IRC log of rif on 2009-06-09

Timestamps are in UTC.

14:47:16 [RRSAgent]: RRSAgent has joined #rif
14:47:19 [RRSAgent]: logging to http://www.w3.org/2009/06/09-rif-irc
14:49:31 [ChrisW]: sandro?
14:49:50 [ChrisW]: zakim, this will be rif
14:49:50 [Zakim]: ok, ChrisW; I see SW_RIF()11:00AM scheduled to start in 11 minutes
14:49:56 [ChrisW]: Chair: Chris Welty
14:50:09 [ChrisW]: Meeting: RIF Telecon 9-Jun-09
14:50:13 [ChrisW]: Agenda:
14:50:25 [ChrisW]: Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rif-wg/2009Jun/0041.html
14:50:37 [ChrisW]: ChrisW has changed the topic to: 9 Jun RIF Telecon, Agenda http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rif-wg/2009Jun/0041.html
14:50:55 [ChrisW]: rrsagent, make minutes
14:50:55 [RRSAgent]: I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/06/09-rif-minutes.html ChrisW
14:51:21 [ChrisW]: agenda+ Admin
14:51:26 [ChrisW]: agenda+ Liason
14:51:30 [ChrisW]: agenda+ Action Review
14:51:35 [ChrisW]: agenda+ LC Pubs
14:51:42 [ChrisW]: agenda+ rdf:text
14:51:48 [ChrisW]: agenda+ Test Cases!
14:51:52 [ChrisW]: agenda+ AOB
14:51:59 [ChrisW]: rrsagent, make logs public
14:55:12 [csma]: csma has joined #rif
14:55:40 [ChrisW]: Regrets: MichaelKifer AdrianPaschke JosDeBruijn ChanghaiKe
14:56:18 [csma]: list items
14:56:29 [csma]: zakim, list agenda
14:56:29 [Zakim]: I see 7 items remaining on the agenda:
14:56:31 [Zakim]: 1. Admin [from ChrisW]
14:56:31 [Zakim]: 2. Liason [from ChrisW]
14:56:32 [Zakim]: 3. Action Review [from ChrisW]
14:56:32 [Zakim]: 4. LC Pubs [from ChrisW]
14:56:33 [Zakim]: 5. rdf:text [from ChrisW]
14:56:33 [Zakim]: 6. Test Cases! [from ChrisW]
14:56:34 [Zakim]: 7. AOB [from ChrisW]
14:56:44 [sandro]: sorry, no tracker for now.
14:56:44 [ChrisW]: we're all set
14:56:50 [ChrisW]: ok
14:57:15 [sandro]: and not much of a www.w3.org. (it's under massive (probably accidental) assault at the moment.)
14:57:27 [ChrisW]: yes, very very slow
14:57:34 [ChrisW]: and you want to host ontologies.....
14:57:48 [sandro]: :-)
14:59:41 [sandro]: I gather we're getting > 5000 requests per second for /TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd from many different locations. Fun fun.
15:00:44 [Zakim]: SW_RIF()11:00AM has now started
15:00:55 [Zakim]: +Mike_Dean
15:01:13 [mdean]: mdean has joined #rif
15:01:20 [Zakim]: +??P33
15:01:27 [Zakim]: +[IBM]
15:01:29 [csma]: zakim, ??P33 is me
15:01:29 [Zakim]: +csma; got it
15:01:39 [ChrisW]: zakim, ibm is temporarily me
15:01:39 [Zakim]: +ChrisW; got it
15:01:46 [StellaMitchell]: StellaMitchell has joined #rif
15:01:50 [DaveReynolds]: DaveReynolds has joined #rif
15:01:59 [sandro]: csma, I suggest you invest in a local copy. perhaps you can load it once, then take a pen and paper and write it down, for future reference?
15:02:24 [Zakim]: +??P60
15:02:52 [ChrisW]: sandro, can you get to the actions list?
15:03:23 [LeoraMorgenstern]: LeoraMorgenstern has joined #rif
15:03:33 [Zakim]: +Stella_Mitchell
15:03:38 [ChrisW]: Scribe: DaveReynolds
15:03:40 [sandro]: trying, Chris
15:03:51 [DaveReynolds]: scribenick: DaveReynolds
15:03:51 [csma]: I got it
15:03:54 [ChrisW]: i got it
15:04:04 [Zakim]: +Leora_Morgenstern
15:04:47 [Zakim]: +Sandro
15:05:28 [Zakim]: +Hassan_Ait-Kaci
15:05:38 [hak]: hak has joined #rif
15:06:16 [Zakim]: -Hassan_Ait-Kaci
15:06:39 [Zakim]: +Hassan_Ait-Kaci
15:06:40 [ChrisW]: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rif-wg/2009Jun/att-0036/2009-05-26-rif-minutes.html
15:06:53 [ChrisW]: PROPOSED: approve minutes of May 26 telecon
15:07:02 [ChrisW]: RESOLVED: approve minutes of May 26 telecon
15:07:04 [csma]: zakim, Hassan_Ait8kaci is hak
15:07:04 [Zakim]: sorry, csma, I do not recognize a party named 'Hassan_Ait8kaci'
15:07:10 [ChrisW]: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rif-wg/2009Jun/att-0027/rif-telecon-090602.html
15:07:18 [csma]: zakim, Hassan_Ait_Kaci is hak
15:07:18 [Zakim]: sorry, csma, I do not recognize a party named 'Hassan_Ait_Kaci'
15:07:23 [ChrisW]: RESOLVED: approve minutes of June 2 telecon
15:07:37 [csma]: zakim, Hassan_Ait-Kaci is hak
15:07:37 [Zakim]: +hak; got it
15:07:45 [ChrisW]: next item
15:07:57 [ChrisW]: zakim, take up item 2
15:07:57 [Zakim]: agendum 2. "Liason" taken up [from ChrisW]
15:08:28 [Harold]: Harold has joined #rif
15:08:44 [DaveReynolds]: Sandro: OWL WG has PR meeting tomorrow
15:09:02 [ChrisW]: s/PR/CR/
15:09:31 [Zakim]: +[NRCC]
15:09:43 [Harold]: zakim, [NRCC] is me
15:09:43 [Zakim]: +Harold; got it
15:09:45 [DaveReynolds]: csma: Paul sent email message regarding PRR meeting which will discuss RIF/PRR alignment
15:09:49 [Zakim]: +klanz2
15:10:13 [DaveReynolds]: csma: suggestion for RIF to be concrete syntax for PRR
15:10:15 [AxelPolleres]: Zakim, klanz2 is probably me
15:10:15 [Zakim]: +AxelPolleres?; got it
15:10:35 [csma]: zakim, mute me
15:10:35 [Zakim]: csma should now be muted
15:10:41 [ChrisW]: zakim, next item
15:10:41 [Zakim]: agendum 1. "Admin" taken up [from ChrisW]
15:10:46 [ChrisW]: zakim, take up item 3
15:10:46 [Zakim]: agendum 3. "Action Review" taken up [from ChrisW]
15:10:50 [Gary_Hallmark]: Gary_Hallmark has joined #rif
15:11:09 [csma]: yes
15:11:31 [Zakim]: +Gary
15:11:38 [DaveReynolds]: action-837 - started process of listing questions, action still open
15:11:39 [csma]: 833 continued :-(
15:12:03 [trackbot]: trackbot has joined #rif
15:12:15 [DaveReynolds]: action-830 closed
15:12:43 [DaveReynolds]: action-829 completed (by Chris)#
15:13:16 [DaveReynolds]: action-828 pending-review
15:13:34 [csma]: will do it right now
15:14:24 [csma]: continued
15:14:29 [csma]: and continued
15:15:03 [DaveReynolds]: action-777 closed (no long needed)
15:15:17 [csma]: 827 is complete
15:15:17 [hak]: continued ...
15:16:08 [DaveReynolds]: Pending review reviews ..
15:16:14 [DaveReynolds]: action-836 closed
15:16:32 [DaveReynolds]: action-835 closed
15:16:45 [DaveReynolds]: action-834 closed
15:17:20 [trackbot]: trackbot has joined #rif
15:17:33 [DaveReynolds]: action-823 - a few outstanding items?
15:17:55 [DaveReynolds]: Editorial question on abridged compact URIs? Axel believes it to have been done.
15:19:54 [DaveReynolds]: Reference to symbol spaces also done.
15:19:59 [DaveReynolds]: action-823 closed
15:20:05 [DaveReynolds]: action-819 closed
15:20:35 [DaveReynolds]: action-765 closed
15:20:58 [csma]: zakim, unmute me
15:20:58 [Zakim]: csma should no longer be muted
15:21:24 [DaveReynolds]: action-762 closed
15:21:41 [ChrisW]: zakim, list agenda
15:21:41 [Zakim]: I see 6 items remaining on the agenda:
15:21:42 [Zakim]: 1. Admin [from ChrisW]
15:21:42 [Zakim]: 3. Action Review [from ChrisW]
15:21:43 [Zakim]: 4. LC Pubs [from ChrisW]
15:21:43 [Zakim]: 5. rdf:text [from ChrisW]
15:21:44 [Zakim]: 6. Test Cases! [from ChrisW]
15:21:44 [Zakim]: 7. AOB [from ChrisW]
15:21:50 [ChrisW]: zakim, take up item 4
15:21:50 [Zakim]: agendum 4. "LC Pubs" taken up [from ChrisW]
15:22:13 [csma]: zakim, mute me
15:22:13 [Zakim]: csma should now be muted
15:22:21 [DaveReynolds]: Chris: Core is complete, all pending items in resolution have been completed and reviewed.
15:23:00 [DaveReynolds]: Chris: BLD is complete except for comment on slight inconsistency in treatment of empty groups.
15:23:02 [trackbot]: ACTION-823 Review changes to BLD closed
15:23:02 [trackbot]: ACTION-819 Add append to DTB closed
15:23:09 [trackbot]: ACTION-765 Make the references be to XML schema 1.1 in all RIF documents closed
15:23:10 [trackbot]: ACTION-762 Amends the XML schema for Core. closed
15:23:42 [DaveReynolds]: Chris: EBNF says groups can be empty, but not explicitly covered in math english and semantics
15:24:30 [ChrisW]: action: harold to update groups in BLD syntax and semantics by today
15:24:31 [trackbot]: Created ACTION-838 - Update groups in BLD syntax and semantics by today [on Harold Boley - due 2009-06-16].
15:24:31 [DaveReynolds]: action Harold: amend BLD treatment of empty groups to be consistent
15:24:32 [trackbot]: Created ACTION-839 - Amend BLD treatment of empty groups to be consistent [on Harold Boley - due 2009-06-16].
15:26:52 [DaveReynolds]: Harold: [discussion with Sandro on wiki formatting problems with the sublist, currently not valid html, Sandro will look at it]
15:27:34 [DaveReynolds]: Chris: SWC all actions closed except for "fix or remove proof" (action-831)
15:27:48 [csma]: q+
15:27:55 [csma]: ack csma
15:28:10 [LeoraMorgenstern]: They should be marked as not having been checked.
15:28:31 [LeoraMorgenstern]: This makes it more understandable if a mistake is later found.
15:28:52 [LeoraMorgenstern]: (Just a note saying that they have not yet been checked, but will be checked in the future.)
15:28:54 [DaveReynolds]: Dave not as scribe - agreed leave them there but marked.
15:28:56 [AxelPolleres]: +1 to leave the proofs.
15:29:17 [csma]: zakim, mute me
15:29:17 [Zakim]: csma should now be muted
15:29:19 [DaveReynolds]: csma: leave the proofs in there to allow people to check
15:29:25 [LeoraMorgenstern]: In my experience, proofs that seem okay but have not been checked almost always are later found to have errors.
15:29:53 [Harold]: "This proof is at risk" ;-)
15:30:03 [LeoraMorgenstern]: Harold, I think that is too strong. ;)
15:30:12 [ChrisW]: action: chrisw to check with Jos about publishing proofs anyway
15:30:12 [trackbot]: Sorry, couldn't find user - chrisw
15:30:17 [ChrisW]: action: chris to check with Jos about publishing proofs anyway
15:30:18 [trackbot]: Created ACTION-840 - Check with Jos about publishing proofs anyway [on Christopher Welty - due 2009-06-16].
15:30:50 [DaveReynolds]: Chris: DTB, all done?
15:32:24 [DaveReynolds]: Sandro: current refers to wiki page for rdf:PlainLiteral which is on a separate wiki so xref needs to be changed to template. Sandro will fix.
15:33:27 [DaveReynolds]: Axel: have editor's note that PlainLiteral type is at risk, should we remove it?
15:33:38 [DaveReynolds]: Sandro, Chris: yes remove it.
15:35:23 [csma]: zakim, unmute me
15:35:23 [Zakim]: csma should no longer be muted
15:35:57 [DaveReynolds]: Chris: PRD. Issue on equivalence of two forms.
15:36:23 [DaveReynolds]: Chris: could leave both and see if anyone spots the difference.
15:36:47 [csma]: zakim, mute me
15:36:47 [Zakim]: csma should now be muted
15:37:06 [csma]: q+
15:37:13 [csma]: ack csma
15:37:40 [DaveReynolds]: s/forms/forms of describing the condition semantics (operational, declarative)/
15:37:46 [DaveReynolds]: Chris: second PRD issue, safeness
15:38:04 [DaveReynolds]: csma: would like version of Core definition which is more easily extensible to PRD
15:38:13 [DaveReynolds]: s/definition/safeness definition/
15:38:43 [AxelPolleres]: AT RISK notes for rdf:PlainLiteral have been removed: http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wiki/index.php?title=DTB&diff=10137&oldid=10092
15:38:49 [csma]: http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wiki/PRD_Safeness_Bottomup
15:38:51 [AxelPolleres]: ... in DTB
15:39:12 [DaveReynolds]: csma: attempted bottom up definition of safeness based on Core definition, intended to be equivalent to Jos' definition in Core then extension to PRD
15:39:14 [AxelPolleres]: ... remaining Editor's Notes, AFAIK were agreed to remain in the LC version.
15:40:06 [DaveReynolds]: csma: discussed with Jos, corrected some ambiguities, Jos would agree with using this form for definition in Core if it checks out
15:40:39 [DaveReynolds]: csma: Jos may be able to check the definition tomorrow
15:41:43 [DaveReynolds]: csma: if that's not possible, then fallback is to use Gary's definition
15:42:30 [DaveReynolds]: Chris: if change definition tomorrow there will be no time to check before publication
15:43:05 [DaveReynolds]: Csma: it is a short definition (< 1A4 page), same approach as core but starts from elements and compose instead of reverse
15:44:05 [DaveReynolds]: Gary: happy so long as the PRD definition can be seen as an extension of Core but not been able to review csma's proposal
15:45:00 [DaveReynolds]: Chris: suggest publish what we have now, if later change both Core and PRD definitions then regard it as just a bug fix since the new version is intended to be equivalent
15:45:40 [DaveReynolds]: csma: not happy with have the full dense definition of safeness in PRD for the point of the PRD audience, so have the bulk in Core is preferable.
15:46:04 [DaveReynolds]: Gary: so the proposal is the change the definition in Core to use csma's bottom up style?
15:46:08 [DaveReynolds]: cmsa: yes
15:46:20 [csma]: http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wiki/PRD_Safeness_Bottomup
15:47:01 [DaveReynolds]: Chris: would need people to review both Core and PRD versions by tomorrow
15:48:56 [trackbot]: trackbot has joined #rif
15:50:42 [ChrisW]: action: Gary to review new safeness
15:50:54 [trackbot]: Created ACTION-841 - Review new safeness [on Gary Hallmark - due 2009-06-16].
15:51:24 [ChrisW]: action: daveR to provide some feedback on new safeness by tomorrow
15:51:24 [trackbot]: Sorry, couldn't find user - daveR
15:51:32 [ChrisW]: action: dave to provide some feedback on new safeness by tomorrow
15:51:32 [trackbot]: Created ACTION-842 - Provide some feedback on new safeness by tomorrow [on Dave Reynolds - due 2009-06-16].
15:52:04 [ChrisW]: action: csma to remove current PRD safeness definition, and prepare to "plug in" new one
15:52:04 [trackbot]: Created ACTION-843 - Remove current PRD safeness definition, and prepare to "plug in" new one [on Christian de Sainte Marie - due 2009-06-16].
15:53:22 [ChrisW]: PLAN: use new safeness text in CORE and PRD if approved by all reviewers by tomorrow (6/10), otherwise go with Gary's text in PRD and leave CORE as is
15:55:00 [csma]: zakim, mute me
15:55:00 [Zakim]: csma should now be muted
15:55:14 [ChrisW]: zakim, list agenda
15:55:14 [Zakim]: I see 6 items remaining on the agenda:
15:55:15 [Zakim]: 1. Admin [from ChrisW]
15:55:15 [Zakim]: 3. Action Review [from ChrisW]
15:55:16 [Zakim]: 4. LC Pubs [from ChrisW]
15:55:16 [Zakim]: 5. rdf:text [from ChrisW]
15:55:18 [Zakim]: 6. Test Cases! [from ChrisW]
15:55:20 [Zakim]: 7. AOB [from ChrisW]
15:55:22 [ChrisW]: zakim, take up item 5
15:55:22 [Zakim]: agendum 5. "rdf:text" taken up [from ChrisW]
15:56:05 [DaveReynolds]: Chris: we approved subject to Axel's review and Axel was OK with it.
15:56:09 [ChrisW]: zakim, take up item 6
15:56:09 [Zakim]: agendum 6. "Test Cases!" taken up [from ChrisW]
15:56:41 [DaveReynolds]: Sandro: aim to publish LC documents Thursday
15:57:49 [DaveReynolds]: Chris: outstanding action of improving description of chaining strategies test cases, should review those
15:57:52 [ChrisW]: http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wiki/Chaining_strategy_numeric-add_1
15:58:42 [ChrisW]: http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wiki/Chaining_strategy_numeric-add_2
15:59:15 [ChrisW]: http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wiki/Chaining_strategy_numeric-subtract_1
15:59:58 [csma]: Yes, it is in Core
16:00:14 [Zakim]: -Mike_Dean
16:00:31 [mdean]: I've got another telecon
16:00:35 [DaveReynolds]: Gary: numeric-add-1 is safe and should be labelled as Core
16:01:51 [csma]: numeric-substract-2 should be Core too
16:02:48 [Harold]: RE: Created ACTION-838 - Update groups in BLD syntax and semantics by today [on Harold Boley - due 2009-06-16]. DONE.
16:03:35 [DaveReynolds]: Chris: for numeric-subtract-1 the final "Note ..." part of the description seems like it is another test case.
16:03:47 [ChrisW]: http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wiki/Chaining_strategy_numeric-subtract_2
16:04:00 [csma]: ... is in Core
16:04:42 [DaveReynolds]: Chris so action-581 is closed
16:04:53 [ChrisW]: http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wiki/Factorial_Forward_Chaining
16:05:12 [Zakim]: -hak
16:06:23 [ChrisW]: action: stella go over test cases for core/bld/prd
16:06:23 [trackbot]: Created ACTION-844 - Go over test cases for core/bld/prd [on Stella Mitchell - due 2009-06-16].
16:06:32 [csma]: Looks good to me. At least, it is safe
16:06:50 [csma]: According to all the definitions of safe that I understand :-)
16:08:07 [DaveReynolds]: Chris: suggest extending definition to explain why this version is safe
16:08:43 [ChrisW]: PROPOSED: approve test case Factorial Forward Chaining
16:08:43 [ChrisW]: From RIF
16:08:43 [ChrisW]: Jump to: navigation, search
16:08:48 [ChrisW]: PROPOSED: approve test case Factorial Forward Chaining
16:09:00 [ChrisW]: +1
16:09:01 [StellaMitchell]: +1
16:09:15 [csma]: zakim, unmute me
16:09:15 [Zakim]: csma should no longer be muted
16:09:19 [Harold]: +1
16:09:19 [AxelPolleres]: +1
16:10:33 [DaveReynolds]: csma: the three factorial examples should cross link via SeeAlso
16:10:37 [csma]: zakim, mute me
16:10:37 [Zakim]: csma should now be muted
16:10:51 [ChrisW]: RESOLVED: approve test case Factorial Forward Chaining
16:11:02 [ChrisW]: http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wiki/Factorial_Relational
16:11:33 [StellaMitchell]: http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wiki/YoungParentDiscount_1
16:13:28 [DaveReynolds]: Axel: this is a test case for the guard predicates and uses old syntax
16:17:00 [DaveReynolds]: Chris: with this data the second rule will not fire, is it worth adding something to trigger that, e.g. someone with age as a string.
16:19:24 [ChrisW]: PROPOSED: approve http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wiki/YoungParentDiscount_1
16:19:27 [ChrisW]: +1
16:19:33 [StellaMitchell]: +1
16:19:48 [DaveReynolds]: Should this be in Core?
16:20:07 [csma]: no
16:20:26 [DaveReynolds]: Gary: no, can't have membership in conclusion
16:20:32 [Harold]: +1
16:20:33 [LeoraMorgenstern]: 1
16:20:34 [DaveReynolds]: +1
16:20:37 [AxelPolleres]: +1
16:20:38 [LeoraMorgenstern]: I mean, +1
16:20:38 [Gary]: +1
16:20:44 [ChrisW]: RESOLVED: approve http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wiki/YoungParentDiscount_1
16:22:18 [ChrisW]: NEXT TELECON: TWO WEEKS (JUNE 23)
16:22:22 [DaveReynolds]: Chris: move to new telecon schedule, so next in two weeks
16:22:41 [ChrisW]: zakim, who is on the phone?
16:22:41 [Zakim]: On the phone I see csma (muted), ChrisW, DaveReynolds, Stella_Mitchell, Leora_Morgenstern, Sandro, Harold, AxelPolleres?, Gary
16:22:55 [csma]: zakim, unmute me
16:22:55 [Zakim]: csma should no longer be muted
16:23:02 [DaveReynolds]: Chris: want people to review outstanding test cases for next telecon
16:23:40 [ChrisW]: ACTION: csma to review All_Builtins, Assert, and AssertRetract
16:23:40 [trackbot]: Created ACTION-845 - Review All_Builtins, Assert, and AssertRetract [on Christian de Sainte Marie - due 2009-06-16].
16:23:51 [csma]: zakim, mute me
16:23:51 [Zakim]: csma should now be muted
16:24:08 [ChrisW]: http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wiki/Category:Proposed
16:25:06 [ChrisW]: ACTION: DaveReynolds to review RDF_Constant_Equivalence and RDF Invalid constants test cases
16:25:06 [trackbot]: Sorry, couldn't find user - DaveReynolds
16:25:15 [ChrisW]: ACTION: Dave to review RDF_Constant_Equivalence and RDF Invalid constants test cases
16:25:15 [trackbot]: Created ACTION-846 - Review RDF_Constant_Equivalence and RDF Invalid constants test cases [on Dave Reynolds - due 2009-06-16].
16:25:32 [ChrisW]: action: Harold to review Class Membership and Frames test cases
16:25:54 [AxelPolleres]: I still owe the all-builtins use case completion... there is an action alredy.
16:26:05 [ChrisW]: action: Stella to review RDF Combination subclass test cases
16:26:48 [ChrisW]: Leora to review NestedLists and NotAssertRetract test cases
16:26:52 [ChrisW]: Action: Leora to review NestedLists and NotAssertRetract test cases
16:27:09 [trackbot]: Created ACTION-847 - Review Class Membership and Frames test cases [on Harold Boley - due 2009-06-16].
16:27:09 [trackbot]: Created ACTION-848 - Review RDF Combination subclass test cases [on Stella Mitchell - due 2009-06-16].
16:27:09 [trackbot]: Created ACTION-849 - Review NestedLists and NotAssertRetract test cases [on Leora Morgenstern - due 2009-06-16].
16:28:05 [ChrisW]: action: Chris to review Element Equality, and List* test cases
16:28:30 [trackbot]: Created ACTION-850 - Review Element Equality, and List* test cases [on Christopher Welty - due 2009-06-16].
16:28:42 [ChrisW]: action: Sandro to review Malformed Lists, Modify, Modify loop, and Modify noloop test cases
16:28:42 [trackbot]: Created ACTION-851 - Review Malformed Lists, Modify, Modify loop, and Modify noloop test cases [on Sandro Hawke - due 2009-06-16].
16:29:21 [ChrisW]: action: Gary to review Multiple* test cases
16:29:24 [trackbot]: Created ACTION-852 - Review Multiple* test cases [on Gary Hallmark - due 2009-06-16].
16:29:32 [ChrisW]: zakim, who is on the phone?
16:29:32 [Zakim]: On the phone I see csma (muted), ChrisW, DaveReynolds, Stella_Mitchell, Leora_Morgenstern, Sandro, Harold, AxelPolleres?, Gary
16:29:55 [Zakim]: -Stella_Mitchell
16:30:01 [Zakim]: -Harold
16:30:01 [csma]: zakim, unmute me
16:30:02 [Zakim]: -Leora_Morgenstern
16:30:02 [Zakim]: csma should no longer be muted
16:30:02 [Zakim]: -Gary
16:30:04 [ChrisW]: zakim, list attendees
16:30:04 [Zakim]: As of this point the attendees have been Mike_Dean, csma, ChrisW, DaveReynolds, Stella_Mitchell, Leora_Morgenstern, Sandro, hak, Harold, AxelPolleres?, Gary
16:30:23 [ChrisW]: rrsagent, make minutes
16:30:23 [RRSAgent]: I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/06/09-rif-minutes.html ChrisW
16:31:01 [Zakim]: -AxelPolleres?
16:31:10 [AxelPolleres]: AxelPolleres has left #rif
16:31:53 [Zakim]: -DaveReynolds
16:36:06 [Zakim]: -ChrisW
16:36:07 [Zakim]: -Sandro
16:36:08 [Zakim]: -csma
16:36:09 [Zakim]: SW_RIF()11:00AM has ended
16:36:10 [Zakim]: Attendees were Mike_Dean, csma, ChrisW, DaveReynolds, Stella_Mitchell, Leora_Morgenstern, Sandro, hak, Harold, AxelPolleres?, Gary
18:35:49 [sandro]: sandro has joined #rif
20:05:49 [sandro]: sandro has joined #rif