IRC log of owl on 2009-06-10
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 14:31:24 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #owl
- 14:31:24 [RRSAgent]
- logging to http://www.w3.org/2009/06/10-owl-irc
- 14:31:37 [MartinD]
- ScribeNick: MartinD
- 16:17:21 [IanH]
- IanH has joined #owl
- 16:36:25 [uli]
- uli has left #owl
- 16:40:53 [MartinD]
- MartinD has joined #OWL
- 16:41:02 [Zakim]
- Zakim has left #owl
- 16:48:37 [Zakim]
- Zakim has joined #owl
- 16:48:41 [sandro]
- zakim, this will be owl
- 16:48:41 [Zakim]
- ok, sandro; I see SW_OWL()1:00PM scheduled to start in 12 minutes
- 16:49:20 [MartinD]
- RRSagent, make records public
- 16:49:53 [ivan]
- ivan has joined #owl
- 16:50:20 [zimmer]
- zimmer has joined #owl
- 16:54:44 [Zakim]
- SW_OWL()1:00PM has now started
- 16:54:51 [Zakim]
- + +0190827aaaa
- 16:55:00 [MartinD]
- Zakim, aaaa is me
- 16:55:00 [Zakim]
- +MartinD; got it
- 16:56:51 [Zakim]
- + +03539149aabb
- 16:57:01 [zimmer]
- Zakim, +03539149aabb is me
- 16:57:01 [Zakim]
- +zimmer; got it
- 16:57:23 [ivan]
- zakim, dial ivan-voip
- 16:57:23 [Zakim]
- ok, ivan; the call is being made
- 16:57:25 [Zakim]
- +Ivan
- 16:57:42 [Zakim]
- +IanH
- 16:58:08 [MarkusK_]
- MarkusK_ has joined #owl
- 16:58:24 [IanH]
- RRSAgent, make records public
- 16:58:36 [Zakim]
- +??P4
- 16:58:39 [IanH]
- IanH has changed the topic to: http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/Teleconference.2009.06.10/Agenda
- 16:59:24 [IanH]
- I see Martin did all the set up stuff already -- thanks!
- 17:00:02 [Rinke]
- Rinke has joined #owl
- 17:00:04 [MartinD]
- you're welcome
- 17:00:21 [MartinD]
- zakim, mute me
- 17:00:21 [Zakim]
- MartinD should now be muted
- 17:00:26 [Zakim]
- +Sandro
- 17:00:31 [Zakim]
- +baojie
- 17:00:41 [bcuencagrau]
- bcuencagrau has joined #owl
- 17:00:59 [baojie]
- baojie has joined #owl
- 17:01:21 [Zakim]
- +bglimm
- 17:01:29 [bcuencagrau]
- Zakim, bglimm is bcuencagrau
- 17:01:29 [Zakim]
- +bcuencagrau; got it
- 17:01:34 [bcuencagrau]
- Zakim, mute me
- 17:01:34 [Zakim]
- bcuencagrau should now be muted
- 17:01:47 [MartinD]
- topic: Admin matters
- 17:01:53 [IanH]
- zakim, who is here?
- 17:01:53 [Zakim]
- On the phone I see MartinD (muted), zimmer, Ivan, IanH, MarkusK_, Sandro, baojie, bcuencagrau (muted)
- 17:01:55 [Zakim]
- On IRC I see baojie, bcuencagrau, Rinke, MarkusK_, zimmer, ivan, Zakim, MartinD, IanH, RRSAgent, sandro, trackbot
- 17:02:09 [MartinD]
- IanH: any agenda amendments?
- 17:02:19 [Zakim]
- +pfps
- 17:02:21 [Zakim]
- + +2
- 17:02:23 [IanH]
- q?
- 17:02:26 [MartinD]
- IanH: I saw the previous minutes need some cleanup
- 17:02:27 [Rinke]
- zakim, +2 is me
- 17:02:27 [Zakim]
- +Rinke; got it
- 17:02:32 [Rinke]
- zakim, mute me
- 17:02:32 [Zakim]
- Rinke should now be muted
- 17:03:08 [pfps]
- pfps has joined #owl
- 17:03:08 [MartinD]
- ... minutes cannot be accepted in their current shape, I will talk to Bijan
- 17:03:39 [MartinD]
- subtopic: Action items status
- 17:03:40 [pfps]
- they're done
- 17:03:48 [MartinD]
- IanH: both items were completed
- 17:04:00 [pfps]
- ... at least, they *better* be done!
- 17:04:00 [MartinD]
- ... no overdue actions, let's move on
- 17:04:19 [MartinD]
- TOPIC: Plain literals
- 17:04:36 [pfps]
- we hope everything holds together
- 17:04:53 [MartinD]
- IanH: thanks goes to Sandro and Peter to make sure things were wrapped up and look good
- 17:05:17 [MartinD]
- ... there is a formal vote on the exit criteria
- 17:06:07 [MartinD]
- ... this needs to be updated, as the problem with rdf: text, etc. is no longer there
- 17:06:08 [Zhe]
- Zhe has joined #owl
- 17:06:35 [Zakim]
- +Zhe
- 17:06:39 [IanH]
- q?
- 17:06:45 [MartinD]
- Sandro: I don't think we need to do anything like implementation of literals
- 17:06:46 [msmith]
- msmith has joined #owl
- 17:06:51 [MartinD]
- IanH: any comments?
- 17:07:04 [MartinD]
- subtopic: Status report on the publication draft
- 17:07:12 [MartinD]
- IanH: all in good shape
- 17:07:25 [MartinD]
- Sandro: yes, they are all in good shape
- 17:07:33 [Zakim]
- +msmith1
- 17:07:54 [Achille]
- Achille has joined #owl
- 17:08:01 [MartinD]
- IanH: I sent an email and people responded, pointers associated with people/editors are mixed, some point to homepage, some to OWL wiki...
- 17:08:03 [Zakim]
- +[IBM]
- 17:08:24 [MartinD]
- ... please check what URL is associated with your name if you are an editor, whether it's the right one
- 17:08:45 [MartinD]
- subtopic: CR transition
- 17:09:06 [MartinD]
- IanH: the status is that all things are "go"... got approval from the director
- 17:09:12 [Zhe]
- :)
- 17:09:25 [MartinD]
- IanH: congratulations to everyone
- 17:09:44 [MartinD]
- Sandro: we can be optimistic that we would have it in the next few days
- 17:10:14 [MartinD]
- IanH: still a few minor hurdles, most administrative... it's likely to appear tomorrow or in a few days
- 17:10:33 [MartinD]
- ... big thanks to Sandro for working on getting the docs out as early as tomorrow
- 17:10:51 [MartinD]
- Sandro: and also thanks to all those contributing to the work
- 17:11:17 [MartinD]
- subtopic: LC transition
- 17:11:22 [Achille]
- Achille has joined #owl
- 17:11:25 [christine]
- christine has joined #owl
- 17:11:31 [MartinD]
- IanH: status is also good, docs are planned to go out shortly...
- 17:11:34 [Achille]
- zakim, ibm is me
- 17:11:34 [Zakim]
- +Achille; got it
- 17:11:39 [IanH]
- q?
- 17:12:13 [pfps]
- not a serious problem
- 17:12:17 [Zakim]
- +??P14
- 17:12:27 [MartinD]
- Sandro: my script doesn't know about notes, not sure how to publish syntax doc - as a note? but it's not a big issue at the moment
- 17:12:37 [christine]
- zakim, ??P14 is me
- 17:12:37 [Zakim]
- +christine; got it
- 17:12:41 [IanH]
- q?
- 17:12:45 [MartinD]
- ... more work needs to be done on this
- 17:12:59 [MartinD]
- IanH: we can focus on other things that need to be done in the near future
- 17:13:04 [MartinD]
- TOPIC: Issues/comments
- 17:13:22 [MartinD]
- IanH: a few issues still trailing, partly queries from the review process
- 17:13:54 [MartinD]
- IanH: first, comment from Benjamin on RL profile ( http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/LC2_Responses/BG1 )
- 17:14:02 [IanH]
- q?
- 17:14:04 [pfps]
- q+
- 17:14:10 [IanH]
- ack pfps
- 17:14:10 [MartinD]
- ... do we want to raise this into an issue form or ?
- 17:14:49 [MartinD]
- pfps: some changes he suggests go in less desirable direction, we made some changes for him, he was 'minimally' satisfied with those
- 17:15:22 [pfps]
- the more references the merrier :-)
- 17:15:23 [MartinD]
- IanH: I think I added both those references at the end, we can certainly use the alternative references as he suggests, would hurt the content
- 17:15:46 [pfps]
- that might be a minimal response
- 17:15:50 [MartinD]
- ... not yet there, but can be done, is this sufficient?
- 17:15:55 [Zhe]
- sounds good
- 17:16:27 [MartinD]
- ... ok, I will make that amendment and go back to Benjamin - if this satisfies his comment without deeper changes, good; if not, let's see what can be done
- 17:16:51 [MartinD]
- ... next, Michael's question on forest-like anonymous individuals
- 17:16:57 [IanH]
- q?
- 17:17:10 [MartinD]
- ... the syntax wasn't clear on this, did editors have chance to look at this?
- 17:17:28 [MartinD]
- pfps: we may need to do an update on that explanation, it was slightly ambiguous
- 17:17:38 [MartinD]
- IanH: esp. unclear wrt. roles
- 17:17:54 [MartinD]
- pfps: Ian to liase with Boris to get this fixed
- 17:18:17 [MartinD]
- ACTION: IanH to ask Boris to make a relevant editorial change in the syntax document
- 17:18:17 [trackbot]
- Sorry, couldn't find user - IanH
- 17:18:32 [MartinD]
- ACTION: Ian to ask Boris to make a relevant editorial change in the syntax document
- 17:18:32 [trackbot]
- Created ACTION-341 - Ask Boris to make a relevant editorial change in the syntax document [on Ian Horrocks - due 2009-06-17].
- 17:19:01 [MartinD]
- Ian: I should also take formal action on Benjamin's comment
- 17:19:23 [IanH]
- ACTION: Ian to add extra reference and check with Benjamin if this satisfies his requirements
- 17:19:23 [trackbot]
- Created ACTION-342 - Add extra reference and check with Benjamin if this satisfies his requirements [on Ian Horrocks - due 2009-06-17].
- 17:19:57 [MartinD]
- Ian: the last thing was Alan's comment on abbreviation form of literals, did Peter respond to this?
- 17:20:16 [MartinD]
- Peter: this has been done, part of a previous action point
- 17:20:17 [msmith]
- Boris's edits to syntax were very helpful for these literals
- 17:20:28 [MartinD]
- Ian: any other points to be discussed?
- 17:20:48 [MartinD]
- Peter: can we make a comment about references? making them more uniform, etc?
- 17:21:04 [MartinD]
- ... at some point we would need to do some cleanup and make them more uniform
- 17:21:32 [MartinD]
- ... some macros are already fairly uniform, but references from text look ugly
- 17:21:52 [MartinD]
- Ian: I agree, some of them don't help with reading the text
- 17:22:18 [MartinD]
- ... since it's mostly done manually, almost every of these references needs to changed by hand
- 17:22:47 [MartinD]
- Sandro: maybe we can replace them by macros, at the point of going through...
- 17:22:56 [MartinD]
- Ian: do we want to record this as an issue?
- 17:24:22 [MartinD]
- Ian: I take the action on me to discuss this unification with the editors of the documents to see if they are willing to do anything with it
- 17:24:30 [IanH]
- ACTION: Ian to discuss with editors the possibility of improving the citation style
- 17:24:30 [trackbot]
- Created ACTION-343 - Discuss with editors the possibility of improving the citation style [on Ian Horrocks - due 2009-06-17].
- 17:25:02 [MartinD]
- Ian: this is not exactly urgent, but let's have it recorded, any other issues?
- 17:25:08 [MartinD]
- TOPIC: Implementation and testing
- 17:25:10 [msmith]
- q+
- 17:25:17 [MartinD]
- Ian: not much to say on this?
- 17:25:17 [IanH]
- ack msmith
- 17:25:44 [ivan]
- q+
- 17:25:49 [MartinD]
- Mike: nothing to discuss, but I expect to have the queue of test cases down to zero next week...
- 17:26:05 [MartinD]
- Ian: if tests are approved, do you think we have sufficient coverage?
- 17:26:07 [IanH]
- q?
- 17:26:29 [MartinD]
- Mike: it would be nice if we had... I guess there should be enough coverage
- 17:26:36 [IanH]
- ack ivan
- 17:26:43 [MartinD]
- ... enough for syntactic items, tests should be sufficient
- 17:27:04 [IanH]
- q?
- 17:27:06 [MartinD]
- Ivan: do the upcoming tests include those that Mike prepared? I look a while ago and some are still empty
- 17:27:48 [MartinD]
- ... we have a tight schedule, we don't have tests for some aspects... they were promised, but when do we expect them to happen?
- 17:28:03 [MartinD]
- Ian: I will clarify this by email...
- 17:28:05 [msmith]
- yes
- 17:28:15 [MarkusK_]
- Michael already was looking at uploading his tests recently, and had some very concrete technical questions; I assume they could be ready rather soon
- 17:28:23 [MartinD]
- ... Mike is getting through them pretty quickly
- 17:28:29 [IanH]
- q?
- 17:28:54 [MartinD]
- Ivan: next Ian and me should see potential testers for RL, so it's important
- 17:29:08 [MartinD]
- Ian: I will communicate with Michael to accelerate this upload
- 17:29:28 [msmith]
- I heard from Dmitry, and he was asking about submitting FaCT++ results
- 17:29:29 [MartinD]
- Ian: I heard from Uli that Italian people ran the tests and will be submitting their results shortly
- 17:30:28 [MartinD]
- Ian: everyone who is an implementer or if you know implementers, please, submit results, it's straightforward
- 17:30:40 [IanH]
- q?
- 17:30:43 [MartinD]
- ... talk to us how to make the upload even easier (if necessary)
- 17:31:12 [Zhe]
- zakim, mute me
- 17:31:12 [Zakim]
- Zhe should now be muted
- 17:31:22 [msmith]
- this link I think http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/Test_Running_Guide
- 17:31:27 [MartinD]
- Ivan: would it be possible to put all the necessary links for the tests on the web page? now there are only test results, but the other links should be equally prominent on the homepage
- 17:31:48 [MartinD]
- Ian: anything else on implementation and/or testing?
- 17:32:11 [MartinD]
- ... I heard the progress was made with OWL API, there is a new version, fully OWL2 compliant - good news
- 17:32:36 [pfps]
- q+
- 17:32:40 [IanH]
- q?
- 17:32:41 [MartinD]
- TOPIC: Features "at risk"
- 17:32:44 [IanH]
- ack pfps
- 17:33:11 [MartinD]
- Peter: it might be good idea to have the implementation reports on the at-risk guys...
- 17:33:17 [IanH]
- q?
- 17:33:24 [MartinD]
- Ian: we already have the implementation of at least one - hermit almost done
- 17:33:32 [MartinD]
- ... who would be the other candidate?
- 17:33:43 [MartinD]
- Peter: Fact or maybe Pellet?
- 17:34:09 [MartinD]
- Ian: would this include both 'rational' and 'literal' support?
- 17:34:26 [IanH]
- q?
- 17:34:31 [MartinD]
- ... is there a plan to implement this in Pellet?
- 17:34:48 [MartinD]
- Mike: yes, we are actively working on this... it's a possibility...
- 17:35:02 [MartinD]
- ... unlikely to have it done in the main release of Pellet
- 17:35:18 [MartinD]
- Ian: maybe even a preliminary report about a beta implementation might be good?
- 17:35:24 [MartinD]
- Mike: working on it...
- 17:35:25 [msmith]
- yes.
- 17:35:38 [christine]
- christine has joined #owl
- 17:35:50 [IanH]
- q?
- 17:35:53 [ivan]
- q+
- 17:35:55 [MartinD]
- Ian: this section is just a reminder to keep us thinking about the implementation points
- 17:35:57 [IanH]
- ack ivan
- 17:36:03 [MartinD]
- Ian: Any other business?
- 17:36:21 [MartinD]
- Ivan: now that we are going to the CR phase, do we need weekly telecons?
- 17:36:37 [MartinD]
- Ian: judging from this week's agenda, it looks thin.
- 17:36:41 [IanH]
- q?
- 17:36:48 [ivan]
- Q+
- 17:36:53 [IanH]
- ack ivan
- 17:36:54 [MartinD]
- ... we will inquire on email what people want to do about this
- 17:37:01 [IanH]
- q?
- 17:37:02 [MartinD]
- ... possibility to go bi-weekly?
- 17:37:07 [IanH]
- q?
- 17:37:10 [IanH]
- ack ?
- 17:37:32 [MartinD]
- Ivan: bi-weekly would be alright, but we should still keep the time allocated for every week at this time, just in case something arises
- 17:37:48 [MartinD]
- Ian: anybody feels strongly about weekly telecons?
- 17:38:20 [MartinD]
- ... I will send an email round to suggest moving from weekly schedule to a bi-weekly one
- 17:38:40 [Rinke]
- thanks, congrats and bye!
- 17:38:42 [Zakim]
- -msmith
- 17:38:42 [Zhe]
- bye
- 17:38:42 [MartinD]
- Ian: if no other business, thanks to Martin for scribing and thanks to all for the transition to CR!
- 17:38:44 [Zakim]
- -Ivan
- 17:38:45 [Zakim]
- -Achille
- 17:38:46 [Zakim]
- -zimmer
- 17:38:47 [Zakim]
- -MarkusK_
- 17:38:47 [Zakim]
- -Zhe
- 17:38:49 [Zakim]
- -baojie
- 17:38:49 [Zakim]
- -IanH
- 17:38:50 [Zakim]
- -Rinke
- 17:38:51 [Zakim]
- -Sandro
- 17:38:52 [MartinD]
- ... telco concluded
- 17:38:53 [Zakim]
- -pfps
- 17:38:55 [Zakim]
- -christine
- 17:39:01 [Zakim]
- -bcuencagrau
- 17:39:02 [Zakim]
- -MartinD
- 17:39:04 [Zakim]
- SW_OWL()1:00PM has ended
- 17:39:08 [Zakim]
- Attendees were +0190827aaaa, MartinD, zimmer, Ivan, IanH, MarkusK_, Sandro, baojie, bcuencagrau, pfps, Rinke, Zhe, msmith, Achille, christine
- 17:47:53 [msmith]
- msmith has left #owl
- 18:08:53 [MartinD]
- Sandro, may I ask for some help with chatlogs?
- 18:15:50 [sandro]
- Hey MartinD
- 18:15:58 [MartinD]
- hi
- 18:16:11 [sandro]
- problems?
- 18:16:17 [MartinD]
- hopefully a quick q: trying to use the panel
- 18:16:29 [MartinD]
- when copying irc log, it complains with "end marker not found"
- 18:16:42 [sandro]
- hold on
- 18:17:13 [MartinD]
- I tried it manually earlier, so chatlog_2009-06-10 exists
- 18:17:38 [sandro]
- Ah. :et
- 18:17:43 [sandro]
- Let's just delete the page.
- 18:17:55 [sandro]
- just use the delete page at the top
- 18:18:01 [MartinD]
- the chatlog you mean?
- 18:18:04 [sandro]
- yes.
- 18:18:28 [sandro]
- then the panel can do its thing in peace.
- 18:18:47 [MartinD]
- can't see delete tab
- 18:19:22 [sandro]
- Okay, I did it.
- 18:19:33 [sandro]
- try panel now....
- 18:20:09 [MartinD]
- looks happier now...
- 18:20:15 [sandro]
- great.
- 18:20:27 [MartinD]
- sorry, my mistake, as I followed the old manual points
- 18:20:38 [sandro]
- yep.... understandable.
- 18:36:12 [MartinD]
- MartinD has left #OWL
- 19:50:59 [Zakim]
- Zakim has left #owl