15:59:11 RRSAgent has joined #soap-jms 15:59:11 logging to http://www.w3.org/2009/07/21-soap-jms-irc 15:59:12 RRSAgent, make logs public 15:59:12 Zakim has joined #soap-jms 15:59:14 Zakim, this will be SJMS 15:59:14 ok, trackbot; I see WS_SOAP-JM()12:00PM scheduled to start in 1 minute 15:59:15 Meeting: SOAP-JMS Binding Working Group Teleconference 15:59:15 Date: 21 July 2009 16:00:00 WS_SOAP-JM()12:00PM has now started 16:00:07 +Eric 16:00:28 +alewis 16:00:46 + +0196270aaaa 16:00:57 Derek has joined #soap-jms 16:01:03 Zakim, aaaa is mphillip 16:01:03 +mphillip; got it 16:01:49 +Yves 16:02:08 Phil has joined #soap-jms 16:02:08 +Phil 16:03:20 Derek - are you going to have a phone presence? 16:03:38 Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2009Jul/0009.html 16:03:57 Regrets: Peter 16:04:01 Chair: Eric 16:04:14 Topic: Appointment of the scribe 16:04:21 Scribe: Mark 16:04:29 Minutes from last call: http://www.w3.org/2009/07/14-soap-jms-minutes.html 16:04:35 Topic: Minutes 16:04:47 No revisions 16:04:54 +Derek 16:04:57 Topic: Review the agenda 16:05:09 TOPIC: Review the agenda 16:06:41 Eric: We should add an AOB item for UDDI question 16:06:44 TOPIC: Review action items 16:06:58 Actions: http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/actions/open 16:07:06 Eric: No progress on 32 16:07:20 Eric: No progress on action 92 16:07:56 s/92/91/ 16:08:14 Mark: Proposed changes for action 92 sent to mailing list 16:08:27 Derek: No progress on 68 16:08:34 close action-92 16:08:34 ACTION-92 Propose the wording for the change to split 2024 into three testable assertions closed 16:08:44 Eric: no progress on 93 16:08:58 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2009Jul/0013.html 16:09:13 Proposal for action 92 linked above 16:15:32 Rework Protocol-2021 http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/CR-soapjms-20090604/#Protocol-2021 16:15:44 Eric: Suggest a single assertion "The client must create the property according to these rules" 16:17:33 Eric: then set out the rules "The requestURI must be derived from the supplied URI by leaving the destinationName as-is, and removing the targetService and replyToName" 16:18:52 Eric: "The client SHOULD remove deliveryMode ...., MAY remove ..." etc 16:19:59 Eric: Put the rules first then have an assertion which states that the conforming client MUST follow the rules 16:23:15 Mark: Will have another go at the wording based on those comments 16:23:42 action mark to reword the protocol-2024 proposal 16:23:42 Sorry, amibiguous username (more than one match) - mark 16:23:42 Try using a different identifier, such as family name or username (eg. mhapner, mphillip) 16:24:06 action mphillip to reword the protocol-2024 proposal 16:24:06 Created ACTION-94 - to reword the protocol-2024 proposal [on Mark Phillips - due 2009-07-28]. 16:24:25 TOPIC: URI specification: 16:24:57 Eric: Have not heard from Dongbo yet 16:25:12 Mark: Still waiting for IBM counsel to approve 16:25:41 Eric: No word from Peter & Progress 16:26:00 Eric: Once we have approval I will start to push the RFC forward again 16:26:08 TOPIC: Specification changes process 16:27:22 Eric: Edits are clearly needed, but we need to track them very carefully and justify them, to avoid going back to working draft state 16:27:39 Eric: Proposed process is outlined in agenda 16:27:53 Eric: i.e. 16:27:57 Proposed process: 16:27:57 * Emails submitted on mailing list - issues should be individual: 16:27:57 http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/#issues 16:27:57 * Each item tracked in our tracker. 16:27:57 * Issues remain "open" until we have the revised text in a copy 16:27:58 of the spec, and agree to it. 16:30:26 No objection to this process 16:30:55 action Eric to Raise a tracking issue for each of the specification changes we have proposed 16:30:55 Created ACTION-95 - Raise a tracking issue for each of the specification changes we have proposed [on Eric Johnson - due 2009-07-28]. 16:31:40 TOPIC: FAQ - action item follow-up 16:31:47 Derek: No progress 16:31:56 TOPIC: FAQ - review of proposed questions 16:32:04 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2009Jul/0010.html 16:32:11 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2009Jul/0011.html 16:33:26 Eric: Proposed questions sent to list (see above ) 16:33:32 Phil: All look like good questions 16:33:41 Derek: Agreed 16:33:58 Amy: OK too 16:34:59 Mark: Asks for clarification on Eric's first question 16:36:33 Eric: One of first statements in spec is that interoperability between JMS providers is out of scope... will reword the question 16:37:44 Mark: Maybe a question about which implementations are tested 16:38:16 Eric: That will be included in an exit report as part of the specification process 16:38:24 thanks Yves :-) 16:38:54 Eric: We'll use that question to point to the record of testers & conformant impls 16:39:28 Amy: May send further questions to list 16:39:49 action Amy to formulate further FAQ questions 16:39:49 Sorry, couldn't find user - Amy 16:40:02 action alewis to formulate further FAQ questions 16:40:02 Created ACTION-96 - Formulate further FAQ questions [on Amelia Lewis - due 2009-07-28]. 16:40:08 action Derek to formulate further FAQ questions 16:40:08 Created ACTION-97 - Formulate further FAQ questions [on Derek Rokicki - due 2009-07-28]. 16:40:35 action Phil to formulate further FAQ questions 16:40:35 Created ACTION-98 - Formulate further FAQ questions [on Phil Adams - due 2009-07-28]. 16:42:02 action Eric to Edit the FAQ page to add a general structure to the Wiki 16:42:02 Created ACTION-99 - Edit the FAQ page to add a general structure to the Wiki [on Eric Johnson - due 2009-07-28]. 16:42:30 Eric: We can all edit the Wiki to answer the questions 16:42:51 Phil: Will we need any special permissions 16:43:18 http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/wiki/Main_Page 16:43:21 Yves: May need to grant appropriate access - try it first then contact Yves if access denied 16:44:03 TOPIC: Implementations - any updates? 16:44:23 Derek: What's the timeline 16:44:57 Eric: As long as it takes - we don't get to Rec until we have two implementations. IBM has one in-flight 16:45:28 Phil: IBM WebSphere has delivered an implementation which we believe to comply 16:45:54 Eric: ...and CXF are working - see mailing list for link to status page 16:46:28 Eric: Filed a bug against Apache Axis2 to update their SOAP/JMS implementation. Hope to do some work on it. 16:47:08 Eric: TIBCO is working on an implementation - possible delivery <6 months 16:47:35 TOPIC: AOB? 16:48:04 UDDI note could be an FAQ entry 16:48:35 -Phil 16:48:37 -mphillip 16:48:38 -alewis 16:48:38 -Yves 16:48:40 -Derek 16:48:40 WS_SOAP-JM()12:00PM has ended 16:48:41 Attendees were Eric, alewis, +0196270aaaa, mphillip, Yves, Phil, Derek 16:52:59 trackbot, generate minutes 16:52:59 Sorry, eric, I don't understand 'trackbot, generate minutes'. Please refer to http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/irc for help 16:53:44 zakim, generate minutes 16:53:44 I don't understand 'generate minutes', eric 16:54:54 rrsagent, generate minutes 16:54:54 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/07/21-soap-jms-minutes.html eric 16:56:00 thanks eric, was just trying to find that in my notes! 16:56:04 mphillip has left #soap-jms 16:56:16 mphillip has joined #soap-jms 16:59:14 eric has left #soap-jms 18:54:46 Zakim has left #soap-jms