16:57:24 RRSAgent has joined #ua 16:57:24 logging to http://www.w3.org/2009/07/30-ua-irc 16:57:51 WAI_UAWG()1:00PM has now started 16:57:58 +[Microsoft] 16:58:04 rrsagent, set logs public 16:58:04 zakim, microsoft is kford 16:58:04 +kford; got it 16:58:40 +AllanJ 16:58:55 Chair: Jim Allan 16:58:56 sharper has joined #ua 16:59:15 Agenda+ Logistics (Regrets, agenda requests, comments)? 16:59:16 Agenda+ HTML 5 and UAAG review - http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/Overview.html 16:59:18 Agenda+ Review any new proposals sent to list. 16:59:41 zakim, agenda? 16:59:41 I see 5 items remaining on the agenda: 16:59:42 8. Review any new proposals sent to list. [from KFord] 16:59:45 9. Tracking user agent status [from KFord] 16:59:46 10. Logistics (Regrets, agenda requests, comments)? [from AllanJ] 16:59:47 11. HTML 5 and UAAG review - http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/Overview.html [from AllanJ] 16:59:49 12. Review any new proposals sent to list. [from AllanJ] 16:59:51 zakim agenda? 17:00:12 Eileen has joined #ua 17:00:45 zakim, code? 17:00:45 the conference code is 82941 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 tel:+33.4.89.06.34.99 tel:+44.117.370.6152), sharper 17:01:01 zakim, close item 9 17:01:01 agendum 9, Tracking user agent status, closed 17:01:02 I see 4 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is 17:01:03 8. Review any new proposals sent to list. [from KFord] 17:01:51 +??P4 17:01:54 zakim, ??P4 is sharper 17:01:54 +sharper; got it 17:02:34 + +1.617.435.aaaa 17:03:05 present: Allan_James (JA-AllanJ), Harper_Simon (SH-sharper), Ford_Kelly (KF-KFord) 17:03:07 zakim, who's here? 17:03:07 On the phone I see kford, AllanJ, sharper, +1.617.435.aaaa 17:03:08 On IRC I see Eileen, sharper, RRSAgent, KFord, AllanJ, Zakim, trackbot 17:03:25 Henny has joined #ua 17:03:25 I'm Kim 17:03:29 zakim, take up item 8 17:03:29 agendum 8. "Review any new proposals sent to list." taken up [from KFord] 17:04:05 present+ Patch_Kim (KP-Eileen) 17:04:51 zakim, close item 1 17:04:51 agendum 1, Logistics (Regrets, agenda requests, comments)?, closed 17:04:52 I see 4 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is 17:04:53 8. Review any new proposals sent to list. [from KFord] 17:04:55 zakim, close item 2 17:04:55 agendum 2, 23 Jul Survey - http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/36791/20090722/, closed 17:04:57 I see 4 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is 17:04:59 zakim, close item 3 17:04:59 8. Review any new proposals sent to list. [from KFord] 17:05:01 agendum 3, editor’s draft status - http://www.w3.org/WAI/UA/2009/ED-UAAG20-20090625/, closed 17:05:03 I see 4 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is 17:05:03 zakim, close item 4 17:05:04 8. Review any new proposals sent to list. [from KFord] 17:05:05 agendum 4, Face to face possible meeting dates, closed 17:05:06 I see 4 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is 17:05:06 zakim, close item 5 17:05:08 8. Review any new proposals sent to list. [from KFord] 17:05:09 agendum 5, Discussion of other work beyond just guideline document UAAG needs to complete, closed 17:05:10 zakim, close item 6 17:05:11 I see 4 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is 17:05:12 8. Review any new proposals sent to list. [from KFord] 17:05:13 agendum 6, Open issues and actions, closed 17:05:14 I see 4 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is 17:05:15 zakim, close item 7 17:05:16 8. Review any new proposals sent to list. [from KFord] 17:05:18 agendum 7, HTML 5 and UAAG, closed 17:05:20 I see 4 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is 17:05:22 8. Review any new proposals sent to list. [from KFord] 17:05:23 zakim, take up item 8 17:05:24 +??P6 17:05:26 agendum 8. "Review any new proposals sent to list." taken up [from KFord] 17:05:43 Greg has joined #ua 17:05:53 zakim, ??P6 is Henny 17:05:53 +Henny; got it 17:06:04 present+ Swan_Henny (HS-Henny) 17:06:24 present+ Lowney_Greg (GL-Greg) 17:06:36 scribe: Harper_Simon 17:06:36 ScribeNick: sharper 17:06:51 + +1.425.895.aabb 17:07:14 regrets: Poehlman_David (DP), Rosmaita_Gregory (GR), Spellman_Jeanne (JS-jeanne) 17:07:38 zakim, +1.425.895.aabb is Greg 17:07:38 +Greg; got it 17:07:58 UAWG: http://www.w3.org/WAI/UA/ 17:08:37 agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2009JulSep/0022.html 17:08:50 rrsagent, draft minutes 17:08:50 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/07/30-ua-minutes.html sharper 17:09:08 zakim, save agenda 17:09:14 ok, sharper, the agenda has been written to http://www.w3.org/2009/07/30-ua-agenda.rdf 17:09:15 zakim, agenda? 17:09:16 I see 4 items remaining on the agenda: 17:09:17 8. Review any new proposals sent to list. [from KFord] 17:09:18 10. Logistics (Regrets, agenda requests, comments)? [from AllanJ] 17:09:19 11. HTML 5 and UAAG review - http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/Overview.html [from AllanJ] 17:09:21 12. Review any new proposals sent to list. [from AllanJ] 17:09:34 zakim, close item 8 17:09:34 agendum 8, Review any new proposals sent to list., closed 17:09:35 I see 3 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is 17:09:37 10. Logistics (Regrets, agenda requests, comments)? [from AllanJ] 17:09:48 +Mark_Hakkinen 17:09:49 zakim, close item 10 17:09:50 agendum 10, Logistics (Regrets, agenda requests, comments)?, closed 17:09:51 I see 2 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is 17:09:52 11. HTML 5 and UAAG review - http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/Overview.html [from AllanJ] 17:10:55 zakim, take up item 12 17:10:55 agendum 12. "Review any new proposals sent to list." taken up [from AllanJ] 17:12:28 present+ Hakkinen_Mark (MH-mth) 17:12:35 rrsagent, draft minutes 17:12:35 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/07/30-ua-minutes.html sharper 17:12:36 -Mark_Hakkinen 17:13:11 +[IPcaller] 17:13:28 Proposal: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2009JulSep/0023.html 17:14:14 mth has joined #ua 17:14:18 zakim, +[IPcaller] mth 17:14:18 I don't understand '+[IPcaller] mth', sharper 17:14:40 zakim, [IPcaller] is mth 17:14:40 +mth; got it 17:16:11 MH, HS, KP: to explain the 4.7 proposal 17:16:35 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2009JulSep/0023.html 17:17:15 MH: 4.7 to encompass direct nav and structured nav, re last weeks discussion of KP proposal 17:17:26 Guideline 4.7 Provide structured and direct navigation 17:17:33 4.7.1 Structured Navigation: Forward and backward sequential navigation over important (structural and operable) elements in rendered content is provided. (Level A) 17:17:41 4.7.2 Direct navigation: direct movement to important (structural and operable) elements in rendered content is provided. (Level A). 17:17:48 4.7.3 Direct activation: direct movement to and activation of any operable elements in rendered content is provided. (Level AA) 17:18:27 4.7.4 Configure Set of Important Elements: The user has the option to configure the set of important elements for structured navigation, including by element type (e.g., headers, list items, images). (Level AAA) @@Editor's note: Review the definition of "important elements" @@ 17:18:44 4.7.5 Direct navigation and activation keystrokes are discoverable both programmatically and via perceivable labels. (Level A) 17:19:09 Background and Discussion at: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2009JulSep/0023.html 17:20:43 JA: How does this lay over on top of 4.1 is there any duplication? 17:21:23 MH: 4.1.7 - has some relationship to this - complimentary. 17:21:27 q+ 17:22:03 GL: wording etc questions 17:22:27 JA: Lets stop at 15 to the hour so we can get into the HTML5 17:22:35 ack KFord 17:23:34 KF: 4.7.3, seems like it also contains the first part of 4.7.2 - both say direct navigation, 4.7.3 with activation. 17:24:16 MH: distinction is directly nav to an active element - 4.7.3 specifically activation so nav and activate are combined in 1 key press. 17:24:47 KF: get the concept, do we need this twice, is it confusing - question for the group 17:26:12 GL: looks like 4.7.3 as written doesn't add anything, because direct commands include a key seq. a UA can comply - no different than defining say ctrl+a and Enter. 17:27:12 MH: difference is that numbers maybe a multi key sequence that would directly activate the element. 17:27:29 GL: don't disagree, but don't think this brings anything. 17:27:44 KP: I think this would work... 17:28:27 GL: nowhere do we already prohibit that kind of thing. dfn. of keyboard commands - maybe overlooks delay between strokes. 17:29:42 KP: from a keyboard point of view fewer are better, problem when you can't put strokes together. 17:29:46 JA: Example? 17:31:07 I suggest we make sure the definition of keyboard command is explicit that there can be no enforced wait in the middle of any sequence, and no having to read. 17:31:16 KP: Firefox, type number and hit enter (or not - config). If there is a wait for a keystroke sequence to resolve (say dialogue) then how do you know if there are more strokes coming to activate something else? 17:32:28 GL: address this by making sure dfn in glossary includes wording that there can be no enforced wait in the middle. 17:34:42 GL: one shouldn't need to get feedback in the middle of the stroke sequence - ie can do alt+F,O, so no wait is required but the sequence type ahead is enacted 17:36:14 If the platform doesn't provide typeahead, I would not expect the UA to add it. (If you want an accessible UA, run one on an accessible OS.) 17:36:39 JA: 4.1.4 is separate activation from action 17:36:41 But if the platform supports typeahead, the UA should support it. 17:37:49 GL: 4.7.3, not required, but included in the best practices 17:39:56 Proposal to remove 4.7.3 as separate SC, instead incorporate it into the best practices as a recommendation that the UA allow the user to avoid having to enter an extra keystroke to activate the element they are navigating to. 17:40:43 rrsagent, draft minutes 17:40:43 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/07/30-ua-minutes.html sharper 17:40:58 http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD-UAAG20-20090723/#def-configure 17:42:29 We need to clarify, does "the user has an option to" also require that the use has the option not to? 17:44:28 For example, if we say "the user has the option to be able to navigate via the keyboard", we wouldn't want that to imply that the user MUST have an option to disable keyboard navigation. 17:46:18 ISSUE: Review "the user has the option to be able to navigate via the keyboard" 17:46:18 Created ISSUE-38 - Review "the user has the option to be able to navigate via the keyboard" ; please complete additional details at http://www.w3.org/WAI/UA/tracker/issues/38/edit . 17:46:37 In 4.7.1, 1. "over" - sounds like skipping over, so change to "through" or "between" 17:47:03 GL: 4.7.1 use of word 'over'; to GL means skip 17:47:09 KP switch over to 'to' 17:47:23 - +1.617.435.aaaa 17:47:50 RESOLVED: switch over to 'to' 17:48:04 4.7 use of "important" makes it not subjective rather than objectively measurable. 17:48:08 + +1.617.435.aacc 17:50:22 ISSUE: need to work on the definition of 'important' so it can be used as an objective measure. 17:50:22 Created ISSUE-39 - Need to work on the definition of 'important' so it can be used as an objective measure. ; please complete additional details at http://www.w3.org/WAI/UA/tracker/issues/39/edit . 17:51:21 Is there any example where it's OK for the UA to not provide keyboard navigation to an enabled element? 17:51:46 3. "structural and" can you provide examples where you want to navigate to structural elements that aren't interactive? Would it be something like using tab to navigate to a group of radio buttons, and the focus is put on whichever radio button in that group last had the focus. 17:52:03 4. "operable" - we already have the terms "enabled" and "interactive" 17:52:03 JA: we need to take this to the list and thrash it out some more. 17:52:15 zakim, close item 12 17:52:15 agendum 12, Review any new proposals sent to list., closed 17:52:16 I see 1 item remaining on the agenda: 17:52:17 11. HTML 5 and UAAG review - http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/Overview.html [from AllanJ] 17:54:08 zakim, take up item 11 17:54:08 agendum 11. "HTML 5 and UAAG review - http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/Overview.html" taken up [from AllanJ] 17:56:07 SH: issues with Canvas and Video and small 17:57:06 MH: issues with Canvas and its use for UIs 18:01:15 q+ 18:01:33 MH: what is difference between UA and web-app functioning as a runtime desktop app 18:01:43 ...how is user to know? 18:01:48 ack KFord 18:02:10 (Kim) q+ 18:02:25 SH: questions about who is responsible for making an application accessible 18:03:05 KF: 508 doesn't mean that it has to be accessible - it just has to state this - and the federal purchasing office has to decide. 18:03:17 KF: 508 in revision 18:04:10 JA: Problems around provision of bespoke accessibility apis. 18:04:24 KF: all manner of HTML5 concerns. 18:05:03 KF: accessibility still expects and is tuned toward web pages - more to web applications - UI model is very different. 18:05:20 KF: so much more that must happen, no clearly defined. 18:05:34 s/no/not 18:06:51 JA: 508 distinction between web and applications is now removed, now mashed together. 18:08:35 ack Eileen 18:10:32 DHTML Style Guide Working Group http://dev.aol.com/dhtml_style_guide 18:11:13 MSDN keyboard article on keyboard design. http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms971323.aspx 18:11:15 q+ 18:11:35 Microsoft Windows 95 Keyboard Guide - http://tinyurl.com/nsbo7o 18:11:52 ack mth 18:13:52 KP: many inconsistencies with common practice keystrokes in web UI 18:14:30 MH: authors creating 'new' widgets and writing unique keyboard behavior/metaphor 18:14:44 MH: genie is out of bottle 18:15:55 KF: tree example, expect widget semantics - but not really the case in web apps. 18:16:29 KF: tool kits is where the keyboard access needs to be added. 18:18:41 JA: extensibility model in HTML5 is adhoc - adhoc solutions will bubble up with no real spec. 18:19:18 JA: We need to generate issues with HTML5 for UAs 18:22:29 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/wai-xtech/2009Jul/ 18:22:36 action: AllanJ to 'interface with PF to find out what they are doing HTML5 wise so we don't duplicate work.' 18:22:36 Sorry, couldn't find user - AllanJ 18:23:03 rrsagent, draft minutes\ 18:23:03 I'm logging. I don't understand 'draft minutes\', sharper. Try /msg RRSAgent help 18:23:08 rrsagent, draft minutes 18:23:08 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/07/30-ua-minutes.html sharper 18:23:10 MSDN keyboard article on keyboard design. http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms971323.aspxI think you can see the archives of PF mail for members at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-wai-pf/feed.rss 18:24:22 action: JA to review html5 for UA behavior 18:24:22 Created ACTION-213 - Review html5 for UA behavior [on Jim Allan - due 2009-08-06]. 18:26:36 Action: HS to review forms in HTML5 18:26:36 Created ACTION-214 - Review forms in HTML5 [on Henny Swan - due 2009-08-06]. 18:27:39 Action: KF to review user interaction in HTML5 18:27:40 Created ACTION-215 - Review user interaction in HTML5 [on Kelly Ford - due 2009-08-06]. 18:28:13 Action: MH to review video, audio, image, media in HTML5 18:28:13 Created ACTION-216 - Review video, audio, image, media in HTML5 [on Markku Hakkinen - due 2009-08-06]. 18:28:47 action sharper Section 3 structure 18:28:48 Created ACTION-217 - Section 3 structure [on Simon Harper - due 2009-08-06]. 18:30:16 action: KP to review user interaction for keyboard in HTML 5 18:30:17 Created ACTION-218 - Review user interaction for keyboard in HTML 5 [on Kimberly Patch - due 2009-08-06]. 18:31:03 rrsagent, draft minutes 18:31:03 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/07/30-ua-minutes.html sharper 18:31:35 -kford 18:31:39 -Henny 18:31:40 -Greg 18:31:40 - +1.617.435.aacc 18:31:42 -sharper 18:31:48 -mth 18:31:54 rrsagent, draft minutes 18:31:54 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/07/30-ua-minutes.html sharper 18:31:58 -AllanJ 18:32:00 WAI_UAWG()1:00PM has ended 18:32:01 Attendees were kford, AllanJ, sharper, +1.617.435.aaaa, Henny, Greg, Mark_Hakkinen, mth, +1.617.435.aacc 18:34:12 Action: SH to review Section 3 structure of HTML5 18:34:12 Sorry, amibiguous username (more than one match) - SH 18:34:12 Try using a different identifier, such as family name or username (eg. sharper, shayes) 18:34:31 Action: sharper to review Section 3 structure of HTML5 18:34:31 Created ACTION-219 - Review Section 3 structure of HTML5 [on Simon Harper - due 2009-08-06]. 18:34:43 rrsagent, draft minutes 18:34:43 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/07/30-ua-minutes.html sharper 18:35:13 zakim, please part 18:35:13 Zakim has left #ua 18:35:18 rrsagent, draft minutes 18:35:18 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/07/30-ua-minutes.html sharper 18:35:41 rrsagent, please part 18:35:41 I see 8 open action items saved in http://www.w3.org/2009/07/30-ua-actions.rdf : 18:35:41 ACTION: AllanJ to 'interface with PF to find out what they are doing HTML5 wise so we don't duplicate work.' [1] 18:35:41 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/07/30-ua-irc#T18-22-36 18:35:41 ACTION: JA to review html5 for UA behavior [2] 18:35:41 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/07/30-ua-irc#T18-24-22 18:35:41 ACTION: HS to review forms in HTML5 [3] 18:35:41 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/07/30-ua-irc#T18-26-36 18:35:41 ACTION: KF to review user interaction in HTML5 [4] 18:35:41 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/07/30-ua-irc#T18-27-39 18:35:41 ACTION: MH to review video, audio, image, media in HTML5 [5] 18:35:41 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/07/30-ua-irc#T18-28-13 18:35:41 ACTION: KP to review user interaction for keyboard in HTML 5 [6] 18:35:41 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/07/30-ua-irc#T18-30-16 18:35:41 ACTION: SH to review Section 3 structure of HTML5 [7] 18:35:41 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/07/30-ua-irc#T18-34-12 18:35:41 ACTION: sharper to review Section 3 structure of HTML5 [8] 18:35:41 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/07/30-ua-irc#T18-34-31