IRC log of sparql on 2009-06-16

Timestamps are in UTC.

13:58:26 [RRSAgent]

RRSAgent has joined #sparql

13:58:26 [RRSAgent]

logging to http://www.w3.org/2009/06/16-sparql-irc

13:58:32 [AxelPolleres]

Zakim, this is SPARQL

13:58:32 [Zakim]

ok, AxelPolleres; that matches SW_(SPARQL)10:00AM

13:58:34 [SteveH]

I think my action was time mermitting, but maybe that wasn't captured

13:58:41 [Zakim]

- +049261287aaaa

13:58:49 [AndyS]

It's FPWD - agreeing to publish is not a universal agreement with the doc.

13:59:03 [bglimm]

Hi all, I am scribing today for the first time... Do i have to do something special to get the chat log published afterwards?

13:59:08 [Zakim]

+ +1.518.276.aabb

13:59:12 [Zakim]

-bcuencagrau

13:59:14 [kasei]

Zakim, aabb is me

13:59:15 [Zakim]

+kasei; got it

13:59:16 [Zakim]

+ +3539149aacc

13:59:19 [kasei]

Zakim, mute me

13:59:19 [Zakim]

kasei should now be muted

13:59:31 [SteveH]

oh, I may be able to attend after all, but will be a bit late

13:59:46 [AxelPolleres]

Zakim, aacc is me

13:59:46 [Zakim]

+AxelPolleres; got it

14:00:08 [kasei]

yes, can hear you

14:00:17 [AxelPolleres]

Zakim, who is speaking?

14:00:21 [kasei]

Zakim, unmute me

14:00:21 [Zakim]

kasei should no longer be muted

14:00:29 [Zakim]

AxelPolleres, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: kasei (29%), AxelPolleres (31%)

14:00:50 [Zakim]

+bcuencagrau

14:00:56 [AxelPolleres]

Zakim, who is on the phone?

14:00:56 [Zakim]

On the phone I see kasei, AxelPolleres, bcuencagrau

14:00:58 [SteveH]

SteveH has joined #sparql

14:00:59 [bglimm]

Zakim, bcuencagrau is bglimm

14:00:59 [Zakim]

+bglimm; got it

14:01:09 [kasei]

Zakim, mute me

14:01:09 [Zakim]

kasei should now be muted

14:01:21 [Zakim]

+??P26

14:01:28 [AxelPolleres]

scribenick: bglimm

14:01:30 [AlexPassant]

Zakim, ??P26 is me

14:01:30 [Zakim]

+AlexPassant; got it

14:01:30 [AndyS]

AndyS has joined #sparql

14:01:34 [AxelPolleres]

scribe: Birte Glimm

14:01:36 [Zakim]

+ +49.261.287.aadd

14:01:45 [SimonS1]

Zakim, aadd is me

14:01:45 [Zakim]

+SimonS1; got it

14:01:52 [Zakim]

+??P29

14:01:57 [SteveH]

Zakim, ??p29 is me

14:01:58 [Zakim]

+SteveH; got it

14:02:25 [Zakim]

+??P34

14:02:27 [AndyS]

zakim, ??P34 is me

14:02:27 [Zakim]

+AndyS; got it

14:02:42 [AxelPolleres]

Zakim, who is on the phone?

14:02:54 [Zakim]

On the phone I see kasei (muted), AxelPolleres, bglimm, AlexPassant, SimonS1, SteveH, AndyS

14:03:23 [Zakim]

+ +2

14:03:34 [KjetilK]

Zakim, +2 is me

14:03:45 [Zakim]

+KjetilK; got it

14:03:52 [KjetilK]

Zakim, mute me

14:03:52 [Zakim]

KjetilK should now be muted

14:04:00 [bglimm]

AxelPolleres: Many people are at SemTec and cannot attent today

14:04:12 [AxelPolleres]

http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Agenda-2009-06-16

14:04:13 [bglimm]

s/attent/attend/

14:04:31 [bglimm]

AxelPolleres: let's approve the minutes from last time

14:04:31 [AxelPolleres]

http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2009-06-09

14:04:45 [bglimm]

... any objections? or additions?

14:05:03 [bglimm]

... nothing, so the minutes are approved

14:05:22 [bglimm]

Alex: I am listed, but I wasn't there

14:05:44 [AxelPolleres]

PROPOSED: Approve minutes with Alex being removed from the attendees list.

14:06:10 [AxelPolleres]

ACTION: Axel Eric to update minutes

14:06:10 [trackbot]

Created ACTION-41 - Eric to update minutes [on Axel Polleres - due 2009-06-23].

14:06:38 [bglimm]

AxelPolleres: Can we approve it with the amendments?

14:06:39 [AxelPolleres]

RESOLVED: Approve minutes with Alex being removed from the attendees list.

14:06:47 [AlexPassant]

regrets for 2009-06-09 are there actually: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2009-06-02

14:07:07 [bglimm]

AxelPolleres: next meeting is in one week, 23rd June same time

14:07:34 [KjetilK]

Zakim, unmute me

14:07:34 [Zakim]

KjetilK should no longer be muted

14:07:49 [bglimm]

... scribe for next week: KjetilK

14:08:00 [KjetilK]

Zakim, mute me

14:08:00 [Zakim]

KjetilK should now be muted

14:08:01 [bglimm]

topic: Liasions

14:08:04 [SimonS]

Regrets for next week. I will be travelling, maybe I can join on IRC

14:08:28 [bglimm]

AxelPolleres: Bijan is not here, so no news from OWL and no news from RIF

14:08:37 [bglimm]

.. no news from liasons today

14:08:43 [bglimm]

topic: actions

14:09:08 [bglimm]

AxelPolleres: we some open actions: 16 on LeeF continious

14:09:15 [Zakim]

+[IPcaller]

14:09:24 [bglimm]

... action 17 on Steve

14:09:35 [bglimm]

Steve: I think that is obsolete now

14:09:58 [bglimm]

AxelPolleres: Action 19 on Ivan is open

14:10:21 [bglimm]

Ivan: What is that action?

14:10:32 [AndyS]

"""Send to the mailing list a few example cases (data, query, results) of SELECT queries in FILTERs"""

14:10:34 [bglimm]

AxelPolleres: We have to look that up in the minutes

14:10:36 [kasei]

s/Ivan/Orri/

14:11:01 [bglimm]

... Action 28 is continued and action 32 on Simon is open

14:11:09 [bglimm]

Somin: Action 32 should be completed

14:11:16 [bglimm]

s/Somin/Simon/

14:11:25 [bglimm]

AxelPolleres: Action 36 is completed

14:11:44 [bglimm]

... Action 37 is completed

14:11:44 [kasei]

action-38 can be closed, and is on the agenda for later

14:12:00 [kasei]

Zakim, unmute me

14:12:00 [Zakim]

kasei should no longer be muted

14:12:21 [bglimm]

... Action 38 on Greg is completed and can be closed

14:12:25 [kasei]

Zakim, mute me

14:12:25 [Zakim]

kasei should now be muted

14:12:35 [bglimm]

... we have 2 open actions to review the F&R docs

14:12:45 [bglimm]

... we leave this open for now

14:12:55 [bglimm]

... action review is done

14:13:02 [bglimm]

Topic: F&R Document

14:13:07 [KjetilK]

Zakim, unmute me

14:13:07 [Zakim]

KjetilK should no longer be muted

14:13:26 [bglimm]

kjetilK: We just 2 things open

14:13:36 [bglimm]

... the short name and the introduction

14:13:59 [bglimm]

... we have the project description

14:14:15 [bglimm]

... SteveH couldn't finish his review

14:14:35 [bglimm]

... whether Chime has reviewed is not known

14:14:40 [AxelPolleres]

q?

14:15:03 [bglimm]

AxelPolleres: Lets look at the open issues for this

14:15:10 [bglimm]

... short name first

14:15:12 [AxelPolleres]

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2009AprJun/0383.html

14:15:21 [AxelPolleres]

http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql-features/

14:15:38 [bglimm]

... proposal was to use the name SPARQL Features

14:15:54 [bglimm]

... but this has no version number

14:16:06 [bglimm]

... any opinions?

14:16:53 [bglimm]

AndyS: Can we ask the team contact and ask what is the standard

14:17:19 [bglimm]

AxelPolleres: They are not here at the moment

14:17:21 [AndyS]

e.g. TR/xpath-datamodel/ -- no version number (and it's xpath 2.0)

14:17:39 [bglimm]

... I can ask the team contact

14:17:45 [AndyS]

but /TR/xmlschema-2/

14:17:54 [AxelPolleres]

ACTION: Axel to ask team contacts whether http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql-features/ is ok

14:17:54 [trackbot]

Created ACTION-42 - Ask team contacts whether http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql-features/ is ok [on Axel Polleres - due 2009-06-23].

14:18:12 [KjetilK]

+1

14:18:22 [bglimm]

AxelPolleres: Can I propose to go with that name unless there is some objection from the team contact?

14:18:29 [bglimm]

... do we need a backup solution

14:18:32 [bglimm]

... ?

14:18:48 [AxelPolleres]

PROPOSED: F&R will be published under http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql-features/ unless there are concerns from the team-contacts.

14:19:10 [AxelPolleres]

RESOLVED: F&R will be published under http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql-features/ unless there are concerns from the team-contacts.

14:19:12 [bglimm]

AxelPolleres: Lets ressolve this and see

14:19:51 [bglimm]

... My concern is that the previous versions said RDF SPARQL and not just SPARQL

14:20:23 [SteveH]

lets delagate

14:20:27 [KjetilK]

+1

14:20:29 [bglimm]

... I think we can go with that for now

14:20:57 [bglimm]

AndyS: your resolution says that the doc will be published like that, so that might cause a problem

14:21:01 [AndyS]

NB we have not decided to publish yet

14:21:19 [bglimm]

AxelPolleres: So should I change the resolution?

14:22:04 [AxelPolleres]

PROPOSE: in case of concerns, leave the naming decision to team contacts.

14:22:25 [bglimm]

.... is it ok to leave it to the team contact for the naming issues?

14:22:30 [bglimm]

... any objections?

14:22:36 [AxelPolleres]

RESOLVED: in case of concerns, leave the naming decision to team contacts.

14:22:46 [bglimm]

... So, there are none and I suggest to resolve this

14:22:54 [bglimm]

Topic: Introduction

14:23:08 [bglimm]

AxelPolleres: Did you incorporate what was on the wiki?

14:23:26 [bglimm]

KjetilK: I havn't, but there was nothing substantial

14:23:26 [AxelPolleres]

http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Features_Introduction_strawman

14:24:03 [bglimm]

AxelPolleres: I looked ob=ver it. It is not a substantial change. It is mostly to reorder some parts

14:24:36 [bglimm]

... also there are links to the resolutions and I was hoping that this fulfils Any's concern about the timestamp feature

14:24:52 [AxelPolleres]

q?

14:25:08 [bglimm]

s/Any's/Andy's/

14:25:24 [bglimm]

AxelPolleres: Would such a reordering be ok?

14:25:33 [AlexPassant]

q+

14:25:40 [bglimm]

... if there are no objections, I propose to change it like that.

14:26:06 [bglimm]

AlexPassant: I would like to keep 1.1 and the structure of the documents

14:26:38 [AxelPolleres]

ACTION: Alex to adopt http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Features_Introduction_strawman with two subsections.

14:26:38 [trackbot]

Created ACTION-43 - Adopt http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Features_Introduction_strawman with two subsections. [on Alexandre Passant - due 2009-06-23].

14:26:46 [bglimm]

AxelPolleres: I will give you an action to adapt the document

14:27:07 [bglimm]

... any more objections?

14:27:20 [bglimm]

... none, so lets do that.

14:27:27 [bglimm]

... next, examples

14:27:49 [AxelPolleres]

http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Feature:ProjectExpressions

14:28:17 [bglimm]

KjetilK: I took text from the wiki and put it in the document

14:28:24 [AxelPolleres]

http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/features/#Project_expressions

14:28:28 [bglimm]

AxelPolleres: Let's have a look

14:28:35 [KjetilK]

http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/features/#Project_expressions_syntax

14:29:04 [bglimm]

... should the construct with expressions be left in, for the moment it was

14:29:26 [bijan]

bijan has joined #sparql

14:29:27 [bglimm]

... it should be clear that this is not the complex expressions

14:29:49 [bglimm]

... Did you include the implementations list?

14:30:05 [bglimm]

kjetilK: I havn't included that

14:30:32 [Zakim]

+??P55

14:30:35 [bglimm]

... it seems that the doc is not self-contained with many links

14:30:37 [bijan]

zakim, ??P55 is me

14:30:37 [Zakim]

+bijan; got it

14:30:48 [bglimm]

AxelPolleres: So you don't have any?

14:31:03 [AndyS]

Checking F&O: fn:concat --> fn:string-join

14:31:05 [AxelPolleres]

(simon was asking)

14:31:16 [AndyS]

fn:concat implies a cast, string-join does not

14:31:36 [bglimm]

AxelPolleres: There are some implementations listed, so should we unify that?

14:31:59 [KjetilK]

AndyS: fixed :-)

14:32:18 [AxelPolleres]

http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/features/#Negation

14:32:23 [bglimm]

... there are some concerns about an example in the negations subsection

14:32:30 [bglimm]

.. any opinions?

14:32:39 [bglimm]

... Kjetil have you seen that email

14:32:49 [SteveH]

It needs a 2nd example

14:32:54 [bglimm]

kjetilK: I saw it and thought about it a bit

14:33:16 [bglimm]

AxelPolleres: what we need is an approval of Andy because he raised the concerns?

14:33:28 [bglimm]

AndyS: Which change?

14:33:38 [kasei]

small typo in 2.3.3: "does not no anyone" shoudl be "does not know anyone"

14:33:47 [bglimm]

AxelPolleres: In the negation section.

14:34:23 [bglimm]

AndyS: The wording says syntax, but we actually make deeper changes

14:34:38 [kasei]

I think it is strange to show an example from SeRQL for negation when there are existing SPARQL approaches...

14:35:02 [AndyS]

agree with kasei

14:35:12 [AndyS]

Use his impl as example.

14:35:17 [AxelPolleres]

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2009AprJun/0379.html

14:35:18 [SimonS]

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2009AprJun/0379.html

14:35:35 [bglimm]

AxelPolleres: I just pasted the relevant mail

14:35:37 [KjetilK]

Zakim, mute me

14:35:37 [Zakim]

KjetilK should now be muted

14:36:16 [kasei]

+1 to the rewording

14:36:18 [bglimm]

AndyS: I think the new wording is better

14:37:26 [bglimm]

AxelPolleres: Is the rewording for the second part fine too?

14:37:31 [KjetilK]

yes

14:37:35 [AlexPassant]

+1

14:37:48 [bglimm]

... There is a second part to this

14:38:02 [bglimm]

... there was a concern that only the minor system is mentioned

14:38:21 [bglimm]

... I am not sure which systems implement UNSAID? I think only ARC.

14:38:27 [KjetilK]

committed :-)

14:38:34 [kasei]

I support UNSAID

14:38:45 [AndyS]

s/ARC/ARQ/

14:38:56 [AxelPolleres]

Orri: NOT EXISTS for SQL

14:39:17 [bglimm]

... we not need to rewrite it as NOT EXISTS in SQL syntax

14:39:26 [bglimm]

s/not/would/

14:39:40 [bglimm]

AndyS: Are there any examples in the wiki pages?

14:39:48 [SimonS]

http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Design:Negation

14:40:01 [SimonS]

q+

14:40:10 [bglimm]

AxelPolleres: I would like to see an example like the other one, expression the same thing as the other one

14:40:16 [AlexPassant]

Zakim: ack me

14:40:19 [AlexPassant]

q-

14:40:49 [AxelPolleres]

ACTION: Orri to mail NOT EXISTS example.

14:40:49 [trackbot]

Created ACTION-44 - Mail NOT EXISTS example. [on Orri Erling - due 2009-06-23].

14:40:49 [bglimm]

Ori: I can mail an example

14:40:51 [kasei]

the UNSAID example in the referenced email will work in RDF::Query as-is.

14:41:30 [bglimm]

s/Ori/Orri/

14:42:15 [AlexPassant]

I was not actuall

14:42:16 [AxelPolleres]

ack AlexPassant

14:42:18 [SimonS]

Zakim, ack me

14:42:18 [Zakim]

I see no one on the speaker queue

14:43:01 [bglimm]

AxelPolleres: Orri will mal an example

14:43:10 [bglimm]

Orri: I can do that now.

14:43:22 [KjetilK]

Zakim, unmute me

14:43:22 [Zakim]

KjetilK should no longer be muted

14:43:34 [bglimm]

AxelPolleres: kjetil or Alex can you adopt that in the document?

14:43:42 [AxelPolleres]

ACTION: adopt NOT EXISTS running example in F&R

14:43:42 [trackbot]

Sorry, couldn't find user - adopt

14:44:05 [bglimm]

... where is Kasei's example?

14:44:05 [kasei]

Zakim, unmute me

14:44:05 [Zakim]

kasei should no longer be muted

14:44:20 [bglimm]

Kasei: It's in the mail and in other places

14:44:41 [AxelPolleres]

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2009AprJun/0379.html

14:44:50 [kasei]

Zakim, mute me

14:44:50 [Zakim]

kasei should now be muted

14:44:58 [AxelPolleres]

Kasei: UNSAID works with Kasei's implementation

14:45:00 [AndyS]

http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Feature:Negation#Example

14:45:11 [AndyS]

first example

14:45:34 [AxelPolleres]

ACTION: Kjetil to adopt one more additional syntaxe UNSAID or NOT EXISTS for negation

14:45:35 [trackbot]

Created ACTION-45 - Adopt one more additional syntaxe UNSAID or NOT EXISTS for negation [on Kjetil Kjernsmo - due 2009-06-23].

14:45:57 [bglimm]

AxelPolleres: Until when can this be done?

14:46:06 [bglimm]

kjetilK: I think immediately

14:46:29 [bglimm]

AxelPolleres: If we have all these actions done, we need approval by two more people.

14:46:57 [AndyS_]

AndyS_ has joined #sparql

14:47:04 [bglimm]

... We can still propose to publish, given that these reviews are positive given that it is a draft

14:47:35 [bglimm]

... So I need two reviewers

14:47:52 [bglimm]

... Steve, when could you look over the documents?

14:47:59 [bglimm]

SteveH: early next week

14:48:00 [kasei]

(very loud typing noises... bglimm, is that you?)

14:48:15 [bglimm]

AxelPolleres: Could anybody do that earlier.

14:48:29 [bglimm]

Simon: I can also do that early next week

14:48:31 [AxelPolleres]

ACTION: Simon to review F&R

14:48:31 [trackbot]

Created ACTION-46 - Review F&R [on Simon Schenk - due 2009-06-23].

14:49:19 [bglimm]

AxelPolleres: Kjetil can you incorporate the changes today after the meeting?

14:49:23 [bglimm]

kjetikK: yes

14:49:39 [bglimm]

AxelPolleres: So next week we can decide whether we can publish or not

14:49:56 [bglimm]

... is there anything more on F&R

14:50:24 [AxelPolleres]

Postpone decision to next telecon (hopefully really ONLY the decision)

14:51:40 [AxelPolleres]

ACTION: Axel to ask team contact to approve patent text (currently commented in the document).

14:51:40 [trackbot]

Created ACTION-47 - Ask team contact to approve patent text (currently commented in the document). [on Axel Polleres - due 2009-06-23].

14:52:16 [bglimm]

AxelPolleres: nothing else? No, so lets move on.

14:52:28 [bglimm]

... to Service Descriptions

14:52:33 [AxelPolleres]

topic: service descriptions

14:52:34 [AxelPolleres]

http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Feature:ServiceDescriptions

14:52:52 [KjetilK]

Zakim, mute me

14:52:52 [Zakim]

KjetilK should now be muted

14:52:52 [bglimm]

... last week two actions were completed on this

14:53:10 [kasei]

Zakim, unmute me

14:53:10 [Zakim]

kasei should no longer be muted

14:53:25 [bglimm]

... Greg, can you tell us what you did?

14:53:26 [AxelPolleres]

http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/actions/38

14:53:35 [bglimm]

Greg: I have posted a list on the wiki

14:53:48 [AxelPolleres]

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2009AprJun/0380.html

14:53:49 [bglimm]

... with things I suggest should be standardised

14:55:13 [AndyS]

q+ to ask about SPARQL/1.0 (minor)

14:56:17 [AxelPolleres]

ack AndyS

14:56:17 [Zakim]

AndyS, you wanted to ask about SPARQL/1.0 (minor)

14:56:38 [bglimm]

AndyS: we need to put the version number of the SPARQL features in

14:57:10 [AxelPolleres]

q+ to ask whether default should be SPARQL 1.0

14:57:52 [AndyS]

ack me

14:58:25 [bglimm]

AxelPolleres: Can we have an assumption that SPARQL 1.0 is the default

14:58:31 [SimonS]

Sounds like a chicken and egg problem: Need SPARQL/1.1 to say I am a SPARQL/1.0 endpoint

14:58:38 [SteveH]

+1 to no defaulting

14:58:51 [bglimm]

AndyS: I don't think. If the system does not say anything, then it is not supporting any particular version

14:59:10 [AxelPolleres]

seems agreement that no default behavior should be assumed/defined.

14:59:38 [bglimm]

... Greg, do you have an example for the connection RI?

14:59:58 [AndyS]

+1 to naming all built-ins with URIs.

14:59:59 [bglimm]

Greg: for new features, such as aggregate functions, it makes sense to give them new URI's

15:00:36 [bglimm]

... at the moment we don't have URIs for all features

15:01:07 [bglimm]

Greg: I think there was support for using URIs instead of keywords

15:01:29 [bglimm]

AxelPolleres: should we have URIs for libraries or URIs for all features?

15:01:32 [AndyS]

and that they should work as a function call. Except BOUND, || and && which are not strict functions (they are technically special forms)

15:01:51 [bglimm]

Greg: That might depend on the decision of whether or not we will have function libraries

15:02:02 [AndyS]

Axel: do we want also to name libraries?

15:02:21 [AxelPolleres]

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2009AprJun/0380.html

15:02:26 [bglimm]

AxelPolleres: We are running out of time, so we might have to contibnue this discussion on mail.

15:02:49 [bglimm]

... I have to talk to Lee on how we proceed now and where we continue

15:03:14 [bglimm]

... whether we should focus on the features or whether we should flesh out the time allowed features in the F&R document

15:03:34 [bglimm]

... Any other things for the agenda?

15:03:45 [Zakim]

-[IPcaller]

15:03:46 [bglimm]

... No, so see you next week.

15:03:49 [Zakim]

-SteveH

15:03:50 [Zakim]

-KjetilK

15:03:50 [AxelPolleres]

Adjourn.

15:03:52 [Zakim]

-SimonS1

15:03:54 [Zakim]

-AlexPassant

15:03:54 [Zakim]

-bijan

15:03:59 [AxelPolleres]

Thanks all!

15:04:00 [Zakim]

-kasei

15:04:06 [Zakim]

-AndyS

15:04:32 [Zakim]

-AxelPolleres

15:04:32 [SteveH_]

SteveH_ has joined #sparql

15:04:40 [AxelPolleres]

Zakim, list attendees

15:04:40 [Zakim]

As of this point the attendees have been +049261287aaaa, +1.518.276.aabb, kasei, +3539149aacc, AxelPolleres, bglimm, AlexPassant, +49.261.287.aadd, SimonS1, SteveH, AndyS, KjetilK,

15:04:44 [Zakim]

... [IPcaller], bijan

15:04:55 [AxelPolleres]

rrsagent, draft minutes please

15:04:55 [RRSAgent]

I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/06/16-sparql-minutes.html AxelPolleres

15:05:32 [bijan]

Axel, Is lee going to do the clean up of the minutes?

15:05:49 [kasei]

kasei has left #sparql

15:06:02 [AxelPolleres]

bijan, I need to check with him

15:06:09 [SimonS]

SimonS has left #sparql

15:06:20 [bglimm]

Let me know if i have to do anything on the minutes

15:06:41 [AxelPolleres]

The minutes magic was done by eric/bijan so far.

15:06:52 [AxelPolleres]

s/bijan/lee/

15:06:55 [bijan]

Yes

15:06:56 [bijan]

Lee

15:06:57 [bijan]

Not me

15:07:00 [bglimm]

At the moment, I get insufficient access privileges if I try to access the minutes

15:07:01 [bijan]

Definitely not me

15:07:15 [bijan]

rrsagent, make minutes public

15:07:15 [RRSAgent]

I'm logging. I don't understand 'make minutes public', bijan. Try /msg RRSAgent help

15:07:38 [AxelPolleres]

yeah, I got the same problem with the rrsagent last week already.

15:07:53 [bijan]

rrsagent,publish minutes

15:07:53 [RRSAgent]

I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/06/16-sparql-minutes.html bijan

15:08:21 [bijan]

I think the team member has to twiddle a bit

15:09:10 [bglimm]

Ok, so can I leave? My russian course started at 4, so I'll be late anyway

15:09:18 [bijan]

Yep

15:09:43 [Zakim]

-bglimm

15:09:45 [Zakim]

SW_(SPARQL)10:00AM has ended

15:09:46 [Zakim]

Attendees were +049261287aaaa, +1.518.276.aabb, kasei, +3539149aacc, AxelPolleres, bglimm, AlexPassant, +49.261.287.aadd, SimonS1, SteveH, AndyS, KjetilK, [IPcaller], bijan

15:10:17 [ericP]

RRSAgent, please make log world-visible

15:10:35 [AxelPolleres]

will figure it out with the others... ah, thanks ericP

15:10:55 [AxelPolleres]

ericP, can you take care of the nicely formatted minutes?

16:04:18 [AxelPolleres]

alright, all taken care of.

17:23:18 [Zakim]

Zakim has left #sparql