12:58:27 RRSAgent has joined #swxg 12:58:27 logging to http://www.w3.org/2009/05/27-swxg-irc 12:58:29 RRSAgent, make logs world 12:58:30 Zakim has joined #swxg 12:58:32 Zakim, this will be 7994 12:58:32 ok, trackbot; I see INC_SWXG()9:00AM scheduled to start in 2 minutes 12:58:35 Meeting: Social Web Incubator Group Teleconference 12:58:36 Date: 27 May 2009 12:59:07 zakim, mute me 12:59:07 sorry, tinkster, I don't know what conference this is 12:59:31 7994? 12:59:36 jsalvachua has joined #swxg 12:59:42 libby: 7994 i think 12:59:48 zakim, code? 12:59:48 the conference code is 7994 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 tel:+33.4.89.06.34.99 tel:+44.117.370.6152), dom 12:59:59 thanks rreck 13:00:00 Hello to all 13:00:06 zakim, who's here? 13:00:06 INC_SWXG()9:00AM has not yet started, tinkster 13:00:07 On IRC I see jsalvachua, Zakim, RRSAgent, cperey, rreck, libby, adam, caribou, hhalpin, tpa, petef, melvster, mischat, tinkster, karl, trackbot, dom, AlexPassant 13:00:15 zakim, mute me 13:00:15 sorry, tinkster, I don't know what conference this is 13:00:17 7996 libby 13:00:29 zakim, this is SWXG 13:00:29 ok, tinkster; that matches INC_SWXG()9:00AM 13:00:30 no, 7994. 13:00:39 +Hakan 13:00:40 zakim, mute me 13:00:41 tinkster should now be muted 13:00:43 +[IPcaller] 13:00:55 Zakim, IPcaller is hhalpin 13:00:55 +hhalpin; got it 13:01:09 + +7.942.aacc 13:01:26 +??P20 13:01:35 +Carine 13:01:41 +jsalvachua 13:01:45 How does this IPcaller thing work then? Does Zakim have a SIP interface? 13:01:48 zakim, mute me 13:01:50 hajons has joined #swxg 13:01:53 jsalvachua should now be muted 13:01:59 +??P24 13:02:09 zakim, who is talking? 13:02:11 + +4222aadd 13:02:15 Zakim, who is making noise? 13:02:20 petef, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: 11 (61%), ??P20 (4%), ??P24 (85%) 13:02:31 hhalpin, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: 11 (10%), ??P24 (24%) 13:02:35 zakim p24 is me 13:02:58 + +0798919aaee 13:03:10 Zakim: +0798919aaee is mischat 13:03:19 zakim, +0798919aaee is mischat 13:03:19 +mischat; got it 13:03:20 zakim, +4222aadd is me 13:03:21 yeah 13:03:22 +petef; got it 13:03:29 zakim, +7.942.aacc is me (I think) 13:03:29 I don't understand '+7.942.aacc is me (I think)', libby 13:03:31 zakim, mute me 13:03:31 mischat should now be muted 13:03:34 zakim, +7.942.aacc is me 13:03:34 +libby; got it 13:04:23 zakim, mute me 13:04:23 petef should now be muted 13:04:24 zakim, who is making noise 13:04:24 I don't understand 'who is making noise', mischat 13:04:38 That's not our anthem though. 13:04:52 zakim, who is making noise? 13:04:54 +karl 13:05:02 mischat, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: hhalpin (29%), ??P24 (31%) 13:05:12 claudio has joined #swxg 13:05:13 + +49.173.515.aaff 13:05:15 zakim, mute karl 13:05:15 karl should now be muted 13:05:16 Zakim, read agenda from http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/socialweb/weekly-agenda.rdf 13:05:16 working on it, hhalpin 13:05:19 done reading agenda, hhalpin 13:06:02 OK, we should probably begin now 13:06:03 the sound is terrible 13:06:03 i nominated chime to scribe 13:06:24 Zakim, whose making noise? 13:06:24 I don't understand your question, hhalpin. 13:06:28 sorry that's me 13:06:29 Zakim, who is making noise? 13:06:32 zakim, who's making noise? 13:06:40 hhalpin, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: hhalpin (67%), ??P24 (9%) 13:06:47 me too 13:06:50 mischat, listening for 10 seconds I could not identify any sounds 13:06:59 is everyone having trouble just *hearing* other people. 13:07:03 All I can hear is a strange humming noise. 13:07:04 Perhaps we should do a quick go around. 13:07:10 it probably worthwile to start 5 minutes earlier with this many participants 13:07:30 Zakim, whose on the phone? 13:07:30 I don't understand your question, hhalpin. 13:07:33 +1 humming noise 13:07:36 Zakim, who is one the phone? 13:07:36 I don't understand your question, hhalpin. 13:07:42 humming 13:07:45 hello ! 13:07:46 Maybe it's me 13:07:46 zakim, who's here? 13:07:46 On the phone I see ??P5, AdamB, tinkster (muted), Hakan, hhalpin, libby, ??P20, Carine, jsalvachua (muted), ??P24 (muted), petef (muted), mischat (muted), karl (muted), 13:07:49 ... +49.173.515.aaff 13:07:50 On IRC I see claudio, hajons, jsalvachua, Zakim, RRSAgent, cperey, rreck, libby, adam, caribou, hhalpin, tpa, petef, melvster, mischat, tinkster, karl, trackbot, dom, AlexPassant 13:07:51 Zakim, mute me 13:07:51 hhalpin should now be muted 13:07:55 whew 13:07:55 Is the humming noise gone? 13:07:58 yes 13:07:59 yes 13:08:00 yes 13:08:00 humming gone 13:08:05 zakim, unmute me 13:08:05 petef should no longer be muted 13:08:07 Ah, perhaps it is some sort of weird Skype bug on my end. 13:08:08 -??P20 13:08:20 call in again perhaps 13:08:30 OK, I'll just mute in and out 13:08:33 is environement noise captured by microphone 13:08:38 ah, you need headphoen if you are using skype you get feedback from laptop mic -> laptop speakers 13:08:43 +??P20 13:08:46 I don't seem to be able to unmute me 13:08:51 +cperey 13:08:55 Zakim, unmute petef 13:08:55 petef was not muted, hhalpin 13:09:09 OK, let's begin the meeting. 13:09:18 hello 13:09:19 but we need a scribe... 13:09:22 I think perhaps I am P24? 13:09:22 do we have any volunteers? 13:09:23 i will scribe 13:09:27 Excellent mischat. 13:09:31 zakim mute me 13:09:38 +1 mischat 13:09:43 Convene SWXG WG meeting of 2009-05-27T13:00-15:00Z 13:09:44 ScribeNick: mischat 13:09:44 couldn't make out a word of that whoevere spoke 13:09:50 Scribe: Mischa 13:09:52 -cperey 13:10:00 Zakim, unmute me 13:10:00 hhalpin should no longer be muted 13:10:02 someone say hello to him 13:10:06 i said hello 13:10:07 Zakim, mute me 13:10:07 hhalpin should now be muted 13:10:19 Zakim, unmute me 13:10:19 hhalpin should no longer be muted 13:10:27 +cperey 13:10:30 Zakim, mute me 13:10:30 hhalpin should now be muted 13:10:43 zakim, unmute p24 13:10:43 sorry, petef, I do not know which phone connection belongs to p24 13:10:44 PROPOSED: to approve SWXG WG Weekly -- 20 May 2009 as a true record 13:10:49 Zakim, unmute me 13:10:49 hhalpin should no longer be muted 13:10:55 Zakim, mute me 13:10:55 hhalpin should now be muted 13:10:56 yes 13:10:59 yes 13:11:00 yes 13:11:01 yes 13:11:04 yes 13:11:05 yes 13:11:10 RESOLVED: approved SWXG WG Weekly -- 20 May 2009 as a true record 13:11:17 (although notingg that DanBri should have cleaned them up) 13:11:25 PROPOSED: to meet again Wed, 3 June. scribe volunteer? 13:11:30 Zakim, unmute me 13:11:30 hhalpin should no longer be muted 13:11:34 i think that danbri did, as per his last email 13:11:36 Zakim, mute me 13:11:36 hhalpin should now be muted 13:11:40 Scribe? 13:11:40 not me 13:11:43 :) 13:11:43 not me 13:11:49 Zakim, unmute me 13:11:49 hhalpin should no longer be muted 13:11:59 we could rotate people ! 13:12:02 i can do june 10th 13:12:03 Zakim, mute me 13:12:03 hhalpin should now be muted 13:12:03 +1 13:12:05 I'm happy to scribe occasionally, but not next week. 13:12:16 OK, let's have adam provisionally as scribe for next meeting. 13:12:26 i have no voice input today, and am happy scribe as a result 13:12:29 I will scribe in the future but not June 3 13:12:43 RESOLVED: move to a scribing list 13:12:48 Zakim, next item 13:12:48 I see nothing on the agenda 13:12:51 Hmmm... 13:12:59 General Organization 13:13:02 i have no audio 13:13:12 unmute me 13:13:16 Zakim, unmute me 13:13:16 hhalpin should no longer be muted 13:13:35 http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/socialweb/wiki/Liaisons 13:13:39 hhalpin: is going through last week's actions 13:13:51 Zakim, unmute me 13:13:51 hhalpin was not muted, hhalpin 13:13:54 apassant is a SPARQL liasion 13:13:55 Zakim, mute me 13:13:55 hhalpin should now be muted 13:13:59 in need of other ones ? 13:14:07 Do we have any volunteers? 13:14:12 are the groups that need liasons listed on the wiki? 13:14:16 Yes. 13:14:23 I've put myself down for Microformats. 13:14:24 I only hear Harry, is anyone else speaking on this bridge? 13:14:24 + +2 13:14:26 are in need of liasons 13:14:36 Zakim, +2 is me 13:14:36 +AlexPassant; got it 13:14:36 i may try to interface with dataportability.org 13:14:42 Ah, OK. 13:14:49 Could you add yourselves to the wiki? 13:15:16 jsalvachua: to be liaison with dataportability.org 13:15:25 + +039011228aahh 13:15:33 toby to be liason with the microformats community 13:15:43 \me Zakim, mute me 13:15:45 zakim, unmute me 13:15:45 petef was not muted, petef 13:15:45 +039011228aahh is claudio 13:15:56 C'mon no volunteers :( 13:15:59 q+ to ask about SIOC liaisons 13:16:02 I volunteered 13:16:07 audio problems 13:16:08 Zakim, q+ 13:16:08 I see AlexPassant, hhalpin on the speaker queue 13:16:14 Zakim, ack 13:16:14 I don't understand 'ack', hhalpin 13:16:17 Zakim, q- 13:16:17 I see AlexPassant on the speaker queue 13:16:19 for Social Network Portability Group List 13:16:21 i may help with other groups, with the vcard ietf group 13:16:27 renanto is on the wiki as the liason with "Policy Language Interest Group" 13:16:29 Zakim, ack AlexPassant 13:16:29 AlexPassant, you wanted to ask about SIOC liaisons 13:16:30 I see no one on the speaker queue 13:16:36 yes 13:16:37 can hear 13:16:39 yes 13:17:01 \me Zakim, mute me 13:17:02 apassant, to find a person to be SOIC liaison 13:17:17 uldis has joined #swxg 13:17:24 Uldis Bojars or John Breslin can be SIOC liaisons 13:17:28 her's uldis 13:17:30 no sound 13:17:32 OK - could you check on them. 13:17:50 ACTION: AlexPassant to see about SIOC liason 13:17:50 Created ACTION-15 - See about SIOC liason [on Alexandre Passant - due 2009-06-03]. 13:17:51 sounds good 13:17:53 AlexPassant to check to see if we can find a SIOC liaison 13:17:56 yeah call went silent 13:18:03 Zakim, unmute me 13:18:03 hhalpin should no longer be muted 13:18:07 -AlexPassant 13:18:13 i can hear you 13:18:15 I hear only Harry 13:18:18 i can hear you too 13:18:26 I have added myself to wiki as volunteer liason for data portability, diso and social network portability 13:18:31 ACTION: [DONE] danbri sketch a 5 line template for interaction with other groups (cf InvitedExperts, DiscussionTopics) 13:18:31 Sorry, couldn't find user - [DONE] 13:18:33 + +2 13:18:34 I *can't* speak 13:18:46 Zakim has my number wrong :-( 13:18:48 ACTION: [DONE] karl to produce a template for TF deliverables. 13:18:48 Sorry, couldn't find user - [DONE] 13:18:50 zakim, unmute petef 13:18:50 petef was not muted, mischat 13:18:59 Zakim, +2 is me 13:18:59 +AlexPassant; got it 13:19:03 zakim, unmute me 13:19:03 karl should no longer be muted 13:19:03 Karl - do you wish to explain your template? 13:19:07 Karl put together a template for the user stories 13:19:09 \me Zakim, mute me 13:19:17 karl has put up 2 templates 13:19:27 are user stories aka use cases? 13:19:31 zakim, P24 is really me. 13:19:31 sorry, petef, I do not recognize a party named 'P24' 13:19:31 yup rreck 13:19:40 so user stories seemed too long 13:19:57 i am developing a use case atm 13:20:02 karl suggests we should be concise and to the point 13:20:31 can someone put the URI to the templates into IRC 13:20:36 Karl's template - http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xg-socialweb/2009May/0103.html 13:20:42 goal of the templates are to speed up the writing 13:20:48 thanks Toby! 13:21:06 templates will give us a common look and feel 13:21:15 + +1.631.704.aajj 13:21:27 zakim, mute me 13:21:27 tinkster was already muted, tinkster 13:21:37 \me Zakim, unmute me 13:21:39 Karl is open to comments/modifications re: the templates 13:22:09 hhalpin happy with the user stories templates 13:22:09 how come petef.a not petef? 13:22:30 hhalpin would like a template for the final report to be put up on the wiki 13:22:39 harry asks if anyone has any experience in this ? 13:22:41 Does anyone have a final report template as well? 13:23:12 Does anyone want to take that action - i.e. finding a template for final deliverables? 13:23:21 microformats.org write all specs on mediawiki - perhaps useful? 13:23:21 karl stated that someone should take an action to port the final report template to the wiki 13:23:52 can we not look at other XGs? 13:24:13 can a chair close this action -> http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/socialweb/track/actions/14 13:24:22 ivan has joined #swxg 13:24:24 i can take a stab at it 13:24:40 ACTION: adam to find a good final report template and port it to the wiki 13:24:40 Created ACTION-16 - Find a good final report template and port it to the wiki [on Adam Boyet - due 2009-06-03]. 13:24:56 hhalpin: adam seemed to suggest that he would look into the template 13:25:12 3. Task Forces 13:25:19 hhalpin asks if anyone has any comments re: the organisation so we can move onto the task force issue 13:25:45 Task force issues: should we merge context / privacy ? 13:25:47 zakim, unmute me 13:25:47 cperey was not muted, cperey 13:25:55 zakim, mute me 13:25:55 karl should now be muted 13:25:56 Context and Privacy Task Force (Karl Dubost)? For Portability and Architectures Task Force (@@)? 13:26:07 i/3. Task Forces/TOPIC: Task forces/ 13:26:19 so, harry is asking if people like proposed task force titles 13:26:36 Portability and Architectures - jsalvachua and petef volunteered last telecon. 13:26:39 cperey: has no preference for times, but thinks we need critical mass 13:26:50 and we need a clear agenda 13:27:07 signing up to task forces where? 13:27:26 zakim, unmute petef.a 13:27:26 petef.a should no longer be muted 13:27:29 Maybe we could remind people to sign up for task forces 13:27:30 zakim, unmute me 13:27:30 karl should no longer be muted 13:27:30 cperey participation has gone down since the start of XG, cperey thinks we should find out how many people are interested in each Task force 13:27:41 petef : we both may start together to push the task force 13:27:48 who is speaking ? 13:27:51 karl *MAY* be the task force leader ;) 13:27:54 zakim, mute me 13:27:54 petef should now be muted 13:28:02 zakim, mute me 13:28:02 cperey should now be muted 13:28:17 should we find out how many are interested in each task force 13:28:23 I find this constant un/muting incredibly frustrating 13:28:43 I thought we had leaders ? 13:28:55 Also interested in portability/arch but not leading. 13:28:59 I agree 13:29:06 Wiki page for each of these task forces? 13:29:06 where? 13:29:10 I don't think we do. 13:29:13 what next is unclear! 13:29:14 I can set up template wiki pages for them. 13:29:22 hhalpin: thinks we need a wiki page for the task forces 13:29:26 I will draft one for portability and architectures 13:29:43 ACTION: tinkster to draft wiki pages for task forces 13:29:43 Created ACTION-17 - Draft wiki pages for task forces [on Toby Inkster - due 2009-06-03]. 13:29:48 toby to set up wiki page re task forces, and people should add what they are thinking 13:29:58 caribou, how? 13:30:34 OK, sorry, muted on skype 13:30:35 zakim, unmute me 13:30:35 jsalvachua should no longer be muted 13:30:36 portability task force, so hhalpin is interested in how the W3C can promote how data can be made portable 13:30:44 Can anyone else hear feedback? 13:30:52 zakim, mute petef.a 13:30:52 petef.a should now be muted 13:30:54 zakim, mute me 13:30:54 karl should now be muted 13:31:00 sorry petef.a 13:31:05 joaquin? 13:31:12 i am not sure if you hear me 13:31:23 No, I don't hear you 13:31:25 no i can only hear typing 13:31:28 i would be happy to contribute but would like to have the discussion on the list 13:31:30 I can just hear typing. 13:31:54 http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/socialweb/wiki/Portability_Architecture_TF 13:32:01 Great 13:32:07 jsalvachua: said that he will try and populate the wiki, regarding a roadmap for the portability task froce 13:32:43 +q 13:32:47 http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/socialweb/wiki/Context_Privacy_TF 13:32:55 4. Invited Guests 13:32:57 I will put some stuff on the wiki for privacy task force 13:33:06 -q 13:33:44 Anyone else? 13:34:00 invited speaker lists have been populated for the widget topic and the Vcard topic, does anyone else have any ideas on this ? 13:34:30 hajons, asks if people should just write to the wiki, if they want to join a task force ? 13:34:41 Yes, just sign up to task force on wiki page 13:34:42 or is there some other protocol 13:34:43 how do we join the task forces 13:34:49 ok 13:34:54 maybe once the task force pages are created, each person can add themselves as a member 13:34:57 of the task force 13:35:04 +1 adam 13:35:10 hhalpin states that we should just add names to the list of task forces on the wiki 13:35:16 i will join the privacy task force 13:35:22 http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/socialweb/wiki/Context_Privacy_TF 13:35:25 ;) 13:35:29 i dont feel capable of leading it 13:35:30 go toby 13:35:46 - +1.631.704.aajj 13:36:00 are we going to have invited guest for privacy and context ? 13:36:20 zakim, unmute me 13:36:20 cperey should no longer be muted 13:36:25 harry wodners if there is any mobile interest 13:36:30 from the group 13:36:35 yes, I will propose a guest on context / mobile 13:36:46 tim gave his regrets and daniel applequist can't make this meeting in particular :( 13:37:08 Perhaps you can explain what the OSLO group is? 13:37:19 Does it have a web-page? 13:37:20 + +1.631.877.aakk 13:37:31 Open Sharing of LOcations 13:37:39 christine, is interested the mobile technologies, and christine also contacted someone (?) external, and they are not interested in developing protocols 13:38:10 OSLO group announced start earlier this year, and they are NOT interested with speaking to W3C 13:38:11 Open Sharing of Location-based Objects (OSLO) - http://uk.techcrunch.com/2009/02/27/oslo-accord-pushes-location-sharing-between-social-networks/ 13:38:31 Christine, perhaps stay in touch with them? 13:38:36 http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/socialweb/wiki/InvitedGuests 13:39:03 there are others which could speak to the w3c 13:39:13 but we need some specific questions 13:39:13 Maybe brainstorm on the wiki what specific questions would be relevant to these mobile operators? 13:39:25 so that christine could approach people 13:39:32 who is speaking ? 13:39:40 lubna 13:39:45 zakim, who's making noise 13:39:45 I don't understand 'who's making noise', tinkster 13:39:46 lubna dajani 13:39:57 she isnt on IRC yet 13:40:05 im trying to help her in another window 13:40:06 lubna said that she has contacts in the mobile space 13:40:07 Or what is part of their problems? 13:40:15 What could they need? 13:40:45 nokia people did context and mobile stuff, and I could ask Mor Naaman to talk about the Zonetag project 13:40:52 but i am out of touch with the mobile stuff 13:41:18 harry asked if we could have a wiki page / content regarding the mobile space 13:41:37 ACTION: cperey to add mobile companies to to Invited Guests and to brainstorm what exact questions or topics would be most interesting 13:41:37 Created ACTION-18 - Add mobile companies to to Invited Guests and to brainstorm what exact questions or topics would be most interesting [on Christine Perey - due 2009-06-03]. 13:41:38 christine would like an agenda to take to the mobile experts before contacting them 13:41:53 now moving to the next topic 13:41:55 5. Creating User Stories on the Wiki 13:41:57 UserStories 13:42:36 zakim, mute me 13:42:36 cperey should now be muted 13:42:45 sorry my phone cut out for a bit 13:42:46 :) 13:43:15 zakim, unmute me 13:43:15 karl should no longer be muted 13:43:18 any more use-cases? 13:43:28 there is some work i emailed round from a chap from cambridge 13:43:48 which had some good examples of how privacy in the social web tends to look like 13:44:28 karl thinks that we should add some more user stories, so that we can get a feel for what the XG should be looking at 13:44:48 i can barely understand you karl i am sorry 13:44:51 :) 13:44:56 yes i will add a story 13:45:01 I feel we are still missing some use-cases regarding businesses and developers 13:45:11 i wanted to get privacy classes but no one answered my email 13:45:14 ah excellent point 13:45:16 karl: we should take the current user stories and check them against the actual social networks such as frienfeed, facebook, etc. 13:45:24 then we can see if our cases make sense 13:45:37 and then we can identify if there are missing ones. 13:45:37 i posted about this 13:45:42 great idea 13:45:45 I've got a developer story - I'll create an action for myself. 13:45:55 harry says that we should have a matrix 13:45:56 social network matrix 13:46:06 ACTION tinkster to document developer stories on wiki. 13:46:06 Created ACTION-19 - Document developer stories on wiki. [on Toby Inkster - due 2009-06-03]. 13:46:10 showing how social networks uphold privacy 13:46:17 SO, i have pointed to a matrix 13:46:19 almost all the user stories that we have are related to privacy/data protection 13:46:20 ACTION: karl to create the matix to be filled 13:46:20 Created ACTION-20 - Create the matix to be filled [on Karl Dubost - due 2009-06-03]. 13:46:21 we have developed at garlik 13:46:22 can someone help me find classes of privacy 13:46:32 but it is for government institutions 13:46:42 about what they do with your data 13:46:50 mischa - could we expland the matrix to deal with commercial social networks? 13:46:53 i could put to a similar oen for social networking sites 13:47:16 Maybe we could look through alexa to get out the top social networking sites. 13:47:19 I can do that... 13:47:28 karl says that he will put up a matrix based on the current user stories 13:47:36 ACTION: To retrieve top X social networking sites from the top 500 sites of Alexa 13:47:36 Sorry, couldn't find user - To 13:47:48 ACTION: hhalpin to retrieve top X social networking sites from the top 500 sites of Alexa 13:47:48 Created ACTION-21 - Retrieve top X social networking sites from the top 500 sites of Alexa [on Harry Halpin - due 2009-06-03]. 13:47:55 so that people can look at each individual social networking sites 13:48:06 Karl, what criteria do you want for this list? 13:48:12 the "top" social networks? 13:48:21 cperey: Alexa traffic 13:48:30 irrelevant 13:48:33 for mobile 13:48:37 s/cperey:/cperey,/ 13:48:45 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_social_networking_websites 13:48:48 cperey, what would be your criteria? :) 13:48:59 how could we get the top X social networking sites for mobile? 13:48:59 Number of unique users per month 13:49:06 is that list available anywhere? 13:49:10 more relevant for all types of social networks 13:49:18 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_social_networking_websites 13:49:27 I have a list (not published) 13:49:34 wouldnt you just select out of the top 500 alexa sites? 13:49:45 I thin that list on wikipedia uses the company's own data, right? 13:49:51 there has been some work from cambridge 13:49:54 were they looked into 13:49:58 I will do Mixi (social network in Japan) because I have an account and they don't open account to people outside Japan 13:49:59 social networking sites 13:50:01 T&Cs 13:50:03 http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/8060407.stm 13:50:13 i would like to invite the phd student which did the work 13:50:14 this is a metrics question 13:50:16 humming is back 13:50:25 looking for the persons link 13:50:32 I'm happy to go through alexa if someone else will merge it with wikipedia and Christine's list 13:50:33 zakim, who is making noise ? 13:50:37 how do you measure a social network 13:50:44 mischat, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: karl (5%) 13:50:47 this is returning to the metric question 13:50:52 zakim, mute me 13:50:52 karl should now be muted 13:51:12 OK 13:51:14 +1 for merging 13:51:18 +1 merging 13:51:20 +1 merging 13:51:22 30-50 social networks 13:51:32 yes that sounds reasonable 13:51:32 So we merge list from alexa\wikipedia with Christine's list? 13:51:32 by country? worldwide? 13:51:37 worldwide 13:51:44 I would assume world-wide at first, and then later we can break it down by country 13:51:45 hhalpin: asked if we could merge christine's list with the alexa rankign and the wikipedia list so as to pick 30 social networking sites 13:51:55 unless your data is already broken down by country Christine 13:52:05 I can work with Harry on this 13:52:12 zakim unmute me 13:52:25 zakim, unmute cperey 13:52:25 cperey should no longer be muted 13:52:31 http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~jra40/publications/ 13:52:48 I would suggest you also need IM based networks such as Skype, GTalk, XMPP, if they are not included already, as they have significant usage and maturity 13:52:50 cperey's data is broken down by country 13:53:14 cperey: on/deck and business models. 13:53:14 30 or 50? 13:53:23 Start with 30 and then build if needed? 13:53:26 cperey would be happy with 30 13:53:29 +1 13:53:35 +1 13:53:46 cperey: will make a list of the last 30 13:53:47 top based on number of users? 13:53:57 i would like us to check their Terms and Conditions 13:54:10 and see if they actually abide by it 13:54:37 MacTed has joined #swxg 13:54:38 ACTION: cperey to make list of top 30 to do profiles on, to merge with hhalpin's list on alexa 13:54:38 Created ACTION-22 - Make list of top 30 to do profiles on, to merge with hhalpin's list on alexa [on Christine Perey - due 2009-06-03]. 13:54:54 I'll have to find someone for http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2channel 13:55:04 Christine, do you list mobile access as a feature too? 13:55:09 -??P20 13:55:11 we do it as more of long-term action 13:55:17 cperey: data has information regarding social networking sites, and their features 13:55:21 not terms and conditions 13:55:24 does your list have the feature? 13:55:37 feature-criteria like instant-messaging, and all of that? 13:55:57 all of the social networking sites on christine's list are mobile centric 13:56:01 cperey: "PC-centric" vs. "mobile-centric" and then a continuum inbetween. 13:56:22 what is a mobile access? specific software for mobile devices? 13:56:22 my cell does the same things as my PC 13:56:25 sounds good to me 13:56:31 cperey: will get her mobile-centric list and we should look at it 13:56:55 yes rreck, but some sites don't well with mobile phones if you don't have a gphone/iphone/other dataphone 13:57:06 and add an pc-centric social networkings site to the cperey's list 13:57:11 Norm has joined #swxg 13:57:14 can we check to see if any of these sites take advantage of user-context, like geolocation from mobile phone? 13:57:56 (not good at scribing) 13:57:57 ! 13:58:00 Sounds great! 13:58:05 +Norm 13:58:15 matrix of social networking site 13:58:18 and their features 13:58:21 where does this live? 13:58:36 we should a manufacture a wiki page for the list 13:58:37 we need a wiki page for this list 13:58:40 yes, please 13:58:52 yes, I will fill in 13:59:11 I need to sign off and go to another meeting, bye all 13:59:20 bye cperey 13:59:25 vcard and portability issues will have its own discussion after this call 13:59:36 any more comments before we move to vcard? 13:59:42 such as things we are missing? 13:59:44 does anyone have any issues, there are lots of quiet people about? 13:59:47 -tinkster 13:59:54 have we looked over anything 13:59:56 Dammit. My phone's gone dead. 14:00:01 Still on IRC though. 14:00:06 are we missing anything obvious ? 14:00:10 -cperey 14:00:13 im not sure 14:00:22 this should be an ongoing process 14:00:30 if you think we are missing something 14:00:36 6. Invited Guest Telecon: VCard in RDF 14:00:38 let the mailing list know 14:00:47 im trying to find classes of privacy and i cant be the first person to want them 14:01:12 rreck: look at this guys work http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~jra40/publications/ 14:01:15 One advantage of the vCard in RDF format (RDF Schema here) is it's use of RDF containers to allow complex vCard expressions. Should this be kept, and if so, how? Which ones, rdf:bag, rdf:Alt, rdf:Seq? How about its use of sub-structure? 14:01:47 I have to leave this call, it is 3 14:01:49 -karl 14:01:51 :( 14:01:55 http://www.w3.org/TR/vcard-rdf 14:01:57 mischat: ty 14:01:59 That's the older vCard in RDF format 14:02:06 - +1.631.877.aakk 14:02:19 Aren't rdf:Bag/rdf:Alt/rdf:Seq generally seen as poor cousins of rdf:List these days? 14:02:28 -petef.a 14:02:44 I have to leave too, bye 14:02:45 1) No use of containers in vCard at all 14:02:51 2) Using *only* rdf:List 14:02:52 why isnt rdf:bag enough 14:02:53 If the order of items is important, use rdf:List, otherwise don't use a container at all. 14:03:01 3) Letting it all be a free for all. 14:03:03 i have to leave this chat now :( 14:03:06 i am sorry 14:03:07 +??P10 14:03:13 Someone else can scribe? 14:03:23 Zakim, P10 is PeterMika 14:03:23 sorry, hhalpin, I do not recognize a party named 'P10' 14:03:28 Zakim, ??P10 is PeterMika 14:03:28 +PeterMika; got it 14:03:35 zakim, dial ivan-voip 14:03:35 ok, ivan; the call is being made 14:03:36 +Ivan 14:03:45 right i am sorry i am off now, you are less a scribe now 14:03:46 bye all 14:03:50 -mischat 14:03:58 is there use for RDF containers? 14:04:11 PeterMika: vCard is 99 percent hCard 14:05:44 Really? Surely there are gobs of vcards out there never rendered in HTML at all 14:06:08 PeterMika: vCard in RDF is fairly minimal 14:06:18 PeterMika: Lots of hCard - between 1-2 billion URLs 14:06:33 -Carine 14:06:35 caribou has left #swxg 14:06:45 Can you share the stats on the usage of the attribute? 14:07:04 hhalpin: But 98% of those 1-2 billion URLs are presumably on a handful of domain names. Just a few script tweaks could change everything. 14:07:17 - +49.173.515.aaff 14:07:34 timbl has joined #swxg 14:07:40 should we merge or not do data-typring? 14:08:00 Zakim, call timbl-office 14:08:00 ok, timbl; the call is being made 14:08:02 +Timbl 14:08:26 so for complex structure is the older version better? 14:09:30 do we need or/want to substructure? 14:09:31 zakim, mute me 14:09:31 sorry, tinkster, I do not know which phone connection belongs to you 14:09:45 I thin Renato had some concern for the subset that wasn't hCard. 14:09:57 +tinkster 14:09:59 zakim, mute me 14:09:59 tinkster should now be muted 14:10:10 sorry i have to leave now, sorry, see you. 14:10:20 And there was a big argument over round-tripping in SWIG a while back... 14:10:21 -jsalvachua 14:10:24 jsalvachua has left #swxg 14:10:34 timbl: I use this for modelling my addresses 14:10:47 timbl: these are proper vCards 14:11:19 timbl: but I can see working with well-defined subset, but would like round-tripping in this subset 14:11:25 There are some parts of vCard which are pretty useless. 14:12:32 timbl: made contact ontology 14:12:40 norm: we should stick faithfully to vCard spec 14:12:50 Here is some of the structuring I think: 14:13:02 corky@qqqfoo.com 14:13:14 More precisely: I said that if we claim to model vCard, we should model it. If not, we shouldn't claim to be modeling it. 14:13:16 You CAN do that with the newer hCard 14:13:21 +uldis 14:13:33 The CLASS property is useless. 14:13:33 Zakim: mute me 14:13:37 It's just it's a bit confusing because we then use v:EMAIL as a subject, not a predicate 14:13:46 but we can type predicates 14:13:55 this I think leads to problems with OWL-DL. 14:13:57 MAILER is pretty useless too. 14:13:59 But I'm OK with that. 14:14:08 (And has been removed in latest drafts.) 14:14:26 CLASS was for what groups it is in? 14:14:45 CLASS has three allowed values: PRIVATE, CONFIDENTIAL and PUBLIC. 14:15:29 You don't need a bifg process to make a note obsolete, i think -- jsut change the Status Of This Document. 14:15:48 no process issue? 14:15:53 no process issue. 14:15:55 So, then we can just merge it with Renato's? 14:16:52 So, no process 14:17:20 I would like to NOT have more than one URI for vCard 14:17:22 The two are these: 14:17:30 http://www.w3.org/TR/vcard-rdf 14:17:37 http://www.w3.org/2006/vcard/ns 14:17:45 timbl has changed the topic to: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xg-socialweb/2009May/0127.html 14:17:58 Then I would like to put the SIMPLE stuff up front in Renato's, and put more difficult things involving data-structuring and rdf:List towards the end of the spec 14:18:24 There's also a silly difference in capitalization 14:18:26 I prefer lower-case 14:19:02 Newer URI comes up #1 on Google for me, searching "vcard rdf". 14:19:14 (without quotes) 14:19:46 Norm's spec==namespace URI. 14:19:57 I prefer having spec URI == namespace URI and then use conneg 14:20:06 Rennato's namespace = http://www.w3.org/2001/vcard-rdf/3.0# 14:20:35 I mean, one option 14:21:13 I mean one option is that we re-use Renato's URI, then use as the namespace URI http://www.w3.org/2006/vcard/ns. 14:21:21 And if one requests "text/html" for http://www.w3.org/2006/vcard/ns 14:21:52 +1 to timbl's suggestion of marking old one as obsolete and recommending new. 14:22:38 That's the issue with TR. 14:22:44 hCard GRDDL profile uses 2006 namespace. 14:22:47 Well, Norm, I think this is at least part of the community. 14:23:12 Fair enough 14:23:39 What is way forward here? 14:23:56 q+ 14:24:41 +1 to just an "obsolete" note, as long as it's clear. 14:25:00 q- 14:25:48 Proposed action: Harry to check with Renato he is OK with: 14:26:03 action on harry: http://www.w3.org/TR/vcard-rdf would refer to the new version, there will be a 'previous version' link to the current one 14:26:03 Sorry, couldn't find user - on 14:26:29 ACTION hhalpin to http://www.w3.org/TR/vcard-rdf would refer to the new version, there will be a 'previous version' link to the current one 14:26:29 Created ACTION-23 - Http://www.w3.org/TR/vcard-rdf would refer to the new version, there will be a 'previous version' link to the current one [on Harry Halpin - due 2009-06-03]. 14:26:40 that works for me and I think Renato will agree with it. 14:26:50 ... http://www.w3.org/TR/vcard-rdf would be kept as the "latest-version" URI, and Reanto's veion woul dbe linke dfrom the new one as a "previous version". 14:26:58 I guess the other question is we keep the "2006" namespace? 14:27:11 q+ 14:27:20 http://www.w3.org/2001/vcard-rdf/3.0# 14:27:23 My vote: keep both namespaces but only recommend 2006. 14:27:32 That is Renato's namespace URI. 14:28:00 Ivan: suggests namespace URIs that tend to use version causes version 14:28:07 Ivan: So let's use "2006" 14:28:08 I agree that it is unwise to use a version number in the URI 14:28:16 -??P5 14:28:21 The year has no semantics 14:28:26 It's based on vCard 3.0. 14:28:30 I am also a bit against years in URIs, but that's a minority opinion. 14:28:33 But you can use /ns/vcard if you want 14:28:38 Ivan: would prefer to vCard 14:28:57 PeterMika: I would agree with "2006" 14:28:58 or /ns/pim/adr 14:29:13 For the time being let's use "2006" 14:29:18 Doesn't that just create yet another URI to include in SPARQL queries, etc? 14:29:40 We already have one too many. 14:29:53 Ok, so keep the same 2006 ns 14:29:57 http://www.w3.org/2006/vcard/ns 14:30:07 lubna has joined #swxg 14:30:23 RESOLVED: keep http://www.w3.org/2006/vcard/ns 14:31:06 The vCard ontology needs examples. At least one that explains you can attach the properties to URIs for people, not just cards! 14:31:17 we need a list of examples 14:31:21 from experience. 14:31:30 -Hakan 14:31:33 PeterMika: Transforming hCard into RDF 14:31:44 PeterMika: vCard represents both a person and organization 14:32:05 PeterMika: hCard is value of organization and fn are the same, the hCard is actually representing an organization and not a person 14:32:12 That is not RDF 14:32:20 q+ 14:32:22 PeterMika: The equivalent properties determine type of object 14:32:25 q- 14:32:32 So the hcrad > vcard mapping has to do some mapping 14:32:46 PeterMika: so address and whatnot can all apply to person 14:32:54 PeterMika: AND organization 14:32:59 PeterMika: Does person have vCard etc. 14:33:06 PeterMika: And then the vCard have an address etc. 14:33:17 PeterMika: These are two main points people struggle with 14:33:25 TimBL: The last one is the major one. 14:33:31 TimBL: Are we modelling a file or person 14:33:38 TimBL: The documentation leads this question open 14:34:05 I'm noting unclarity about this is WHY there's no examples :) 14:34:12 I could not consensus on this. 14:34:25 s/TimBL/PeterMika/ 14:34:56 q- 14:34:59 q+ 14:35:02 q+ 14:35:08 I agree that one should moddl the person not the card. 14:35:16 Like you model a book, not a library card. 14:35:17 zakim, unmute me 14:35:17 tinkster should no longer be muted 14:35:25 yes 14:35:48 toby: 4.0 includes a property "kind" that demarcates between people organization and group 14:35:51 +1 vCard 4.0 14:36:07 timbl: which would be a functional mapping to a RDF class 14:36:28 toby: individual or pre-defined group or organization 14:36:31 AdamB has joined #swxg 14:36:32 toby: also maybe one for "place" 14:36:43 zakim, mute me 14:36:43 tinkster should now be muted 14:36:48 Those shoudl defintely map to classses. 14:37:09 how stable is vCard 4.0? 14:37:13 Should we track it? 14:37:14 Not especially stable. 14:39:04 yes, certainly - should be able to attach these to Person/Organisation URIs. 14:39:28 ivan: hhalpin said having the same person with several vCard is an edge-case 14:39:34 ivan: since I have two addresses 14:39:51 ivan: so in my phone I have two entries for my name 14:40:14 I think vCard 4.0 drafts have ways of representing multiple sets of contact information in one card. 14:40:27 I am liking vCard 4.0 :) 14:40:40 e.g. this phone, this fax and this address are for one set of uses; and this phone and this address are for another. 14:40:50 I've not really studied that part of the syntax though. 14:41:36 timbl: so you'll miss the fact that these two vCards are not the same in RDF. 14:41:39 a person may have different vCards which they "give" to people same as one may have different versions of a business card 14:41:44 timbl: about the same person 14:41:53 timbl: does this mean ontology is broken/ 14:41:56 q+ 14:42:01 q- 14:42:03 q- 14:42:31 ivan: vCard represents me or my address, I think it represents my address 14:42:42 timbl: we do not walk about what a vCard represents 14:43:19 [ a vcard:Vcard] vcard:sameOwnerAs [a vcard:Vcard ] . 14:43:47 (No, vCard doesn't have a sameOwnerAs property, but we could always define such a term.) 14:43:53 pmika has joined #swxg 14:44:03 s/modelling/modeling/ 14:44:40 so we don't drop the vCard class 14:44:55 we keep it and keep domains pretty open-ended 14:45:01 I think that's because the spec's a bit ambivalent norm 14:45:06 but in our examples we use People and Organizations 14:45:28 This would make it clear to users, since most users will just look at examples 14:45:43 timbl: we should be default not give it any class. 14:46:42 should we add this to the GRDDL and the spec, this weird hCard algorithm? 14:46:49 to determine people and organization? 14:47:01 if fn=org => organization is not possible to express in OWL 14:47:14 so it should be in GRDDL? 14:47:29 Not express it in OWL, but *mention* it in RDF spec and then implement it in GRDDL. 14:47:38 yes, it has to be in the hcard-to-rdf conversion 14:48:04 we should make a test case here 14:48:20 org class only has name and unit. 14:48:39 PeterMika: So these properties should be extended to organization class 14:48:49 PeterMika: ALL properties can be extended to organization class 14:49:20 PeterMika: for example, "adr". Strictly, in vCard people have addresses,not organizations, but people use addresses directly on organizations in hCard. 14:49:40 contact:SocialEntity ~= foaf:Agent. 14:50:20 orgname, orgunit 14:50:30 orgunit can be repeated. 14:51:45 [ a v:vCard ; v:fn "Tim Berners-Lee" ; v:org [ a v:Organization ; v:organization-name "MIT" ; v:organization-unit "CISAL" ] ] 14:51:54 is how it currently works. 14:52:49 OK, am a bit confused. 14:53:58 Organisations are messy in vCard RDF because they're messy in vCard. 14:54:27 org MIT unit CSAIL means memberOf [ a Unit; name "CSAIL"; partOf [ a Org; name "MIT"]] 14:54:45 There are organisation properties which "hang off" people, plus the convention of fn==org whih means that the entire vCard represents an organisation. 14:54:46 PeterMika: allow both, have examples for both cases 14:55:00 org MIT means memberOf [ a Org; name "MIT"] 14:55:08 PeterMika: show an organization where the unit is not used, just give it name and some other properties. 14:55:30 PeterMika: A case where the vCard is using to describe an organization 14:55:42 FOAF's model for people, orgs, membership is a lot more sensible. 14:55:45 TimBL: You need to spot these patterns 14:56:04 PeterMika: Yes, you need to do that in transform. 14:56:12 Perhaps we can add that to GRDDL. 14:56:19 foaf:member 14:56:21 Norm? 14:56:24 Has FOAF got org is part of biggerOrg? 14:56:38 skos:widerThan :) 14:56:38 no, but dublin core has "hasPart/isPartOf" 14:56:41 foaf:Organization 14:56:56 I wonder whether a gorup is a SocialEntity 14:57:08 don;t see any properties tho 14:57:14 http://xmlns.com/foaf/spec/#term_Organization 14:57:17 "This is a more 'solid' class than foaf:Group, which allows for more ad-hoc collections of individuals. These terms, like the corresponding natural language concepts, have some overlap, but different emphasis. " 14:57:31 ok 14:57:32 not sure if there's any formal subclassing 14:57:36 probaby not 14:57:40 Maybe socialEntity should be explicitly allowed to incldeu a group. 14:57:41 of group, that is 14:57:55 may be used together with foaf:member ? (":csail foaf:member :mit") 14:58:07 not very clear 14:58:20 AlexPassant: not sure of :csail foaf:member :mit. 14:58:25 Good Q Alex 14:58:29 re. earlier mention of SIOC - for representing organisations FOAF would be more appropriate that SIOC 14:58:45 there is no equivalent of organization-unit in FOAF and I would not be in favor of bringing in a single FOAF class into the VCard spec 14:58:47 :microsoft foaf:member :w3c . 14:58:55 FAOF more appropraite thatn SIOC? 14:59:32 -Timbl 14:59:37 Re FOAF and VCard, I think we first fix vCard RDF spec, because that's relatively easy, and then see what the future of FOAF is in the next telecon. 14:59:51 sounds good 15:00:36 previous thread on foaf:Group / foaf:Organisation http://lists.foaf-project.org/pipermail/foaf-dev/2007-January/008396.html 15:00:44 Good luck to all! See you on the next telcon 15:00:47 -Norm 15:00:53 thanks to norm 15:01:24 cheers AlexPassant 15:01:28 -petef 15:01:56 did you get a response? doesn't look like it AlexPassant 15:02:03 perhaps bump the thread? 15:02:22 libby: unfortunately, no answer - I sent a similar one a year later but no answer as well 15:02:22 republish it for next week? 15:03:19 Formal note, it's an IG note, not a SWXG note. 15:03:24 XGs can't do Notes even :) 15:03:42 send us examples 15:03:51 PeterMika will examples. 15:04:06 Shall we wrap up? 15:04:10 take care! 15:04:10 -tinkster 15:04:12 -Ivan 15:04:14 ivan has left #swxg 15:04:14 -PeterMika 15:04:17 -libby 15:04:18 -AlexPassant 15:04:19 -hhalpin 15:04:19 -AdamB 15:04:21 -uldis 15:04:25 Meeting adjourned 15:04:30 RSSAgent, draft minutes 15:04:41 RRSAgent, draft minutes 15:04:41 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/05/27-swxg-minutes.html hhalpin 15:04:45 - +039011228aahh 15:04:46 INC_SWXG()9:00AM has ended 15:04:48 Attendees were +4222aaaa, AdamB, tinkster, +7.942.aabb, Hakan, hhalpin, Carine, jsalvachua, mischat, petef, libby, karl, +49.173.515.aaff, cperey, AlexPassant, +039011228aahh, 15:04:50 ... +1.631.704.aajj, +1.631.877.aakk, Norm, PeterMika, Ivan, Timbl, uldis 15:05:20 have fun! 15:06:42 pmika has left #swxg 15:20:39 tpa has joined #swxg 15:54:32 i/General Organization/TOPIC: General Organization/ 15:55:44 i/4. Invited Guests/TOPIC: Invited Guests/ 15:56:25 i/5. Creating User Stories on the Wiki/TOPIC: Creating User Stories on the Wiki/ 15:56:52 i/6. Invited Guest Telecon: VCard in RDF/TOPIC: Invited Guest Telecon: VCard in RDF/ 15:57:26 i/Convene SWXG WG meeting of 2009-05-27T13:00-15:00Z/TOPIC: Convene SWXG WG meeting of 2009-05-27T13:00-15:00Z/ 15:57:32 RRSAgent, draft minutes 15:57:32 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/05/27-swxg-minutes.html tinkster 15:58:22 i/Convene SWXG WG meeting/TOPIC: Convene SWXG WG meeting of 2009-05-27T13:00-15:00Z/ 15:58:38 Chair: hhalpin 15:58:44 RRSAgent, draft minutes 15:58:44 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/05/27-swxg-minutes.html tinkster 16:02:09 i/Excellent mischat./TOPIC: Convene SWXG WG meeting of 2009-05-27T13:00-15:00Z/ 16:02:17 RRSAgent, draft minutes 16:02:17 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/05/27-swxg-minutes.html tinkster 16:04:32 s|SWXG WG meeting/TOPIC: Convene SWXG WG meeting|scratch this| 16:04:38 RRSAgent, draft minutes 16:04:38 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/05/27-swxg-minutes.html tinkster 16:06:49 OK, I can't get rid of that last heading. :-( 16:11:53 hhalpin, fyi: http://twitter.com/_masaka/status/1936882959 16:12:04 masaka uses 2006 ns 16:13:35 oshani has joined #swxg 16:17:09 this might be worth a look - http://ontologi.es/vcardx# 16:19:03 toby 16:19:13 I just cleaned up the minutes 16:19:46 i think it's acceptable now, thanks. 16:21:05 I've added some topic headings to them, but the "Convene" heading applied in the wrong place first time around, so now there are two "Convene" headings :-( 16:21:35 before making any more changes, cvs ci out the latest version 16:21:42 i just checked one in that merged our changes 16:21:50 there may still be minor errors 16:22:07 s/cvs ci/cvs co 16:22:28 I don't think I have CVS access to it (at least, not write access). I was just using RRSAgent's IRC interface. 16:22:36 ah. 16:22:40 that's why there was a cvs diff. 16:22:44 we should get you cvs access. 16:23:00 not sure if RRS agent does cvs differs, I think it should 16:23:10 but I can get rid of last heading, where is it? At end? 16:23:38 It's now only showing in the TOC, but not the body of the message. 16:23:52 ok, i got rid of it in toc 16:23:55 let me cvs ci it back in. 16:24:53 remind me to get you cvs access. 16:25:03 it makes things like this a bit easier 16:25:19 now check it 16:25:21 should be fine 16:25:21 ACTION hhalpin to get tinkster CVS access. 16:26:10 c'mon trackbot 16:26:11 There's some sort of CVS-added gunk just before the "General Organization" heading. 16:26:16 Created ACTION-24 - Get tinkster CVS access. [on Harry Halpin - due 2009-06-03]. 16:27:53 ok, should be fixed, check again 16:30:14 looks good to me 16:30:53 The first heading is still AWOL - in the contents, but not in the body. I think it was originally quite a bit before your "PROPOSED: to approve SWXG WG Weekly..." thing, so has probably been trimmed out. 16:33:57 fixed 16:34:23 ok, gotta run. 16:34:30 thanks for all the help! 16:48:51 Zakim has left #swxg 18:02:52 libby has joined #swxg 18:08:13 tpa has joined #swxg