +??P11 16:16:24 RRSAgent, pointer? 16:16:24 See http://www.w3.org/2009/11/24-rif-irc#T16-16-24 16:16:49 rrsagent, make logs public 16:16:50 continued, I think 16:17:02 zakim, unmute me 16:17:02 csma should no longer be muted 16:17:27 close action-947 16:17:27 ACTION-947 Send email to implementors asking for test results. closed 16:17:54 close action-946 16:17:54 ACTION-946 Put syntax of imports on next agenda closed 16:18:00 close action-944 16:18:00 ACTION-944 Summarize issue of imports argument and propose a solution closed 16:18:20 close action-942 16:18:20 ACTION-942 Draft reponse to TK3 (Thomas Krekeler) closed 16:19:47 @stella, you are right, I forgot about it (I had champagne just before the meeting, hips!) 16:20:32 close action-948 16:20:32 ACTION-948 Modify retract case. closed 16:20:44 zakim, mute me 16:20:44 csma should now be muted 16:23:32 StellaMitchell has joined #rif 16:23:37 close action-941 16:23:37 ACTION-941 Draft reply to EM3 (David Mott: question on FLD) closed 16:23:42 close action-943 16:23:42 ACTION-943 Send email to Jos regarding Ian Horrock's public comments on discussion of OWL closed 16:23:50 will do 16:24:01 action: csma to send response DM3 16:24:01 Created ACTION-949 - Send response DM3 [on Christian de Sainte Marie - due 2009-12-01]. 16:24:27 continued 16:25:11 close action-937 16:25:12 ACTION-937 Draft reply to public comment CD2 closed 16:25:20 action: csma to send response cd2 16:25:20 Created ACTION-950 - Send response cd2 [on Christian de Sainte Marie - due 2009-12-01]. 16:25:46 935, 932 are continued 16:26:07 zakim, unmute me 16:26:07 csma should no longer be muted 16:26:26 zakim, mute me 16:26:26 csma should now be muted 16:27:31 close action-930 16:27:31 ACTION-930 Look at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rif-comments/2009Sep/0009.html closed 16:28:20 zakim, unmute me 16:28:20 josb should no longer be muted 16:28:51 jos: working on proofs for action 831 16:29:03 continued ... eventually I'll get enough time to get back into it and catch up with all the changes 16:29:19 :-) 16:29:30 action-152? 16:29:30 ACTION-152 -- Paul Vincent to propose test cases for UC1 -- due 2008-01-15 -- OPEN 16:29:30 http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/track/actions/152 16:29:54 zakim, unmute me 16:29:54 csma should no longer be muted 16:31:36 TOPIC: Public Comments 16:32:22 q+ 16:33:21 dave: I responded to some public comments directly, and just want to make sure this is recorded properly 16:33:23 Ok, I did not see it 16:33:47 cw: anything else on public comments? 16:33:54 TOPIC: XML Syntax of import 16:34:20 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rif-wg/2009Nov/0056.html 16:35:01 cw: harold sent the email above discussing the xml syntax for imports 16:35:13 ...any discussion about this? 16:35:14 zakim, unmute me 16:35:14 csma was not muted, csma 16:36:54 csma: I don't prefer one syntax over the other, but I am concerned about undoing a resolution that we made at a F2F 16:37:53 cw: we already agreed to revisit the syntax, and we did agree to have a striped xml syntax in general 16:38:28 cw: Gary, Sandro, what are your thoughts on this syntax? 16:39:05 Gary: the proposal is ok with me 16:39:22 Sandro: Harold, can we discuss for a minute? 16:39:33 zakim, mute sandro 16:39:33 Sandro should now be muted 16:41:00 csma: the point here is whether we overturn a resolution 16:41:16 harold: I think the resolution was misunderstood by me and others at the time it was made 16:42:03 16:42:08 16:42:12 uri 16:42:17 16:42:28 16:42:34 16:42:38 csma: current syntax is above 16:42:49 16:42:53 uri 16:42:58 16:43:04 16:43:09 16:43:37 zakim, unmute me 16:43:37 Sandro should no longer be muted 16:43:37 ack sandro 16:43:53 csma: syntax according to resolution is not striped, harold's proposal is striped 16:44:26 sandro: I understood the resolution at the time we made it, because we thought it was too verbose to maintain striping in this case 16:44:31 ...I could go other way 16:45:06 ...but if we go to the striped form, I have 2 concerns 1) link instead of const 2) anyURI instead of rif:iri 16:45:13 s/other/either/ 16:46:10 harold: location and profiles cannot be domain elements that's why they are not rif:ifi. they were originally rif:iri and that's why we changed them 16:47:22 cw: link is a new tag proposed to contain profile and location 16:47:37 AdrianP has joined #rif 16:47:55 http://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-syntax/#Imports 16:48:06 cw: did owl2 make a change from how owl1 handled imports? 16:48:27 sandro: above is the owl2 import text 16:48:38 I like the LINK proposal 16:48:45 cw: so it's metadata on the ontology, not part of the domain 16:48:49 +??P12 16:49:01 Zakim, ??P12 is me 16:49:01 +AdrianP; got it 16:49:27 sandro: since it's a directive, I think it's ok to use const and it won't be part of the domain 16:50:12 cw: we didn't contextualize const 16:50:26 Zakim, mute me 16:50:26 AdrianP should now be muted 16:51:13 sandro: link instead of const means implementers need to write more code, also worried about distinguishing the iris from rif:ifis 16:52:16 Currently the BLD XSD says: 16:52:17 16:52:17 16:52:17 16:52:17 16:52:17 16:52:18 16:52:21 16:52:46 sandro: my 1st choice: pre-resolution, 2nd: resolution, 3rd current proposal 16:52:57 zakim, unmute me 16:52:57 csma was not muted, csma 16:53:51 cw: so Sandro will consider this more and we'll try to resolve in the next telecon 16:53:52 TOPIC: Implementations 16:54:27 er, no, my 1st choice is Portland (resolution), 2nd choice (Const/rif:iri), 3rd choice (Link/anyURI) 16:56:29 action: mdean to get implementation report for SIL 16:56:29 Created ACTION-951 - Get implementation report for SIL [on Mike Dean - due 2009-12-01]. 16:56:46 I also sent a message about an implementation of FLD. 16:57:18 csma: I asked Ontoprise for more information about their implementation, but I didn't get a reply yet 16:58:35 cw: also we got a message about fuxi, but it wasn't a complete implemenation report 16:59:00 action: sandro to follow up with chime on fuxi implementation report 16:59:00 Created ACTION-952 - Follow up with chime on fuxi implementation report [on Sandro Hawke - due 2009-12-01]. 17:00:25 q+ 17:01:11 ack mi 17:03:28 action: harold to contact josderoo about implementation report and test case submission for eye 17:03:28 Created ACTION-953 - Contact josderoo about implementation report and test case submission for eye [on Harold Boley - due 2009-12-01]. 17:04:16 cw: bld and core are ok for exit criteria 17:05:18 ...and we have a detailed implementation report from RIFle that says it's PRD 17:05:49 cw: csma, do you implement all of DTB? 17:05:54 q+ 17:05:56 csma: no, need to list them 17:06:44 csma: Gary pointed out a bug with conflict resolution strategy 17:07:08 ...it's a bug, so shoudn't require another last call, but I need to discuss more with Gary 17:07:54 http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wiki/Implementations 17:08:17 action: gary to submit implementation report 17:08:17 Created ACTION-954 - Submit implementation report [on Gary Hallmark - due 2009-12-01]. 17:08:50 I _think_ it is a bug, but other may disagree, and think that the modification is a change of design :-( 17:09:09 cw: we're on track for FLD implementations also 17:09:38 cw: so we're at risk for 1) DTB (2 implemenations for every data type) and 2) SWC 17:10:05 sure, OWL 2 RL is OWL 17:10:19 cw: fuxi says it supports owl2-rl, Sando can you get some clarification about that? 17:10:42 ...does he also support RDF 17:12:05 sandro: about the 2 risks above (DTB, SWC), I would like to see people's test case results 17:12:21 cw: csma, will you ask ontroprise about RDF/OWL? 17:12:24 csma: yes 17:12:33 mike: and SILK has some support for OWL 17:12:45 cw: ok, so SWC is looking ok 17:13:21 Ontoprise's KAON2 in principle already supports OWL with DL-safe rules, but I don't know whether they plan to build a RIF interface for it 17:13:31 \me, do you mean "before JRules will support OWL"? 17:13:45 zakim, mute me 17:13:45 csma should now be muted 17:13:50 cw: so we should contact each implementation to catalog what DTB datatypes they support - best to ask what they don't support 17:15:28 cw: we don't actually require test results. So, ask implementions if they have test results and if they don't what datatypes they do not support 17:16:06 Zakim, unmute me 17:16:06 csma should no longer be muted 17:18:41 action: josb to contact Adrian Marte at STI2 about test cases and DTB support 17:18:41 Created ACTION-955 - Contact Adrian Marte at STI2 about test cases and DTB support [on Jos de Bruijn - due 2009-12-01]. 17:19:15 cw: I think we're at risk for DTB 17:19:20 -ChrisW 17:19:25 hmmm 17:20:17 +ChrisW 17:20:40 I have done the numeric builtins and the list builtins, expect to complete dates and strings soon... 17:20:50 TOPIC: test cases 17:21:28 http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wiki/Builtins_Numeric 17:22:37 action: stella to move hexbinary TC with base64binary 17:22:37 Created ACTION-956 - Move hexbinary TC with base64binary [on Stella Mitchell - due 2009-12-01]. 17:23:08 +1 for builtins numeric minus the hexBinary 17:23:16 PROPOSED: accept http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wiki/Builtins_Numeric with hexbinary removed 17:23:26 +1 17:23:28 +1 17:23:28 +1 17:23:31 +1 17:23:32 +1 17:23:32 +1 17:23:35 +1 17:23:36 +1 17:23:36 +1 17:23:37 RESOLVED: accept http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wiki/Builtins_Numeric with hexbinary removed 17:23:46 zakim, who is on the phone? 17:23:46 On the phone I see Mike_Dean, Sandro, Harold, josb, StellaMitchell, hak (muted), Leora_Morgenstern, csma, MichaelKifer, Gary, DaveReynolds, AdrianP (muted), ChrisW 17:23:57 zakim, mute me 17:23:57 csma should now be muted 17:24:01 http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wiki/Builtins_List 17:24:13 +1 for bultins list 17:24:21 +1 17:24:35 +1 17:24:46 +1 17:25:03 +1 17:25:09 PROPOSED: accept http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wiki/Builtins_List 17:25:11 +1 17:25:14 +1 17:25:19 +1 17:25:20 +1 17:25:21 RESOLVED: accept http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wiki/Builtins_List 17:25:21 +1 17:25:21 +1 17:25:45 http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wiki/Builtin_literal-not-identical 17:26:41 zakim, unmute me 17:26:41 csma should no longer be muted 17:27:47 zakim, mute me 17:27:47 csma should now be muted 17:28:40 PROPOSED: http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wiki/Builtin_literal-not-identical 17:28:43 +1 17:28:44 +1 17:28:44 +1 17:28:46 +1 17:28:47 +1 17:28:48 +1 17:28:51 +1 17:28:57 RESOLVED: accept http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wiki/Builtin_literal-not-identical 17:28:57 +1 17:29:16 Gary has joined #rif 17:30:44 +1 17:30:51 -AdrianP 17:31:14 +1 to adjourn 17:31:21 -Harold 17:31:22 -hak 17:31:24 -Gary 17:31:27 -Leora_Morgenstern 17:31:29 -MichaelKifer 17:31:29 -DaveReynolds 17:31:31 zakim, unmute me 17:31:31 csma should no longer be muted 17:31:33 -Mike_Dean 17:31:34 -josb 17:31:35 MichaelKifer has left #rif 17:31:39 rrsagent, make logs public 17:31:43 rrsagent, make minutes 17:31:43 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/11/24-rif-minutes.html ChrisW 17:32:08 zakim, list attendees 17:32:08 As of this point the attendees have been Mike_Dean, Sandro, ChrisW, +39.047.101.aaaa, Harold, josb, +1.606.784.aabb, StellaMitchell, Leora_Morgenstern, hak, csma, +1.631.833.aacc, 17:32:12 ... MichaelKifer, +1.503.533.aadd, Gary, DaveReynolds, AdrianP 17:32:15 rrsagent, make minutes 17:32:15 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/11/24-rif-minutes.html ChrisW 17:33:03 I can see them. 17:33:15 -StellaMitchell 17:34:54 -ChrisW 17:34:59 -Sandro 17:35:02 -csma 17:35:04 SW_RIF()11:00AM has ended 17:35:05 Attendees were Mike_Dean, Sandro, ChrisW, +39.047.101.aaaa, Harold, josb, +1.606.784.aabb, StellaMitchell, Leora_Morgenstern, hak, csma, +1.631.833.aacc, MichaelKifer, 17:35:07 ... +1.503.533.aadd, Gary, DaveReynolds, AdrianP 19:59:19 Zakim has left #rif 21:32:54 AxelPolleres has joined #rif