12:58:35 RRSAgent has joined #egov 12:58:35 logging to http://www.w3.org/2009/05/13-egov-irc 12:58:37 RRSAgent, make logs public 12:58:39 Zakim, this will be EGOV 12:58:40 Meeting: eGovernment Interest Group Teleconference 12:58:40 Date: 13 May 2009 12:58:48 zakim, who's here? 12:58:49 On IRC I see Owen, Zakim, davemc, John, josema, kevin, trackbot 12:59:01 ok, trackbot, I see T&S_EGOV()9:00AM already started 12:59:08 On the phone I see ??P15 12:59:37 +[IPcaller] 12:59:43 On IRC I see RRSAgent, Owen, Zakim, davemc, John, josema, kevin, trackbot 12:59:59 +Rodrigo 13:00:01 + +1.202.626.aaaa 13:00:04 I am on my iPhone for IRC 13:00:11 zakim, Rodrigo is me 13:00:17 +josema; got it 13:00:23 +??P33 13:00:30 ya'll aren't hearing me, will dial back in 13:00:52 -[IPcaller] 13:01:20 +Rachel 13:01:26 zakim, aaaa is Kevin 13:01:26 +Kevin; got it 13:01:40 Rachel has joined #egov 13:01:41 Daniel_Bennett has joined #egov 13:01:48 +??P7 13:01:54 zakim, IPcaller is Owen 13:01:54 sorry, josema, I do not recognize a party named 'IPcaller' 13:02:01 zakim, [IPcaller] is Owen 13:02:01 sorry, josema, I do not recognize a party named '[IPcaller]' 13:02:05 zakim, who's here? 13:02:09 On the phone I see ??P15, josema, Kevin, ??P33, Rachel, ??P7 13:02:10 On IRC I see Daniel_Bennett, Rachel, RRSAgent, Owen, Zakim, davemc, John, josema, kevin, trackbot 13:02:14 zakim, ??P7 is dave 13:02:20 +dave; got it 13:02:20 zakim, ??P7 is davemc 13:02:28 I already had ??P7 as dave, josema 13:02:34 zakim, dave is davemc 13:02:40 +davemc; got it 13:03:05 zakim, ??P15 is probably John 13:03:20 +John?; got it 13:03:41 agenda? 13:03:49 zakim, who's noisy? 13:04:46 josema, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: Rachel (63%), Kevin (89%) 13:05:18 zakim, who's here? 13:05:19 + +1.202.564.aabb 13:05:29 pretty responsive here 13:05:31 + +1.202.319.aacc - is perhaps Daniel_Bennett 13:05:33 zakim, aabb is probably Brand 13:05:41 yes, aabb is Daniel 13:05:47 On the phone I see John?, josema, Kevin, ??P33, Rachel, davemc, +1.202.564.aabb, Daniel_Bennett 13:05:47 zakim, who's here? 13:05:55 +Brand?; got it 13:06:03 zakim, aabb is Brand 13:06:07 On the phone I see John?, josema, Kevin, ??P33, Rachel, davemc, Brand?, Daniel_Bennett 13:06:08 whoops 202-319-aabb is Daniel 13:06:11 On IRC I see Daniel_Bennett, Rachel, RRSAgent, Owen, Zakim, davemc, John, josema, kevin, trackbot 13:06:15 it's fine :) 13:06:21 sorry, josema, I do not recognize a party named 'aabb' 13:07:06 zakim, who's here? 13:07:07 On the phone I see John?, josema, Kevin, ??P33, Rachel, davemc, Brand?, Daniel_Bennett 13:07:08 On IRC I see Daniel_Bennett, Rachel, RRSAgent, Owen, Zakim, davemc, John, josema, kevin, trackbot 13:07:31 zakim, ??P33 is probably Owen 13:07:31 +Owen?; got it 13:07:49 chairs: john, kevin 13:07:55 is Twibe official? 13:08:00 take up next agendum 13:08:13 kevin: any volunteers? 13:08:23 ... adjustments? 13:08:38 Kevin wanted to discuss the panel this summer 13:08:49 scribe: josema 13:08:53 agenda? 13:09:03 take up next agendum 13:09:19 [kevin thanks everybody for the work on the Note] 13:09:47 [kevin refers to: http://thedesignstate.com/national-design-policy-council-video/] 13:10:51 kevin: doc puts up in very good position to help governments 13:11:15 john: agree, kevin also sent appreciation note to Jose's W3C collagues 13:11:23 ...I'm sure we all endorse as group 13:11:35 +! Kudos to Jose are deserved 13:11:40 ...think this will be an important resource for people 13:14:01 + +34.63.557.aadd 13:14:29 [jose thanks all and is happy to see this finally published, eager to discuss next steps] 13:14:35 zakim, aadd is oscar 13:14:35 +oscar; got it 13:15:00 owen: also sent message to several lists 13:15:10 daniel: great work, what next? 13:15:19 + +1.512.797.aaee 13:15:32 owen: what about timbl + kevin to meet with Kundra? 13:15:42 kevin: I'd be happy to do so 13:16:33 zakim, who's noisy? 13:16:43 josema, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: John? (29%) 13:17:30 zakim, aaee is sharron 13:17:30 +sharron; got it 13:17:39 agenda? 13:18:56 [jose mentions charter extension] 13:19:20 take up next agendum 13:22:21 -oscar 13:22:57 [john gives summary of EU PSI directive, COM, status] 13:23:42 [on PSI directive: http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/policy/psi/actions_eu/policy_actions/index_en.htm] 13:23:49 s/PSI/EU PSI 13:24:06 [john on need of transposition and deadlines] 13:25:21 Sharron has joined #egov 13:25:58 john: enabling people to create their own services have helped move the agenda in the UK 13:26:25 +oscar 13:27:09 +Ken 13:27:13 -sharron 13:28:44 +sharron 13:28:58 jose: the examples in the COM caught my eye 13:29:22 COM: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2009:0212:FIN:EN:PDF 13:29:52 john: I'm not planning to go to SemTech at the moment 13:30:13 kevin: there's opportunity to speak but no travel funding 13:31:05 [open government initiative event] 13:31:43 ->http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-egov-ig/2009May/0035 thread start 13:32:01 s/initiative/innovations 13:32:16 [opportunity to organize a panel there] 13:32:36 s/[opportunity to organize a panel there]/daniel: opportunity to organize a panel there 13:32:52 ... some volunteered, plan to organize the panel around the Note content 13:33:15 [personal democracy forum] 13:34:06 daniel: held yearly in NYC, went last year, end of June this year 13:34:28 ...hosted by TechPresident, several high profiles speakers 13:35:00 kevin: do you see opportunity to participate there wrt Note? 13:35:23 daniel: I can ask Micah Sifry 13:35:29 zakim, who's noisy? 13:35:39 josema, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: oscar (28%), John? (99%) 13:35:44 zakim, mute oscar 13:35:44 oscar should now be muted 13:36:16 -oscar 13:36:18 john: we have a meeting tomorrow, Beth Noveck to give talk via videolink on OGD 13:37:05 ...easy to find, easy to use, easy to reuse ?? is the title 13:38:19 [kevin re-reads activity plan and asks people to let group know of opportunities where we could talk about Note] 13:40:00 take up next agendum 13:40:31 +oscar 13:40:32 [kevin reminds satisfaction after challenging initial period] 13:42:30 go for it. Let's hear them 13:43:24 one challenge - learning w3c operating procedures, took a while for group to get up to speed 13:43:50 just a quick note that the twibe group EGOV is official. I set it up last week 13:44:12 VERY important for folks to take turns scribing 13:44:48 if Jose scribes, his time is divided between talking & typing and it is hard to do both well 13:45:12 I didn't attend the f2f, but the minutes were quite useful in coming up to speed. 13:45:20 so Step Up people!!!!! 13:46:19 -Brand? 13:46:25 ideas - appoint a scribe at end of one call, to scribe the next call. 13:46:46 Idea - if you are assigned to scribe and can't make the meeting, you are responsible to find a replacement 13:46:47 scribe: Rachel 13:47:04 dave refers to this one: http://www.w3.org/2007/eGov/IG/wiki/Scribe_List 13:47:04 idea - if no one steps up to scribe, there is no meeting 13:48:22 one challenge as group started was that most participants were new to w3c, new to IRC, may not have had access to IRC from work computer 13:48:24 I liked Daniel's suggestion 13:48:43 as a step 13:49:23 +1 Daniel's suggestion 13:49:52 [Daniel volunteers to scribe next meeting] 13:50:48 one barrier to scribing is not being familiar w/voices & names 13:50:49 Like Sharron did at our last meeting 13:51:16 if you are new to the group, ask speakers to identify themselves before speaking 13:51:18 [Sharron volunteers as backup] 13:53:43 [Rachel volunteers to edit docs] 13:54:17 kevin: "rapid issue releases" 13:54:17 Exactly +1 13:54:23 +1 13:54:27 +1 13:54:45 No more 'war and peace' 13:55:08 (as in the novel) 13:55:25 -oscar 13:58:05 scribe: josema 13:58:25 [john on http://sandbox.opsi.gov.uk/] 13:58:34 +oscar 13:58:45 zakim, unmute oscar 13:58:45 oscar was not muted, josema 13:59:20 john: if you want to talk about something you need to be able to identify it 13:59:38 ...e.g. you need to be able to point to a paragraph 14:00:04 You can't "mash" a PDF easily 14:00:39 daniel: putting stuff up in XML allows for this sort of stuff 14:00:45 ...using XPointer, etc. 14:01:09 let's discuss mashing PDF separately. Technical point of order 14:02:10 owen: I think that john's example is interesting to show that governments do not get it 14:02:25 +1 14:02:28 ...XML->PDF automatically is doable, opposite not true 14:02:55 dave: PDF purpose is to show exact replica of doc, not to have pointers to this or that 14:03:25 ...XML made for that, not a PDF expert but heard from them it's even possible with PDF 14:03:58 Is bad PDF like bad HTML - you can do better but people often don't? 14:04:20 kevin: respect both paths here, we want to provide as much data as possible 14:04:44 PDF to XPDF is available via free technology from Adobe http://labs.adobe.com/technologies/mars/ 14:04:46 daniel: we should not shy away with getting into discussion about formats with respect 14:05:12 yup, the point is the URI 14:05:30 dave: agree and believe there are principles that could be applicable to a variety of formats 14:06:00 oscar: PDF is wonderful technology, but I was trying to point out in the doc it's difficult to get data out 14:06:24 ...probably a technology that it's used in the wrong context in many cases, hence the issues 14:06:38 ...this is something we could also work on in the future 14:06:50 ...formats are of paramount importance 14:07:02 daniel: sandbox stuff is wonderful 14:07:22 ...having techniques for dealing with that sort of information is always useful 14:08:55 dave: US Courts have 350Mio docs in PDFs, we should be careful not to break the leal tracks when structuring the data 14:09:26 rachel: 99% of people dealing with content don't have a clear idea of what XML, this needs a cultural change, capability building 14:10:29 daniel: brilliant point 14:11:09 rachel: people do not easily move to do something differently 14:11:38 kevin: I believe those are things to potentially incorporate in 2nd charter 14:11:59 ...better communication to ??? 14:12:12 ...is that something we want to build onto? 14:12:35 dave: agree??? 14:12:41 agenda? 14:13:36 We just drifted - no conspiracy :) 14:16:15 my view, we worked best as one group 14:16:22 [jose on TFs expectations different from outcome] 14:16:47 oscar: agree, don't think they have worked very well, we might want to explore something different 14:17:16 agree, re-org is good idea 14:20:02 dmcallis has joined #egov 14:20:02 -davemc 14:20:16 sorry, my internet connection dropped 14:20:25 rachel: suggest to have a pre-marketing plan for next docs 14:20:30 kevin: agree 14:21:13 dmcallis has left #egov 14:21:45 owen: key issue is to identify and establish comms with stakeholders 14:22:51 take up next agendum 14:22:51 also identify channels where we want to distribute message - twitter, etc 14:23:26 kevin: need to get a draft of 2nd charter in June 14:24:11 kevin: homework assignment: should the IG focus on less topics? 14:24:30 ...think about it, go through paper, identify some 14:24:45 ...I feel each of major areas in paper are very timely and applicable 14:25:00 ...I'd like to preserve those categories if doable with resources we have 14:25:07 maybe we should do a 'divide the dollar' exercise to priopritise? 14:25:26 owen: point is who wants to work on what? 14:25:49 ...I'd be more than willing to document goals and stakeholders in StratML 14:25:55 oscar: I'd need some time to think about it 14:26:02 ...start thread by email 14:27:34 daniel: I would be a little bit worried about trying to do many things at once 14:27:58 ...as owen said we should question ourselves if we are meeting stakeholders' needs 14:28:47 john: I think we need to prioritize, we cover a broad are now on Note 14:29:02 ...we need to pick those places where we can make most impact 14:29:15 ...strongest level of participation and expertise 14:29:24 ...go through a conversation as a group 14:29:29 ...to identify them 14:29:37 +1 14:30:10 kevin: I think we are all saying same thing, agree with both 14:30:48 ...March F2F had great participation that allowed us to be where we are today 14:31:28 ...reason why I'm also interested in marketing our efforts, led to this good position 14:31:44 rachel: what are the end result we want for stage 2? 14:32:02 rrsagent, draft minutes 14:32:02 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/05/13-egov-minutes.html josema 14:32:26 kevin: I think we need to start solving what we can solve out of those issues we identified already 14:32:34 -oscar 14:32:38 +1 14:32:53 ...we have lots of questions in there, need to address them 14:32:55 +1 14:33:07 plural - documents 14:34:01 john: no way we'll solve all issues identified 14:34:21 ...but if we focus well we can achieve success in small amounts 14:34:25 ...going step by step 14:34:38 -sharron 14:34:40 must go, bye all til next time. 14:35:36 kevin: I think we need to be open 14:35:59 so, year 2, solutions to issues, severaldocs, but agile and responsive 14:37:40 Normative sounds scary... 14:38:07 not that much ;) 14:38:45 ACTION: josema to send message to list about different publishing options rec/BPS/etc. 14:38:46 Created ACTION-63 - Send message to list about different publishing options rec/BPS/etc. [on José Manuel Alonso - due 2009-05-20]. 14:39:41 owen: +1 to produce smaller docs and reference better existing ones 14:41:01 kevin: can everybody commit to submit messages with ideas, description as specific as possible around this next week, get together in 2 weeks time and review that list and build consensus around it? 14:41:05 [all agree] 14:42:01 [kevin to touch base with Karen get back to group on marketing plan] 14:43:54 [ADJOURNED] 14:44:04 -Kevin 14:44:06 -josema 14:44:07 -Daniel_Bennett 14:44:07 -Rachel 14:44:09 -Ken 14:44:10 -John? 14:44:10 T&S_EGOV()9:00AM has ended 14:44:11 Attendees were [IPcaller], +1.202.626.aaaa, josema, Rachel, Kevin, davemc, John?, +1.202.564.aabb, +1.202.319.aacc, Brand?, Owen?, +34.63.557.aadd, oscar, +1.512.797.aaee, sharron, 14:44:13 ... Ken 14:44:21 rrsagent, draft minutes 14:44:21 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/05/13-egov-minutes.html josema 14:51:02 John has left #egov 16:13:42 davemc has joined #egov 16:14:24 davemc has joined #egov 16:15:02 davemc has left #egov 17:12:56 trackbot has joined #egov