IRC log of rdfa on 2009-11-05
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 15:43:19 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #rdfa
- 15:43:19 [RRSAgent]
- logging to http://www.w3.org/2009/11/05-rdfa-irc
- 15:43:24 [manu]
- zakim, this will be rdfa
- 15:43:24 [Zakim]
- ok, manu; I see SW_SWD(RDFa)11:00AM scheduled to start in 17 minutes
- 15:43:49 [manu]
- Scribe: manu
- 15:44:07 [manu]
- Present: Manu_Sporny, Ben_Adida, Mark_Birbeck, Ivan_Herman
- 15:44:12 [manu]
- Regrets: Steven_Pemberton
- 15:44:17 [manu]
- Present+ Shane_McCarron
- 15:44:45 [manu]
- Meeting: RDFa in XHTML Task Force
- 15:44:57 [manu]
- Chair: Ben_Adida
- 15:45:34 [manu]
- rrsagent, make log public
- 15:45:38 [manu]
- rrsagent, draft minutes
- 15:45:38 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/11/05-rdfa-minutes.html manu
- 15:57:06 [ShaneM]
- ShaneM has joined #rdfa
- 15:57:38 [Zakim]
- SW_SWD(RDFa)11:00AM has now started
- 15:57:46 [Zakim]
- +shadi
- 15:57:51 [manu]
- zakim, I am shadi
- 15:57:51 [Zakim]
- ok, manu, I now associate you with shadi
- 15:57:58 [manu]
- zakim, shadi is manu
- 15:57:58 [Zakim]
- +manu; got it
- 15:58:03 [Zakim]
- +ShaneM
- 16:00:21 [ivan]
- zakim, code?
- 16:00:21 [Zakim]
- the conference code is 7332 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 tel:+33.4.89.06.34.99 tel:+44.117.370.6152), ivan
- 16:00:45 [Zakim]
- +Ivan
- 16:06:31 [manu]
- Topic: Action Items
- 16:06:36 [manu]
- ACTION: Manu to aggressively push review of test cases via mailing list [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/10/29-rdfa-minutes.html#action08]
- 16:06:43 [manu]
- -- continue
- 16:07:00 [manu]
- Manu: Sent out overview
- 16:08:01 [manu]
- Manu: Asked 3 new test cases to be reviewed.
- 16:08:09 [manu]
- ACTION: Manu to try and find other interested parties in RDFa WG. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/10/22-rdfa-minutes.html#action08]
- 16:08:12 [manu]
- -- continues
- 16:08:51 [benadida]
- benadida has joined #rdfa
- 16:08:51 [manu]
- ACTION: Ben to finish authoring RDFa WG charter. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/10/22-rdfa-minutes.html#action07]
- 16:08:54 [manu]
- -- continues
- 16:08:57 [benadida]
- hey folks
- 16:09:15 [manu]
- ACTION: Manu speak with Andy Seaborne about SPARQL.org implementation re: c14n [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/10/15-rdfa-minutes.html#action06]
- 16:09:32 [benadida]
- I'm having a bit of a child care "crisis" this morning, I have to send regrets, too, sorry for the last minute.
- 16:09:34 [manu]
- -- done
- 16:10:38 [manu]
- ok Ben, we'll continue the telecon without you, hope your crisis becomes "solved" soon.
- 16:11:05 [benadida]
- yeah it's not horrendously serious, just requires my attention.
- 16:11:07 [benadida]
- thanks.
- 16:11:34 [manu]
- Manu: Do have more thoughts on RDFa WG, Ivan?
- 16:12:09 [manu]
- Ivan: We need more W3C members.
- 16:12:51 [manu]
- Ivan: Currently in talks with a number of people offline - we seem to be in good shape.
- 16:13:50 [manu]
- Ivan: If we have 2 large search companies and a number of other smaller companies (all W3C members) we're fine.
- 16:14:55 [manu]
- rrsagent, drop action 4
- 16:15:32 [manu]
- Ivan: We should expect questions that are raised regarding why RDFa is a separate group from Semantic Web.
- 16:16:02 [manu]
- ACTION: Manu speak with Andy Seaborne about SPARQL.org implementation re: c14n [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/10/15-rdfa-minutes.html#action06]
- 16:16:19 [manu]
- -- done
- 16:16:32 [manu]
- Manu: Jeremy Carroll said that this is a bug in Jena/SPARQL.org
- 16:16:40 [manu]
- Manu: Andy seemed to imply it was as well.
- 16:16:50 [manu]
- ACTION: Shane to look at XML spec and see if xml: is illegal in RDF/XML re: TC 142 [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/10/22-rdfa-minutes.html#action09]
- 16:16:52 [manu]
- -- continues
- 16:17:01 [manu]
- ACTION: Shane to re-draft XMLLiteral errata text [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/10/15-rdfa-minutes.html#action04]
- 16:17:29 [manu]
- -- continues
- 16:18:21 [manu]
- Topic: RDFa WG Charter
- 16:18:31 [manu]
- Ivan: I have one thing to mention re: the charter
- 16:18:53 [manu]
- Ivan: I don't think we should include the Microsoft extensibility thing as a part of the RDFa charter.
- 16:19:23 [manu]
- Ivan: What happens if the HTML5 group stops the extensibility mechanism? Our charter would be wrong.
- 16:19:46 [manu]
- Manu: Fine to remove it - we were attempting to express that we'd like to work with HTML WG on distributed extensibility.
- 16:21:33 [manu]
- Ivan: We need to remove names for W3C staff contact - wait until after a vote.
- 16:21:59 [manu]
- Manu: ok, made both changes to the charter.
- 16:22:41 [manu]
- Ivan: The other discussion we'll want to have is IG vs. WG
- 16:23:13 [manu]
- Shane: We want to publish REC track documents, so we have to be a WG.
- 16:24:17 [manu]
- Ivan: So, an open question is that RDFa 1.1 will probably apply to HTML5, so why the new WG?
- 16:25:13 [manu]
- Shane: XHTML+RDFa module has to be updated, and is work that is done independently of the HTML5 spec. That's why we need a new WG.
- 16:25:27 [manu]
- Manu: There is also an RDFa 1.1 Core spec
- 16:25:44 [manu]
- Ivan: Right, the underlying RDFa 1.1 Core spec would be independent of any language.
- 16:26:02 [manu]
- Ivan: There is MediaRSS - which is RDFa being used in a non-XML dialect.
- 16:26:14 [manu]
- Ivan: That should be a REC, and must be done by a WG, not at IG.
- 16:26:43 [manu]
- s/non-XML/non-XHTML/
- 16:27:05 [manu]
- Shane: Sure - we should have some kind of language-agnostic RDFa 1.1 Core document.
- 16:27:15 [manu]
- Shane: An evolution of the current spec could do that pretty easily.
- 16:27:23 [manu]
- Shane: The XHTML logic is restricted to 1 chapter.
- 16:27:45 [manu]
- Ivan: A little more than that - we refer to href and img, and some other HTML dependent things.
- 16:27:53 [ShaneM]
- @src too
- 16:28:26 [manu]
- Ivan: We could do a generic spec which may have an additional XHTML spec.
- 16:28:39 [manu]
- Ivan: We have to be very specific about what the WG is producing.
- 16:30:27 [manu]
- Topic: profile/vocab discussion
- 16:33:22 [manu]
- Manu: @profile is perma-thread area on HTML WG and WHAT WG.
- 16:33:34 [manu]
- Topic: RDFa DOM API
- 16:34:46 [manu]
- Manu: Two approaches - generic RDF DOM API, and a specific RDFa DOM API.
- 16:35:04 [manu]
- Ivan: We may not want to make this an HTML-specific thing.
- 16:35:41 [manu]
- Shane: I don't think there is an HTML DOM - so, we may want to do something that is XML-specific.
- 16:35:58 [manu]
- Shane: XHTML/HTML DOM was something we never wanted to do.
- 16:36:11 [manu]
- Ivan: What might be faster and easier to define would be the RDFa-specific DOM API.
- 16:36:43 [manu]
- Ivan: At ISWC2009, there was a paper on how one could extract triples from an element.
- 16:36:53 [manu]
- Ivan: The point is that there is a slightly more general issue that is coming up.
- 16:37:18 [manu]
- Ivan: How can we reconcile this: How do I get and manage RDF data from Javascript in general? Regardless of whether or not it comes from RDFa?
- 16:37:43 [manu]
- Ivan: TimBL was done in Javascript, data was extracted from all places... RDFa is just one source.
- 16:37:51 [manu]
- Ivan: it would be nice if these two things could be reconciled.
- 16:37:57 [manu]
- Ivan: Unless it becomes overcomplicated.
- 16:38:15 [ShaneM]
- s/TimBL/Tabulator/
- 16:41:31 [manu]
- Manu: So, we could use the jQuery approach - specific API for RDFa
- 16:41:41 [manu]
- Manu: Then jQuery provides the RDF query mechanism.
- 16:42:18 [manu]
- Shane: I think this could conflict with the way the HTML5 group does things.
- 16:47:19 [manu]
- Manu: If we do the jQuery approach - we could tie in a unified RDF query mechanism, regardless of the underlying data expression mechanism - Microdata, RDFa, Microformats, etc.
- 16:47:53 [manu]
- Ivan: So, are we interested in a generic API to extract data out of triple stores, regardless of where it comes from.
- 16:49:01 [manu]
- Ivan: Is that a something that the RDFa WG would like to solve?
- 16:50:30 [manu]
- Ivan: There is a clear pressure from a number of people that we need something at the triple store level... a specific RDFa API won't solve the real problem.
- 16:50:41 [manu]
- Shane: So, RDFa API is necessary, but not sufficient.
- 16:51:20 [manu]
- Ivan: Is another WG needed to provide this? Or can this be solved in the RDFa WG?
- 16:52:14 [manu]
- Ivan: What I'm interested in is the integrated triple store.
- 16:52:31 [manu]
- Ivan: From a SemWeb programmers point of view, this is what I'd want.
- 16:53:05 [manu]
- Shane: I see a couple of different things here, one of them is having triple-store access available. Via the DOM or otherwise.
- 16:53:13 [manu]
- Shane: This is an API for extracting triples from a URI.
- 16:53:55 [manu]
- Ivan: In rdflib, there is no provenance.
- 16:54:06 [manu]
- Ivan: Everything gets merged into the same bin.
- 16:54:42 [manu]
- Manu: So is it fair to say that we're talking about a TripleStore API?
- 16:54:50 [manu]
- Ivan: Yes... but these two should meet somewhere.
- 16:54:59 [manu]
- Ivan: Maybe only at an implementation level.
- 16:55:36 [manu]
- Ivan: Some have said you don't need a TripleStore API - you only need a SPARQL API.
- 16:55:54 [manu]
- Ivan: Just like you don't have an API to get SQL data, you just issue SQL commands.
- 16:59:16 [manu]
- Ivan: I think charter text should make these points very clearly.
- 16:59:33 [manu]
- ACTION: Manu to update the charter to talk about RDFa API
- 17:00:01 [manu]
- Manu: We could do TripleStore API in jquery?
- 17:00:27 [manu]
- Ivan: Maybe we want to put conditional item in there about TripleStore API
- 17:00:38 [manu]
- Ivan: Maybe we plan to have a Note on a generic TripleStore API.
- 17:01:10 [manu]
- Ivan: We would not be obligated to do TripleStore API, but we will look into the issue.
- 17:01:35 [Zakim]
- -ShaneM
- 17:01:37 [Zakim]
- -manu
- 17:01:39 [Zakim]
- -Ivan
- 17:01:39 [Zakim]
- SW_SWD(RDFa)11:00AM has ended
- 17:01:41 [Zakim]
- Attendees were manu, ShaneM, Ivan
- 17:04:05 [ivan]
- rrsagent, draft minutes
- 17:04:05 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/11/05-rdfa-minutes.html ivan
- 17:04:24 [manu]
- s/--continue/--continues/
- 17:04:28 [manu]
- rrsagent, draft minutes
- 17:04:28 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/11/05-rdfa-minutes.html manu
- 17:05:03 [manu]
- Present- Mark_Birbeck
- 17:05:16 [manu]
- Present- Ben_Adida
- 17:05:35 [manu]
- Regrets: Ben_Adida, Mark_Birbeck
- 17:05:39 [manu]
- rrsagent, draft minutes
- 17:05:39 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/11/05-rdfa-minutes.html manu
- 17:06:04 [manu]
- Regrets+ Steven_Pemberton
- 17:06:06 [manu]
- rrsagent, draft minutes
- 17:06:06 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/11/05-rdfa-minutes.html manu
- 17:06:25 [manu]
- Chair: Manu_Sporny
- 17:06:27 [manu]
- rrsagent, draft minutes
- 17:06:27 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/11/05-rdfa-minutes.html manu
- 17:07:25 [manu]
- s/\-\-continue/\-\-continues/
- 17:07:27 [manu]
- rrsagent, draft minutes
- 17:07:27 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/11/05-rdfa-minutes.html manu
- 17:07:44 [manu]
- s/Chair: Ben_Adida/Chair: Manu Sporny/
- 17:07:47 [manu]
- rrsagent, draft minutes
- 17:07:47 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/11/05-rdfa-minutes.html manu
- 17:08:41 [manu]
- turns out, HTML WG call is replaced by F2F TPAC meeting.
- 17:48:29 [manu]
- rrsagent, bye
- 17:48:29 [RRSAgent]
- I see 7 open action items saved in http://www.w3.org/2009/11/05-rdfa-actions.rdf :
- 17:48:29 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Manu to aggressively push review of test cases via mailing list [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/10/29-rdfa-minutes.html#action08] [1]
- 17:48:29 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/11/05-rdfa-irc#T16-06-36
- 17:48:29 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Manu to try and find other interested parties in RDFa WG. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/10/22-rdfa-minutes.html#action08] [2]
- 17:48:29 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/11/05-rdfa-irc#T16-08-09
- 17:48:29 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Ben to finish authoring RDFa WG charter. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/10/22-rdfa-minutes.html#action07] [3]
- 17:48:29 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/11/05-rdfa-irc#T16-08-51-1
- 17:48:29 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Manu speak with Andy Seaborne about SPARQL.org implementation re: c14n [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/10/15-rdfa-minutes.html#action06] [5]
- 17:48:29 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/11/05-rdfa-irc#T16-16-02
- 17:48:29 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Shane to look at XML spec and see if xml: is illegal in RDF/XML re: TC 142 [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/10/22-rdfa-minutes.html#action09] [6]
- 17:48:29 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/11/05-rdfa-irc#T16-16-50
- 17:48:29 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Shane to re-draft XMLLiteral errata text [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/10/15-rdfa-minutes.html#action04] [7]
- 17:48:29 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/11/05-rdfa-irc#T16-17-01
- 17:48:29 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Manu to update the charter to talk about RDFa API [8]
- 17:48:29 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/11/05-rdfa-irc#T16-59-33
- 17:48:32 [manu]
- zakim, bye
- 17:48:32 [Zakim]
- Zakim has left #rdfa