IRC log of sparql on 2009-07-21
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 13:54:14 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #sparql
- 13:54:14 [RRSAgent]
- logging to http://www.w3.org/2009/07/21-sparql-irc
- 13:54:23 [Zakim]
- Zakim has joined #sparql
- 13:54:35 [AxelPolleres]
- Zakim, this will be SPARQL
- 13:54:35 [Zakim]
- ok, AxelPolleres; I see SW_(SPARQL)10:00AM scheduled to start in 6 minutes
- 13:55:27 [Zakim]
- SW_(SPARQL)10:00AM has now started
- 13:55:35 [Zakim]
- + +3539149aaaa
- 13:55:45 [Zakim]
- + +7.441.173.70.aabb
- 13:55:45 [AxelPolleres]
- Zakim, aaaa is me
- 13:55:45 [Zakim]
- +AxelPolleres; got it
- 13:55:47 [Zakim]
- -AxelPolleres
- 13:55:48 [Zakim]
- +AxelPolleres
- 13:55:56 [LukeWM_]
- LukeWM_ has joined #sparql
- 13:55:56 [Zakim]
- - +7.441.173.70.aabb
- 13:55:58 [swh_]
- swh_ has joined #sparql
- 13:56:03 [Zakim]
- +john-l
- 13:56:11 [ericP]
- Zakim, please dail ericP-office
- 13:56:11 [Zakim]
- I don't understand 'please dail ericP-office', ericP
- 13:56:25 [ericP]
- Zakim, please dial ericP-office
- 13:56:26 [Zakim]
- ok, ericP; the call is being made
- 13:56:26 [Zakim]
- +EricP
- 13:56:29 [Zakim]
- + +7.441.173.70.aacc
- 13:56:55 [AxelPolleres]
- who dialed in from +7 ?
- 13:57:02 [AndyS]
- zakim, aacc is me
- 13:57:02 [Zakim]
- +AndyS; got it
- 13:57:05 [Zakim]
- + +200000aadd
- 13:57:08 [AndyS]
- It's the UK dialin
- 13:57:19 [Zakim]
- + +200000aaee
- 13:57:26 [alepas]
- Zakim, /200000aadd is me
- 13:57:26 [Zakim]
- sorry, alepas, I do not recognize a party named '/200000aadd'
- 13:57:34 [alepas]
- Zakim, +200000aadd is me
- 13:57:34 [Zakim]
- +alepas; got it
- 13:57:40 [AndyS]
- but zakim usually prints ??P foo for it. I had to try twice to get in.
- 13:58:10 [Zakim]
- - +200000aaee
- 13:58:23 [bglimm]
- bglimm has joined #SPARQL
- 13:58:53 [SimonKJ]
- SimonKJ has joined #sparql
- 13:59:05 [Zakim]
- +kasei
- 13:59:09 [kasei]
- Zakim, mute me
- 13:59:09 [Zakim]
- kasei should now be muted
- 13:59:30 [Zakim]
- + +0186528aaff
- 13:59:48 [Zakim]
- +ARonksley
- 13:59:56 [bglimm]
- Zakim, +0186528aaff
- 13:59:56 [Zakim]
- I don't understand '+0186528aaff', bglimm
- 14:00:06 [bglimm]
- Zakim, +0186528aaff is bglimm
- 14:00:06 [Zakim]
- +bglimm; got it
- 14:00:18 [SteveH]
- can we find out which line were on?
- 14:00:19 [bglimm]
- Zakim, mute me
- 14:00:19 [Zakim]
- bglimm should now be muted
- 14:00:28 [ivan]
- zakim, dial ivan-voip
- 14:00:28 [Zakim]
- ok, ivan; the call is being made
- 14:00:29 [SteveH]
- what's the code for putting your hand up
- 14:00:33 [Zakim]
- +Ivan
- 14:00:40 [LukeWM_]
- zakim, who is on the phone?
- 14:00:40 [Zakim]
- On the phone I see AxelPolleres, john-l, EricP, AndyS, alepas, kasei (muted), bglimm (muted), ARonksley, Ivan
- 14:00:42 [AxelPolleres]
- Who is ARonksley?
- 14:00:56 [Zakim]
- + +1.919.663.aagg
- 14:01:10 [kjetil_]
- kjetil_ has joined #sparql
- 14:01:20 [SteveH]
- Zakim, ARonksley is [Garlik]
- 14:01:20 [Zakim]
- +[Garlik]; got it
- 14:01:27 [SimonKJ]
- Zakim, +1.919.663.aagg is SimonKJ
- 14:01:28 [Zakim]
- +SimonKJ; got it
- 14:01:30 [SteveH]
- Zakim, [Garlik] has SteveH LukeWM_
- 14:01:30 [Zakim]
- +SteveH, LukeWM_; got it
- 14:01:31 [AxelPolleres]
- ack ARonklsey
- 14:01:34 [AxelPolleres]
- q?
- 14:01:43 [SteveH]
- q-
- 14:01:46 [SteveH]
- q=
- 14:01:51 [SteveH]
- q?
- 14:01:51 [AxelPolleres]
- q?
- 14:02:00 [SteveH]
- queue=
- 14:02:05 [bglimm]
- ack ARonksley
- 14:02:07 [SteveH]
- queue=""
- 14:02:08 [Zakim]
- +alepas.a
- 14:02:23 [AxelPolleres]
- Zakim, who is on the phone?
- 14:02:24 [Zakim]
- On the phone I see AxelPolleres, john-l, EricP, AndyS, alepas, kasei (muted), bglimm (muted), [Garlik], Ivan, SimonKJ, alepas.a
- 14:02:29 [Zakim]
- [Garlik] has SteveH, LukeWM_
- 14:02:45 [AxelPolleres]
- http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Agenda-2009-07-21
- 14:03:02 [kjetil_]
- Zakim, who is talking
- 14:03:03 [Zakim]
- I don't understand 'who is talking', kjetil_
- 14:03:11 [SteveH]
- scribenick SteveH
- 14:03:15 [kjetil_]
- Zakim, who is talking?
- 14:03:16 [AxelPolleres]
- scribe: Steve Harris
- 14:03:25 [Zakim]
- kjetil_, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: AxelPolleres (12%), alepas.a (6%), Ivan (4%)
- 14:03:37 [Zakim]
- +Chimezie_Ogbuji
- 14:03:39 [AxelPolleres]
- Zakim, alepas.a is kjetil
- 14:03:39 [Zakim]
- +kjetil; got it
- 14:03:49 [kjetil_]
- Zakim, alepas.a is me
- 14:03:49 [Zakim]
- sorry, kjetil_, I do not recognize a party named 'alepas.a'
- 14:04:38 [AxelPolleres]
- http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2009-07-14
- 14:04:45 [SteveH]
- accept last minutes?
- 14:04:53 [AxelPolleres]
- PROPOSED: accept minutes http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2009-07-14
- 14:05:11 [AxelPolleres]
- RESOLVED: accept minutes http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2009-07-14
- 14:05:35 [Prateek]
- Prateek has joined #sparql
- 14:05:53 [SteveH]
- ericP to scribe next week, but at risk for next 2 meetings
- 14:06:11 [kjetil_]
- Zakim: mute me
- 14:06:23 [SteveH]
- greg to scribe is eric not available
- 14:06:32 [Zakim]
- +Prateek
- 14:07:01 [SteveH]
- phase 1 charter, finalised just now, should go next week
- 14:07:09 [SteveH]
- ivan: ^^
- 14:07:26 [SteveH]
- ivan: should take effect sept 1st
- 14:07:33 [AxelPolleres]
- q?
- 14:07:35 [ivan]
- s/next week/this week/
- 14:07:45 [SteveH]
- queue=
- 14:07:58 [SteveH]
- vacation plans
- 14:08:27 [SteveH]
- wiki page?
- 14:08:40 [SteveH]
- ACTION: AxelPolleres to setup wiki page
- 14:08:40 [trackbot]
- Sorry, couldn't find user - AxelPolleres
- 14:09:10 [SteveH]
- ACTION: Axel to setup wiki page to capture vacation times
- 14:09:10 [trackbot]
- Created ACTION-61 - Setup wiki page to capture vacation times [on Axel Polleres - due 2009-07-28].
- 14:09:25 [SteveH]
- Liassons
- 14:09:32 [chimezie]
- chimezie has joined #sparql
- 14:09:33 [SteveH]
- no news from OWL
- 14:09:35 [ericP]
- nothing from HCLS
- 14:09:46 [SteveH]
- nothing from XQuery
- 14:09:54 [SteveH]
- nothing from RIF
- 14:10:07 [chimezie]
- Zakim, mute me
- 14:10:07 [Zakim]
- Chimezie_Ogbuji should now be muted
- 14:10:09 [SteveH]
- nothing from RDB2RDF
- 14:10:21 [SteveH]
- Actions...
- 14:11:44 [SteveH]
- SPARQL Update reviews were done
- 14:12:18 [SteveH]
- ericP: I have implemented SPARUL a coulpe of times
- 14:12:32 [SteveH]
- ericP: went a bit beyond the draft, with [some stuff couldn't hear]
- 14:12:38 [AxelPolleres]
- ACTION: Eric to add review/experiences on SPARQL/update
- 14:12:38 [trackbot]
- Created ACTION-62 - Add review/experiences on SPARQL/update [on Eric Prud'hommeaux - due 2009-07-28].
- 14:13:33 [SteveH]
- kjetil_: action 58 is done
- 14:14:34 [AxelPolleres]
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2009JulSep/0061.html
- 14:15:49 [SimonKJ]
- on #60, I didn't follow up on Kjetil's mail as I thought it, and Andy's response, summarized things well and I didn't feel I could add anything
- 14:15:56 [SteveH]
- SPARQL/Update
- 14:16:07 [kjetil_]
- SimonKJ: ok, that's fine
- 14:16:28 [SteveH]
- AlexPassant: ok with the submission
- 14:16:48 [SteveH]
- AlexPassant: INSERT two forms, feels that it would be easier for the end user to only have one
- 14:17:08 [SteveH]
- AlexPassant: Add ing a MOVE keyword would be more convienient
- 14:17:23 [SteveH]
- AlexPassant: [seomthing] would be better in the protocol than the language
- 14:17:37 [AxelPolleres]
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2009JulSep/0069.html
- 14:18:06 [AlexPassant]
- s/[seomthing]/SILENT
- 14:18:16 [AxelPolleres]
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2009JulSep/0073.html
- 14:18:25 [SteveH]
- LukeWM_, no strong opinions
- 14:18:36 [SteveH]
- LukeWM_, thought INSERT/UPDATE would be better in protocol?
- 14:18:57 [SteveH]
- LukeWM_, there are a bunch of verbs no clear when you can use WHERE etc.
- 14:19:05 [SteveH]
- LukeWM_, not clear when you should use MODIFY
- 14:19:33 [SteveH]
- AxelPolleres: hoping for comments on that review
- 14:19:55 [SteveH]
- ericP: people can rework grammars
- 14:20:10 [AxelPolleres]
- Eric, pointer to grammar tool to extend change the grammar.
- 14:20:11 [SteveH]
- AndyS: is it the same one in the submissions
- 14:20:21 [SteveH]
- ericP: no, it's the same as the one in the comment
- 14:20:23 [ericP]
- all of my comments are in http://www.w3.org/Submission/2008/04/Comment
- 14:20:50 [SteveH]
- sorry, those LukeWM_,'s should be :'s
- 14:21:07 [ericP]
- http://www.w3.org/2005/01/yacker/uploads/SPARUL_EGP?lang=perl&markup=html
- 14:21:18 [ericP]
- http://www.w3.org/2005/01/yacker/uploads/SPARUL?lang=perl&markup=html
- 14:21:33 [SteveH]
- ericP, tweaked version of grammar
- 14:21:40 [SteveH]
- ericP: tweaked version of grammar
- 14:21:54 [LukeWM_]
- looks really useful, ericP
- 14:22:00 [SteveH]
- ericP: can try tweaking the grammar and see if it still works
- 14:22:34 [AxelPolleres]
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2009JulSep/0076.html
- 14:22:52 [SteveH]
- SimonKJ: transactions, good to be clear upfront that transactions are out of scope
- 14:23:11 [SteveH]
- SimonKJ: if youre a SQL dev. then INSERT+DEL is normal, but in a transaction
- 14:23:21 [AxelPolleres]
- Simon, transactions missing for intuitive way to "MOVE"
- 14:23:24 [SteveH]
- SimonKJ: having a move would let us make it atomic
- 14:23:26 [SteveH]
- q+
- 14:23:36 [SteveH]
- SimonKJ: same concerns about INSERT two forms
- 14:23:44 [SteveH]
- SimonKJ: went from not liking to neutral
- 14:24:10 [SteveH]
- SimonKJ: on UPDATE there is some wording around graphs existing or not, should eb consistent
- 14:24:21 [SteveH]
- SimonKJ: add some wording to sections that dont mention
- 14:24:35 [SteveH]
- SimonKJ: CLEAR needs some expansion, "does not remove graph"
- 14:24:38 [AxelPolleres]
- SimonKJ: What happens on updates on non-existing graphs?
- 14:24:49 [SteveH]
- SimonKJ: security seems to be out of band
- 14:25:00 [SteveH]
- SimonKJ: will be important in the protocol
- 14:25:09 [AxelPolleres]
- ack SteveH
- 14:25:18 [Zakim]
- -kjetil
- 14:26:11 [AxelPolleres]
- (steve pls summarize your comment on IRC I possible)
- 14:27:28 [kjetil_]
- kjetil_ has joined #sparql
- 14:27:38 [SteveH]
- AndyS: MOVE gives the impl. more scope to impose atomicity
- 14:27:41 [AxelPolleres]
- Andy: It is more an implementation issue how to support atomicity.
- 14:28:08 [AndyS]
- q+ to make a meta point
- 14:28:11 [Zakim]
- +[Garlik.a]
- 14:28:15 [SteveH]
- q-
- 14:28:26 [SimonKJ]
- if SteveH could comment on email we can pick up the discussion there
- 14:28:48 [AndyS]
- q-
- 14:28:55 [SteveH]
- AxelPolleres: suggest that we confirm to use SPARUL as the basis for SPARQL/Update
- 14:29:02 [ericP]
- +1
- 14:29:08 [SteveH]
- +1
- 14:29:09 [kjetil_]
- +1
- 14:29:32 [ivan]
- +1
- 14:29:39 [AxelPolleres]
- q?
- 14:29:42 [kasei]
- +1
- 14:29:42 [SteveH]
- what does "formally" mean in this case?
- 14:29:44 [AlexPassant]
- +1
- 14:29:45 [bglimm]
- +1
- 14:29:53 [AndyS]
- +1
- 14:30:00 [chimezie]
- +1
- 14:30:08 [AxelPolleres]
- PROPOSED: Base "SPARQL/Update" on the SPARQL/Update submission
- 14:30:12 [ivan]
- =1
- 14:30:14 [ivan]
- +1
- 14:30:16 [AxelPolleres]
- +1
- 14:30:36 [SteveH]
- no objections, no abstentions
- 14:30:41 [AxelPolleres]
- RESOLVED: Base "SPARQL/Update" on the SPARQL/Update submission
- 14:30:52 [AndyS]
- I think there is a significant amount of work to be done (e.g. formal model, do graphs exists at all times, MOVE, ...)
- 14:31:23 [SteveH]
- AxelPolleres: Andy has some points to raise
- 14:31:44 [AxelPolleres]
- AndyS: formal model missing
- 14:31:45 [kjetil_]
- q+
- 14:31:49 [SteveH]
- AndyS: there's no formal model of what's going on, have to create a structure
- 14:32:00 [AxelPolleres]
- ... emtpy graphs issue
- 14:32:03 [SteveH]
- AndyS: do graphs exist without triples etc.
- 14:32:07 [ivan]
- q+
- 14:32:17 [SteveH]
- AndyS: can you mix queries and updates, how do they work together
- 14:32:30 [SteveH]
- AndyS: something we would concoiusly decide not to do
- 14:32:43 [SteveH]
- AndyS: ASK in update
- 14:32:50 [AxelPolleres]
- ... can you mix queries and updates in one operation?
- 14:32:50 [SteveH]
- Subslect is maybe a better example
- 14:33:04 [SteveH]
- AxelPolleres, WHEREs?
- 14:33:23 [SteveH]
- AndyS: eg. only apply some update under these conditions
- 14:33:40 [SteveH]
- AndyS: could have an ASK to fail some request depending on result
- 14:33:57 [ericP]
- q?
- 14:34:12 [SteveH]
- AndyS: there are issues like this that need to be covered, need to be sure were solving the right problem
- 14:34:16 [AxelPolleres]
- ack kjetil
- 14:34:36 [SteveH]
- kjetil_: some of the comments, I agree with, to MODIFY verb, do we need it?
- 14:34:41 [AxelPolleres]
- (sounds like an issue to me)
- 14:34:58 [ericP]
- AndyS, do your ASK { } INSERT {... } scenarios require a super-language anyways?
- 14:35:08 [AxelPolleres]
- q?
- 14:35:24 [AndyS]
- EricP, you mean SPARQL/Scripting? :-)
- 14:35:30 [SteveH]
- ivan: wondering whether the changes we plan on the QL, what effect will they have on the update lang
- 14:35:36 [kjetil_]
- I also feel that DELETE is a bit verbose and could be simplified
- 14:35:52 [SteveH]
- ivan: project expressions etc. do they affect the update language
- 14:35:52 [AxelPolleres]
- also sounds like an issue.
- 14:35:55 [kjetil_]
- I think it is quite close to a FP WD, but Last Call is further away
- 14:36:09 [AndyS]
- +1 to kjetil_
- 14:36:14 [LukeWM_]
- q+
- 14:36:23 [AxelPolleres]
- ack ivan
- 14:36:24 [SteveH]
- ivan: difficut to put as an issue
- 14:36:43 [SteveH]
- ivan: whenever we discuss adding to query lang, whether it could affect update
- 14:36:48 [AxelPolleres]
- ack LukeWM
- 14:37:07 [SteveH]
- LukeWM_: I think ivan has a point, worried about inference, has someone else had expereince
- 14:37:28 [SteveH]
- AndyS: it ruins your post conditions, you can delete triples but still there
- 14:37:41 [SteveH]
- ivan: what's the equivalent of subquery?
- 14:38:25 [SteveH]
- AndyS: not sure which way round, "can you have subselects inside" where, and "select which has an insert inside it" or "nested inserts and deletes"
- 14:38:32 [SteveH]
- ivan: the second one
- 14:39:02 [SteveH]
- AxelPolleres: we need a draft on the table, in order to get interactions
- 14:39:16 [SteveH]
- q?
- 14:39:45 [chimezie]
- Zakim, unmute me
- 14:39:45 [Zakim]
- Chimezie_Ogbuji should no longer be muted
- 14:39:49 [SteveH]
- looking for volunteer
- 14:40:03 [SteveH]
- to summarise issues that have come up
- 14:40:25 [LukeWM_]
- +1 to wikipage
- 14:40:26 [SteveH]
- ericP: what about a wiki page
- 14:40:28 [SteveH]
- +1
- 14:41:09 [AxelPolleres]
- ACTION: start wikipage on Update issues
- 14:41:09 [trackbot]
- Sorry, couldn't find user - start
- 14:41:20 [AxelPolleres]
- ACTION: Luke to start wikipage on Update issues
- 14:41:20 [trackbot]
- Created ACTION-63 - Start wikipage on Update issues [on Luke Wilson-Mawer - due 2009-07-28].
- 14:42:09 [SteveH]
- AxelPolleres: timeline towards FPWD, in charter we'll have tight timeline, should have FPWD by end of Sept.
- 14:42:22 [SteveH]
- AxelPolleres: in next week or so should identify editors
- 14:42:39 [SteveH]
- AxelPolleres: base on update submission to draft new document
- 14:43:02 [SteveH]
- AxelPolleres: all issues in draft in next few months, need reviewers etc.
- 14:43:30 [SteveH]
- need to draft new features in sparql/query
- 14:43:33 [kjetil_]
- could we have a straw poll on HTTP REST Update?
- 14:43:40 [AxelPolleres]
- http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Template:DesignQL
- 14:43:55 [SteveH]
- AxelPolleres: template to help draft extensions
- 14:44:07 [SteveH]
- AxelPolleres: should lead to draft of sparql/query
- 14:44:24 [SteveH]
- AxelPolleres: volunteers for features
- 14:44:44 [SteveH]
- AxelPolleres: people championed features, and filed out strawman
- 14:44:56 [SteveH]
- AxelPolleres: recruit as subsection editors
- 14:45:04 [SteveH]
- AxelPolleres: do people think that's a good approach
- 14:45:16 [AxelPolleres]
- q?
- 14:45:43 [SteveH]
- might do subquery
- 14:45:49 [SteveH]
- time permitting
- 14:45:54 [AndyS]
- http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Design:SubSelect
- 14:46:30 [kjetil_]
- I hope to write test cases if we continue our W3C membership
- 14:46:33 [SteveH]
- AxelPolleres: people responsible for those sections
- 14:47:19 [SteveH]
- project expresions...
- 14:47:52 [SteveH]
- aggregates...
- 14:48:02 [SteveH]
- chimezie: I'll volunteer
- 14:48:12 [SteveH]
- first strawman in 2 weeks
- 14:48:15 [SteveH]
- negation...
- 14:48:26 [SteveH]
- AxelPolleres: lots of discussion already
- 14:48:30 [SteveH]
- AndyS: will do negation
- 14:48:39 [SteveH]
- ericP: I was about to
- 14:48:59 [SteveH]
- ericP: project exp. tied closely with subselect
- 14:49:15 [SteveH]
- ericP: it might improve my attitude
- 14:49:28 [SteveH]
- ericP to do project expressions
- 14:49:44 [SteveH]
- AxelPolleres: plan is to have draft on wiki under templates in 2 weeks
- 14:49:46 [AxelPolleres]
- q?
- 14:50:08 [AxelPolleres]
- ACTION: steve to draft subqueries in template
- 14:50:08 [trackbot]
- Created ACTION-64 - Draft subqueries in template [on Steve Harris - due 2009-07-28].
- 14:50:20 [AxelPolleres]
- ACTION: Eric to draft project expressions
- 14:50:20 [trackbot]
- Created ACTION-65 - Draft project expressions [on Eric Prud'hommeaux - due 2009-07-28].
- 14:50:31 [SteveH]
- due date is wrong
- 14:50:32 [AxelPolleres]
- ACTION: chime to draft aggregates
- 14:50:32 [trackbot]
- Created ACTION-66 - Draft aggregates [on Chimezie Ogbuji - due 2009-07-28].
- 14:50:50 [AxelPolleres]
- ACTION: Andy to draft negation
- 14:50:50 [trackbot]
- Created ACTION-67 - Draft negation [on Andy Seaborne - due 2009-07-28].
- 14:51:05 [SteveH]
- ericP: what form of negation are we talking about?
- 14:51:11 [SteveH]
- ivan: good question
- 14:51:19 [SteveH]
- AxelPolleres: that's not been decided
- 14:51:23 [chimezie]
- Zakim, mute me
- 14:51:23 [Zakim]
- Chimezie_Ogbuji should now be muted
- 14:51:28 [SteveH]
- ericP: would be decided by who drafted it
- 14:51:40 [SteveH]
- AxelPolleres: should we discuss it before we draft it out
- 14:52:15 [SteveH]
- ericP: the working group understands the two problems fairly well, still at wiki stage, until we select one we can't put it into draft
- 14:52:29 [SteveH]
- AxelPolleres: can we reach agreement on that in the time remaining
- 14:52:57 [SteveH]
- AxelPolleres: wither draft something pointing out both options, how either would work, or...
- 14:53:09 [SteveH]
- AxelPolleres: but could put on agenda for next week
- 14:53:34 [SteveH]
- ericP: I prefer to keep sketching in the place where it is now
- 14:53:41 [AxelPolleres]
- http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Template:DesignQL
- 14:53:45 [SteveH]
- AxelPolleres: actions are to put it into design templates
- 14:53:46 [Zakim]
- -[Garlik.a]
- 14:54:04 [SteveH]
- ericP: prefer not to put it there yet, better to discuss on wiki
- 14:54:20 [SteveH]
- AxelPolleres: all the drafts go into feature sketch places?
- 14:54:31 [SteveH]
- ericP: good trackability
- 14:54:49 [SteveH]
- AxelPolleres: the idea of templates is to bring into existing spec structure
- 14:55:17 [SteveH]
- AxelPolleres: seems that negation is still a bit open, maybe good discussion for next week
- 14:55:27 [SteveH]
- AndyS: what are you hoping to achieve
- 14:55:34 [SteveH]
- AxelPolleres: agreement on which way to go
- 14:55:45 [SteveH]
- AndyS: email seemed to peter out
- 14:56:16 [SteveH]
- AndyS: more support from people not dealing with theory for FILTER, waiting for discussion to complete
- 14:56:29 [SteveH]
- AxelPolleres: waiting for clarification
- 14:56:49 [SteveH]
- ericP: AndyS was going to write down algebra for FILTER, ericP was going to work out MINUS approach
- 14:56:55 [SteveH]
- q+
- 14:56:56 [AndyS]
- Andy has done that.
- 14:57:14 [SteveH]
- ericP will do algebra for FILTER approach
- 14:57:18 [AxelPolleres]
- ACTION: Eric to sketch algebra for minus.
- 14:57:18 [trackbot]
- Created ACTION-68 - Sketch algebra for minus. [on Eric Prud'hommeaux - due 2009-07-28].
- 14:57:40 [SteveH]
- AndyS: one of the important questions is are there any usecases where MINUS can express things that FILTER can't
- 14:57:47 [AxelPolleres]
- AndyS: Are ther use cases where minus can express what unsaid can't?
- 14:57:52 [SteveH]
- AndyS: what real usecases are we trying to address
- 14:58:17 [kjetil_]
- kjetil_ has joined #sparql
- 14:58:23 [SteveH]
- ericP: I hear pushback from people who like monotonic from people who like NAF
- 14:58:57 [SteveH]
- ericP: in terms of what you can express, if you do a set minus, where it's close to a relational set minus, then there are a case where !bounds have a particular effect
- 14:59:07 [AxelPolleres]
- Eric, can you point us to the email with the example?
- 14:59:10 [Zakim]
- +[Garlik.a]
- 14:59:11 [AndyS]
- q+ to ask where eric heard that
- 14:59:12 [SteveH]
- ericP: it comes down to what happens when you've got optionals that aren't bound on the outside
- 14:59:24 [SteveH]
- ericP: in the general case their identical
- 14:59:35 [AxelPolleres]
- ack SteveH
- 14:59:53 [LukeWM_]
- I can scribe for steve ...
- 15:00:02 [ivan]
- q+ a side issue for the minutes...
- 15:00:05 [AxelPolleres]
- SteveH: people who don't care about theory mostly care about theory?
- 15:00:16 [AxelPolleres]
- s/about theory/about syntax/
- 15:00:17 [ivan]
- q+ to report a side issue before he has to go
- 15:00:35 [LukeWM_]
- AndyS: can you back that up?
- 15:01:06 [kjetil_]
- q+ to ask about completion of F&R
- 15:01:28 [SteveH]
- AndyS: wanted to ask ericP where he was getting pushback from
- 15:01:37 [SteveH]
- ericP: from experience of previous WG
- 15:01:49 [SteveH]
- ericP: when we have UNSAID we had objections
- 15:01:57 [SteveH]
- AndyS but we didn't have minus at that time
- 15:02:04 [SteveH]
- AndyS: but we didn't have minus at that time
- 15:02:15 [SteveH]
- ericP: it's easier to express that to them as it's this minus that
- 15:02:25 [SteveH]
- ericP: I think it would be a more appealing algebra
- 15:02:51 [ivan]
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ac-members/2009JulSep/0013.html
- 15:02:52 [SteveH]
- AxelPolleres: ericP can you elaborate on the usecase differences
- 15:03:04 [SteveH]
- ivan: charter call has just gone out
- 15:03:04 [AxelPolleres]
- Charter call has gone out.
- 15:03:13 [SteveH]
- ivan: get your AC reps to vote
- 15:03:18 [AxelPolleres]
- q?
- 15:03:22 [ivan]
- q-
- 15:03:25 [AndyS]
- q-
- 15:03:27 [kjetil_]
- when is the deadline for voting?
- 15:03:29 [kjetil_]
- ack me
- 15:03:29 [Zakim]
- kjetil_, you wanted to ask about completion of F&R
- 15:03:39 [Zakim]
- -Ivan
- 15:03:39 [AxelPolleres]
- ack kjetil
- 15:03:41 [Zakim]
- -Chimezie_Ogbuji
- 15:03:52 [SteveH]
- kjetil_: completion of F&R
- 15:04:02 [SteveH]
- kjetil_: do we have any plan for the completion
- 15:04:08 [SteveH]
- AxelPolleres: on agenda for next time
- 15:04:25 [SteveH]
- kjetil_: I'm officialy on vacation next week, but will be there
- 15:04:35 [SteveH]
- AxelPolleres: time permitting features
- 15:05:15 [SteveH]
- AxelPolleres: will need to work independently, not spend much telecon time until we've addressed the required features
- 15:05:17 [kjetil_]
- AxelPolleres: also, would be nice to have a straw-man poll on HTTP RESTful Update :-)
- 15:05:37 [kjetil_]
- AxelPolleres, also, would be nice to have a straw-man poll on HTTP RESTful Update :-)
- 15:05:40 [SteveH]
- AxelPolleres: have a look at features and consider joining taskforces where you're interested
- 15:05:58 [SteveH]
- AxelPolleres: RESTful updates, we have to discuss
- 15:06:01 [SteveH]
- next week
- 15:06:13 [Zakim]
- -SimonKJ
- 15:06:15 [Zakim]
- -john-l
- 15:06:16 [Zakim]
- -[Garlik]
- 15:06:18 [Zakim]
- -[Garlik.a]
- 15:06:19 [Zakim]
- -alepas
- 15:06:28 [Zakim]
- -bglimm
- 15:06:51 [AndyS]
- http://jena.sourceforge.net/ARQ/service.html
- 15:07:05 [Zakim]
- -Prateek
- 15:07:40 [SteveH]
- AxelPolleres, what needs to be done to make the minutes visible?
- 15:08:07 [LukeWM]
- LukeWM has joined #sparql
- 15:10:22 [AndyS]
- SERVICE <http://sparql.org/books>
- 15:10:22 [AndyS]
- { pattern }
- 15:10:56 [AxelPolleres]
- ACTION: Axel to update deadlines of design draft actions.
- 15:10:56 [trackbot]
- Created ACTION-69 - Update deadlines of design draft actions. [on Axel Polleres - due 2009-07-28].
- 15:10:56 [AndyS]
- FETCH <http://sparql.org/booksGraph>
- 15:11:02 [ivan]
- ivan has left #sparql
- 15:11:06 [AxelPolleres]
- Zakim, list attendees
- 15:11:06 [Zakim]
- As of this point the attendees have been +3539149aaaa, +7.441.173.70.aabb, AxelPolleres, john-l, EricP, +7.441.173.70.aacc, AndyS, +200000aaee, alepas, kasei, bglimm, Ivan,
- 15:11:09 [Zakim]
- ... SimonKJ, SteveH, LukeWM_, Chimezie_Ogbuji, kjetil, Prateek, [Garlik]
- 15:11:18 [AndyS]
- FETCH ?g
- 15:11:59 [AxelPolleres]
- rrsagent, draft minutes
- 15:11:59 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/07/21-sparql-minutes.html AxelPolleres
- 15:12:07 [AndyS]
- http://seaborne.blogspot.com/2008/10/walking-web.html
- 15:12:11 [AxelPolleres]
- rrsagent, make minutes public
- 15:12:11 [RRSAgent]
- I'm logging. I don't understand 'make minutes public', AxelPolleres. Try /msg RRSAgent help
- 15:12:30 [AxelPolleres]
- rrsagent, make public minutes
- 15:12:30 [RRSAgent]
- I'm logging. I don't understand 'make public minutes ', AxelPolleres. Try /msg RRSAgent help
- 15:13:13 [AxelPolleres]
- rrsagent, make records public
- 15:14:35 [AndyS]
- zakim, who is on the phone?
- 15:14:35 [Zakim]
- On the phone I see AxelPolleres, EricP, AndyS, kasei (muted)
- 15:17:26 [AndyS]
- AndyS has joined #sparql
- 15:18:29 [AxelPolleres]
- I am running, bye
- 15:18:38 [Zakim]
- -AxelPolleres
- 15:20:16 [Zakim]
- -kasei
- 15:35:39 [Zakim]
- -AndyS
- 15:35:41 [Zakim]
- -EricP
- 15:35:41 [Zakim]
- SW_(SPARQL)10:00AM has ended
- 15:35:43 [Zakim]
- Attendees were +3539149aaaa, +7.441.173.70.aabb, AxelPolleres, john-l, EricP, +7.441.173.70.aacc, AndyS, +200000aaee, alepas, kasei, bglimm, Ivan, SimonKJ, SteveH, LukeWM_,
- 15:35:45 [Zakim]
- ... Chimezie_Ogbuji, kjetil, Prateek, [Garlik]
- 15:48:44 [AndyS]
- AndyS has joined #sparql
- 15:56:39 [iv_an_ru]
- iv_an_ru has joined #sparql
- 16:51:42 [LukeWM]
- LukeWM has joined #sparql
- 17:04:25 [iv_an_ru]
- iv_an_ru has joined #sparql
- 17:19:18 [Zakim]
- Zakim has left #sparql
- 17:31:10 [SteveH]
- SteveH has joined #sparql