16:59:37 RRSAgent has joined #tagmem 16:59:37 logging to http://www.w3.org/2009/06/11-tagmem-irc 16:59:39 RRSAgent, make logs public 16:59:41 Zakim, this will be TAG 16:59:41 ok, trackbot, I see TAG_Weekly()1:00PM already started 16:59:42 Meeting: Technical Architecture Group Teleconference 16:59:42 Date: 11 June 2009 16:59:49 +jar 16:59:56 RRSAgent, make logs member 17:00:34 agenda + Convene 17:00:45 agenda + Approval of Minutes 17:00:54 agenda + Administrative items 17:01:02 agenda + TagSoupIntegration-54 (ISSUE-54) and liaison with HTML working group 17:01:11 agenda + LanguageVersioning-41 (formerly XMLVersioning-41) (ISSUE-41). 17:01:33 agenda + F2F Agenda Planning 17:01:34 +Sam 17:01:40 agenda + Should the TAG look into architectural issues relating to APIs? 17:01:57 agenda + Pending Review Items 17:02:06 agenda + Overdue Action Items 17:02:17 +[IBMCambridge] 17:02:22 rubys1 has joined #tagmem 17:02:23 zakim, [IBMCambridge] is me 17:02:23 +noah; got it 17:02:27 zakim, who is here? 17:02:27 On the phone I see Raman, DanC, jar, Sam, noah 17:02:30 On IRC I see rubys1, RRSAgent, jrees, Zakim, raman, ht_redmond, DanC, noah, trackbot 17:02:30 johnk has joined #tagmem 17:02:33 +John_Kemp 17:02:37 Zakim, take up item 1 17:02:37 agendum 1. "Convene" taken up [from DanC] 17:02:42 Hi Sam, thank you for joining us. 17:02:53 glad to be here 17:03:44 regrets+ Ashok, Henry, Tim, Larry 17:04:30 regrets- Henry 17:05:55 NM welcomes Sam Ruby, reviews agenda 17:06:03 zakim, please call ht-redmond 17:06:03 I am sorry, ht_redmond; I do not know a number for ht-redmond 17:06:08 NM: next week's telcon is at risk; no regrets now, though 17:06:41 RESOLVED: to approved http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2009/05/28-minutes 17:06:47 Zakim, close item 2 17:06:47 agendum 2, Approval of Minutes, closed 17:06:48 I see 8 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is 17:06:49 1. Convene [from DanC] 17:06:54 Zakim, close item 1 17:06:54 agendum 1, Convene, closed 17:06:56 I see 7 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is 17:06:58 3. Administrative items [from DanC] 17:06:58 Zakim, close item 3 17:06:58 agendum 3, Administrative items, closed 17:07:01 I see 6 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is 17:07:03 4. TagSoupIntegration-54 (ISSUE-54) and liaison with HTML working group [from DanC] 17:07:11 Zakim, next item 17:07:12 agendum 4. "TagSoupIntegration-54 (ISSUE-54) and liaison with HTML working group" taken up [from DanC] 17:07:24 ht_redmond, possible - _ confusion? 17:07:31 johnk_ has joined #tagmem 17:07:38 (no, I failed to update the dialout page properly) 17:07:48 NM: clearly success of HTML specs in development is a high priority for W3C... 17:08:12 zakim, what is code? 17:08:12 I don't understand your question, ht_redmond. 17:08:17 zakim, what is the code? 17:08:17 the conference code is 0824 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 tel:+33.4.89.06.34.99 tel:+44.117.370.6152), ht_redmond 17:08:52 NM: evolution of HTML interacts with our issues on language versioning and error handling 17:09:07 NM: we've talked about RDFa some 17:09:22 zakim, please call ht-mobile 17:09:23 ok, ht_redmond; the call is being made 17:09:24 +Ht 17:10:26 zakim, disconnect me 17:10:26 sorry, ht_redmond, I do not see a party named 'ht_redmond' 17:10:30 zakim, disconnect ht 17:10:30 Ht is being disconnected 17:10:31 -Ht 17:11:13 TVR: what news since the AC meeting; any news of your work with Steven P? 17:12:12 SR: the work with Steven... we looked at RDFa as a test case... 17:13:09 ... Ian Hickson took the RDFa requirements and produced something different 17:14:58 +??P6 17:15:01 SR: I think the review of RDFa by the HTML WG has turned up technical issues... 17:15:12 zakim, ? is ht_redmond 17:15:12 +ht_redmond; got it 17:15:33 ... RDFa was designed in the context of XHTML, but it's deployed in text/html, and that raises issues... 17:15:46 ... there are test cases and a spec being written 17:16:15 (test cases? I try to keep an eye out for those. maybe I'll q+ to ask for pointers.) 17:17:32 q? 17:17:32 Browsers are not the only HTML-consuming application. . . 17:17:40 NM: suppose this new spec depended on head/@profile but the editor of the main HTML 5 spec didn't specify @profile... 17:18:18 SR: yes, that's somewhat likely... @profile works a certain way in browsers; that's not really an issue, operationally. The only operational issue is what validator should say 17:18:35 q+ to ask about extensibility/namespaces 17:18:41 ack ht 17:18:41 ht_redmond, you wanted to ask about extensibility/namespaces 17:18:56 I can hear Henry fine 17:19:28 HT: ~1.5years ago, we discussed ARIA attributes in HTML 5... 17:19:33 SR: yes, I recall... 17:20:22 HT: it didn't work out as I would have liked, despite my spending a lot of energy... we seem to have aria_* attributes [or aria-* ] 17:21:10 HT: "extensibility is pretty much done" is one of the main arguments, especially from hsivonen. Where are we on that discussion? 17:21:35 q+ to say I want to understand html5 attitude to extension... agree with assessment "it's going to happen, how to channel it" 17:21:48 SR: I think hsivonen hasn't changed his position. I don't agree, but I don't see how to convince people such as hsivonen 17:22:01 q+ to ask more about particular extensibility mechanisms 17:22:20 ack next 17:22:21 jrees, you wanted to say I want to understand html5 attitude to extension... agree with assessment "it's going to happen, how to channel it" 17:23:00 [scribe missed what jar refers to re attributes] 17:23:00 johnk__ has joined #tagmem 17:23:29 SR: [earlier] people use new attributes all the time... 17:24:18 TVR: Chris Wilson seems to support extensibilty; he's moved away from the IE browser team... is he [doing something]? 17:24:50 q? 17:24:52 ... it seems to be that anyone who has a different opinion walks away. 17:25:43 johnk has joined #tagmem 17:25:56 [scribe struggles to record the gist of TVR's comment and SR's response] 17:26:44 NM: what sorts of extensibility mechanisms do you think are in play? 17:27:02 q? 17:27:13 ack next 17:27:14 SR: I think various extensions for things that people care about will happen, even without an overall mechanism. ARIA, fb: etc. 17:27:15 noah, you wanted to ask more about particular extensibility mechanisms 17:27:30 q+ to add the palm pre stuff to the list 17:27:58 SR: I hope to see, if not help build, validators that have some helpful approach to extensibility 17:29:17 NM: there's a self-describing sense to the web with a few registries (URI schemes, media types) and URI-based hooks... it looks like that's being lost with this free-for-all of fb: and aria-* 17:29:46 q? 17:30:13 SR: I think it's worth encouraging a few other vocabularies before building the extensibility bridge 17:30:37 NM: but doesn't that risk 3 or 4 mechanisms that we have to support? 17:31:00 johnk_ has joined #tagmem 17:31:06 TVR: yes, that does look like a risk 17:31:09 ack next 17:31:10 DanC, you wanted to add the palm pre stuff to the list 17:31:38 http://www.w3.org/QA/2009/02/palm_webos_approach_to_html_ex.html 17:31:57
johnk__ has joined #tagmem 17:33:27 original question was how can tag be helpful. no answer? 17:34:14 q? 17:34:47 johnk_ has joined #tagmem 17:35:08 so does the html5 wg need to know anything? 17:35:51 q+ to ask about the AC meeting question: managing the namespace, who's on top? 17:36:08 TVR meant this for the public record: TVR: I hear that unification efforts winding down and polarization remaining; this seems that there's little opportunity for the TAG to make a difference in the coming months 17:36:13 NM: we'd have to show people something they don't know. "we're the tag and we think X" doesn't help much 17:36:33 s/TVR meant this for the public record: // 17:38:15 q? 17:38:21 ack nt 17:38:24 ack ht 17:38:24 ht_redmond, you wanted to ask about the AC meeting question: managing the namespace, who's on top? 17:38:25 ack next 17:39:23 johnk__ has joined #tagmem 17:39:35 -Sam 17:39:47 NM: thanks for coming, Sam; if there's anything we can do to catalyze things, please let us know 17:40:01 Zakim, next item 17:40:01 agendum 5. "LanguageVersioning-41 (formerly XMLVersioning-41) (ISSUE-41)." taken up [from DanC] 17:40:07 Zakim, close item 5 17:40:08 agendum 5, LanguageVersioning-41 (formerly XMLVersioning-41) (ISSUE-41)., closed 17:40:10 I see 4 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is 17:40:10 Zakim, next item 17:40:11 6. F2F Agenda Planning [from DanC] 17:40:13 agendum 6. "F2F Agenda Planning" taken up [from DanC] 17:40:15 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2009/06/23-agenda 17:41:20 NM: one constraint I'm working with is that TVR is only available to dial in in our afternoons 17:42:30 NM: major goals of the meeting are * work on client-side URL patterns [?] and * versioning 17:42:40 q? 17:43:06 +1, agenda looks ok to me too 17:43:32 ACTION-33 due next week 17:43:32 ACTION-33 revise naming challenges story in response to Dec 2008 F2F discussion due date now next week 17:44:08 -ht_redmond 17:44:35 NM: note people identified as shepherds for sessions 17:44:52 johnk_ has joined #tagmem 17:45:07 q? 17:46:07 Zakim, next item 17:46:07 agendum 7. "Should the TAG look into architectural issues relating to APIs?" taken up [from DanC] 17:46:51 ACTION-273? 17:46:51 ACTION-273 -- Ashok Malhotra to carry forward framing issues around Archicture of APIs, with help from JK and LM -- due 2009-06-04 -- OPEN 17:46:51 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/273 17:47:06 JK: AM and LM and I talked about this and drafted something... 17:47:46 ... trying to frame the issue... 17:50:29 Zakim, next item 17:50:29 agendum 8. "Pending Review Items" taken up [from DanC] 17:50:51 action-255? 17:50:51 ACTION-255 -- John Kemp to contact Sam to ask (a) how can the TAG be helpful (b) offer set up phone call involving Sam & 1 or 2 others -- due 2009-05-13 -- PENDINGREVIEW 17:50:51 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/255 17:50:58 close ation-255 17:51:01 close action-255 17:51:01 ACTION-255 Contact Sam to ask (a) how can the TAG be helpful (b) offer set up phone call involving Sam & 1 or 2 others closed 17:51:41 ack danc 17:52:32 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2009Jun/0013.html 17:52:52 johnk__ has joined #tagmem 17:53:44 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2009Jun/0028.html 17:54:12 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2009Jun/0013.html 17:55:52 johnk_ has joined #tagmem 17:56:15 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/whenToUseGet.html 17:58:19 NM: maybe the "when to use get" finding should be updated to deal with malicious actors? 17:58:23 johnk__ has joined #tagmem 18:00:55 ACTION-255: the tag considered updating the "when to use get" finding but didn't find a critical mass of interest 18:00:56 ACTION-255 Contact Sam to ask (a) how can the TAG be helpful (b) offer set up phone call involving Sam & 1 or 2 others notes added 18:00:59 close action-255 18:00:59 ACTION-255 Contact Sam to ask (a) how can the TAG be helpful (b) offer set up phone call involving Sam & 1 or 2 others closed 18:01:12 zakim, who is here? 18:01:12 On the phone I see Raman, DanC, jar, noah, John_Kemp 18:01:13 On IRC I see johnk__, rubys1, RRSAgent, jrees, Zakim, ht_redmond, DanC, noah, trackbot 18:01:30 ACTION-257? 18:01:30 ACTION-257 -- Noah Mendelsohn to invite Mark Not or Lisa D to revisit progress in IETF/HTML liaison on content sniffing -- due 2009-05-28 -- OPEN 18:01:30 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/257 18:01:38 johnk_ has joined #tagmem 18:03:28 ACTION-264 due july 11 18:03:28 ACTION-264 Draft agenda item for upcoming telcon discussion of geolocation and privacy due date now july 11 18:03:53 close ACTION-270 18:03:53 ACTION-270 Provide additional material for review at F2F for Issue 41 closed 18:04:18 johnk__ has joined #tagmem 18:04:22 action-270? 18:04:22 ACTION-270 -- Larry Masinter to provide additional material for review at F2F for Issue 41 -- due 2009-06-22 -- PENDINGREVIEW 18:04:22 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/270 18:06:02 ACTION-272 due 15 June 18:06:02 ACTION-272 Report back to the TAG on outcome of collaboration with LM on Versioning due date now 15 June 18:06:52 ACTION-273 due 15 June 18:06:52 ACTION-273 Carry forward framing issues around Archicture of APIs, with help from JK and LM due date now 15 June 18:07:56 RESOLVED: to cancel the TAG telcon of 18 June 18:08:58 -DanC 18:08:58 -Raman 18:09:00 -noah 18:09:02 -jar 18:09:04 -John_Kemp 18:09:04 TAG_Weekly()1:00PM has ended 18:09:05 Attendees were Raman, DanC, jar, Sam, noah, John_Kemp, Ht, ht_redmond 22:01:34 RRSAgent has joined #tagmem 22:01:34 logging to http://www.w3.org/2009/06/11-tagmem-irc 22:01:37 RRSAgent, draft minutes 22:01:37 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/06/11-tagmem-minutes.html DanC 22:01:54 RRSAgent, make logs world-access 22:02:13 chair: NM 22:45:58 ht_redmond has joined #tagmem 23:32:27 timbl has joined #tagmem