IRC log of xproc on 2009-09-17
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 14:59:47 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #xproc
- 14:59:47 [RRSAgent]
- logging to http://www.w3.org/2009/09/17-xproc-irc
- 14:59:48 [Norm]
- Meeting: XML Processing Model WG
- 14:59:48 [Norm]
- Date: 17 Sep 2009
- 14:59:48 [Norm]
- Agenda: http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2009/09/10-agenda
- 14:59:48 [Norm]
- Meeting: 153
- 14:59:48 [Norm]
- Chair: Norm
- 14:59:50 [Norm]
- Scribe: Norm
- 14:59:52 [Norm]
- ScribeNick: Norm
- 15:00:46 [Norm]
- Zakim, who's on the phone?
- 15:00:46 [Zakim]
- sorry, Norm, I don't know what conference this is
- 15:00:47 [Zakim]
- On IRC I see RRSAgent, Zakim, alexmilowski, PGrosso, Norm, ht
- 15:00:49 [Norm]
- Zakim, this is xproc
- 15:00:49 [Zakim]
- ok, Norm; that matches XML_PMWG()11:00AM
- 15:00:51 [PGrosso]
- Zakim, this is xproc
- 15:00:51 [Zakim]
- PGrosso, this was already XML_PMWG()11:00AM
- 15:00:52 [Norm]
- Zakim, who's on the phone?
- 15:00:53 [Zakim]
- ok, PGrosso; that matches XML_PMWG()11:00AM
- 15:00:55 [Zakim]
- On the phone I see [ArborText], Norm
- 15:01:08 [Zakim]
- +Alex_Milows
- 15:01:09 [Zakim]
- +Vojtech
- 15:01:34 [ht]
- rebooting, with you shortly
- 15:02:07 [Zakim]
- +Ht
- 15:02:34 [Norm]
- Zakim, who's on the phone?
- 15:02:34 [Zakim]
- On the phone I see PGrosso, Norm, Alex_Milows, Vojtech, Ht
- 15:02:51 [Norm]
- Present: Paul, Norm, Alex, Vojtech, Henry
- 15:02:55 [Norm]
- Regrets: Mohamed
- 15:05:32 [Norm]
- Topic: Accept this agenda?
- 15:05:32 [Norm]
- -> http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2009/09/17-agenda
- 15:05:57 [Norm]
- Accepted.
- 15:06:03 [Norm]
- Topic: Accept minutes from the previous meeting?
- 15:06:03 [Norm]
- -> http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2009/09/10-minutes
- 15:06:06 [Norm]
- Accepted.
- 15:06:12 [Norm]
- Topic: Next meeting: telcon 1 Oct 2009
- 15:06:54 [Norm]
- Vojtech gives regrets for 1 Oct.
- 15:07:14 [Norm]
- Topic: Comments on draft
- 15:07:23 [Norm]
- -> http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2008/11/cr-comments/
- 15:07:38 [Norm]
- Topic: 162 No binding for a non-primary input port
- 15:07:51 [Norm]
- Vojtech: Close this one; latest editor's draft solves this one.
- 15:08:06 [Norm]
- Topic: 163 Output port may be connected to...
- 15:08:07 [ht]
- ht has joined #xproc
- 15:08:38 [Norm]
- Vojtech: For the declared outputs, the spec outputs now says that it may be connected to the xpath context for some other step.
- 15:09:08 [Norm]
- Norm: Ok. I tried to make that clear, but failed. I'll expand on that.
- 15:09:26 [Norm]
- Norm: I'll enumerate all the cases.
- 15:09:35 [Norm]
- Vojtech: Or if you can generalize it somehow...I don't know.
- 15:11:04 [Norm]
- Vojtech: In the same section, an "output port may be connected to more than one input port."
- 15:11:17 [Norm]
- ...Could that be misleading because in a compound step it could be the output of a contained step?
- 15:11:21 [Norm]
- Norm: Uhm...maybe.
- 15:11:36 [Norm]
- Norm: Maybe "an output port may have more than one binding"?
- 15:11:53 [Norm]
- Vojtech: I'm not sure if binding is the right thing. We use both binding and being connected. I think sometimes they mean different things.
- 15:12:59 [Norm]
- Norm: I'll make an attempt to finesse this somehow.
- 15:15:06 [Norm]
- Vojtech: Is this section confusing wrt atomic and compound steps?
- 15:15:08 [Norm]
- Norm: Yes, probably.
- 15:15:44 [Norm]
- Norm: I need to fix this.
- 15:16:33 [Norm]
- Topic: 164 Bag-merge definition
- 15:17:22 [Norm]
- Vojtech explains his concern.
- 15:17:44 [Norm]
- Henry: A quick survey of the likely specs didn't turn up a good definition, which surprised me a bit.
- 15:18:06 [Norm]
- ...If "unordered collection which allows duplicates" is better...
- 15:18:21 [Norm]
- ...The problem is that any of these work, the question is which ones will work for which people.
- 15:18:45 [Norm]
- ...I can try harder to find a definition in the literature.
- 15:20:06 [Norm]
- Norm: I don't know if "unordered collection" carries the implication that duplicates are allowed or not.
- 15:20:11 [Norm]
- ...I'd be just as happy to leave it, I think.
- 15:20:29 [Norm]
- Topic: 165 Step type exports definition
- 15:22:00 [Norm]
- Some discussion of how to fix the markup
- 15:22:19 [Norm]
- Henry will edit the XML and check it back in.
- 15:24:30 [Norm]
- Topic: Publish a heartbeat document?
- 15:24:51 [Norm]
- Proposal: Publish a new CR draft to satisfy our heartbeat requirements.
- 15:24:54 [Norm]
- Accepted.
- 15:25:45 [alexmilowski]
- (time for me to go take Max to school)
- 15:25:55 [Norm]
- Topic: Default XML Processing Model
- 15:26:03 [Norm]
- Norm: Henry, anything to work on this week?
- 15:26:04 [Zakim]
- -Alex_Milows
- 15:26:10 [Norm]
- Henry: No, no progress yet.
- 15:29:25 [Zakim]
- -Ht
- 15:29:39 [ht]
- Didn't mean to hang up -- are we done?
- 15:30:13 [Norm]
- uhm
- 15:30:20 [Norm]
- I was going to reload the doc and let folks look at it
- 15:30:49 [Norm]
- Topic: Any other business?
- 15:31:02 [Norm]
- Adjourned.
- 15:31:06 [Zakim]
- -Vojtech
- 15:31:06 [Zakim]
- -Norm
- 15:31:07 [Zakim]
- XML_PMWG()11:00AM has ended
- 15:31:08 [Zakim]
- Attendees were Norm, PGrosso, Alex_Milows, Vojtech, Ht
- 15:31:10 [Norm]
- RRSAgent, set logs world-visible
- 15:31:15 [Norm]
- rrsagent draft-minutes
- 15:31:19 [PGrosso]
- PGrosso has left #xproc
- 15:31:34 [Norm]
- RRSAgent, draft minutes
- 15:31:34 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/09/17-xproc-minutes.html Norm
- 16:03:53 [alexmilowski]
- alexmilowski has left #xproc
- 16:17:23 [ht]
- Have you updated? I don't see a change yet. . .
- 17:18:49 [Zakim]
- Zakim has left #xproc