IRC log of au on 2009-07-20
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 19:49:08 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #au
- 19:49:09 [RRSAgent]
- logging to http://www.w3.org/2009/07/20-au-irc
- 19:49:15 [Jan]
- Zakim, this will be AUWG
- 19:49:15 [Zakim]
- ok, Jan; I see WAI_AUWG()3:00PM scheduled to start 49 minutes ago
- 19:49:20 [Jan]
- Meeting: WAI AU
- 19:50:28 [Jan]
- Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/2009JulSep/0010.html
- 19:50:41 [Jan]
- Regrets: Ann M.
- 19:58:38 [jeanne]
- jeanne has joined #au
- 19:59:47 [Zakim]
- WAI_AUWG()3:00PM has now started
- 19:59:54 [Zakim]
- +Jeanne
- 20:00:26 [Zakim]
- +??P1
- 20:02:07 [Jan]
- zakim, ??P1 is really Jan
- 20:02:07 [Zakim]
- +Jan; got it
- 20:02:52 [Zakim]
- +Tim_Boland
- 20:03:33 [Zakim]
- +[IPcaller]
- 20:04:10 [Jan]
- zakim, [IPcaller] is really Jutta
- 20:04:10 [Zakim]
- +Jutta; got it
- 20:04:15 [Zakim]
- +Greg_Pisocky
- 20:04:51 [ARonksley]
- ARonksley has joined #au
- 20:04:56 [Greg]
- Greg has joined #au
- 20:05:07 [Jan]
- CHair: Jutta Treviranus
- 20:05:11 [Jan]
- Chair: Jutta Treviranus
- 20:06:48 [Zakim]
- +Joshue
- 20:07:15 [Greg]
- Greg can scribe
- 20:07:42 [Jan]
- zakim, Joshue is really ARonksley
- 20:07:42 [Zakim]
- +ARonksley; got it
- 20:07:48 [Jan]
- Scribe: Greg
- 20:08:17 [Jan]
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/2009JulSep/0010.html
- 20:08:48 [Jan]
- Topic: Real-time publishing Note
- 20:09:16 [jtrevir]
- jtrevir has joined #au
- 20:09:21 [Jan]
- New editors draft: http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/2009/ED-ATAG20-20090717/
- 20:09:37 [Greg]
- First item on agenda, take a look at Real Time publishing Note on the new editors draft
- 20:09:37 [Jan]
- Real-time publishing: ATAG 2.0 applies to authoring tools with workflows that involve real-time publishing of web content (e.g., some collaborative tools). For these authoring tools, conformance to Part B of ATAG 2.0 may involve some combination of real-time accessibility supports and additional accessibility supports available after the real-time authoring session (e.g., the ability to add...
- 20:09:39 [Jan]
- ...captions for audio that was initially published in real-time). For more information, see the Techniques - Appendix E: Real-time content production.
- 20:10:48 [Greg]
- JR: Used to say real time authoring tools did not have to look at B, just A. This was considered a loophole, so here is the reworked content.
- 20:14:09 [Zakim]
- -Jutta
- 20:14:32 [Zakim]
- +??P5
- 20:15:00 [Jan]
- zakim, ??P5 is really Jutta
- 20:15:00 [Zakim]
- +Jutta; got it
- 20:16:22 [Greg]
- JS: Any problem addressing real time issues in Part A?
- 20:16:42 [Greg]
- JR: Then agreed, the issue is Part B
- 20:17:31 [Greg]
- JS above should be JR
- 20:18:58 [Jan]
- Resolution: To use wording: Real-time publishing: ATAG 2.0 applies to authoring tools with workflows that involve real-time publishing of web content (e.g., some collaborative tools). For these authoring tools, conformance to Part B of ATAG 2.0 may involve some combination of real-time accessibility supports and additional accessibility supports available after the real-time authoring...
- 20:19:00 [Jan]
- ...session (e.g., the ability to add captions for audio that was initially published in real-time). For more information, see the Techniques - Appendix E: Real-time content production.
- 20:19:16 [Jan]
- Topic: Conformance Claim section
- 20:20:27 [Jan]
- JR: Required Components of an ATAG 2.0 Conformance Claim...
- 20:25:51 [Jan]
- All: Claimant name and affiliation.: No objections.
- 20:26:06 [Jan]
- All: Conformance level satisfied.: No objections.
- 20:26:21 [Jan]
- All: Authoring tool information:: No objections.
- 20:26:33 [Jan]
- All: Included Technologies: No objections.
- 20:26:43 [Jan]
- All: Excluded Technologies: No objections.
- 20:26:55 [Jan]
- All: Declarations: No objections.
- 20:27:13 [Greg]
- That completes the conformance section
- 20:27:29 [Jan]
- Topic: B.2.1.X proposal
- 20:27:37 [Zakim]
- -ARonksley
- 20:27:37 [Greg]
- Proposal on Decision Support by JT
- 20:28:29 [Zakim]
- -Tim_Boland
- 20:29:37 [Zakim]
- +ARonksley
- 20:30:21 [Greg]
- Add another success criteria to B.2.1.x
- 20:31:19 [Jan]
- http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/2009/ED-ATAG20-20090717/#principle-support-author
- 20:31:45 [Greg]
- JT: Any objections to adding as a success criteria?
- 20:31:57 [Jan]
- Techs: http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/2009/ED-ATAG20-TECHS-20090717/#principle-support-author
- 20:32:30 [Zakim]
- -Jutta
- 20:33:01 [Zakim]
- +??P3
- 20:33:14 [Jan]
- GP: How to determine what is the most accessible way
- 20:33:49 [Jan]
- JT: Doesn't need to be "most accessible way"..just accessible vs not accessible
- 20:34:07 [Jan]
- GP: OK as long as techniques are not ranked over each other
- 20:35:24 [Jan]
- JT: Guidance can take various forms but its about ensuring authors can make informed choices
- 20:35:47 [Jan]
- JR: Objectins?
- 20:36:16 [Jan]
- Resolution: Add in new success criteria B.2.1.X Decision Support.
- 20:36:49 [Jan]
- GP: Back on previous question...
- 20:37:29 [Jan]
- GP: Would it be sufficient to have a mode where an author could turn off "onerous"
- 20:38:17 [Jan]
- JR: Doesn't need to be oneours...not a requirement to force author behaviour
- 20:38:28 [Jan]
- GP: But user might not want prompts etc
- 20:38:46 [Jan]
- JT: Right it might just be extra text
- 20:39:11 [Jan]
- GP: User jusdt wants to drop in images...because know where they go....
- 20:39:26 [Jan]
- GP: I see prompt...dialog...etc. in the examples in the techniques
- 20:39:43 [Jan]
- JT: OK we need to modify that text to include less obtrusive choices]
- 20:39:48 [Zakim]
- -ARonksley
- 20:40:39 [Jan]
- JR: Could we just keep it yellow until we get the tech examples woked out?>
- 20:40:43 [Jan]
- GP: OK
- 20:40:58 [Jan]
- JT: Example from iPhone dev kit....
- 20:41:14 [Jan]
- JR: Can you send a screenshot?
- 20:41:16 [Jan]
- JT: Yes
- 20:41:31 [Jan]
- Action JT: Screenshot of iphone dev enviro showing inobtrusive info
- 20:41:39 [trackbot]
- Created ACTION-174 - Screenshot of iphone dev enviro showing inobtrusive info [on Jutta Treviranus - due 2009-07-27].
- 20:41:59 [Jan]
- GP: I like the idea...but don't want to require authors to use it at a partilar time in every case
- 20:42:03 [Jan]
- JT: Of course not
- 20:42:44 [Zakim]
- + +200000aaaa
- 20:44:12 [Zakim]
- -Greg_Pisocky
- 20:44:18 [Zakim]
- -??P3
- 20:44:37 [Jan]
- JR: Please look at new approach in the techniques document
- 20:44:38 [Zakim]
- - +200000aaaa
- 20:46:23 [Zakim]
- -Jan
- 20:46:28 [Zakim]
- -Jeanne
- 20:46:30 [Zakim]
- WAI_AUWG()3:00PM has ended
- 20:46:31 [Zakim]
- Attendees were Jeanne, Jan, Tim_Boland, Jutta, Greg_Pisocky, ARonksley, +200000aaaa
- 20:47:03 [Jan]
- RRSAgent, make minutes
- 20:47:03 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/07/20-au-minutes.html Jan
- 20:47:08 [Jan]
- RRSAgent, set logs public
- 20:47:14 [Jan]
- Zakim, bye
- 20:47:14 [Zakim]
- Zakim has left #au
- 20:47:23 [Jan]
- RRSAgent, bye
- 20:47:23 [RRSAgent]
- I see 1 open action item saved in http://www.w3.org/2009/07/20-au-actions.rdf :
- 20:47:23 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: JT to Screenshot of iphone dev enviro showing inobtrusive info [1]
- 20:47:23 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/07/20-au-irc#T20-41-31