14:00:25 <RRSAgent> RRSAgent has joined #wam
14:00:25 <RRSAgent> logging to http://www.w3.org/2009/11/12-wam-irc
14:00:26 <Zakim> +Art_Barstow
14:00:32 <ArtB> ScribeNick: ArtB
14:00:35 <ArtB> Scribe: Art
14:00:38 <ArtB> Chair: Art
14:00:45 <ArtB> Meeting: Widgets Voice Conference
14:00:51 <ArtB> Date: 12 November 2009
14:01:00 <ArtB> Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2009OctDec/0631.html
14:01:06 <arve> arve has joined #wam
14:01:12 <ArtB> Regrets: Frederick, David
14:01:25 <ArtB> RRSAgent, make log Public
14:01:33 <trackbot> trackbot has joined #wam
14:01:33 <trackbot> Sorry... I don't know anything about this channel
14:01:33 <trackbot> If you want to associate this channel with an existing Tracker, please say 'trackbot, associate this channel with #channel' (where #channel is the name of default channel for the group)
14:01:35 <Zakim> + +49.163.829.aaaa
14:01:48 <marcin> Zakim, aaaa is marcin
14:01:48 <Zakim> +marcin; got it
14:01:49 <ArtB> trackbot, associate this channel with #webapps
14:01:49 <trackbot> Associating this channel with #webapps...
14:01:58 <marcin> Present+ Marcin_Hanclik
14:02:26 <ArtB> RRSAgent, make minutes
14:02:26 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/11/12-wam-minutes.html ArtB
14:04:22 <Marcos> yikes!
14:05:28 <Zakim> + +1.479.524.aabb
14:05:41 <Marcos> zakim, +1.479.524.aabb is me
14:05:41 <Zakim> +Marcos; got it
14:05:49 <ArtB> Present: Art, Marcin, Marcos
14:07:03 <ArtB> Topic: Review and tweak agenda
14:07:09 <ArtB> AB: draft agenda submitted on Nov 11 ( http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2009OctDec/0631.html ). 
14:07:19 <ArtB> AB: One change request is to add a third topic for the VM-MF spec "more precision on full screen" ( http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2009OctDec/0541.html ).
14:07:39 <ArtB> AB: another change request is to talk briefly about our plans for the P&C Candidate #2
14:07:53 <ArtB> AB: and we will drop 5.b since David won't be here and we'll discuss that topic on next call if it remains open
14:08:11 <ArtB> AB: any other change requests?
14:08:21 <ArtB> [ None ]
14:08:27 <ArtB> Topic: Announcements
14:08:33 <ArtB> AB: any short announcements? I don't have any
14:08:44 <ArtB> [ None ]
14:08:57 <marcin> Agenda point 5. should point to: http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-vmmf/
14:08:57 <ArtB> Topic: P&C spec: Constrained specification of <icon>
14:09:04 <ArtB> AB: during last week's f2f meeting we discussed an <icon> issue that Magnus raised ( http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2009OctDec/0445.html ). Since then, one of his colleagues expanded on their concern via (  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2009OctDec/0567.html ).
14:09:39 <ArtB> AB: Marcos and I discussed this issue in IRC earlier today. The P&C spec doesn't actually specify what a WUA will do with the icon elements. Thus, it seems like the text about the optional width and height attributes only applying to formats with "intrinsic" width/height can be removed.
14:10:19 <ArtB> AB: what do people think about this issue?
14:10:33 <ArtB> MC: I don't think removing the text would be problematic
14:10:42 <ArtB> ... but I want to review it more thoroughly
14:10:57 <ArtB> ... now, width and height processing is limited
14:11:16 <ArtB> ... WUA are free to interpret w/h as they want
14:11:37 <ArtB> ... thus I think we should remain silent on what the WUA does with these two attributes
14:11:40 <Zakim> +arve
14:11:47 <ArtB> Present+ Arve
14:11:53 <ArtB> AB: Marcin, any comments?
14:11:59 <ArtB> MH: I haven't looked at it yet
14:12:10 <arve_> arve_ has joined #wam
14:13:05 <ArtB> AB: the action now is for people to respond on the mail list
14:13:19 <ArtB> ... Marcos, will you do that?
14:13:41 <ArtB> MC: yes, but need to check again the proposal
14:13:44 <darobin> darobin has joined #wam
14:13:49 <ArtB> ... my gut feel is that we should leave this to impl
14:13:58 <Zakim> +??P5
14:14:17 <darobin> Zakim, mute me
14:14:17 <Zakim> darobin should now be muted
14:14:20 <ArtB> ... but if we delete those two statements, I don't think it will affect implementations
14:14:31 <ArtB> AB: agree on the "will not affect impls"
14:14:51 <darobin> Zakim, unmute me
14:14:51 <Zakim> darobin should no longer be muted
14:14:59 <ArtB> Present+ Robin
14:15:10 <drogersuk> drogersuk has joined #wam
14:15:20 <ArtB> Topic: P&C spec: Candidate publication plans
14:15:45 <ArtB> AB: LCWD#3 comments end on 19 November
14:16:13 <ArtB> ... assuming we get no major comments, we will want to publish CR#2 ASAP
14:16:18 <ArtB> MC: yes, that's correct
14:16:27 <ArtB> AB: I need to schedule a director's call
14:16:32 <ArtB> ... I started that process
14:16:43 <ArtB> ... tentative dates are Nov 23-25 range
14:16:51 <ArtB> MC: those dates are OK with me
14:17:06 <ArtB> ACTION: barstow schedule a Director's Call for P&C CR #2
14:17:06 <trackbot> Created ACTION-451 - Schedule a Director's Call for P&C CR #2 [on Arthur Barstow - due 2009-11-19].
14:18:02 <ArtB> RB: we can go to CR while the CfE period is in effect but we can't go to PR until CfE ends
14:18:13 <ArtB> AB: good; I'll clarify that with the Team
14:18:48 <ArtB> ... best case is we enter CR in November
14:19:05 <ArtB> ... CfE ends 28 December
14:19:25 <ArtB> ... still need to determine interop plans
14:19:45 <ArtB> Topic: TWI spec: test suite status
14:20:09 <ArtB> AB: Marcos, you wanted to give a short status on TWI test suite
14:20:15 <ArtB> MC: I've started working on it
14:20:22 <ArtB> ... but haven't uploaded test cases yet
14:20:47 <Marcos> http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-api/test-suite/
14:21:02 <ArtB> MC: ignore the doc's title
14:21:16 <ArtB> ... but this document includes the test file template
14:21:39 <ArtB> ... we can gain from the P&C experience
14:21:48 <ArtB> ... should be easier to create tests
14:21:58 <ArtB> ... and provide better feedback on Pass/Fail
14:22:12 <ArtB> ... If people have feedback, please send it!
14:22:20 <ArtB> AB: this is excellent
14:22:53 <ArtB> AB: to clarify, you are OK with going to LC now but don't want to enter CR until the test cases are completed?
14:23:12 <ArtB> MC: yes, that's correct
14:23:32 <ArtB> AB: anything else on the test suite for today?
14:23:41 <ArtB> MC: no, not for now
14:23:50 <ArtB> ... there are only about 10 testable assertions in the spec
14:24:02 <ArtB> ... thus I think there will only be 30-40 test cases
14:24:14 <ArtB> ... so realtively small compared to P&C test suite
14:24:19 <ArtB> AB: ok; good
14:24:29 <ArtB> Topic: TWI spec: Call for consensus to publish LC#2
14:24:40 <ArtB> AB: last week I sent a heads-up that today we would discuss whether or not the TWI spec ( http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-api ) is ready to be published as a new LC (LC#2). Comments?
14:25:09 <ArtB> [ None ]
14:25:19 <darobin> +1
14:25:25 <ArtB> AB: proposed resolution: the group agrees The Widgets Interface spec is ready for LCWD publication
14:25:36 <ArtB> AB: any objections?
14:25:40 <ArtB> [ None ]
14:25:44 <ArtB> RESOLUTION: the group agrees The Widgets Interface spec is ready for LCWD publication
14:25:54 <ArtB> AB: do we want a 3-week comment period?
14:26:21 <ArtB> ... given this is LC#2, I think 3 weeks is OK
14:26:30 <ArtB> MC: ok with me
14:26:36 <ArtB> AB: any other feedback?
14:26:42 <ArtB> MH: ok with me too
14:26:53 <ArtB> AB: we will use a 3-week comment period
14:27:00 <ArtB> AB: who should we ask to review this LC?
14:27:26 <ArtB> ... Marcos, do you recall who we asked to review the 1st LC?
14:27:39 <ArtB> ACTION: barstow determine the list of reviewers for TWI LC#2
14:27:40 <trackbot> Created ACTION-452 - Determine the list of reviewers for TWI LC#2 [on Arthur Barstow - due 2009-11-19].
14:27:49 <ArtB> ACTION: barstow submit a publication request for TWI LCWD #2
14:27:49 <trackbot> Created ACTION-453 - Submit a publication request for TWI LCWD #2 [on Arthur Barstow - due 2009-11-19].
14:27:59 <ArtB> ACTION: marcos prepare TWI spec for LCWD #2 publication on Nov 24 with a comment period ending December 15
14:27:59 <trackbot> Created ACTION-454 - Prepare TWI spec for LCWD #2 publication on Nov 24 with a comment period ending December 15 [on Marcos Caceres - due 2009-11-19].
14:29:00 <ArtB> MC: can we get it published sooner
14:29:23 <ArtB> AB: oops, that's my mistake; the pub date will be Nov 17
14:29:44 <ArtB> ... and the 3-week comment period will end Dec 8
14:29:51 <ArtB> ... Thanks for catching that MC!
14:30:25 <ArtB> Topic: VM-MF spec: issues by Magus
14:30:32 <ArtB> AB: on November 2 Magnus submitted an email re viewmode issues ( http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2009OctDec/0446.html )
14:31:54 <arve> q+
14:32:03 <ArtB> AB: my comment on point #1 is that the titles for the views carry quite a bit of historical baggage
14:32:15 <ArtB> ... and thus are somewhat confusing
14:32:46 <marcin> Zakim, who's making noise
14:32:46 <Zakim> I don't understand 'who's making noise', marcin
14:32:58 <marcin> Zakim, who's making noise?
14:33:01 <arve> zakim, who is making noise?
14:33:10 <Zakim> marcin, listening for 11 seconds I heard sound from the following: Marcos (17%)
14:33:20 <Zakim> arve, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: Art_Barstow (4%)
14:33:41 <marcin> Zakim, mute me
14:33:41 <Zakim> marcin should now be muted
14:33:59 <ArtB> Arve: re point #1
14:34:04 <ArtB> ... this is a legacy issue
14:34:20 <ArtB> ... Opera's initial impl only supported one mode
14:34:28 <Benoit> Benoit has joined #wam
14:35:07 <ArtB> AB: would you please Arve, respond to point #1 on the mail list?
14:35:11 <ArtB> Arve: yes, will do
14:35:25 <ArtB> ACTION Arve respond to point #1 in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2009OctDec/0446.html
14:35:26 <trackbot> Created ACTION-455 - Respond to point #1 in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2009OctDec/0446.html [on Arve Bersvendsen - due 2009-11-19].
14:35:27 <marcin> Zakim, unmute me
14:35:27 <Zakim> marcin should no longer be muted
14:35:32 <arve> zakim, mute me
14:35:32 <Zakim> arve should now be muted
14:35:59 <ArtB> AB: re point #2, is that in scope for VM-I spec?
14:36:02 <ArtB> MH: yes, it is
14:36:06 <marcin> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2009OctDec/0047.html
14:36:07 <arve> zakim, unmute me
14:36:07 <Zakim> arve should no longer be muted
14:36:09 <ArtB> ... I submitted an email about this
14:36:32 <Marcos> Zakim, mute arve
14:36:32 <Zakim> arve should now be muted
14:36:35 <ArtB> MH: we need to discuss what the view modes mean
14:37:09 <ArtB> ... in my email I deteremined quite a large number of possible values
14:37:32 <ArtB> ... I agree "all" could be removed
14:37:43 <ArtB> ... it is the same as not specifying any
14:38:14 <Marcos> +q
14:38:22 <Marcos> -q
14:38:36 <Marcos> Zakim, unmute arve 
14:38:36 <Zakim> arve should no longer be muted
14:38:50 <ArtB> AB: re point #3, Marcos responded but Magnus did not reply
14:39:08 <ArtB> Arve: re point #2, the VM spec doesn't include any sec considerations
14:39:39 <ArtB> ... and that's a bug, especially for full screen
14:39:47 <drogersuk> David here
14:39:54 <drogersuk> I proposed some security considerations
14:39:54 <ArtB> AB: we will discuss VM-MF sec concerns next week
14:40:05 <drogersuk> I'm here - happy to discuss now
14:40:11 <drogersuk> can't join the call though
14:40:24 <ArtB> david - can you join the call next week?
14:40:40 <ArtB> I'd rather discuss this when we can talk about it. OK?
14:40:42 <drogersuk> yes but I'd prefer we agree this now
14:40:58 <drogersuk> I put it into the F2F and that was over a week ago
14:41:01 <ArtB> we decided at the beginning of the week to not include this today
14:41:06 <drogersuk> Why?
14:41:33 <ArtB> because "I'd rather discuss this when we can talk about it."
14:41:44 <drogersuk> ok, let me leave the meeting and join the call
14:41:47 <drogersuk> let's do it now
14:41:56 <ArtB> Arve: I will respond to Magnus mail
14:42:00 <ArtB> AB: OK
14:42:14 <ArtB> Topic: VM-MF spec: more precision on full screen
14:42:17 <Zakim> + +7.771.83.aacc
14:42:25 <ArtB> AB: an old thread was re-started about the viewmodes, in particular the full screen mode ( http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2009OctDec/0541.html ). Marcos, Robin?
14:42:33 <Marcos> zakim, mute Arve
14:42:33 <Zakim> arve should now be muted
14:42:52 <ArtB> AB: where do we stand on this?
14:42:56 <drogersuk> present+ David_Rogers
14:43:04 <ArtB> MC: I think we agree we need to define base semantics to each mode
14:43:31 <ArtB> ... with each mode there are some potential security implications
14:43:52 <ArtB> ... our discussion was about to what level of detail the modes must be defined
14:44:36 <ArtB> RB: nothing else to add; agree with Marcos' summary
14:45:00 <ArtB> AB: have we captured all of the relevant properties?
14:45:11 <ArtB> ... is the set of properties complete?
14:45:28 <ArtB> MH: we may have some issues with full screen and the properties
14:45:36 <marcin> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2009OctDec/0047.html
14:46:53 <ArtB> MH: we may need another property
14:47:58 <ArtB> ... we have one media feature now but maybe we need more than one
14:48:55 <ArtB> ... otherwise, we may have some border cases that aren't defined
14:49:16 <ArtB> MC: at the f2f I proposed a viewport media rul
14:49:25 <ArtB> s/media rul/media rule/
14:49:37 <ArtB> ... I need to formalize that proposal
14:49:51 <ArtB> ... I don't understand the interactivity proposal
14:50:03 <marcin> arve, probably yes
14:50:39 <arve> q+
14:50:57 <Marcos> zakim, unmute arve 
14:50:57 <Zakim> arve should no longer be muted
14:51:29 <ArtB> Arve: re interactivity, either the media is interactive or not (e.g. print or screen)
14:51:54 <ArtB> ... think we should ask AnneVK
14:52:01 <drogersuk> q+
14:52:06 <ArtB> ... not sure how to specify this or if we should specify it
14:52:48 <ArtB> AB: can you Arve chat with Anne about this?
14:52:53 <ArtB> Arve: yes, ok
14:52:55 <arve> Zakim, mute me
14:52:55 <Zakim> arve should now be muted
14:53:55 <ArtB> AB: so there is an open action for all to continue discussions and for Marcin to drive toward closure on the open issues
14:54:08 <ArtB> MH: yes, and I will start by removing all to align with P&C
14:54:21 <ArtB> Topic: VM-MF spec: security considerations by Davi
14:54:26 <Marcos> d
14:54:47 <ArtB> AB: View modes security considerations; David Rogers (2-Nov)  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2009OctDec/0438.html
14:55:04 <ArtB> AB: David?
14:55:32 <ArtB> DR: this is an input for the VM-MF spec
14:55:49 <ArtB> MH: I can add this info
14:56:12 <ArtB> DR: I presented it at the f2
14:56:22 <ArtB> ... not clear why we need to wait for ratification
14:56:59 <ArtB> AB: the general process is if there is no discussion on an input then we add it to the agenda
14:57:13 <ArtB> MC: have you looked at the sec consids in the P&C spec?
14:57:28 <ArtB> DR: yes; tried to align it with what is in the P&C spec
14:57:56 <ArtB> ... understand we want a sec consids section per spec
14:58:01 <Marcos> http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets/#media-type-registration-for-applicationw
14:58:26 <ArtB> MC: we had to do it for P&C because of the IETF req for that info be in the P&C for the MT reg
14:58:42 <ArtB> DR: I will need to look at it
14:59:05 <ArtB> MC: the deadline is Nov 19
14:59:11 <ArtB> ... for P&C LC#3 comments
14:59:44 <ArtB> DR: does anyone object to my input?
14:59:50 <ArtB> MC: we have no objections
14:59:58 <ArtB> ... think we need considerations per view mode
15:00:16 <ArtB> ... i.e. "these are the sec consids" for fullscreen, etc.
15:00:23 <ArtB> ... we can build on your input
15:00:44 <ArtB> DR: I'm happy if the Editor will add my input
15:00:46 <Zakim> - +7.771.83.aacc
15:01:00 <ArtB> AB: anything else on this topic?
15:01:17 <ArtB> Topic: WARP spec: IRI normalization
15:01:27 <ArtB> AB: on November 2, Dom submitted two comments re the WARP spec ( http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2009OctDec/0442.html and (  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2009OctDec/0443.html ). 
15:02:02 <ArtB> AB: any feedback on Dom's comments?
15:02:43 <ArtB> ACTION darobin respond to Dom's two comments about WARP submitted on Nov 2
15:02:44 <trackbot> Created ACTION-456 - Respond to Dom's two comments about WARP submitted on Nov 2 [on Robin Berjon - due 2009-11-19].
15:03:15 <ArtB> MC: are there any updates to WARP spec?
15:03:22 <ArtB> RB: not since TPAC
15:03:46 <ArtB> MC: when will it be ready for review?
15:03:53 <ArtB> RB: please review ASAP
15:04:20 <ArtB> AB: last week I sent out a call for comments
15:04:36 <ArtB> ... we can set aside a big chunk of time on Nov 19 for WARP if needed
15:04:43 <ArtB> Topic: WARP spec: comments from Bryan
15:04:50 <ArtB> AB: on November 2, Bryan submitted some comments re WARP ( http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2009OctDec/0437.html ). Marcos and Bryan have been going back and forth on this.
15:05:05 <Benoit_> Benoit_ has joined #wam
15:05:20 <ArtB> AB: without Bryan here, not sure we should deep dive on this
15:05:26 <ArtB> MC: Marcin also responded
15:05:31 <ArtB> MH: yes, I did
15:05:40 <ArtB> MC: would be good if Robin also responded
15:05:50 <ArtB> RB: yes, I'll get to that
15:06:01 <ArtB> AB: let's skip this topic for today ...
15:06:09 <ArtB> Topic: WARP spec: local addresses and UPnP
15:06:16 <ArtB> AB: on November 2, Marcin submitted some comments comments re WARP and local addressees and UPnP ( http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2009OctDec/0456.html )
15:07:13 <ArtB> MH: we talked about UPnP a bit during last week's f2f meeting
15:07:46 <ArtB> ... we may want to add some additional support for local hosts
15:07:55 <ArtB> ... support private IP ranges
15:08:17 <ArtB> ... local nets with IPv6 can be problematic
15:08:52 <ArtB> ... IPv6 provides a means to know if an address is local
15:09:09 <ArtB> ... want to make the spec future-proof
15:09:30 <MikeSmith> MikeSmith has joined #wam
15:09:38 <arve> zakim, unmute
15:09:38 <Zakim> I don't understand 'unmute', arve
15:09:41 <arve> zakim, unmute me
15:09:41 <Zakim> arve should no longer be muted
15:09:50 <ArtB> AB: who can we ask to review this proposal?
15:09:56 <ArtB> MH: perhaps some IETF people
15:10:25 <ArtB> Arve: I think we need an agreement within the group before talking to IETF
15:10:45 <ArtB> ... I need some time to understand MH's proposal
15:11:10 <ArtB> AB: can you get some comments within 1 week Arve?
15:11:14 <ArtB> Arve: yes
15:11:18 <arve> zakim, mute me
15:11:18 <Zakim> arve should now be muted
15:11:51 <ArtB> AB: all should send comments to the list
15:11:59 <ArtB> ... if needed, we can discuss this next week
15:12:16 <ArtB> AB: anything else on this topic?
15:12:18 <ArtB> [ No ]
15:12:31 <ArtB> Topic: URI Scheme spec: LC comment processing
15:12:37 <ArtB> AB: the LC comment period for the 8-Oct-2009 URI Scheme LC ( http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD-widgets-uri-20091008/ ) ended on November 10. I believe there was only one comment. Robin, what's the plan for responding?
15:13:08 <ArtB> RB: yes, just the one comment from Larry Masinter
15:13:25 <ArtB> ... I haven't yet responded to him but will do so
15:13:33 <ArtB> ACTION: barstow create a Comment Tracking Doc for the 8-Oct-2009 Widget URI LC
15:13:33 <trackbot> Created ACTION-457 - Create a Comment Tracking Doc for the 8-Oct-2009 Widget URI LC [on Arthur Barstow - due 2009-11-19].
15:14:10 <ArtB> AB: after Robin replies to LM, please follow-up if you have additional comments
15:14:31 <ArtB> Topic: AOB
15:14:37 <ArtB> AB: I don't have anything for today. Does anyone have any AOB for today?
15:14:50 <ArtB> [ No ]
15:14:52 <ArtB> AB: meeting adjourned
15:15:05 <Zakim> -darobin
15:15:06 <ArtB> RRSAgent, make minutes
15:15:06 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/11/12-wam-minutes.html ArtB
15:15:07 <Zakim> -Marcos
15:15:11 <Zakim> -Art_Barstow
15:15:22 <Zakim> -marcin
15:15:44 <MoZ> MoZ has joined #wam
15:20:24 <Zakim> disconnecting the lone participant, arve, in IA_WebApps(Widgets)9:00AM
15:20:25 <Zakim> IA_WebApps(Widgets)9:00AM has ended
15:20:26 <Zakim> Attendees were Art_Barstow, +49.163.829.aaaa, marcin, Marcos, arve, darobin, +7.771.83.aacc
15:22:33 <ArtB> zakim, bye
15:22:33 <Zakim> Zakim has left #wam
15:22:37 <ArtB> rrsagent, bye
15:22:37 <RRSAgent> I see 5 open action items saved in http://www.w3.org/2009/11/12-wam-actions.rdf :
15:22:37 <RRSAgent> ACTION: barstow schedule a Director's Call for P&C CR #2 [1]
15:22:37 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/11/12-wam-irc#T14-17-06
15:22:37 <RRSAgent> ACTION: barstow determine the list of reviewers for TWI LC#2 [2]
15:22:37 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/11/12-wam-irc#T14-27-39
15:22:37 <RRSAgent> ACTION: barstow submit a publication request for TWI LCWD #2 [3]
15:22:37 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/11/12-wam-irc#T14-27-49
15:22:37 <RRSAgent> ACTION: marcos prepare TWI spec for LCWD #2 publication on Nov 24 with a comment period ending December 15 [4]
15:22:37 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/11/12-wam-irc#T14-27-59
15:22:37 <RRSAgent> ACTION: barstow create a Comment Tracking Doc for the 8-Oct-2009 Widget URI LC [5]
15:22:37 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/11/12-wam-irc#T15-13-33