12:00:33 RRSAgent has joined #mediaann 12:00:33 logging to http://www.w3.org/2009/09/22-mediaann-irc 12:00:35 RRSAgent, make logs public 12:00:37 Zakim, this will be MAWG 12:00:37 ok, trackbot, I see IA_MAWG()8:00AM already started 12:00:38 Meeting: Media Annotations Working Group Teleconference 12:00:38 Date: 22 September 2009 12:00:57 Zakim, ??P4 is me 12:00:57 +Hui; got it 12:01:00 +florian 12:01:19 +??P6 12:01:40 +raphael 12:01:55 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/09/22-mediaann-minutes.html raphael 12:02:18 zakim, who is here? 12:02:18 On the phone I see +46.7.61.26.aaaa, tmichel, pchampin (muted), tobias, Hui, florian, Felix (muted), raphael 12:02:21 On IRC I see RRSAgent, tmichel, Zakim, tobias, Hui, pchampin, fsasaki, florian, raphael, trackbot 12:02:33 Chair: Joakim 12:02:48 Scribe: Pierre-Antoine Champin 12:02:54 scribenick: pchampin 12:02:57 scribenick: pchampin 12:03:46 joakim has joined #mediaann 12:04:25 zakim, pick victim 12:04:25 I don't understand 'pick victim', joakim 12:04:34 zakim, pick a victim 12:04:34 Not knowing who is chairing or who scribed recently, I propose raphael 12:04:34 Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2009Sep/0041.html 12:04:49 zakim, pick a victim 12:04:49 Not knowing who is chairing or who scribed recently, I propose +46.7.61.26.aaaa 12:05:02 Thierry will scribe next week. 12:05:07 also regrets for next week by Felix 12:05:22 s/by Felix/by Felix (at a workshop)/ 12:05:30 Next meeting will be on 2009-09-29 12:05:43 veroniqueM has joined #mediaann 12:06:06 Topic: API 12:06:48 Florian: Chris has been updating Wonsuk's proposol with WebIDL 12:07:00 ... but may have had some problems with write access to the document. 12:07:02 +Chris 12:07:10 -Chris 12:08:26 +Chris 12:09:08 ... Chris had problem with defining the datatypes. 12:09:32 ... Should we use "easy" WebIDL types, or define complex datatypes. 12:10:31 Chris: still have to decide whether return types should be structured or not. 12:10:59 ... e.g. how do we identify persons or organizations (getCreator). 12:12:40 Joakim: make a proposal on which we can vote. 12:13:21 Chris: we have not reached a consensus on a concrete solution yet. 12:14:25 ACTION-155 ongoing 12:16:15 Joakim: late for the draft document. Can the editors make a proposal in the coming week? 12:16:37 s/in the coming week/by the end of the week/ 12:17:04 Chris: we can do that. 12:17:22 Joakim: please update us on the particular issues you encounter. 12:18:02 chris has joined #mediaann 12:18:20 ... Felix, do you have an opinion on the question of datatypes? 12:19:02 Felix: I would prefer easy WebIDL types. 12:19:16 Felix: but have to re-think this again properly 12:19:58 Joakim: we should take a decision soon, even if we need to backtrack later. 12:21:20 - +46.7.61.26.aaaa 12:21:29 Joakim: I have to go. Florian and Chris can discuss those issues with the rest of the group. 12:21:58 Florian: we now have a WedIDL representation of the models and properties. 12:22:19 ... Regarding the 'contributor' property, how do we represent persons or organizations. 12:22:37 ... For the moment: a string, which can be a URI. 12:22:41 ... Any better idea? 12:23:10 s/Florian: we now/Chris: we now/ 12:24:49 Pierre-Antoine: applications should be able to decide whether the string is intended to be a URI or not. 12:25:32 Chris: in WebIDL, we can fix the meaning of the string (using comments) 12:26:15 Pierre-Antoine: but in many underlying formats, you won't always have a URI, so you should be able to provide a literal string 12:26:55 Chris: depends on using simple or structured value 12:27:13 ... Do we want to be able to give first-name, last-name, etc... 12:28:35 Hui: strong type is better 12:29:19 we can define a URI type, constraining the value to be a valid URI 12:30:42 Chris: should getCreator return a URI, or a structured value with different properties ? 12:32:31 Pchampin: I think that if we decide to provie a structured value, it should be reusing existing vocabularies. 12:32:37 But your URI will point to a structured object ? 12:32:46 ... foaf:Person? 12:32:50 ... ebu:Person? 12:32:50 Chris: returning a URI shifts the problem to the application. 12:33:03 ... iptc:Person ? 12:33:06 many choices :-) 12:33:18 what about vocabularies that have no URI? 12:33:28 well, it is not clear for the moment so the URI allows all of them 12:33:29 lists of person names in thesauri 12:33:30 ... DIG35 also defines Person :-) 12:33:31 I second veronique's question 12:33:50 veroniqueM, what's their type ? 12:34:04 we are interested in the type rather than the instance 12:34:24 skos:COncept at best 12:34:40 but usually instances of 12:35:45 and how would you do to get more information about the person? 12:36:11 instances of skos:Concept 12:36:25 not skos:Concept themselves 12:37:49 +q 12:39:00 Pchampin: really to independant questions? 12:39:15 ... 1/ do we want to embed description or point to them (URI)? 12:39:35 ... 2/ do we prescrive a given vocabulary? 12:39:54 wonsuk has joined #mediaann 12:40:07 I think that with the mapping table, we list a set of possible vocabularies 12:40:16 but we should not limit the value to these 12:40:23 I'm not sure I understand what you meant veroniqueM: http://dbpedia.org/resource/Barack_Obama rdf:type skos:Concept means ... Barack Obama is a skos:Concept 12:40:43 Chris: I think we should define a minimal vocabulary for persons. 12:40:43 in that case yes 12:41:42 +wonsuk 12:42:13 Raphael: let us ask Jean-Pierre his own rationale for defining new types or resusing existing ones 12:43:59 PChampin: any one to write that mail to Jean-Pierre? :) 12:45:00 Here's a module from BONDI : http://bondi.omtp.org/1.01/apis/contact.html ; it tries to abstract the AddressBook in various mobile phones. They created detailed structure about contact. Anything we can learn from their approach? 12:45:29 Raphael: Chris could also elaborate on this. Jean-Pierre could tell us about that choice in EBU. 12:45:32 I can send this email 12:45:55 ...because this is a very interesting question, actually. 12:46:09 ACTION Tobias to ask Jean-Pierre about the rationale in EBU to redefine the notion of Person rather than reuse an existing one 12:46:09 Created ACTION-156 - Ask Jean-Pierre about the rationale in EBU to redefine the notion of Person rather than reuse an existing one [on Tobias Bürger - due 2009-09-29]. 12:47:30 Chris: a couple of existing vocabularies would fulfill our needs. 12:47:49 (xx45?, mpeg-7 probably) 12:48:31 But it would not be a good idea to have out API returning a structured value from another ontology. 12:48:49 dig35 12:49:00 s/xx45?/dig35/ 12:52:40 Raphael just explained me what the discussion was about :0 12:52:52 and I would vote for creating a ma:person 12:52:57 linked to foaf:person 12:53:04 to define things in out namesapce 12:53:15 like we did for the equivalents of dc:title etc 12:53:25 yes I agree 12:53:38 PChampin: if we use a generic structure (property-value paires), it is acceptable to populate it with properties from other ontologies 12:53:52 s/out namesapce/our namespace 12:55:03 Chris: in favour of defining a concept 12:55:03 how will we define the "things"? 12:55:18 Pchampin: me too 12:55:38 do you mean with "things" specific person-related concepts like first_name, last_name, ... 12:55:42 My approach would be to start from the use cases, model what is necessary, and no more 12:55:45 ... but do you intend to do the same for *properties* of those "secondary" concepts? 12:55:57 things probably just DOMString 12:56:11 don't try to model everything you could know about a Person if it is useless 12:56:23 I agree 12:57:06 Again, Jean Pierre has a very precised idea of what a metadata is necessary to define a Person in broadcasted TV content use case 12:57:10 ... we could start from that 12:57:23 ok 12:57:31 well, the idea is to model what is present in the Multimedia stanards, so another option is to strat from there, the same as we selected the core properties of the Media Ontology, no? 12:57:32 I agree to both of Raphael's comments. 12:57:42 -Felix 12:57:58 who wants to compare all xxx:Person ? 12:58:04 -raphael 12:58:05 -florian 12:58:07 -Hui 12:58:09 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/09/22-mediaann-minutes.html raphael 12:58:10 -Chris 12:58:14 s/stanards/standards 12:58:21 -tobias 12:58:24 I proposed more or less the same as what your typing now Veronique 12:58:31 -tmichel 12:58:37 -wonsuk 12:58:46 -pchampin 12:58:47 IA_MAWG()8:00AM has ended 12:58:48 Attendees were +46.7.61.26.aaaa, tmichel, pchampin, tobias, Hui, florian, Felix, raphael, Chris, wonsuk 12:59:02 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/09/22-mediaann-minutes.html pchampin 12:59:26 [adjourned] 12:59:29 @Raphael: I have read a comparison of the definitions of person in existing standards some years ago. perhaps I find it somewhere and will send it arounf 12:59:47 it would be useful Toby, thanks! 13:01:10 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/09/22-mediaann-minutes.html fsasaki 13:03:06 Zakim, list attendees 13:03:06 sorry, wonsuk, I don't know what conference this is 13:03:34 RRSAgent, make logs public 13:03:39 ok 13:03:44 RRSAgent, draft minutes 13:03:44 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/09/22-mediaann-minutes.html wonsuk 13:03:44 now there here 13:03:50 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/09/22-mediaann-minutes.html raphael 13:04:31 RRSAgent, bye 13:04:31 I see no action items