IRC log of swd on 2009-05-19

Timestamps are in UTC.

14:58:36 [RRSAgent]
RRSAgent has joined #swd
14:58:36 [RRSAgent]
logging to http://www.w3.org/2009/05/19-swd-irc
14:58:44 [Ralph]
Meeting: SemWeb Deployment Working Group
14:58:48 [Ralph]
rrsagent, please make record public
14:59:21 [JonP]
JonP has joined #swd
15:01:07 [Antoine]
Antoine has joined #swd
15:01:24 [seanb]
seanb has joined #swd
15:01:54 [Zakim]
SW_SWD()11:00AM has now started
15:01:57 [Zakim]
+ +1.607.341.aaaa
15:02:04 [Zakim]
- +1.607.341.aaaa
15:02:06 [Zakim]
SW_SWD()11:00AM has ended
15:02:07 [Zakim]
Attendees were +1.607.341.aaaa
15:02:33 [Zakim]
SW_SWD()11:00AM has now started
15:02:41 [Zakim]
+Ralph
15:03:05 [Zakim]
+??P39
15:03:08 [seanb]
zakim, ??P39 is me
15:03:08 [Zakim]
+seanb; got it
15:03:35 [Zakim]
+ +1.607.341.aaaa
15:03:48 [Ralph]
zakim, aaaa is Jon
15:03:48 [Zakim]
+Jon; got it
15:04:01 [Zakim]
+??P43
15:04:30 [Antoine]
zakim, ??P43 is me
15:04:30 [Zakim]
+Antoine; got it
15:06:00 [Ralph]
Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2009May/0064.html
15:06:13 [Ralph]
-> http://www.w3.org/2009/05/05-swd-minutes.html previous 2009-05-05
15:12:43 [edsu]
edsu has joined #swd
15:13:09 [Ralph]
zakim, list attendees
15:13:09 [Zakim]
As of this point the attendees have been Ralph, seanb, +1.607.341.aaaa, Jon, Antoine
15:14:15 [Zakim]
+[LC]
15:14:30 [Ralph]
zakim, lc is Ed
15:14:30 [Zakim]
+Ed; got it
15:14:56 [Zakim]
+Guus_Schreiber
15:15:07 [Ralph]
Chair: Guus
15:15:45 [Guus]
Guus has joined #swd
15:16:48 [Ralph]
zakim, pick a victim
15:16:48 [Zakim]
Not knowing who is chairing or who scribed recently, I propose seanb
15:17:02 [Ralph]
scribe: Ralph
15:17:08 [Ralph]
Topic: Admin
15:17:33 [Ralph]
RESOLVED to accept minutes of the last telecon http://www.w3.org/2009/05/05-swd-minutes.html
15:17:40 [Ralph]
PROPOSED next telecon 2 June
15:17:44 [Ralph]
RESOLVED next telecon 2 June
15:17:48 [Ralph]
Topic: SKOS
15:18:29 [Ralph]
-> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/SKOS/reference/20090315/ editor's draftof SKOS Reference
15:18:37 [Ralph]
(currently $Revision 1.8$
15:19:02 [Ralph]
Sean: editorial tweaks discussed in mail are almost complete
15:19:17 [Ralph]
... so nearly done w/Reference
15:19:28 [Ralph]
[DONE] ACTION: SKOS editors to draft acknowledgements section for SKOS Reference
15:19:28 [Ralph]
[recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/05/05-swd-minutes.html#action04]
15:19:52 [Ralph]
[DONE] ACTION: SKOS editors to draft acknowledgements section for SKOS Reference [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/05/05-swd-minutes.html#action04]
15:20:46 [Ralph]
Guus: issue-214 still open
15:20:57 [Ralph]
Antoine: That doesn't really concern SKOS; it's about RDFa
15:21:03 [Ralph]
Jon: that was my feeling as well
15:21:12 [Ralph]
-> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/214 issue 214
15:22:22 [Ralph]
Ed: DanBri's comment was about something in loc.gov
15:22:28 [Ralph]
s/Jon:/Ed:/
15:23:29 [Ralph]
Ralph: is DanBri citing something in one of our documents?
15:23:42 [Ralph]
Guus: no, an LC document
15:23:54 [Ralph]
Antoine: so change the tracker product to RDFa
15:24:47 [Ralph]
Ralph: but if this is going to be a frequent mistake maybe we should consider adding some advice
15:24:53 [Ralph]
Guus: that could go in the Primer
15:24:58 [Ralph]
Ralph: yes
15:25:14 [Ralph]
Guus: so we conclude this does not affect the Reference?
15:25:21 [Antoine]
+1
15:25:23 [Ralph]
[no objections]
15:25:25 [seanb]
+1
15:25:41 [edsu]
+1
15:25:44 [Ralph]
Guus: therefore no outstanding CR comments
15:26:16 [Ralph]
Sean: regarding URIs in Appendix C
15:26:22 [Ralph]
... there are references to namespace documents
15:26:26 [Ralph]
... which URIs should I use?
15:26:36 [Ralph]
Guus: we'll take that up in a moment
15:27:10 [Ralph]
[CONTINUES] ACTION: Ralph to raise issue-214 with rdfa tf [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/05/05-swd-minutes.html#action01]
15:28:12 [Ralph]
-> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/SKOS/primer/primer-20090427.html SKOS Primer Editor's Draft
15:28:33 [Ralph]
Ralph: I presumed we'd publish the Primer together with the Reference Proposed Rec
15:28:35 [Ralph]
Guus: yes
15:28:54 [Ralph]
-- Implementation Report
15:29:10 [Ralph]
Antoine: I added some historical notes
15:29:22 [Ralph]
... and added links to the issue tracker
15:29:42 [Ralph]
-> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/SKOS/reference/20090315/implementation.html implementation report
15:30:29 [Ralph]
Guus: I suggest publishing the Use Cases as a Group Note at the same time as the Proposed Rec
15:30:33 [Antoine]
http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/SKOS/usecases/ucr-20090428.html
15:30:54 [Antoine]
http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/SKOS/usecases/ucr-20090428.html#Candidate
15:31:42 [Ralph]
Antoine: I added cross-references to the UCR
15:32:54 [Ralph]
PROPOSED: Publish revised SKOS Use Cases and Requirements as a Group Note at the time the final SKOS Recommendation is published
15:33:10 [Ralph]
+1
15:33:20 [Ralph]
RESOLVED: Publish revised SKOS Use Cases and Requirements as a Group Note at the time the final SKOS Recommendation is published
15:35:38 [Ralph]
-- Namespace document
15:35:47 [Ralph]
Guus: what's the state of the labels in the namespace document?
15:35:52 [Ralph]
Sean: discussion on the list
15:36:08 [Ralph]
... there's an HTML variant and an RDF/XML variant
15:36:24 [Ralph]
... the HTML variant had a lot of additional text which I've removed and put in an appendix
15:36:31 [Ralph]
... so each variant only describes itself
15:36:38 [Ralph]
... I believe the content is now OK
15:37:15 [Ralph]
... the SKOS namespace document is served via content negotiation
15:37:46 [Ralph]
... what URIs should I use for the OWL DL subset and the SKOS XL RDF/XML variant?
15:38:23 [seanb]
-> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/SKOS/reference/20090315/#namespace-documents Appendix C
15:40:17 [Ralph]
Guus: the reference to http://www.w3.org/2008/05/skos-xl in C.4. looks correct
15:40:31 [Ralph]
Ralph: we've used that URI before, so OK to keep using it
15:40:55 [Ralph]
Sean: what URI to use for the OWL 1 DL subset?
15:41:01 [Ralph]
Guus: have we published it before?
15:41:09 [Ralph]
Sean: no, but it is in the directory
15:42:20 [Ralph]
Ralph: there's no particular reason why we could not use the 2008/04/skos/ space
15:42:33 [Ralph]
Guus: and this is the DL version of the schema in 2008/04/skos
15:42:45 [Ralph]
Sean: what should we call it?
15:43:01 [Ralph]
skos-owl1-dl.rdf ?
15:43:08 [Ralph]
Guus: fine with me
15:43:47 [seanb]
I meant 2004/02/skos/skos-owl1-dl.rdf ??
15:43:55 [Ralph]
s|2008/04|2004/02
15:44:15 [Guus]
2004/02/skos/owl1-dl.rdf
15:44:17 [Guus]
?
15:44:33 [Ralph]
Sean: skos/owl1-dl.rdf is fine with me
15:44:37 [Ralph]
Ralph: ok with me too
15:45:20 [Ralph]
... it's a new RDF namespace so we'll need Director's approval
15:46:09 [Ralph]
Guus: send notice to the list when Appendix C is ready for review
15:46:33 [Ralph]
ACTION: Sean send notice to the list when Appendix C is ready for review
15:46:43 [Ralph]
-- Implementation Report
15:47:26 [Ralph]
Guus: looking at the issues list, of 29 issues 27 refer to implementations
15:47:42 [Ralph]
... so I think there's ample evidence that the SKOS specification is being implemented
15:48:03 [Ralph]
Sean: I'm slightly worried that the capture of the various constructs used in each vocabulary is not exhaustive
15:48:21 [Ralph]
... the reports were not necessarily completely explicit
15:48:35 [Ralph]
... in particular, I'm not sure that ordered collections have been implemented
15:48:46 [Ralph]
... but 2 implementations do claim to use -xl
15:48:56 [Ralph]
Guus: I couldn't find any details on the -xl implementations
15:49:24 [Ralph]
Antoine: we do have one vocabulary that would benefit from label relations but we've not yet done it
15:49:47 [Ralph]
Sean: I have an email from @@ that I could ask him to send to the list
15:50:02 [Ralph]
Guus: -xl is an extension anyway
15:50:23 [Ralph]
... it's clear that the main part of SKOS, in particular the mapping relations, is heavily used
15:50:54 [Ralph]
... I don't feel the Group needs to put enormous effort into a systematic analysis
15:51:09 [Ralph]
... with 27 implementations I feel we can say we're done
15:51:14 [Ralph]
Sean: I'm happy to go with that
15:51:41 [Ralph]
Guus: I'm happy to write some text with my findings for the transition request
15:52:00 [Ralph]
Sean: can I consider this implementation report to be completed then?
15:52:11 [Ralph]
... I'll paste the two tables into the HTML document
15:52:39 [Ralph]
-> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/SKOS/reference/20090315/implementation.html implementation report generated from the issues tracker
15:53:09 [Ralph]
Sean: there are two additional tables generated from a Google spreadsheet
15:53:44 [seanb]
-> http://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=rmQPwhMMWXxY62FinzE44Eg google doc
15:54:21 [Ralph]
Sean: should I paste the spreadsheet table into the implementation report?
15:54:22 [Ralph]
Guus: yes
15:54:24 [Ralph]
Ralph: yes
15:54:37 [Ralph]
Sean: it's a hassle to do that paste so I'd like to do it only once
15:54:58 [Ralph]
Guus: how about an image paste?
15:55:03 [Ralph]
Ralph: no, that would be frowned on
15:55:21 [Ralph]
Guus: I suggest freezing it now
15:55:51 [Ralph]
... the implementation report does not have to be exhaustive
15:56:18 [Ralph]
Sean: OK, I'll freeze and paste later today
15:56:42 [Ralph]
[DONE] ACTION: Sean to look for SKOS constructs not used by current implementations [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/04/21-swd-minutes.html#action04]
15:56:50 [Ralph]
[CONTINUES] ACTION: Sean to complete implementation report by 19th [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/05/05-swd-minutes.html#action05]
15:57:14 [Ralph]
PROPOSED to request the Director to advance the SKOS Reference to Proposed Recommendation
15:57:35 [Ralph]
Topic: Transition Request
15:58:03 [Ralph]
Guus: we've met the CR exit criteria
15:58:50 [Ralph]
PROPOSED to request the Director to advance the SKOS Reference to Proposed Recommendation http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/SKOS/reference/20090315/
15:59:15 [Ralph]
PROPOSED to request the Director to advance the SKOS Reference to Proposed Recommendation http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/SKOS/reference/20090315/ with Appendix C edits
15:59:47 [Ralph]
+1
15:59:49 [Zakim]
-Ralph
16:00:11 [Antoine]
RESOLVED to request the Director to advance the SKOS Reference to Proposed Recommendation http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/SKOS/reference/20090315/ with Appendix C edits
16:00:54 [Antoine]
scribenick:Antoine
16:01:40 [Antoine]
ACTION: Guus to prepare the request for PR
16:02:35 [Antoine]
Guus: once PR is requested, the WG gets out of the loop, and advisory committee vote, and the director takes direction
16:02:43 [Antoine]
s/direction/decision
16:03:18 [Antoine]
ACTION: Ralph publish Antoine's new intermediate pages for legacy specs [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/04/21-swd-minutes.html#action11]
16:03:22 [Antoine]
--CONTINUES
16:03:36 [Antoine]
ACTION: Ben review RDFa Use Cases and propose transition to Group Note [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/09/30-swd-minutes.html#action02]
16:03:40 [Antoine]
--CONTINUES
16:03:54 [Antoine]
ACTION: Ralph to review the revised Recipes draft [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/12/02-swd-minutes.html#action15]
16:03:56 [Antoine]
--CONTINUES
16:04:13 [Antoine]
ACTION: Ralph post his comments on the editor's draft of the metadata note [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/11/25-swd-minutes.html#action03]
16:04:16 [Antoine]
--CONTINUES
16:04:30 [Antoine]
ACTION: Ralph/Diego to work on Wordnet implementation [of Recipes implementations] [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/01/22-swd-minutes.html#action20]
16:04:34 [Antoine]
--CONTINUES
16:05:06 [Zakim]
-Ed
16:05:06 [Zakim]
-seanb
16:05:07 [Zakim]
-Jon
16:05:11 [Zakim]
-Guus_Schreiber
16:05:20 [edsu]
edsu has left #swd
16:05:28 [Antoine]
Zakim, list participants
16:05:28 [Zakim]
As of this point the attendees have been Ralph, seanb, +1.607.341.aaaa, Jon, Antoine, Ed, Guus_Schreiber
16:05:44 [Antoine]
RRSAgent, make logs public
16:05:54 [Antoine]
RRSAgent, generate minutes
16:05:54 [RRSAgent]
I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/05/19-swd-minutes.html Antoine
16:09:57 [TomB]
TomB has joined #swd
16:10:12 [Zakim]
disconnecting the lone participant, Antoine, in SW_SWD()11:00AM
16:10:25 [TomB]
I just got in from the airport - anyone there?
16:10:56 [seanb]
Hi Tom!
16:11:03 [seanb]
We're just done.
16:11:56 [TomB]
hi sean
16:12:13 [TomB]
any particular issues arise or all okay?
16:20:21 [Antoine]
Antoine has left #swd
17:07:33 [Zakim]
SW_SWD()11:00AM has ended
17:07:36 [Zakim]
Attendees were Ralph, seanb, +1.607.341.aaaa, Jon, Antoine, Ed, Guus_Schreiber
17:19:22 [seanb]
Ralph -- are you there?
17:20:32 [seanb]
One more question about namespaces.... :-)
18:34:26 [Zakim]
Zakim has left #swd
19:28:31 [Ralph]
Ralph has left #swd