19:31:04 RRSAgent has joined #ws-ra 19:31:04 logging to http://www.w3.org/2009/06/30-ws-ra-irc 19:31:06 RRSAgent, make logs public 19:31:06 Zakim has joined #ws-ra 19:31:08 Zakim, this will be WSRA 19:31:08 ok, trackbot, I see WS_WSRA()3:30PM already started 19:31:09 Meeting: Web Services Resource Access Working Group Teleconference 19:31:09 Date: 30 June 2009 19:31:27 +Ashok_Malhotra 19:31:41 +[Microsoft] 19:31:43 + +984999aabb 19:32:03 asir has joined #ws-ra 19:32:21 +Tom_Rutt 19:32:40 zakim, aabb is Sreed 19:32:40 +Sreed; got it 19:32:43 +Gilbert 19:32:44 +??P11 19:32:50 gpilz has joined #ws-ra 19:34:13 DaveS has joined #ws-ra 19:36:01 Scribe: Wu Chou 19:36:27 agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-resource-access/2009Jun/0059.html 19:37:12 Agenda agreed 19:37:35 minutes approved 19:37:57 +Yves 19:38:35 August F2F hosted by Microsoft 19:39:20 asir: need the list of people who attend and will provide local information 19:40:22 LOL firm maybe - I love it 19:40:23 bob: England F2F meeting - who thinks to attend - a quick call 19:40:58 Asir: yes 19:41:17 dug: someone will be there from IBM 19:41:22 dave: yes 19:41:30 fred: No 19:41:36 Gil: yes 19:41:45 Li: no 19:42:12 Mark: will you attend? 19:42:36 Ram: yes 19:42:37 DaveS has joined #ws-ra 19:42:48 tom: no 19:42:54 wu: yes 19:42:55 Yves: yes 19:43:15 Dave: Yes 19:43:18 zakim, who is making noise? 19:43:32 dug, listening for 13 seconds I heard sound from the following: Bob_Freund (26%), Gilbert (77%), Yves (11%) 19:43:37 gil! 19:43:40 sorry my headset 19:44:04 10 or more will attend F2F at England 19:44:18 zakim, unmute gil 19:44:18 Gilbert should no longer be muted 19:44:43 http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=7068 19:45:48 issue 7068 accepted and Doug is the owner 19:46:16 http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=7068 19:46:18 This specification defines one ContentDescription URI, 19:46:20 http://.../ContentDescription/Literal, which can be used to convey to the 19:46:22 service that the children of the wst:Create element are not instructions 19:46:23 but rather are to be taken as the literal resource representation of the 19:46:24 new resource. 19:47:38 asir: there is another issue related to literal representation, what is the relation? 19:47:50 dug: this another issue 19:47:55 asir: no dependency 19:47:58 dug: yes 19:48:13 asir: would like more time 19:49:03 Topic: 6699 19:49:23 http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6699 19:50:44 dug: remove this feature from RT 19:50:47 q+ 19:51:19 ack asir 19:51:27 ashok: this feature is abou resource not fragment. 19:51:48 asir: we are fine to drop this feature from RT. 19:52:01 Bob: this feature will be droped from RT (resolution) 19:52:26 zakim, who is making noise? 19:52:36 gpilz, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: Doug_Davis (9%), Bob_Freund (70%), Ashok_Malhotra (5%) 19:52:55 http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=7039 19:52:58 Topic: 7039 19:53:55 dug: examing inside EPR is problem. The identifier should be removed. 19:53:57 +q 19:54:15 ack gp 19:54:47 q+ 19:54:47 q+ 19:54:59 Implementations of Event Sources, or Subscription Managers, MUST NOT assume that this reference parameter will be used. 19:55:06 gpilz: prefer to address this issue with some clarifying text in addition to remove it 19:55:15 ack asir 19:55:28 s/in addition/as opposed/ 19:55:28 DaveS has joined #ws-ra 19:55:30 ack dug 19:55:38 asir: my suggestion is in line with Gil to clarifying it. 19:56:16 q+ 19:56:17 dug: add some text e.g. implementation ... 19:56:18 + 19:56:21 q+ 19:56:24 ack asir 19:56:41 I can live with #2 but I reserve the right to say "I told you so" later :-) 19:56:46 asir: close it with some email if all agree with clarifying text 19:56:55 ack dave 19:57:23 +q 19:57:33 ack dug 19:57:41 dave: would like to live option 1 19:57:59 chad has joined #ws-ra 19:59:19 bob: two choices - remove+some clarifying text (thumb up) or delete it (down) 19:59:28 asir: up 19:59:32 dug: down 19:59:35 dave: down 19:59:40 fred: abstain 19:59:45 gil: down 20:00:00 LOL 20:00:14 li: down 20:00:23 ram: up 20:00:48 reed: down 20:01:01 tom: down 20:01:16 s/reed/sreed/ 20:01:19 yeve: abstain 20:01:33 bob: more down than up 20:02:01 asir: my suggestion looking at proposal more 20:02:22 q+ 20:02:35 ack dave 20:03:06 q+ 20:03:07 DaveS: like to know the value to bother proposal up 20:04:25 ack gp 20:04:26 asir: Iook at the Primer example 20:04:28 Do we have a link for the primer? 20:05:20 gpilz: logically cannot be any interoperablity issue by removing this identifier. 20:05:30 Please see section 6.3 in http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/ra/9/01/UnderstandingWebServiceResourceAccess.pdf 20:06:03 q+ 20:06:10 ack dug 20:06:17 q+ 20:07:52 dug: agree with Gill 20:08:07 asir: posted the link to the use case to irc 20:08:26 ack asir 20:08:30 q+ 20:08:38 asir: Section 6.3 use case 20:08:48 ack dug 20:09:27 DaveS has joined #ws-ra 20:09:37 wsu:Id 20:09:38 dug: use case does not say it must be this identifier. Otherwise, it will be a problem. 20:09:41 q+ 20:09:44 or a query param :-) 20:09:48 ack dave 20:09:49 q+ 20:10:15 DaveS: it looks like a topic for Primer, not for the specs. 20:10:24 ack asir 20:10:55 +1 20:10:56 +1 gil - it can't be about interop 20:11:02 +1 20:11:41 q+ 20:11:47 Bob: more discussion on this point? 20:11:52 ack asir 20:12:02 asir: I would like to look further 20:12:07 Bob: next week? 20:13:37 Topic: 6692 20:14:09 -Mark_Little 20:14:54 q+ 20:15:17 DaveS has joined #ws-ra 20:16:07 [My network here in Japan keeps droping the IRC, so next time it goes, I'll just leave it.] 20:16:27 is there a link to this doc? 20:16:32
  • http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-resource-access/2009Jun/0052.html 20:16:33 asir: presenting the proposal based on F2F WG decision - using Qname and remove mode 20:22:20 q+ 20:22:24 asir: At high level, retain the delivery element, delete mode, using Qname, etc. 20:23:08 ack dug 20:24:10 q+ 20:24:21 dug: some sections are really nice. agree delivery element. Questions about delivery pattern. 20:26:08 dug: delivery pattern adding a level of complexity. I have a draft proposal. 20:26:20 ack gp 20:28:04 gpilz: ws-eventing may not have a lot of control on extension works. 20:28:23 q+ 20:28:32 ack asir 20:28:40 q+ 20:29:39 asir: we are open to the name of delivery pattern. 20:30:00 ack tom 20:30:01 bob: Qname is the agreed direction at F2F 20:30:59 tom: dug rewording has a delivery element further down 20:31:25 q+ 20:32:41 -Sreed 20:32:50 ack wu 20:33:07
  • wu: we need to read more about doug's proposal 20:33:23 q+ 20:33:52 ack asir 20:34:04 http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/ra/9/06/wseventing-DeliveryElement.html 20:34:14 asir: push mode is gone in doug proposal 20:34:42 dug: present his proposal. 20:39:26 q+ 20:39:59 ack dug 20:40:21
  • li has joined #ws-ra 20:41:06 bob: if Geoff and Doug can work together to address the differences 20:41:47 orange armband? 20:42:47 bob: let's move on to issue 6413 20:43:09 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-resource-access/2009Jun/0070.html 20:45:48 bob: introduce his findings 20:46:03 q+ 20:46:25 q+ 20:47:12 ack asir 20:47:22 q- 20:47:49 ack ram 20:47:59 DaveS: I am quite happy with this. 20:48:48 q+ 20:49:00 ram: would like to see some concrete proposal 20:49:44 ack asir 20:49:47 dug: 1 and 3 may be o.k., 2 needs details. he can live with it 20:50:51 ack yves 20:50:58 asir: we are currently exploring these options, need concrete proposal 20:51:36 yeves: preferable for a separate specs 20:51:39 +1 to separate spec for frags and link it to Transfer 20:52:18 agree that we need a concrete proposal 20:52:24 yeves: need a better details to move forward 20:52:53 bob: can folk to live with point 1 and 3? 20:53:02 asir: we can live with 2 and 3. 20:53:52 asir: can we have one more week to look into these options? 20:53:57 bob: o.k. 20:54:33 bob: let's spend a little time talking 6917 20:56:51 gpilz: my proposal 6401 may help this issue. 20:57:08 bob: do we agree the problem statement? 20:58:03 bob: we should not preclude topic 20:58:19
  • i made some use cases here: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-resource-access/2009May/0176.html 20:59:19 dug: i do not view this an optimization, may or may not be faster 21:00:02 bob: Li can you start to push forward on this? 21:01:23 -Ashok_Malhotra 21:01:43 -Tom_Rutt 21:01:53 -Wu_Chou 21:01:54 -Yves 21:01:54 -[Microsoft] 21:01:55 -fmaciel 21:01:55 -Bob_Freund 21:01:56 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/06/30-ws-ra-minutes.html Yves 21:01:57 -Doug_Davis 21:02:02 -??P11 21:02:04 - +0207827aaaa 21:02:52 TomRutt has left #ws-ra 21:04:00 trackbot, end call 21:04:00 Sorry, Yves, I don't understand 'trackbot, end call'. Please refer to http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/irc for help 21:04:24 trackbot, end telcon 21:04:24 Zakim, list attendees 21:04:24 As of this point the attendees have been Doug_Davis, fmaciel, +0207827aaaa, Bob_Freund, Wu_Chou, Mark_Little, Ashok_Malhotra, [Microsoft], +984999aabb, Tom_Rutt, Sreed, Gilbert, 21:04:25 RRSAgent, please draft minutes 21:04:25 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/06/30-ws-ra-minutes.html trackbot 21:04:26 RRSAgent, bye 21:04:26 I see no action items 21:04:28 ... Yves