00:11:13 silvia has joined #video 01:09:07 cardona507 has joined #video 01:10:49 silvia has changed the topic to: TPAC 09 HTML Working Group "HTML5 Video" breakout group, meeting FRI 10am, topics: http://bit.ly/4fMyto 01:47:32 silvia has joined #video 05:24:08 silvia has joined #video 06:07:31 cardona507 has joined #video 06:27:02 cardona507 has joined #video 06:37:07 cardona507 has joined #video 08:49:27 philip_ has joined #video 10:16:14 foolip has joined #video 18:11:11 RRSAgent has joined #video 18:11:11 logging to http://www.w3.org/2009/11/06-video-irc 18:11:19 mth has joined #video 18:11:21 frankolivier has joined #video 18:11:23 glenng has joined #video 18:11:31 silvia has changed the topic to: TPAC 09 HTML Working Group "HTML5 Video" breakout group, meeting FRI 10am, topics: http://bit.ly/3sHMcT 18:11:35 MikeSmith has joined #video 18:11:37 cyns has joined #video 18:11:55 Eliot_Graff has joined #video 18:11:58 JF has joined #video 18:12:08 scribenick: timeless 18:12:11 chaals has joined #video 18:12:14 scribe: timeless 18:12:15 SCain has joined #video 18:12:43 Topic: Video 18:12:46 Sylvia: ... 18:12:52 Topic: Video Breakout Session 18:13:05 Sylvia: What we're going to do is go through this document from top to bottom 18:13:07 meeting: HTML WG face to face, Santa Clara - video session 18:13:15 http://esw.w3.org/topic/HTML/MultimediaAccessibilty/TPACSession#head-791e3205ef073305f38ecb15244f822545c6c051 18:13:16 ... 18:13:17 Bryan_Sullivan has joined #video 18:13:24 ... let's start with baseline codecs 18:13:30 Carlos Cardona: 18:13:41 Carlos Cardona: ... I was wondering what the intention was 18:13:51 adrianba has joined #video 18:13:52 Sylvia: I think the right person is hiding 18:13:59 Dave Singer: from apple 18:14:16 ... I think the general consensus is we want a guaranteed fallback 18:14:25 ... unfortunately it's been a one on one discussion 18:14:30 glenn has joined #video 18:14:46 ... we want something that's easy to deploy 18:14:50 ... for mobile terminals 18:14:58 ... we want to address royalty free IPR 18:15:11 ... generally, we're looking for something a little boring 18:15:16 ... i'm continuing to work with other companies 18:15:29 ... and trying to convince them that there's value working with us 18:15:35 ... i've seen movement 18:15:37 ... but it's slow 18:15:56 ... sam asked, what process do we propose to how we're going to resolve this issue 18:16:02 ... it's really frustrating 18:16:17 ... i'm as frustrated as everyone else in this room 18:16:19 ... given the source fallback capability 18:16:24 ... i think we're looking for the final fallback 18:16:29 kohei has joined #video 18:16:33 ... you can put your preferred format 18:16:40 ... but then you can put the fallback codec 18:16:41 kford has joined #video 18:16:59 plh: is it worth spending our time on a codec 18:17:20 ... that we know is only going to satisfy some portion of the audience 18:17:29 dsinger: I think it's very important 18:17:46 ... and there's a large portion of the world who is just wants something that works 18:17:49 Adrian Baker: microsoft 18:17:55 ... I agree with everything David said 18:18:04 s/Baker/Bateman/ 18:18:08 ... the only thing i question is whether it's feasible to describe a process 18:18:15 Adrian Bateman: ... 18:18:21 q? 18:18:31 ... that goes about doing this 18:18:38 ... given that it really involves one to one discussion 18:18:51 ... the only way to have a process is when you have multiple options 18:18:56 Sylvia: ... 18:19:04 ... to talk about a process 18:19:12 ... would be putting back a call for proposals 18:19:19 ... for things which satisfy all requirements 18:19:25 ... i'm not sure it's really workable 18:19:32 MichaelC has joined #video 18:19:43 ... i'm sure that behind closed doors, there's another ... that's being proposed 18:19:46 plh: about process 18:19:56 ... i'm not going to create a group 18:20:04 ... unless i know people will join the group 18:20:15 ... and if the group of people who would join the group 18:20:22 ... is different from the group of people in html5 18:20:33 ... then i'm not sure if there's a point 18:20:41 ... the amount of resources to create an open call 18:20:50 ... from the w3c is very significant 18:20:59 ... including closing it 18:21:04 syliva: hearing that 18:21:11 ... it would have to come out of the html5 group? 18:21:27 David: I think you don't want to issue a question for which you don't want to hear the answer 18:21:35 Carlos: ... 18:21:41 ... if we do find a codec, moving forward 18:21:53 ... do we still intend to keep the element that descends from