06:34:48 RRSAgent has joined #svg 06:34:48 logging to http://www.w3.org/2009/05/13-svg-irc 06:34:49 ok brb 06:34:50 RRSAgent, make logs public 06:34:50 Zakim has joined #svg 06:34:52 Zakim, this will be GA_SVGWG 06:34:52 ok, trackbot, I see GA_SVGWG()2:30AM already started 06:34:53 Meeting: SVG Working Group Teleconference 06:34:53 Date: 13 May 2009 06:35:26 +??P1 06:35:34 Zakim, ??P1 is me 06:35:34 +ed; got it 06:35:41 Zakim, who's here? 06:35:41 On the phone I see ??P0, ed 06:35:42 On IRC I see RRSAgent, jwatt, ed, karl, ed_work, anthony, trackbot 06:36:53 Zakim, ??P0 is me 06:36:53 +jwatt; got it 06:38:07 +??P2 06:38:19 Zakim, ??P2 is me 06:38:19 +anthony; got it 06:39:01 heycam has joined #svg 06:39:46 +??P3 06:39:49 Zakim, ??P3 is me 06:39:49 +heycam; got it 06:40:13 Scribe: Cameron 06:40:14 Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-svg-wg/2009AprJun/0124.html 06:40:16 ScribeNick: heycam 06:40:18 Chair: Erik 06:40:42 Topic: SVG Open F2F 06:40:53 ED: i got a question from ruud about when the wg was meeting 06:40:58 ... maybe we should discuss dates 06:41:46 CM: ruud said doug said probably after svg open 06:41:59 AG: it's useful to have it before, since then we can get things done before the conference 06:42:12 ED: i'd agree that it'd be better to have it before 06:42:21 ... svg open is oct 2-4 06:42:33 ... friday-sunday 06:42:46 ... having it the week before then, monday-thursday, would be fine with me 06:43:03 ... i.e. from sep 28 06:43:13 AG: what about sat-wed, to have a break in between? 06:43:15 ED: yes that'd work 06:43:27 CM: i'd rather a break in between too 06:44:16 ED: i'm not sure if there are any conflicting meetings 06:44:47 ... be good to ask chris/doug to see if they have any problems with having the meeting before svg open 06:44:51 ... if we feel that's the best plan 06:45:19 ... also i'm wondering if we'll meet at the TPAC 06:45:44 ... we did respond to the polls before saying that we wouldn't meet, and we'd prefer early in the following year 06:45:52 ... just meeting a few of the groups 06:46:08 ... since svg open and the TPAC meeting are relatively close is it worth travelling? 06:46:15 CM: what are the tpac dates? 06:47:03 ED: november 06:47:28 2-6 november 06:47:33 s/2/... 2/ 06:47:40 ... and svg open is 2-4 october 06:47:46 ... so it's pretty close 06:48:39 AG: any reason why svg open was pushed back? 06:48:47 ED: think some people were saying august wasn't a good time for academics 06:49:32 CM: so we're meeting just 3 times this year? depends on when the possible mini-tpac would be i guess. 06:50:10 CM: difficult to travel again so soon 06:50:12 ED: me too 06:50:34 CM: be interesting to know what the other mini-meeting groups will do 06:50:44 ED: since they're not going to svg open, probably they don't have such a big problem to attend tpac 06:50:52 AG: assuming i can travel, i'm not too fussed about it 06:51:02 ... a pain to travel twice in 4 weeks, but i can do it 06:51:11 ... i don't mind if it's shifted back either 06:51:51 ED: for the svg open f2f, should i put the dates on the wiki as proposed dates? from sep 28? 06:52:28 AG: i'd prefer sep 26 06:52:33 ... how many days of meeting do we want? 06:53:03 ED: where will we be meeting? would we book a hotel? 06:53:18 CM: maybe mozilla? 06:53:34 ED: i can check if opera have facilities 06:54:29 ... i'll put sep 26-30 as the meeting dates, with one day rest before svg open 06:55:07 ACTION: Erik to mail Ruud about SVG Open F2F dates, CCing Doug and Chris 06:55:08 Created ACTION-2558 - Mail Ruud about SVG Open F2F dates, CCing Doug and Chris [on Erik Dahlström - due 2009-05-20]. 06:55:48 Regrets: Chris, Doug 06:56:01 RRSAgent, pointer? 06:56:01 See http://www.w3.org/2009/05/13-svg-irc#T06-56-01 06:56:18 ED: jonathan, do you know if moz has offices we could meet in? 06:56:21 Zakim, who is on the call? 06:56:21 On the phone I see jwatt, ed, anthony, heycam 06:57:31 trackbot, close ACTION-2555 06:57:31 ACTION-2555 Write the proposal for the Working Group panel closed 06:57:53 Topic: Module updates 06:57:57 ED: any new things happening? 06:58:09 ... don't think i've seen anything 06:58:15 ... i made some minor changes to the filters module 06:58:31 AG: haven't done anything major yet, still doing investigations into a few things 06:59:42 Topic: Errata progress 06:59:57 ED: the spec itself, is it ready for folding items in? 07:00:19 CM: not yet 07:00:31 AG: i've got a question on wording for the erratum i have to do 07:01:06 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-svg/2009Apr/0101.html 07:01:14 ... that's the original problem report 07:01:15 http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/track/issues/2268 07:02:11 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-svg-wg/2009AprJun/0096.html 07:02:25 AG: wondering what wording to replace with 07:02:40 ED: in that url that's a summary of the behaviour in opera/batik 07:02:53 ... i'm quite sure it was the same in firefox/safari too 07:03:21 ... you could turn those two bullet points into wording 07:04:51 CM: you could add a sentence after the existing one, to state whether the implicit linetos are relative or absolute, based on the relative-ness of the moveto command 07:05:54 ED: you could say that an uppercase "M" means the implicit linetos are absolute, and a lowercase "m" means they are relative 07:06:28 AG: i might add an example, too 07:08:40 CM: i mailed ian jacobs to ask about publishing the second edition spec including changes that aren't in the errata document 07:08:47 ... he said that's fine, as long as they aren't new features 07:09:19 ... so basically, the same type of changes as in the errata 07:09:28 ... the AC review of the PER is sufficient 07:11:15 ED: are we freezing the errata document? 07:11:26 CM: yes, after anthony's erratum is added 07:11:35 http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.1F2/errata/errata.xml 07:11:48 ... the remaining unfinished errata can still be added to the spec directly, before it's published 07:12:27 http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.1F2/errata/errata.xml#svglength-clarification-and-exceptions 07:12:34 ED: this one looks complete 07:13:52 ED: so it's adding the exception, and stating that the unitType is changed 07:13:58 CM: yes, for the valueAsString attributes 07:14:05 ... and there's the exceptions for the other two methods, below 07:14:06 ED: looks ok 07:18:18 CM: i changed the text just now to mention throwing if SVG_LENGTHTYPE_UNKNOWN is passed in 07:18:23 (or SVG_ANGLETYPE_UNKNOWN) 07:19:06 "Raised if unitType is not SVG_ANGLETYPE_UNKNOWN" should be "Raised if unitType is SVG_ANGLETYPE_UNKNOWN" ? 07:20:26 ok fixed 07:21:45 ED: any objection to moving it to proposed? 07:21:55 none heard 07:28:26 http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.1F2/errata/errata.xml#clarify_implicit_lineto_commands_in_path_syntax 07:30:44 RESOLUTION: Clarify implicit linetos to be absolute or relative in line with current implementations 07:30:53 s/Clarify/We will clarify/ 07:34:43 http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.1F2/errata/errata.xml#svgsvgelement-should-not-extend-viewcss-documentcss-or-documentevent 07:37:32 ED: i think this one looks fine 07:37:37 ... one minor detail 07:37:53 ... why does this errata repeat the section about how SVGDocument implement DocumentEvent? 07:37:55 and DocumentCSS? 07:38:13 ... that's both in the new section B.6.4 and before the SVGDocument interface description 07:40:04 CM: i don't mind to drop that paragraph and mention DocumentEvents in appendix B 07:40:52 ACTION: Cameron to modify the #svgsvgelement-should-not-extend-viewcss-documentcss-or-documentevent erratum according to the minutes here 07:40:52 Created ACTION-2559 - Modify the #svgsvgelement-should-not-extend-viewcss-documentcss-or-documentevent erratum according to the minutes here [on Cameron McCormack - due 2009-05-20]. 07:41:14 http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.1F2/errata/errata.xml#usecurrentview-should-be-read-only 07:42:05 ED: i agree with this one, any objections to moving it to proposed? 07:42:12 AG: should be fine 07:43:20 http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.1F2/errata/errata.xml#currentscale-should-not-throw 07:45:12 ED: i'm ok with this 07:45:18 JW: what about when you assign NaN? 07:45:35 CM: i think that falls under the same category of things in the ecmascript binding that isn't specified currently 07:45:38 ED: ok, move it to proposed 07:46:02 http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.1F2/errata/errata.xml#allow-foreignobject-outside-switch 07:47:03 ED: i agree with this one, to allow as a child of any container element 07:47:06 ... not just 07:48:20 CM: these dtd fragments are going to disappear from the chapters when the second edition is published 07:48:50 ED: move it to proposed if there are no objections 07:49:46 http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.1F2/errata/errata.xml#getbbox_clarification 07:50:43 JW: do we say anything about calling getBBox() for elements outside the document 07:50:43 CM: we do in tiny, but not in 1.1 07:51:28 http://www.w3.org/TR/SVGTiny12/coords.html#BoundingBox 07:51:46 Elements and document fragments which derive from SVGLocatable but are not in the rendering tree, such as those in a 'defs' element or those which have been been created but not yet inserted into the DOM, must still have a bounding box. The geometry of elements outside the rendering tree must take into account only those properties and values (such as 'font-size') which are specified within that element or document fragment, or which have a lacuna value or an 07:51:46 implementation-defined value. 07:53:16 CM: i'm ok with this erratum 07:53:20 ED: ok, move it to proposed 07:59:35 ACTION: Cameron to publish the errata after doing his other action 07:59:36 Created ACTION-2560 - Publish the errata after doing his other action [on Cameron McCormack - due 2009-05-20]. 08:00:57 -anthony 08:00:58 -ed 08:00:58 -heycam 08:01:10 -jwatt 08:01:11 GA_SVGWG()2:30AM has ended 08:01:13 Attendees were ed, jwatt, anthony, heycam 08:01:38 RRSAgent, make minutes 08:01:38 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/05/13-svg-minutes.html heycam 08:57:54 heycam has joined #svg 09:07:13 Zakim has left #svg