13:26:32 RRSAgent has joined #bpwg 13:26:32 logging to http://www.w3.org/2009/05/19-bpwg-irc 13:26:34 RRSAgent, make logs public 13:26:34 Zakim has joined #bpwg 13:26:36 Zakim, this will be BPWG 13:26:36 ok, trackbot; I see MWI_BPWG()9:30AM scheduled to start in 4 minutes 13:26:37 Meeting: Mobile Web Best Practices Working Group Teleconference 13:26:37 Date: 19 May 2009 13:26:40 chair: DKA 13:26:42 Regrets: EdC, adam, jo, alanc, Bryan, jeffs, yeliz, sangwhan, rob 13:27:35 abel_ has joined #bpwg 13:28:30 Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-bpwg/2009May/0027.html 13:30:14 zakim, what is the code? 13:30:14 the conference code is 2794 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 tel:+33.4.89.06.34.99 tel:+44.117.370.6152), DKA 13:30:19 MWI_BPWG()9:30AM has now started 13:30:26 +??P3 13:30:40 Zakim is giving me lip. 13:30:44 +Francois 13:31:15 +??P5 13:31:20 zakim, ??P3 is brucel 13:31:20 +brucel; got it 13:31:21 brucel has joined #bpwg 13:31:31 yo 13:31:31 zakim, ??p5 is me. 13:31:31 +DKA; got it 13:31:41 zakim, who is here? 13:31:41 On the phone I see brucel, Francois, DKA 13:31:42 On IRC I see brucel, abel_, Zakim, RRSAgent, DKA, francois, trackbot 13:33:08 +josema 13:33:25 zakim, josema is me 13:33:25 +abel_; got it 13:34:49 Regrets+ tom 13:35:07 abel__ has joined #bpwg 13:35:53 Scribe: francois 13:36:17 Topic: MWABP: JSON parsing 13:37:02 brucel: I talked to some of the guys in Opera. We don't have any formal tests that we've done and that we could share, but the "10 times" figure sounds correct to anyone. 13:37:39 ... whether we should reconsider is another topic, but the impact of performance is real. 13:37:49 +Kai_Dietrich 13:37:49 dka: ok, that's an important point. 13:39:26 Opera also agreed that security concerns are v important 13:39:34 francois: dom replied with the same arguments I raised before. 13:40:11 ... The problem is with security. It's hard to write a BP that has security implications. 13:40:59 Anne van Kesteran just replied to me that "soon browsers will have native JSON parsers" but that's not a BP for now 13:41:03 abel_ has joined #bpwg 13:41:31 dka: ok so we need to find some balance between security and performance 13:42:05 Topic: MWABP - Kai's Hendry comment 13:42:13 -> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-bpwg-comments/2009AprJun/0002.html Kai Hendry's comment 13:43:02 francois: it's more or less a suggestion that we have a BP around the use of OpenID 13:43:45 dka: I think it's worth considering. Maybe not talking specifically about OpenID. 13:44:00 ... Do you think it fits into the mobile space? 13:44:09 ack franc 13:44:51 SeanP has joined #bpwg 13:45:19 jsmanrique has joined #bpwg 13:45:29 Francois: it may not be mobile enough and also with OpenID you need to enter a URI to log into a site so this might not be appropriate for the mobile space. 13:45:52 Francois: Also FOAF+SSL technology might remove the need to enter u+p but this is still an emerging technology. 13:46:34 Francois: I love OpenID but ... 13:46:54 So do I! 13:47:08 Kai has joined #bpwg 13:47:12 +SeanP 13:47:33 dka: my view would be that it's incorrect to have a BP that specifically calls out OpenID. 13:47:51 +1 with dka for usability issues 13:48:13 ... I think it's worth discussing on the mailing-list. 13:49:07 ... Using one OpenID could ease remembering of the URI by browsers, but that's not implemented in browsers for the time being AFAICT. 13:49:18 +abel_.a 13:49:55 Topic: Addendum to BP 13:50:28 Zakim abel_.a is jsmanrique 13:50:37 kai: the status really hasn't changed. Jo should reword to have some linguistic integrity within the document and set another editorial meeting. 13:51:21 dka: I know Jo's really busy these days, so I'm a bit worried about that. Is it possible that we re-assign this action to someone else? 13:51:35 kai: Phil Archer had offered to do that. 13:51:43 dka: He's the one I had in mind, indeed. 13:52:33 ACTION: dan to get in touch with Phil and Jo with a view to having the Addendum reviewed for consistency 13:52:34 Created ACTION-963 - Get in touch with Phil and Jo with a view to having the Addendum reviewed for consistency [on Daniel Appelquist - due 2009-05-26]. 13:53:03 kai: I would be happy to do that as well. 13:53:13 dka: let me start this, and I'll get out of the way. 13:53:33 kai: good. 13:54:54 ... what about the second editorial session? 13:55:26 francois: another one was planned indeed, but it's kind of linked to the above action on dan to see if Phil can replace Jo. 13:56:14 Topic: CT 13:56:28 dka: anything we could discuss? 13:56:50 francois: I don't think so. We need to see the result of the discussion put into words. Editorial work. 13:56:56 seanp: I agree with francois. 13:57:22 dka: I guess that's another point to try to remove the addendum from Jo's hand so that he may focus on the CT guidelines. 13:57:23 More on the JSOn question: It would only make the app run 10x slower if evaling the incoming data is the major performance bottleneck. If that's the case you might be better off dumping json altogether and going for a format that is optimized for your needs rather than designed to be flexible (see e.g. [1] for an example complete with numbers). 13:57:23 13:57:23 [1] http://code.flickr.com/blog/2009/03/18/building-fast-client-side-searches/ 13:58:18 dka: any other point? 13:58:56 francois: not from me. About relationship between WCAG and MWBP, the Education and Outreach WG is to review the doc on Friday. Hopefully publication early next week. 13:59:09 ACTION-692? 13:59:09 ACTION-692 -- Sunghan Kim to provide some example BP statements based on the presentation he gave at Korea F2F -- due 2008-03-11 -- CLOSED 13:59:09 http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/actions/692 13:59:10 Topic: Issues and Actions 13:59:30 ACTION-962? 13:59:30 ACTION-962 -- François Daoust to reach out for comments on MWABP via the BPBlog -- due 2009-05-19 -- OPEN 13:59:30 http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/actions/962 14:00:18 francois: I published a blog post, no comment received so far. 14:00:25 close ACTION-962 14:00:25 ACTION-962 Reach out for comments on MWABP via the BPBlog closed 14:00:54 ACTION-959? 14:00:54 ACTION-959 -- François Daoust to enact the resolution on XHTML Basic 1.1 revision - when it reaches rec -- due 2009-05-19 -- OPEN 14:00:54 http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/actions/959 14:01:45 francois: this action is pending the publication of XHTML Basic 1.1 as a new Rec. 14:02:04 dka: OK, I think we should probably close this call at this point. AOB? 14:02:49 hugs 14:02:51 bye 14:02:54 -Kai_Dietrich 14:03:02 -abel_ 14:03:06 ... Thanks everyone, we'll pick up the topics next week when we have more time and resources. 14:03:07 bye 14:03:10 -Francois 14:03:12 brucel has left #bpwg 14:03:16 -SeanP 14:03:19 -brucel 14:03:21 -jsmanrique 14:03:26 -DKA 14:03:28 MWI_BPWG()9:30AM has ended 14:03:29 Attendees were Francois, brucel, DKA, abel_, Kai_Dietrich, SeanP, jsmanrique 14:04:44 RRSAgent, draft minutes 14:04:44 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/05/19-bpwg-minutes.html francois 14:08:02 abel__ has joined #bpwg 14:26:17 RRSAgent, bye 14:26:17 I see 1 open action item saved in http://www.w3.org/2009/05/19-bpwg-actions.rdf : 14:26:17 ACTION: dan to get in touch with Phil and Jo with a view to having the Addendum reviewed for consistency [1] 14:26:17 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/05/19-bpwg-irc#T13-52-33 14:26:19 zakim, bye 14:26:19 Zakim has left #bpwg