09:01:43 RRSAgent has joined #mediafrag 09:01:43 logging to http://www.w3.org/2009/10/07-mediafrag-irc 09:01:45 RRSAgent, make logs public 09:01:45 Zakim has joined #mediafrag 09:01:47 Zakim, this will be IA_MFWG 09:01:47 ok, trackbot; I see IA_MFWG()5:00AM scheduled to start now 09:01:48 Meeting: Media Fragments Working Group Teleconference 09:01:48 Date: 07 October 2009 09:01:57 zakim, code? 09:01:57 the conference code is 3724 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 tel:+33.4.89.06.34.99 tel:+44.117.370.6152), jackjansen 09:01:59 IA_MFWG()5:00AM has now started 09:02:06 +erik 09:02:25 erik has joined #mediafrag 09:02:49 +Jack_Jansen 09:03:02 +Yves 09:03:32 zakim, mute me 09:03:32 Jack_Jansen should now be muted 09:04:10 conrad has joined #mediafrag 09:04:37 +raphael 09:04:47 Zakim, code 09:04:47 I don't understand 'code', conrad 09:05:02 Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-fragment/2009Oct/0000.html 09:05:06 Chair: Erik, RFaphael 09:05:07 Zakim, code? 09:05:07 the conference code is 3724 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 tel:+33.4.89.06.34.99 tel:+44.117.370.6152), conrad 09:05:08 zakim, code? 09:05:10 the conference code is 3724 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 tel:+33.4.89.06.34.99 tel:+44.117.370.6152), jackjansen 09:05:14 Chair: Erik, Raphael 09:05:47 Present: Erik, Raphael, Jack, Yves, Conrad, Davy 09:05:55 Regrets: Silvia, Michael 09:05:59 +??P3 09:05:59 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/10/07-mediafrag-minutes.html raphael 09:06:08 Zakim, ??P3 is me 09:06:08 +conrad; got it 09:06:29 Zakim, mute me 09:06:29 conrad should now be muted 09:06:34 s/RFaphael/Raphael 09:06:37 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/10/07-mediafrag-minutes.html raphael 09:07:19 Zakim, unmute me 09:07:19 conrad should no longer be muted 09:07:49 scribenick: conrad 09:08:17 Zakim, mute me 09:08:17 conrad should now be muted 09:08:27 Topic: 1. admin 09:08:38 Last week telecon minutes: http://www.w3.org/2009/09/30-mediafrag-minutes.html 09:08:39 +1 to accept minutes 09:08:41 +1 09:08:45 +1 09:08:47 +1 09:09:10 RESOLVED: to accept the minutes of 2009-09-30 09:09:58 raphael: i have reworked the use case and req documents 09:10:30 q+ 09:10:36 Topic: 2. UC & Requirements doc 09:10:53 ACTIOn-116? 09:10:53 ACTION-116 -- Davy Van Deursen to davy And Erik to review UC & Requirements document before pub -- due 2009-10-07 -- OPEN 09:10:53 http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/tracker/actions/116 09:11:07 ACTION-105? 09:11:07 ACTION-105 -- Raphaël Troncy to address all comments and write a reply to MAWG -- due 2009-09-16 -- OPEN 09:11:07 http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/tracker/actions/105 09:11:09 ACTION-106? 09:11:09 ACTION-106 -- Raphaël Troncy to draft a paragraph explaining upfront in the document why we are doing that ... justification for the MPEG community -- due 2009-09-16 -- OPEN 09:11:09 http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/tracker/actions/106 09:11:17 close action-116 09:11:18 ACTION-116 Davy And Erik to review UC & Requirements document before pub closed 09:11:21 close action-105 09:11:21 ACTION-105 Address all comments and write a reply to MAWG closed 09:11:23 close action-106 09:11:23 ACTION-106 Draft a paragraph explaining upfront in the document why we are doing that ... justification for the MPEG community closed 09:11:49 Some unanswered questions: http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/WD-media-fragments-reqs/ 09:12:56 Zakim, unmute me 09:12:56 Jack_Jansen should no longer be muted 09:13:14 Werner suggests we don't use the term "Mask" 09:13:23 continuous view? 09:13:42 "continous part"? 09:14:23 Replace "mask" by a "single segment" 09:14:36 jackjansen, just add a statement that we don't want holes 09:14:38 Jack: we don't want holes 09:15:25 raphael: section 3.1 figure explains context, but the last row "example image track" illustrates that we can take a blob of an image, but the text doesn't consider this 09:15:42 raphael, case, eg. spatial regions of images 09:16:05 phillip suggested we specify that we also support spatial ranges 09:16:30 jack: what is the difference (from our point of view) between text and image track? 09:17:12 i think the overlapping content is the main thing 09:17:36 so for temporal addressing there can be multiple text elements which match a temporal region 09:17:46 jack: for this draft perhaps we should only specify audio+video 09:18:16 and chasing dependencies of previous text elements (ie. working out which are active now) can be more difficult than eg. video keyframes 09:18:36 q+ 09:18:38 raphael: we should publish, including these minor changes 09:18:55 zakim, ack erik 09:18:55 I see jackjansen on the speaker queue 09:19:12 jack: editorial note by silvia is a question to the reader 09:19:23 jack: editorial note by dave singer, needs to be addressed (sec 3.12)? 09:19:45 "The fallback plan needs to be clarified. We must be able to handle the way the # is already used, e.g. in YouTube, without breaking what is already working." 09:20:01 raphael: the wg. has discussed that we need to be backwards-compatible with existing implementations as much as possible 09:20:10 eg. youtube syntax, and we are still discussing what the behaviour should be 09:20:30 so is the vague phrasing of compatibility with "widely implemented solutions" enough? 09:21:59 raphael: we have already discussed that eg. the youtube way could be a different syntax we specify, with explicity hms 09:22:17 nessy has joined #mediafrag 09:22:23 jack: ok then we should add a sentence about that, and a note to suggest that parsers recognize foreign syntax and stay away from it 09:22:50 jack: so if we draft a paragraph and send it to dave, see what he thinks 09:23:14 raphael: ok, but also that is not blocking the publication of documents 09:23:22 http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/WD-media-fragments-reqs/ 09:23:36 Proposed to publish documents currently staged at http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/WD-media-fragments-reqs/ 09:23:53 +1 for publication 09:23:57 +1 09:23:58 +1 09:24:00 +1 09:24:05 +1 09:24:15 Zakim, mute me 09:24:15 Jack_Jansen should now be muted 09:24:23 +1 09:24:34 +1 09:24:54 RESOLVED: to publish documents currently staged at http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/WD-media-fragments-reqs/ 09:25:16 3. specification 09:25:22 Topic: 3. Specification 09:25:24 action-117? 09:25:24 ACTION-117 -- Raphaël Troncy to review Silvia's summary of her blogpost, i.e. the Section 3 of the spec -- due 2009-10-07 -- OPEN 09:25:24 http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/tracker/actions/117 09:26:33 raphael: no progress on 117 and 112, pending comments by silvia 09:26:38 Raphael: suggest to postpone decision on publishing this doc to next week 09:27:24 Raphael: after 117 and 112 are complete, we can think about publishing the documents, as they don't currently reflect the progress we have made 09:27:42 Topic: 4. Test Cases 09:27:46 q+ 09:27:51 all actions on test cases are pending 09:27:54 Zakim, unmute me 09:27:54 Jack_Jansen should no longer be muted 09:28:05 zakim, ack Jack 09:28:05 I see no one on the speaker queue 09:28:22 jackjansen, please notify the mailing list when spec changes are made 09:28:41 nessy: we should implement cvs commit emails etc. etc. 09:28:51 q- 09:29:06 conrad: yes, but we won't have access to the cvs management box, I don't hink 09:29:22 Yves would know if that was possible 09:29:37 I second silvia's proposal 09:30:36 usually there is a separate mailing list for cvs-commits, and a post-hook added to cvs to mail commit details to that list 09:30:43 eg. media-fragment-notifications or something like that 09:31:13 ACTION: Yves to request admins to set up a cvs notifications mailing list and notifications 09:31:13 Created ACTION-119 - Request admins to set up a cvs notifications mailing list and notifications [on Yves Lafon - due 2009-10-14]. 09:31:14 Silvia, it just meant we agree on your comment today that the spec doc is not yet ready for publication 09:31:21 ... but it is pending on my actions 09:31:38 ... when they are done, I think the missing sections will be here and the document publishable 09:31:49 Raphael: AOB? 09:32:01 Topic: 7. AOB 09:32:05 Raphael: AOB? 09:32:13 raphael: I agree :) 09:32:25 -Jack_Jansen 09:32:26 -raphael 09:32:28 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/10/07-mediafrag-minutes.html raphael 09:32:29 -Yves 09:32:31 -erik 09:32:33 -conrad 09:32:34 IA_MFWG()5:00AM has ended 09:32:35 Attendees were erik, Davy, Jack_Jansen, Yves, raphael, conrad 09:35:24 zakim, bye 09:35:24 Zakim has left #mediafrag 09:42:40 RRSAgent, bye 09:42:40 I see 1 open action item saved in http://www.w3.org/2009/10/07-mediafrag-actions.rdf : 09:42:40 ACTION: Yves to request admins to set up a cvs notifications mailing list and notifications [1] 09:42:40 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/10/07-mediafrag-irc#T09-31-13