08:44:50 RRSAgent has joined #swdag2009 08:44:50 logging to http://www.w3.org/2009/07/01-swdag2009-irc 08:45:05 cerealtom has joined #swdag2009 08:45:52 danbri has changed the topic to: Dagstuhl 2009 - vocab management etc breakout discussion 08:45:57 ivan has joined #swdag2009 08:46:01 rrsagent, please make logs public 08:46:19 topic 1. vocab hosting and persistence 08:46:41 re hosting there is the vocab hosting best practices document from swdbp 08:47:08 re vocabulary alignments there are various developments... 08:48:10 sorry, missed the details of the mentioned alignment work 08:48:33 OMV: ontology metadata vocabulary 08:49:18 re URI schemes... 08:49:24 danbrI: I have a specific proposal on federating independent namespaces, dns risk reduction & long term persistence 08:49:27 sharedname.org 08:49:30 purl.org 08:49:38 (and associated purl software) 08:49:54 danbri++ re dns risk reduction 08:50:21 also the google vocab namespace 08:51:26 lets not enumerate all of these right now 08:52:13 question: is physical hosting an issue 08:52:14 ? 08:52:25 consensus: generally yes 08:53:05 guus: are we just going to provide a list of existing services or develop some guidelines? 08:54:46 now covering the state of the art wrt directory services for vocabs 08:54:58 examples, swoogle, watson, falcons, talis schemacache 08:58:18 guus: distinction: concept search (e.g watson/swoogle) vs schema search (schemacache) 08:59:49 schemaweb.info is outdated and not maintained. schemacache needs to be pushed live 09:00:25 schemacache current uri: http://schemacache.test.talis.com/ 09:01:16 crawling vs curation 09:02:17 ivan points out there are some well used offerings in specific domains 09:02:42 distinction: general offering versus domain dependent 09:02:49 topic 3. versioning 09:03:04 aldogan has joined #swdag2009 09:03:22 hhalpin has joined #swdag2009 09:03:33 publishing versioning histories for vocabs 09:03:39 (says danbri) 09:04:54 danbri mentions tom baker from DC 09:05:10 "when did dc:audience appear?" all these aspects are recorded 09:05:46 also cf the w3c document versioning scheme 09:05:47 Reto has joined #swdag2009 09:07:21 danbri would like a mechanism for people to declare downstream dependencies on vocabularies 09:07:43 ivan: its a hairy ie research problem, technical but also sociological 09:13:19 -> http://openprovenance.org/ Open provenance model 09:14:35 Natasha has joined #swdag2009 09:14:37 also a need to revisit some of the named graphs work and provide some guidance 09:14:52 ...to the community at large on usage of NG 09:15:11 this was topic 4 (provenance) btw 09:15:38 preventing man in the middle attacks is a good use case for signing vocabs with pgp 09:17:36 research issue: robustness of vocabs and class hierarchies 09:17:41 chris: falcon and others already have heuristics built in, ie, they reject statements that would define a superclass of foaf:Person 09:17:51 and trust mechanisms to address this 09:18:30 cerealtom: for rights, the legal works have been done at open data comons and cc0 at science commons 09:18:42 ... active usage of this should be pushed 09:19:00 danbri: that is mostly at data issues 09:19:43 tom: many diff jurisdictions have diff approaches 09:19:48 ...whether there's some notion of a db right 09:19:52 ...diff legal frameworks 09:20:03 ...for making legal claims, of ownerships over sets of data, collections etc 09:20:09 ... see work from Jordan Hatchett 09:20:23 ... one strategy: put all in public domain 09:20:29 ... layer on that social norms 09:20:39 ... statements and requests for how it is used 09:20:47 ... most ppl want attribution for what they do 09:20:58 .... typically dont want to chase that thru the lawcourts, but was some ack 09:21:12 ... cc lets you waive formal rights but express social norms 09:21:24 ... open data commons 09:21:44 stefan: eg i'd like to make my data public, but not have it aggregated 09:22:05 -> www.opendatacommons.org Open data commons' site 09:22:15 danbri: see TAMI and respect my privacy work from MIT/DIG (note : Oshani is in SocialWeb XG ...) 09:22:41 see http://dig.csail.mit.edu/2009/SocialWebPrivacy/ 09:23:25 tom: talis community license > odc 09:26:25 rrsagent, draft minutes 09:26:25 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/07/01-swdag2009-minutes.html ivan 09:26:44 rrsagent, make minutes public 09:26:44 I'm logging. I don't understand 'make minutes public', danbri. Try /msg RRSAgent help 09:28:54 http://www.w3.org/2009/07/01-swdag2009-irc 09:31:26 natasha has joined #swdag2009 09:36:48 Federation of Independent Namespaces 09:37:15 mutual back-watching for namespace hosts 09:37:25 proposal from danbri and tom baker 09:44:35 http://dublincore.org/documents/singapore-framework/ 09:44:39 Application profiles 09:45:44 whole range of practices from bare reuse of ontology entities from other namespaces, to owl:import 09:46:30 one intermediate practice is declaring a module of an ontology to be imported (this works for reasoning purposes) 09:46:55 so you can think about this in two ways 09:47:01 abstract space of possible combinations 09:47:15 which subset of that on some level that can be characterized as graph patterns 09:47:18 are good practices 09:47:23 on a practical level: 09:47:43 let's think about practical examples 09:47:48 on an instance level 09:47:53 that can be put in tutorials 09:48:55 guus: alignments are just vocabularies that link. 09:49:16 bizer; but you can have transformation rules rather than alignments via a common concept, ala SKOS 09:49:42 transformation rules = data fusion 09:49:42 ivan: there is also the issue of the granularity of terms within vocabularies, if I refer to a specific term, what else do I pull in 09:53:21 how can alignments that are manually made 09:53:51 rather than automatically made 09:53:55 is intensional vs. extensional alignments an issue here? or are we just discussing about publishing alignments? 09:53:56 be found and used, and validated. 09:54:23 I think intensional vs. extensional is vocabulary-dependent. 09:55:04 research challenge: lack of semantics and semantics of alignment 09:55:36 so you can figure out how to reason properly over aligned vocabularies (again, how much of another vocabulary do you pull in?) 09:55:57 owl:sameAs often used to map any kind of similarity 09:56:23 but this is on the social side, since owl:sameAs has a proper (extesional) semantics 09:56:31 directory services make it hard to find alignments 09:56:57 we need directory services for alignments and make it easier to find them, standard way to host, as well as who said what alignment and provenance of alignment. 09:59:10 guus: named graphs may be a potentially a way to get alignments off the ground 09:59:27 guus: is this a w3c challenge for named graphs? 10:00:07 ivan: how can I make ANY inferences in a multi-namespace document? 10:00:26 ivan: does current RDF-based semantics work in multi-namespace documents? Does DL? 10:00:34 ivan: Probably for RDF(S), not for DL. 10:04:18 cerealtom has left #swdag2009 10:55:11 natasha has joined #swdag2009 11:06:44 aldogan has joined #swdag2009 11:09:03 ivan has joined #swdag2009 11:09:15 rrsagent, draft minutes 11:09:15 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/07/01-swdag2009-minutes.html ivan 11:24:43 Reto has joined #swdag2009 11:35:48 ------- 11:35:55 Start of session again after lunch 11:36:34 guus Trying to summarize the research challenges and relations to other groups 11:37:47 * Semantics of alignment 11:37:57 * language for publishing algnments 11:38:08 aldogan has joined #swdag2009 11:38:18 * characterizing graph patterns 11:39:42 * internal and external dependencies across vocabularies 11:40:32 * ranking and characterizing directory services 11:42:33 * inferences with multi-namespace vocabularies 11:45:34 s/inferences with multi-namespace vocabularies/inference consequences of cherry-picking/ 11:46:05 isn't the last a special case of the previous one? 11:48:42 * quality criteria for ranking vocabularies and alignments 11:49:20 s/ranking/ranking deployed/ 11:49:50 (forget the last one, rephrase:) 11:50:19 * metrics for selecting deployed vocabularies and vocabulary elements 11:55:49 asun: not every language expresses the same concepts 11:56:18 * problems of multilingual vocabulary alignments 11:56:21 asun: like different kinds of fishes exist in say Greek, not English. 11:56:33 harry: but we need to encourage vocabulary schemas to have multiple languages. 11:57:08 s/vocabulary// 11:57:38 rrsagent, draft minutes 11:57:38 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/07/01-swdag2009-minutes.html ivan 12:02:11 TAG's latest versioning: 12:02:12 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/versioning-html/ 12:03:30 cerealtom has joined #swdag2009 12:05:00 * vocabulary versioning in a distributed environments 12:08:16 Slogan: do not delay the future 12:08:35 * SW specific provenance models 12:09:09 rrsagent, draft minutes 12:09:09 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/07/01-swdag2009-minutes.html ivan 12:09:25 3 or 4 strands that must be brought together: hacker/internet/crypto provenance, database provenance, logical formalism / kr scene (OWL, RIF, ...) .... and then the RDF/dataweb/web2 scene where the best we have is SPARQL graphs 12:14:36 Topic: finding the top 5 research issues 12:32:09 Reto has joined #swdag2009 12:32:26 my personal ranking of topics: 12:32:31 (this isn't private voting is it?) 12:32:31 n2. graph patterns. 12:32:32 n4. provenance models. 12:32:32 n5. quality metrics for selecting vocabs. 12:32:32 n3. vocab dependencies and cherry picking. 12:32:32 n1. semantics of alignments / alignment language. 12:32:34 n6. multilingual vocabs. 12:37:09 After due deliberations and semi-secret voting the result is as follows: 12:39:38 Final list of research challenges 12:39:56 1. Quality metrics for selecting vocabularies and vocabulary elements 12:41:32 cbaldassarre has joined #swdag2009 12:41:41 2. Logical consequences from cherry picking vocabulary elements from distributed vocabularies 12:42:16 3. SW-specific provenance models 12:43:00 4. Semantics of alignments, including languages and models for publishing alignments 12:44:50 5. Characterizing graph patterns in published web data 12:46:52 rrsagent, draft minutes 12:46:52 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/07/01-swdag2009-minutes.html ivan 12:51:13 1. Semantics of alignments, including languages and models for publishing alignments 12:51:33 2. vocab dependencies and cherry picking 12:51:49 3. Quality metrics for selecting vocabularies and vocabulary elements 12:51:59 4. provenance models 12:53:04 multilinguality and graph patterns are very important as well, uhm 12:53:20 unsure how much overlap exists among the topics emerged however 12:59:38 Topic: short term goals 12:59:47 Subtopic: White paper 13:00:01 guus outlining a structure 13:00:24 - URI Scheme (PURL, etc) 13:00:34 - Physical hosting, backup policies 13:01:03 - Versioning strategy (current practice like W3C practice, DC practice) 13:02:13 - DNS Redirect advices, examples, templates 13:03:28 - minimal attribution metadata 13:04:52 - link & advice with respect to ODC 13:05:16 s/ODC/Open Data Commons/ 13:08:59 rrsagent, draft minutes 13:08:59 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/07/01-swdag2009-minutes.html ivan 13:09:23 i am listening in IRC 13:09:27 "listening" via text 13:27:20 Topic: relationships to other groups 13:34:13 rrsagent, draft minutes 13:34:13 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/07/01-swdag2009-minutes.html ivan 13:50:49 cerealtom has left #swdag2009 13:54:19 ivan has left #swdag2009 14:15:09 aldogan has joined #swdag2009 14:16:03 natasha has joined #swdag2009 14:16:26 Reto has joined #swdag2009 14:25:50 danbri has joined #swdag2009 15:51:46 danbri has joined #swdag2009 17:49:13 aldogan has joined #swdag2009 17:50:16 danbri has joined #swdag2009 18:04:32 danbri has joined #swdag2009 18:08:28 aldogan has joined #swdag2009 20:20:59 aldogan has joined #swdag2009 21:31:12 aldogan has joined #swdag2009 23:17:31 danbri has joined #swdag2009 23:46:32 aldogan has joined #swdag2009