IRC log of webcgm on 2009-07-01
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 15:04:55 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #webcgm
- 15:04:55 [RRSAgent]
- logging to http://www.w3.org/2009/07/01-webcgm-irc
- 15:05:06 [stuart]
- Zakim, this is WebCGM
- 15:05:06 [Zakim]
- ok, stuart; that matches GA_WebCGM()11:00AM
- 15:05:10 [Zakim]
- +Thierry
- 15:05:25 [stuart]
- Scribe: stuart
- 15:05:26 [Dave]
- Dave has joined #webcgm
- 15:05:31 [stuart]
- chair: lofton
- 15:05:39 [stuart]
- regrets: benoit, don
- 15:05:58 [stuart]
- Meeting: WebCGM Teleconf
- 15:06:16 [Zakim]
- + +1.425.228.aaaa
- 15:07:18 [stuart]
- agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcgm-wg/2009Jul/0000.html
- 15:07:22 [lofton]
- agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcgm-wg/2009Jul/0000.html
- 15:07:44 [lofton]
- minutes: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcgm-wg/2009May/0008.html
- 15:08:22 [stuart]
- present: Thierry, Dave C, Stuart, Lofton
- 15:08:58 [lofton]
- zakim, +1.425.228.aaaa is Dave
- 15:08:58 [Zakim]
- +Dave; got it
- 15:09:05 [stuart]
- topic: roll call 11:00am ET,
- 15:10:28 [stuart]
- topic: Comments on 2nd LCWD
- 15:11:14 [stuart]
- There has been one comment so far.
- 15:11:14 [tmichel]
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcgm-wg/2009Jun/0010.html
- 15:13:01 [tmichel]
- +q
- 15:13:11 [stuart]
- It is felt that it would be a lot onf work to create a normative schema and would require a complete rewrite of chapter 4
- 15:14:11 [stuart]
- That said, we might consider writing a schema as a non normative technical report.
- 15:15:59 [stuart]
- A similiar situation happened in SMIL and they used a tool to create a relax ng schema and included it in an informative appendix
- 15:16:44 [lofton]
- As TM pointed out: SMIL used a tool to convert DTD to Relax NG, but the result of course has no greater richness than the DTD.
- 15:17:06 [lofton]
- (So ... why bother, if you're not going to use the greater capability of the schema.)
- 15:17:29 [lofton]
- TM also said: there is no W3C requirement for Schema vs. DTD.
- 15:19:24 [lofton]
- TM: also invite commenter to make a contribution of a first cut at a schema.
- 15:19:35 [lofton]
- SG: Relax NG or Schema?
- 15:36:47 [stuart]
- topic: Implementation Report
- 15:36:54 [lofton]
- lofton has joined #webcgm
- 15:38:33 [stuart]
- Thierry: suggests that we include the 2.1 tests in the impliementation report
- 15:38:57 [tmichel]
- we should have a test suite covering 2.0 and 2.1
- 15:39:12 [tmichel]
- 2.1 should be delivered in a subdirectory
- 15:39:30 [tmichel]
- and we should have a implementation covering only the delta 21 tests
- 15:39:40 [Dave]
- gotta step away for a minute
- 15:40:24 [lofton]
- CR-exit and Impl. Report should *only* concern 2.1 changes (add-on functionality of 2.1).
- 15:40:36 [tmichel]
- +1
- 15:43:10 [lofton]
- A fine detail that needs to be answered: should the old 2.0 (& 1.0) tests be updated in the ProfileEd string?
- 15:44:51 [Dave]
- i'm back
- 15:45:22 [lofton]
- Or should the test suite, in the Overview.html, explain that tests with ProfileEd:2.0 (or 1.0) are 2.1-valid except for the ProfileEd string.
- 15:46:30 [lofton]
- Or should METAFILE DESCRIPTION elt. in Ch.6 be changed to say that 1.0 and 2.0 are valid entries for ProfileEd in the 2.1 version of WebCGM?
- 15:47:00 [lofton]
- Ultimately: all ProfileEd should be 2.1.
- 15:47:21 [stuart]
- I will look into seeing how hard it would be to write a script to change the profileED to 2.1
- 15:47:36 [lofton]
- But maybe as an expedient, we'll make the first release with the old 1.0 and 2.0, and explanation that future release will fix it to 2.1.
- 16:03:20 [stuart]
- The comment also included a question about CSS.
- 16:04:30 [lofton]
- my reply about CSS:
- 16:04:31 [lofton]
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcgm-wg/2009Jun/0009.html
- 16:07:06 [lofton]
- I'll summarize for the WG list and we can incorporate it into our response (in 2 weeks).
- 16:07:51 [stuart]
- topic: next F2F: Ann Arbor
- 16:08:52 [stuart]
- The two main items will be the CR transition changes and the test fest.
- 16:09:26 [stuart]
- it is unknown how much of the schedule would be consumed with ths.
- 16:09:31 [stuart]
- s/ths/this/
- 16:13:01 [stuart]
- rrsagent, make logs member
- 16:13:10 [Zakim]
- -Dave
- 16:13:15 [stuart]
- rrsagent, set logs world
- 16:13:26 [stuart]
- rrsagent, draft minutes
- 16:13:26 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/07/01-webcgm-minutes.html stuart
- 16:13:36 [stuart]
- rrsagent, bye
- 16:13:36 [RRSAgent]
- I see no action items