IRC log of swd on 2009-05-19
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 14:58:36 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #swd
- 14:58:36 [RRSAgent]
- logging to http://www.w3.org/2009/05/19-swd-irc
- 14:58:44 [Ralph]
- Meeting: SemWeb Deployment Working Group
- 14:58:48 [Ralph]
- rrsagent, please make record public
- 14:59:21 [JonP]
- JonP has joined #swd
- 15:01:07 [Antoine]
- Antoine has joined #swd
- 15:01:24 [seanb]
- seanb has joined #swd
- 15:01:54 [Zakim]
- SW_SWD()11:00AM has now started
- 15:01:57 [Zakim]
- + +1.607.341.aaaa
- 15:02:04 [Zakim]
- - +1.607.341.aaaa
- 15:02:06 [Zakim]
- SW_SWD()11:00AM has ended
- 15:02:07 [Zakim]
- Attendees were +1.607.341.aaaa
- 15:02:33 [Zakim]
- SW_SWD()11:00AM has now started
- 15:02:41 [Zakim]
- +Ralph
- 15:03:05 [Zakim]
- +??P39
- 15:03:08 [seanb]
- zakim, ??P39 is me
- 15:03:08 [Zakim]
- +seanb; got it
- 15:03:35 [Zakim]
- + +1.607.341.aaaa
- 15:03:48 [Ralph]
- zakim, aaaa is Jon
- 15:03:48 [Zakim]
- +Jon; got it
- 15:04:01 [Zakim]
- +??P43
- 15:04:30 [Antoine]
- zakim, ??P43 is me
- 15:04:30 [Zakim]
- +Antoine; got it
- 15:06:00 [Ralph]
- Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2009May/0064.html
- 15:06:13 [Ralph]
- -> http://www.w3.org/2009/05/05-swd-minutes.html previous 2009-05-05
- 15:12:43 [edsu]
- edsu has joined #swd
- 15:13:09 [Ralph]
- zakim, list attendees
- 15:13:09 [Zakim]
- As of this point the attendees have been Ralph, seanb, +1.607.341.aaaa, Jon, Antoine
- 15:14:15 [Zakim]
- +[LC]
- 15:14:30 [Ralph]
- zakim, lc is Ed
- 15:14:30 [Zakim]
- +Ed; got it
- 15:14:56 [Zakim]
- +Guus_Schreiber
- 15:15:07 [Ralph]
- Chair: Guus
- 15:15:45 [Guus]
- Guus has joined #swd
- 15:16:48 [Ralph]
- zakim, pick a victim
- 15:16:48 [Zakim]
- Not knowing who is chairing or who scribed recently, I propose seanb
- 15:17:02 [Ralph]
- scribe: Ralph
- 15:17:08 [Ralph]
- Topic: Admin
- 15:17:33 [Ralph]
- RESOLVED to accept minutes of the last telecon http://www.w3.org/2009/05/05-swd-minutes.html
- 15:17:40 [Ralph]
- PROPOSED next telecon 2 June
- 15:17:44 [Ralph]
- RESOLVED next telecon 2 June
- 15:17:48 [Ralph]
- Topic: SKOS
- 15:18:29 [Ralph]
- -> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/SKOS/reference/20090315/ editor's draftof SKOS Reference
- 15:18:37 [Ralph]
- (currently $Revision 1.8$
- 15:19:02 [Ralph]
- Sean: editorial tweaks discussed in mail are almost complete
- 15:19:17 [Ralph]
- ... so nearly done w/Reference
- 15:19:28 [Ralph]
- [DONE] ACTION: SKOS editors to draft acknowledgements section for SKOS Reference
- 15:19:28 [Ralph]
- [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/05/05-swd-minutes.html#action04]
- 15:19:52 [Ralph]
- [DONE] ACTION: SKOS editors to draft acknowledgements section for SKOS Reference [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/05/05-swd-minutes.html#action04]
- 15:20:46 [Ralph]
- Guus: issue-214 still open
- 15:20:57 [Ralph]
- Antoine: That doesn't really concern SKOS; it's about RDFa
- 15:21:03 [Ralph]
- Jon: that was my feeling as well
- 15:21:12 [Ralph]
- -> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/214 issue 214
- 15:22:22 [Ralph]
- Ed: DanBri's comment was about something in loc.gov
- 15:22:28 [Ralph]
- s/Jon:/Ed:/
- 15:23:29 [Ralph]
- Ralph: is DanBri citing something in one of our documents?
- 15:23:42 [Ralph]
- Guus: no, an LC document
- 15:23:54 [Ralph]
- Antoine: so change the tracker product to RDFa
- 15:24:47 [Ralph]
- Ralph: but if this is going to be a frequent mistake maybe we should consider adding some advice
- 15:24:53 [Ralph]
- Guus: that could go in the Primer
- 15:24:58 [Ralph]
- Ralph: yes
- 15:25:14 [Ralph]
- Guus: so we conclude this does not affect the Reference?
- 15:25:21 [Antoine]
- +1
- 15:25:23 [Ralph]
- [no objections]
- 15:25:25 [seanb]
- +1
- 15:25:41 [edsu]
- +1
- 15:25:44 [Ralph]
- Guus: therefore no outstanding CR comments
- 15:26:16 [Ralph]
- Sean: regarding URIs in Appendix C
- 15:26:22 [Ralph]
- ... there are references to namespace documents
- 15:26:26 [Ralph]
- ... which URIs should I use?
- 15:26:36 [Ralph]
- Guus: we'll take that up in a moment
- 15:27:10 [Ralph]
- [CONTINUES] ACTION: Ralph to raise issue-214 with rdfa tf [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/05/05-swd-minutes.html#action01]
- 15:28:12 [Ralph]
- -> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/SKOS/primer/primer-20090427.html SKOS Primer Editor's Draft
- 15:28:33 [Ralph]
- Ralph: I presumed we'd publish the Primer together with the Reference Proposed Rec
- 15:28:35 [Ralph]
- Guus: yes
- 15:28:54 [Ralph]
- -- Implementation Report
- 15:29:10 [Ralph]
- Antoine: I added some historical notes
- 15:29:22 [Ralph]
- ... and added links to the issue tracker
- 15:29:42 [Ralph]
- -> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/SKOS/reference/20090315/implementation.html implementation report
- 15:30:29 [Ralph]
- Guus: I suggest publishing the Use Cases as a Group Note at the same time as the Proposed Rec
- 15:30:33 [Antoine]
- http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/SKOS/usecases/ucr-20090428.html
- 15:30:54 [Antoine]
- http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/SKOS/usecases/ucr-20090428.html#Candidate
- 15:31:42 [Ralph]
- Antoine: I added cross-references to the UCR
- 15:32:54 [Ralph]
- PROPOSED: Publish revised SKOS Use Cases and Requirements as a Group Note at the time the final SKOS Recommendation is published
- 15:33:10 [Ralph]
- +1
- 15:33:20 [Ralph]
- RESOLVED: Publish revised SKOS Use Cases and Requirements as a Group Note at the time the final SKOS Recommendation is published
- 15:35:38 [Ralph]
- -- Namespace document
- 15:35:47 [Ralph]
- Guus: what's the state of the labels in the namespace document?
- 15:35:52 [Ralph]
- Sean: discussion on the list
- 15:36:08 [Ralph]
- ... there's an HTML variant and an RDF/XML variant
- 15:36:24 [Ralph]
- ... the HTML variant had a lot of additional text which I've removed and put in an appendix
- 15:36:31 [Ralph]
- ... so each variant only describes itself
- 15:36:38 [Ralph]
- ... I believe the content is now OK
- 15:37:15 [Ralph]
- ... the SKOS namespace document is served via content negotiation
- 15:37:46 [Ralph]
- ... what URIs should I use for the OWL DL subset and the SKOS XL RDF/XML variant?
- 15:38:23 [seanb]
- -> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/SKOS/reference/20090315/#namespace-documents Appendix C
- 15:40:17 [Ralph]
- Guus: the reference to http://www.w3.org/2008/05/skos-xl in C.4. looks correct
- 15:40:31 [Ralph]
- Ralph: we've used that URI before, so OK to keep using it
- 15:40:55 [Ralph]
- Sean: what URI to use for the OWL 1 DL subset?
- 15:41:01 [Ralph]
- Guus: have we published it before?
- 15:41:09 [Ralph]
- Sean: no, but it is in the directory
- 15:42:20 [Ralph]
- Ralph: there's no particular reason why we could not use the 2008/04/skos/ space
- 15:42:33 [Ralph]
- Guus: and this is the DL version of the schema in 2008/04/skos
- 15:42:45 [Ralph]
- Sean: what should we call it?
- 15:43:01 [Ralph]
- skos-owl1-dl.rdf ?
- 15:43:08 [Ralph]
- Guus: fine with me
- 15:43:47 [seanb]
- I meant 2004/02/skos/skos-owl1-dl.rdf ??
- 15:43:55 [Ralph]
- s|2008/04|2004/02
- 15:44:15 [Guus]
- 2004/02/skos/owl1-dl.rdf
- 15:44:17 [Guus]
- ?
- 15:44:33 [Ralph]
- Sean: skos/owl1-dl.rdf is fine with me
- 15:44:37 [Ralph]
- Ralph: ok with me too
- 15:45:20 [Ralph]
- ... it's a new RDF namespace so we'll need Director's approval
- 15:46:09 [Ralph]
- Guus: send notice to the list when Appendix C is ready for review
- 15:46:33 [Ralph]
- ACTION: Sean send notice to the list when Appendix C is ready for review
- 15:46:43 [Ralph]
- -- Implementation Report
- 15:47:26 [Ralph]
- Guus: looking at the issues list, of 29 issues 27 refer to implementations
- 15:47:42 [Ralph]
- ... so I think there's ample evidence that the SKOS specification is being implemented
- 15:48:03 [Ralph]
- Sean: I'm slightly worried that the capture of the various constructs used in each vocabulary is not exhaustive
- 15:48:21 [Ralph]
- ... the reports were not necessarily completely explicit
- 15:48:35 [Ralph]
- ... in particular, I'm not sure that ordered collections have been implemented
- 15:48:46 [Ralph]
- ... but 2 implementations do claim to use -xl
- 15:48:56 [Ralph]
- Guus: I couldn't find any details on the -xl implementations
- 15:49:24 [Ralph]
- Antoine: we do have one vocabulary that would benefit from label relations but we've not yet done it
- 15:49:47 [Ralph]
- Sean: I have an email from @@ that I could ask him to send to the list
- 15:50:02 [Ralph]
- Guus: -xl is an extension anyway
- 15:50:23 [Ralph]
- ... it's clear that the main part of SKOS, in particular the mapping relations, is heavily used
- 15:50:54 [Ralph]
- ... I don't feel the Group needs to put enormous effort into a systematic analysis
- 15:51:09 [Ralph]
- ... with 27 implementations I feel we can say we're done
- 15:51:14 [Ralph]
- Sean: I'm happy to go with that
- 15:51:41 [Ralph]
- Guus: I'm happy to write some text with my findings for the transition request
- 15:52:00 [Ralph]
- Sean: can I consider this implementation report to be completed then?
- 15:52:11 [Ralph]
- ... I'll paste the two tables into the HTML document
- 15:52:39 [Ralph]
- -> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/SKOS/reference/20090315/implementation.html implementation report generated from the issues tracker
- 15:53:09 [Ralph]
- Sean: there are two additional tables generated from a Google spreadsheet
- 15:53:44 [seanb]
- -> http://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=rmQPwhMMWXxY62FinzE44Eg google doc
- 15:54:21 [Ralph]
- Sean: should I paste the spreadsheet table into the implementation report?
- 15:54:22 [Ralph]
- Guus: yes
- 15:54:24 [Ralph]
- Ralph: yes
- 15:54:37 [Ralph]
- Sean: it's a hassle to do that paste so I'd like to do it only once
- 15:54:58 [Ralph]
- Guus: how about an image paste?
- 15:55:03 [Ralph]
- Ralph: no, that would be frowned on
- 15:55:21 [Ralph]
- Guus: I suggest freezing it now
- 15:55:51 [Ralph]
- ... the implementation report does not have to be exhaustive
- 15:56:18 [Ralph]
- Sean: OK, I'll freeze and paste later today
- 15:56:42 [Ralph]
- [DONE] ACTION: Sean to look for SKOS constructs not used by current implementations [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/04/21-swd-minutes.html#action04]
- 15:56:50 [Ralph]
- [CONTINUES] ACTION: Sean to complete implementation report by 19th [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/05/05-swd-minutes.html#action05]
- 15:57:14 [Ralph]
- PROPOSED to request the Director to advance the SKOS Reference to Proposed Recommendation
- 15:57:35 [Ralph]
- Topic: Transition Request
- 15:58:03 [Ralph]
- Guus: we've met the CR exit criteria
- 15:58:50 [Ralph]
- PROPOSED to request the Director to advance the SKOS Reference to Proposed Recommendation http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/SKOS/reference/20090315/
- 15:59:15 [Ralph]
- PROPOSED to request the Director to advance the SKOS Reference to Proposed Recommendation http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/SKOS/reference/20090315/ with Appendix C edits
- 15:59:47 [Ralph]
- +1
- 15:59:49 [Zakim]
- -Ralph
- 16:00:11 [Antoine]
- RESOLVED to request the Director to advance the SKOS Reference to Proposed Recommendation http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/SKOS/reference/20090315/ with Appendix C edits
- 16:00:54 [Antoine]
- scribenick:Antoine
- 16:01:40 [Antoine]
- ACTION: Guus to prepare the request for PR
- 16:02:35 [Antoine]
- Guus: once PR is requested, the WG gets out of the loop, and advisory committee vote, and the director takes direction
- 16:02:43 [Antoine]
- s/direction/decision
- 16:03:18 [Antoine]
- ACTION: Ralph publish Antoine's new intermediate pages for legacy specs [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/04/21-swd-minutes.html#action11]
- 16:03:22 [Antoine]
- --CONTINUES
- 16:03:36 [Antoine]
- ACTION: Ben review RDFa Use Cases and propose transition to Group Note [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/09/30-swd-minutes.html#action02]
- 16:03:40 [Antoine]
- --CONTINUES
- 16:03:54 [Antoine]
- ACTION: Ralph to review the revised Recipes draft [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/12/02-swd-minutes.html#action15]
- 16:03:56 [Antoine]
- --CONTINUES
- 16:04:13 [Antoine]
- ACTION: Ralph post his comments on the editor's draft of the metadata note [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/11/25-swd-minutes.html#action03]
- 16:04:16 [Antoine]
- --CONTINUES
- 16:04:30 [Antoine]
- ACTION: Ralph/Diego to work on Wordnet implementation [of Recipes implementations] [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/01/22-swd-minutes.html#action20]
- 16:04:34 [Antoine]
- --CONTINUES
- 16:05:06 [Zakim]
- -Ed
- 16:05:06 [Zakim]
- -seanb
- 16:05:07 [Zakim]
- -Jon
- 16:05:11 [Zakim]
- -Guus_Schreiber
- 16:05:20 [edsu]
- edsu has left #swd
- 16:05:28 [Antoine]
- Zakim, list participants
- 16:05:28 [Zakim]
- As of this point the attendees have been Ralph, seanb, +1.607.341.aaaa, Jon, Antoine, Ed, Guus_Schreiber
- 16:05:44 [Antoine]
- RRSAgent, make logs public
- 16:05:54 [Antoine]
- RRSAgent, generate minutes
- 16:05:54 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/05/19-swd-minutes.html Antoine
- 16:09:57 [TomB]
- TomB has joined #swd
- 16:10:12 [Zakim]
- disconnecting the lone participant, Antoine, in SW_SWD()11:00AM
- 16:10:25 [TomB]
- I just got in from the airport - anyone there?
- 16:10:56 [seanb]
- Hi Tom!
- 16:11:03 [seanb]
- We're just done.
- 16:11:56 [TomB]
- hi sean
- 16:12:13 [TomB]
- any particular issues arise or all okay?
- 16:20:21 [Antoine]
- Antoine has left #swd
- 17:07:33 [Zakim]
- SW_SWD()11:00AM has ended
- 17:07:36 [Zakim]
- Attendees were Ralph, seanb, +1.607.341.aaaa, Jon, Antoine, Ed, Guus_Schreiber
- 17:19:22 [seanb]
- Ralph -- are you there?
- 17:20:32 [seanb]
- One more question about namespaces.... :-)
- 18:34:26 [Zakim]
- Zakim has left #swd
- 19:28:31 [Ralph]
- Ralph has left #swd