11:59:35 RRSAgent has joined #mediaann 11:59:35 logging to http://www.w3.org/2009/05/26-mediaann-irc 12:00:07 chair: Joakim 12:00:33 + +46.1.07.17.aaaa 12:01:04 +florian 12:01:08 +pchampin 12:01:16 zakim, aaaa is joakim 12:01:16 +joakim; got it 12:01:22 +wonsuk 12:02:03 + +0436991876aabb 12:02:17 zakim, aabb is wbailer 12:02:17 +wbailer; got it 12:02:29 Meeting: MAWG 12:04:01 zakim, who is here? 12:04:01 On the phone I see ??P0, joakim, florian, pchampin, wonsuk, wbailer 12:04:02 On IRC I see RRSAgent, Zakim, joakim, pchampin, wonsuk, florian, tobias, wbailer, shepazu, trackbot 12:04:19 zakim, ??P0 is me 12:04:19 +tobias; got it 12:04:26 zakim, pick a victim 12:04:26 Not knowing who is chairing or who scribed recently, I propose joakim 12:04:30 zakim, pick a victim 12:04:30 Not knowing who is chairing or who scribed recently, I propose wbailer 12:05:07 i volunteered for next week 12:05:11 zakim, pick a victim 12:05:11 Not knowing who is chairing or who scribed recently, I propose wonsuk 12:06:37 agenda. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2009May/0107.html 12:06:55 Regrets: Raphael, Chris and JP 12:07:54 meeting minutes: accepted. 12:08:06 scribe: tobias 12:08:09 http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/track/actions/open 12:08:36 ACTION-43 pending. 12:09:04 ACTION-47 ongoing. 12:09:21 ACTION-101 ongoing. 12:10:01 s/ACTION-101/ACTION-102 12:10:11 +1 12:10:23 +1 12:10:30 +1 12:10:36 close ACTION-109 12:10:36 ACTION-109 Elaborate on the description and the meaning of each attribute by April 28 closed 12:10:48 close ACTION-118 12:10:48 ACTION-118 Put terminology discussion on the agenda for next telecon closed 12:11:05 close ACTION-119 12:11:05 ACTION-119 Review the Ontology document closed 12:11:52 close ACTION-120 12:11:52 ACTION-120 Submit our vocabulary to the Media Fragment WG for comments closed 12:12:38 AGENDA ITEM: Initial draft of "Ontology for Media Entity 1.0" 12:13:14 wonsuk: explains status of the draft document. 12:14:19 wonsuk: status has already been sent to the list: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2009May/0113.html 12:14:53 wonsuk: made a new draft based on the comments; added the mawg properties 12:15:34 http://www.w3.org/2007/10/htmldiff?doc1=http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2008/video/mediaann/mediaont-1.0/mediaont-1.0.html%3Frev%3D1.7%26content-type%3Dtext/html;%2520charset%3Dutf-8%23tbd&doc2=http://dev.w3.org/2008/video/mediaann/mediaont-1.0/mediaont-1.0.html 12:16:11 wonsuk: link to see the diff between new and old version of the draft 12:18:41 joakim: is update from david singer incorporated in the draft? 12:18:59 wonsuk: not planned to add it to the document. 12:20:19 joakim: should we discuss the descriptions and include them in the second version? 12:20:36 florian: agrees; list with properties should do it for the moment. 12:20:50 florian: would add note that we include the types and further information later. 12:21:01 florian: we can discuss it in the F2F. 12:21:03 fsasaki has joined #mediaann 12:21:33 joakim: thanks Wonsuk for his excellent work on the document! 12:22:37 Hi felix, thanks for the review 12:22:49 Please what is the status on action 101? 12:23:02 +??P10 12:23:06 "To clrify arrow + description in UC doc" 12:24:58 close ACTION-101 12:24:58 ACTION-101 Clarify arrow + descriptions for the diagram in section 3 of UC & req dcouments closed 12:25:36 joakim: use case and requirements document seems to have been published. 12:25:52 http://www.w3.org/TR/media-annot-reqs/ 12:26:27 above is version from Jan. 19th 12:27:53 veroniqueM has joined #mediaann 12:28:11 joakim: how can we check if the document is published? 12:28:34 ACTION: joakim to remind doug to publish requirements document 12:28:34 Created ACTION-121 - Remind doug to publish requirements document [on Joakim Söderberg - due 2009-06-02]. 12:29:12 ACTION: joakim to talk to with Phillipe about the delay of the publication 12:29:13 Created ACTION-122 - Talk to with Phillipe about the delay of the publication [on Joakim Söderberg - due 2009-06-02]. 12:29:59 Veronique, please what is the status on ACTION-102? 12:30:08 Update canonical processes use cases? 12:31:06 The idea was to gather feedback from the community and edit additions to the UC and req doc once more feedback is gathered 12:31:17 maybe it's a good idea to close this item :) 12:31:27 joakim: we decided to try to resolve open issues during the F2F 12:31:35 close ACTION-102 12:31:35 ACTION-102 Update canonical processes use cases closed 12:32:03 AGENDA ITEM [b] ii) Terminology 12:32:06 Media Entity vs. Entity Endeavour 12:32:24 florian: we should stay with "media entity", otherwise the discussion will not end. 12:32:24 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2009May/0090.html 12:32:50 werner: Silvia commented on Wonsuks mail about the terminology. 12:33:24 werner: Silvia said if we want to be compatible with the media fragments group we should stick to the URI resource definition 12:33:43 URI RFC: http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2396.html 12:34:14 werner: we should look at the URI RFC to end up with a compatible terminology. 12:34:53 pierre-antoine: resource definition from URI RFC is quite general 12:36:02 pierre-antoine: maybe we should stick to "resource" and acknowledge that there are different types of resources (information resource vs. non-information resource) 12:36:11 are you proposing that we should use "Media Resource" instead of Media Entity then? 12:36:24 yes 12:36:25 ok:-) 12:37:33 pierre-antoine: distinction resource vs. representation is in contradiction that we do not commit to media hierarchy (such as the one from FRBR) 12:38:25 using "Media Resource" would make us compatible with Media fragments! 12:39:07 joakim: keep media entity or change it before publishing? 12:39:21 florian: we should keep "media entity" 12:39:40 werner: it would be more tricky to change it later 12:39:52 werner: prefers to clarify before publication. 12:40:10 I think thatwe should go for interoperability with the media fragment group, but we need a term that is more generic than media resource if it has to encompass media resource AND representation 12:41:22 joakim: could someone summarize the points pierre-antoine made? 12:41:47 joakim: ...to argue for "media resource" and then decide on the mailing list if we change the name 12:42:41 PA would it be possible for you to write such an email to the public list? 12:42:53 yes 12:43:34 joakim: we should decide next week if we change the name or not. 12:43:53 joakim: wonsuk, what else are you missing from the group in order to have a final draft? 12:44:44 wonsuk: we are almost done; we need to add some descriptions for two properties (targetAudience, locator) 12:46:33 wonsuk: if anyone has comments to improve 4.1.1 : very welcome! 12:46:58 wonsuk: otherwise the document is quite final. 12:47:57 ACTION: joakim to ask the mailing list to provide descriptions for targetAudience/locator 12:47:57 Created ACTION-123 - Ask the mailing list to provide descriptions for targetAudience/locator [on Joakim Söderberg - due 2009-06-02]. 12:48:43 wonsuk: we need a clarification of 4.1.1 12:49:08 4.1.1 Description of approach for the property definitions 12:49:34 wonsuk: ...the title makes sense, we could publish in this state, but some more ideas for this part are highly welcome to improve this part. 12:53:39 Vernoique? 12:53:55 I am not on the phone... 12:54:30 I could have a look at the updated version of the document and send comments to the WG's list 12:54:47 joakim: we should keep 4.1.1; but elaborate it more 12:54:48 if that was the question :) 12:55:01 I think that we should change the title 12:55:08 we do not define the properties 12:55:17 Vernoique, can you elaborate 4.1.1? 12:55:29 +1 veronique 12:55:32 we simply selected a number of these 12:55:48 @Wonsuk: could you explain your needs to Veronique regarding 4.1.1? 12:56:02 I can have a look at the doc and propose changes, I can send them to the list... 12:57:01 \me @Veronique: Wonsuk will write you an email 12:58:15 joakim: if we have the update on 4.1.1+ description of attributes by the end of this week, we could have a new draft by the next telecon 12:58:36 right 12:58:45 how about the introduction? 12:58:52 did anyone have comments about it? 12:59:05 it is quite a crucial part of the document! 12:59:11 I have revised it1§ 12:59:20 I have revised it! 12:59:22 I know 12:59:28 Tobias gave the comment for introduction. 12:59:32 I was wondering if you had had feedback about it 12:59:34 Do you want another round? 12:59:36 ok! 12:59:40 no, no 12:59:46 I was just asking :) 12:59:57 joakim: AOB? 13:00:01 perfect if everyone is fine with it! 13:00:12 joakim: conference is closed for today! 13:00:21 bue 13:00:24 -wbailer 13:00:24 bye 13:00:25 -florian 13:00:26 bye bye 13:00:27 -Felix 13:00:31 bye~~ 13:00:38 logout 13:00:38 -joakim 13:00:48 -pchampin 13:00:48 wonsuk has left #mediaann 13:01:07 rrsagent, draft minutes 13:01:08 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/05/26-mediaann-minutes.html tobias 13:01:20 Thanks Tobias for scribing! 13:01:28 you are welcome :-) 13:01:29 -wonsuk 13:02:58 -tobias 13:02:59 IA_MAWG()8:00AM has ended 13:03:01 Attendees were +46.1.07.17.aaaa, florian, pchampin, joakim, wonsuk, +0436991876aabb, wbailer, tobias, Felix 13:03:06 rrsagent, make logs public 15:04:17 fsasaki has joined #mediaann 15:29:05 Zakim has left #mediaann