15:54:45 RRSAgent has joined #CSS 15:54:45 logging to http://www.w3.org/2009/07/01-CSS-irc 15:54:55 zakim, this will be style 15:54:55 ok, plinss; I see Style_CSS FP()12:00PM scheduled to start in 6 minutes 15:56:21 Style_CSS FP()12:00PM has now started 15:56:28 + +1.858.216.aaaa 15:56:42 zakim, +1.858.216 is me 15:56:42 +plinss; got it 15:57:37 + +1.206.324.aabb 15:57:54 +glazou 15:58:10 Zakim, +1.206.324 is me 15:58:10 +sgalineau; got it 15:59:30 dbaron has joined #css 15:59:57 +[Mozilla] 16:00:09 Zakim, [Mozilla] has David_Baron 16:00:09 +David_Baron; got it 16:01:32 33 celsius here, pffff :-( 16:01:44 +Bert 16:01:47 glazou, it was 39 or so here on Sunday 16:02:02 +??P14 16:04:12 since we're into weather 16:04:17 Seattle is currently 20 16:04:28 forecast 27. perfect ! 16:04:42 of course it's going to suck the rest of the year 16:05:38 MoZ: only during ftfs :) 16:07:31 alexmog has joined #css 16:07:31 (The weather is quite nice here now, though; forecast 29-30 for the next 3 days.) 16:07:46 RRSAgent: make logs public 16:07:55 Zakim, who is on the phone? 16:07:55 On the phone I see plinss, sgalineau, glazou, [Mozilla], Bert, ??P14 16:07:56 [Mozilla] has David_Baron 16:09:15 Zakim, I am ??P14 16:09:15 +fantasai; got it 16:09:32 Bert: Multicol 16:09:36 has already been published 16:09:41 Regrets: Øyvind Stenhaug, Anne van Kesteren, Dave Singer, Tona Henderson, Håkon Wium Lie, Steve Zilles, César Acebal, Molly Holzschlag 16:10:00 I'm here on IRC and will be on the call in 5 minutes or so 16:10:16 dbaron: Any status on publishing flexbox? 16:10:36 ACTION: Bert publish flexbox as FPWD 16:10:36 Created ACTION-161 - Publish flexbox as FPWD [on Bert Bos - due 2009-07-08]. 16:11:04 Bert notes that lots of people are on holiday, but he will try to get that done 16:12:08 phone span, sorry for the noise 16:12:11 http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-images/ 16:12:13 +[Microsoft] 16:12:23 Zakim, [Microsoft] has alexmog 16:12:23 +alexmog; got it 16:13:31 I'm ok with publishing 16:14:24 RESOLVED: Publish css3-images as FPWD 16:14:39 ACTION: Bert publish css3-images as FPWD 16:14:39 Created ACTION-162 - Publish css3-images as FPWD [on Bert Bos - due 2009-07-08]. 16:16:34 Topic: Anonymous Table Boxes 16:16:35 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-css-wg/2009AprJun/0184.html 16:17:20 fantasai sent a request for Opera, Microsoft, and Apple to contact their engineers and collect feedback on Boris Zbarsky's anonymous table box generation proposal and testcases 16:18:07 Zakim, [Microsoft] has arronei 16:18:07 +arronei; got it 16:18:32 fantasai: I don't think we can productively discuss this ourselves, we should get feedback from the engineers who are working on it 16:18:47 fantasai: and have that feedback sent to www-style 16:19:33 Peter suggests we set a deadline for hearing back, perhaps two or four weeks 16:19:44 fantasai: four weeks should be plenty... that's the 23rd 16:20:35 four weeks is the 29th 16:21:12 ACTION: arron send feedback on anonymous table boxes to www-style 16:21:12 Created ACTION-163 - Send feedback on anonymous table boxes to www-style [on Arron Eicholz - due 2009-07-08]. 16:21:29 anne? 16:22:27 ACTION: Peter send emails to Opera and Apple requesting feedback on anonymous table boxes from their engineers 16:22:27 Created ACTION-164 - Send emails to Opera and Apple requesting feedback on anonymous table boxes from their engineers [on Peter Linss - due 2009-07-08]. 16:22:42 Topic: IPTV 16:23:17 fantasai: I'm happy to leave that to the chairs. 16:23:27 fantasai: dsinger wrote a very nice template you should be able to use 16:24:29 Topic: border-radius and overflow on replaced elements 16:24:33 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2009Jun/0115.html 16:24:54 Hyatt's comments on css3-background: 16:24:55 Looks good. To address dbaron's concern about overflow, we implemented a very lightweight form of overflow:hidden for replaced elements that doesn't allow programmatic scrolling, etc. All it does is clip. This is kind of gross, however, as we now have two types of overflow:hidden in the engine. 16:25:01 Form controls in WebKit also clip their contents anyway completely independently of overflow. 16:25:04 The most elegant solution is probably just to say you always clip replaced element contents to the curve even when overflow is visible. I can't really think of any scenario where you'd want the contents of a replaced element to spill out of the curve. 16:25:42 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2009Jun/0117.html 16:26:01 fantasai: So are people happy with always clipping replaced element content to the curve? 16:26:25 that is what I'd expect from a border, whatever its shape 16:26:36 -[Mozilla] 16:26:44 oops, I hung up instead of hitting mute 16:26:49 doh 16:26:52 +[Mozilla] 16:28:42 dbaron: My one concern is Robert's comment on form controls 16:29:45 dbaron: for some replaced form controls, we might need to allow overflow 16:29:56 dbaron: e.g. on Mac the focus ring is this blue glow that overflows 16:30:13 fantasai: can we make an exception for form controls then? 16:32:10 Bert: Why are we doing this? 16:32:26 fantasai: because for authors, they would expect replaced elements to clip to the curve when they specify one 16:33:08 fantasai: and because even for overflow: hidden, this triggers special scrolling behavior in UAs like Mozilla and WebKit that they don't want to have for a bunch of images that don't need it 16:38:54 fwiw, i don't expect replaced elements to stick out of borders. i'd assume a designer want either the border to clip or expand around the element but not cause an ugly overflow... 16:38:54 Bert is concerned that we are introducing different behavior for replaced elements and other elements 16:40:21 fantasai explains that from an authors point of view, given that most of the time content fits within its border box and that border-radius clips the background, replaced elements are just acting weird if they don't clip to the curve 16:40:43 what happens if overflow:visible is set on a replaced element with a border ? 16:41:15 Bert: we'll need css3-page to be updated to not imply that replaced elements can overflow their border box 16:41:18 fantasai: ye 16:41:18 s 16:41:25 fantasai: I'll need to update css3-page to say that 16:41:53 sgalineau, right now nothing happens 16:42:08 sgalineau, setting other values of overflow also doesn't do anything 16:42:13 so then i wouldn't expect overflow:hidden behavior to be an issue...? 16:42:19 sgalineau, because right now replaced elements never overflow their border 16:42:33 sgalineau, but with border-radius and image-fit this becomes possible 16:43:17 I prefer keeping the current behavior; it's consistent and, i think, what authors expect 16:43:21 i.e. clipping 16:43:48 the currently-specified behavior allows overflow, it is not clipping 16:43:52 the proposal is to require clipping 16:44:08 except in cases where the UA determines it to be necessary not to, e.g. form controls 16:45:02 dbaron: my personal preference would be to require authors to specify overflow: hidden if they want this behavior 16:45:33 dbaron: if we only end up with it in the case where authors request it, it's not that huge of a perf issue 16:45:43 dbaron: creating it by default for every image is expensive 16:47:41 sylvain: I would not expect a replaced element to overflow its border, at least by default, that just seems weird 16:48:03 sylvain: If I put a border on an image or a video or anything ... 16:49:27 Sylvain: As an author, I might set a border and put an image inside it or set an image and put a border around it, but I wouldn't expect to have a border and the image overflow the border 16:49:43 dbaron: I don't think we can implement this in time for CR 16:50:08 peter: I'm uncomfortable with special-casing things 16:50:27 peter: currently you can't make it overflow, what about in the future? 16:50:47 peter: we're introducing new properties that cause overflow 16:51:21 sylvain: ... why do we want these new properties introduce the ability to overflow for these elements? 16:51:40 sylvain: Did we have authors complaining about not being able to overflow replaced elements before this? 16:51:51 Peter: it's just an implementation artifact 16:52:34 sylvain: FWIW I'm just more comfortable with the existing behavior remaining where it was, i.e. no overflow 16:52:48 Sylvain: Rather than requiring people to specify extra properties 16:53:00 Sylvain: Especially since there seems to be no demand or use case scenario for it 16:53:50 Sylvain: Rounding the border shouldn't cause overflow, I just would not expect that 16:55:48 I just would not expect that styling the border differently would affect overflow. 16:56:54 Peter: Why can't we just require people to set overflow: hidden 16:57:29 Bert: CSS2 currently says that overflow doesn't apply to replaced element, it would be easy to keep it that way 16:58:22 Bert imagines someone creating a map with a small viewport with scrollbars 16:59:13 Peter is averse to special-casing things, but isn't going to hold things up here for it 16:59:33 peter: we can always unwind it with further properties if necessary 17:00:56 RESOLVED: accept that overflow: visible does not allow replaced content to overflow 17:01:31 -sgalineau 17:01:32 -[Mozilla] 17:01:34 -fantasai 17:01:36 -plinss 17:01:46 -[Microsoft] 17:01:48 -Bert 17:01:50 -glazou 17:01:52 Style_CSS FP()12:00PM has ended 17:01:55 Attendees were +1.858.216.aaaa, plinss, +1.206.324.aabb, glazou, sgalineau, David_Baron, Bert, fantasai, alexmog, arronei, [Mozilla] 17:24:22 alexmog has joined #css 18:47:37 sgalineau has joined #css 19:00:48 shepazu has joined #css 19:54:44 annevk has joined #css 20:17:12 sgalineau has joined #css 20:36:19 alexmog has joined #css