15:59:14 RRSAgent has joined #html-wg 15:59:14 logging to http://www.w3.org/2009/05/07-html-wg-irc 15:59:15 some part of the processing chain for http://www.w3.org/html/wg/href/draft-ietf.html put an incorrect charset decl 15:59:16 RRSAgent, make logs public 15:59:16 Zakim has joined #html-wg 15:59:17 Title: Web addresses in HTML 5 (at www.w3.org) 15:59:18 Zakim, this will be HTML 15:59:18 ok, trackbot, I see HTML_WG()12:00PM already started 15:59:19 Meeting: HTML Weekly Teleconference 15:59:19 Date: 07 May 2009 16:00:33 - +49.251.280.aaaa 16:00:34 HTML_WG()12:00PM has ended 16:00:34 Attendees were +49.251.280.aaaa 16:00:35 HTML_WG()12:00PM has now started 16:00:40 +Sam 16:01:19 Zakim, call DanC-work 16:01:19 ok, DanC; the call is being made 16:01:20 +DanC 16:02:07 + +49.251.280.aaaa 16:02:07 + +1.218.349.aabb 16:02:15 Zakim, +49.251.280.aaaa is me 16:02:15 +Julian; got it 16:02:53 +Matt_May 16:03:01 +Masinter 16:04:04 218.349 is Duluth, Minnesota... Laura? 16:05:03 regrets+ Doug_Schepers 16:05:40 Zakim, pick a scribe 16:05:40 Not knowing who is chairing or who scribed recently, I propose Matt_May 16:05:43 Zakim, aaaa is Laura Carlson 16:05:43 I don't understand 'aaaa is Laura Carlson', rubys 16:06:01 Zakim, aaaa is Laura_Carlson 16:06:01 sorry, DanC, I do not recognize a party named 'aaaa' 16:06:22 Zakim, pick a scribe 16:06:22 Not knowing who is chairing or who scribed recently, I propose Sam 16:06:24 Zakim, pick a scribe 16:06:24 Not knowing who is chairing or who scribed recently, I propose Julian 16:07:11 scribe: Julian 16:07:20 chair: rubys 16:07:42 Topic: ISSUE-54 (doctype-legacy-compat) 16:07:47 rubys: open issues issigned to lachlan; not responding 16:07:55 q+ 16:08:28 action-103? 16:08:28 ACTION-103 -- Lachlan Hunt to register about: URI scheme -- due 2009-04-09 -- OPEN 16:08:28 http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/actions/103 16:08:29 Title: ACTION-103 - HTML Weekly Tracker (at www.w3.org) 16:08:40 Laura has joined #html-wg 16:09:01 julian: joseph holsten tried to update the draft but apparently had trouble getting the draft submitted 16:10:41 action-103? 16:10:41 ACTION-103 -- Julian Reschke to register about: URI scheme -- due 2009-05-21 -- OPEN 16:10:41 http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/actions/103 16:10:43 Title: ACTION-103 - HTML Weekly Tracker (at www.w3.org) 16:11:15 Topic: ISSUE-55 (head-profile) 16:11:18 julian: new draft seems to normatively reference HML5 which may be a problem. 16:11:18 aciton-99? 16:11:20 concern if the document is going in the wrong direction on about: scheme 16:11:30 action-99? 16:11:30 ACTION-99 -- Sam Ruby to review @profile -- due 2009-04-30 -- OPEN 16:11:30 http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/actions/99 16:11:31 Title: ACTION-99 - HTML Weekly Tracker (at www.w3.org) 16:11:39 q+ 16:12:02 TOPIC: @profile 16:12:51 "scheme" attribute of META element Chabot, Elliot (Wednesday, 6 May) http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-comments/2009May/0009.html 16:12:52 Title: "scheme" attribute of META element from Chabot, Elliot on 2009-05-06 (public-html-comments@w3.org from May 2009) (at lists.w3.org) 16:14:02 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2009Apr/0208.html 16:14:04 Title: Please review use cases relating to embedding micro-data in text/html from Ian Hickson on 2009-04-23 (public-html@w3.org from April 2009) (at lists.w3.org) 16:14:04 Julian: toding some work on @profile with leif, currently waiting for Hixie's proposal on microdata 16:14:14 s/toding/doing/ 16:14:31 issue-55: note summary of micro-data http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2009Apr/0208.html 16:14:31 ISSUE-55 head/@profile missing, but used in other specifications/formats notes added 16:14:32 Title: Please review use cases relating to embedding micro-data in text/html from Ian Hickson on 2009-04-23 (public-html@w3.org from April 2009) (at lists.w3.org) 16:14:37 dsinger has joined #html-wg 16:15:10 q+ 16:15:35 DanC: same issue as microdata? 16:15:38 +dsinger 16:16:02 action-99? 16:16:02 ACTION-99 -- Sam Ruby to review @profile -- due 2009-04-30 -- OPEN 16:16:02 http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/actions/99 16:16:06 action-99 due next week 16:16:06 ACTION-99 Review @profile due date now next week 16:16:20 +Cynthia_Shelly 16:16:32 q+ to ask what RDFa stuff was supposed to be done? 16:16:34 rubys: push date forward to next week 16:17:03 rubys: waiting for Hixie's microdate feedback 16:17:10 Zakim, call Mike 16:17:10 ok, MikeSmith; the call is being made 16:17:11 +Mike 16:17:17 ack danc 16:17:17 DanC, you wanted to ask what RDFa stuff was supposed to be done? 16:17:28 q- 16:17:52 action-96? 16:17:52 ACTION-96 -- Henri Sivonen to to ensure editor removes Origin header: from spec -- due 2009-05-06 -- OPEN 16:17:52 http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/actions/96 16:17:56 Topic: ISSUE-63 (origin-req-scope) 16:18:22 rubys: Henri not available 16:18:30 ACTION-96? 16:18:30 ACTION-96 -- Henri Sivonen to to ensure editor removes Origin header: from spec -- due 2009-05-06 -- OPEN 16:18:30 http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/actions/96 16:19:11 masinter: there was discussion on HTTP-WG mailing list whether Referer could be used instead 16:19:17 . http://esw.w3.org/topic/IETF_HTML5_Meeting_March_2009?highlight=(ietf) 16:19:20 rubys: no new information since SFO IETF meeting 16:19:34 "# Browser vendors are highly skeptical that that will be sufficient 16:19:34 # Action Item: MNot to send a pointer to prior discussion " 16:20:17 Sam: I think mnot did that 16:20:30 danc: nobody owns the ball right now 16:20:51 rubys: Henri should own it 16:21:09 MikeSmith: Henri is traveling 16:21:22 rubys: move to next week 16:21:23 action-96 due next week 16:21:23 ACTION-96 to ensure editor removes Origin header: from spec due date now next week 16:21:42 TOPIC: versioning 16:21:54 masinter: discussion ongoing in TAG 16:22:24 ACTION-108 due 7 June 16:22:24 ACTION-108 Report back on the TAG's work on versioning wrt HTML due date now 7 June 16:22:25 danc: proposal to move by one month 16:22:48 s/by one/by two/ 16:22:54 www-tag Versioning and HTML 16:23:10 issue-31? 16:23:10 ISSUE-31 -- What to do when a reasonable text equivalent is unknown/unavailable? -- OPEN 16:23:10 http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/31 16:23:15 topic: missing alt 16:23:22 q+ 16:23:42 LeifHS has joined #html-wg 16:24:24 danc: update due dates before telco if there are no news 16:24:27 -Matt_May 16:24:43 issue-56? 16:24:43 ISSUE-56 -- Assess whether "URLs" section/definition conflicts with Web architecture -- OPEN 16:24:43 http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/56 16:24:49 topic: URLs 16:25:02 danc: done with formatting 16:25:14 danc: done with reformatting 16:25:32 danc: next step submit as I-D 16:26:06 danc: is the WG interested in when to submit it? 16:26:32 masinter: the WG isn't needed for the decision 16:26:53 krijnh has joined #html-wg 16:26:57 danc: there was discussion in www-tag 16:27:13 danc: which mailing list? 16:27:21 Proposal in www-tag to merge with IRI document. Proposal to continue to discuss on uri@w3.org 16:27:24 danc: uri mailing list 16:27:35 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2009Apr/0081.html 16:27:47 danc: HT summarized what documents are out there 16:28:03 danc: encoding problem in query parameters 16:28:10 q+ 16:28:17 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2009May/0001.html 16:28:22 Martin's reply discusses the non-western search engine use case http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2009May/0000.html 16:28:47 q+ to say we should decide once for all where to discuss this, and make sure Martin D. is there as well 16:29:01 oops... 0001 is the one I meant 16:29:15 I expect discussion to converge on uri@w3.org 16:29:25 ... though I'm not sure how to get browser vendors there. 16:29:28 ack danc 16:29:34 q- 16:29:39 Zakim, mute Mike 16:29:39 Mike should now be muted 16:30:02 action dan: submit id for URLs in HTML 5 16:30:03 Created ACTION-121 - Submit id for URLs in HTML 5 [on Dan Connolly - due 2009-05-14]. 16:30:24 topic: decentralized ext. 16:30:30 issue-41? 16:30:30 ISSUE-41 -- Decentralized extensibility -- OPEN 16:30:30 http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/41 16:30:35 rubys: chris not here 16:30:43 DanC if you want help editing IRI documents, please let me know I am willing to do technical editing work 16:30:52 topic: aria taskforce 16:31:04 114 should be connected to an aria issue... fixing... 16:31:10 action-114? 16:31:10 ACTION-114 -- Cynthia Shelly to report progress on ARIA TF -- due 2009-05-07 -- OPEN 16:31:10 http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/actions/114 16:31:15 good to know, masinter; I'll try to call you 16:32:01 Topic: ISSUE-35 (aria-processing) 16:32:48 ACTION-105 ? 16:32:48 ACTION-105 -- Sam Ruby to should arrange a meeting between chairs of HTML WG and XHTML2 WG to ensure there is a plan for coordination of vocabularies to avoid incompatibilities. -- due 2009-04-30 -- OPEN 16:32:48 http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/actions/105 16:33:00 topic: HTML/XHTML WG relation 16:33:27 ACTION-105 due next week 16:33:27 ACTION-105 Should arrange a meeting between chairs of HTML WG and XHTML2 WG to ensure there is a plan for coordination of vocabularies to avoid incompatibilities. due date now next week 16:33:34 rubys: plh currently not interested discussing merging 16:33:40 masinter: why is RDFa relevant? 16:34:05 ACTION-114 due 21 May 16:34:05 ACTION-114 Report progress on ARIA TF due date now 21 May 16:34:07 rubys: if *HTML would be merged, we'd have to figure out what to do with RDFa 16:34:23 q+ 16:34:39 masinter: what's the criterium for resolving this? 16:34:48 krijnh has joined #html-wg 16:35:00 danc: merged group would need to take XHTML requirements seriusly 16:35:15 s/seriusly/seriously/ 16:35:39 masinter: some requirements are common, others ... 16:36:08 q+ 16:36:17 rubys: we will now soon whether the requirements ARE taken seriously 16:36:29 s(now/know/ 16:36:33 s/now/know/ 16:36:43 s/know/have some good data/ 16:36:54 masinter: disposition of comments on public-html-comments 16:37:01 masinter: are these tracked? 16:37:15 . http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-comments/ 16:37:17 danc: we let them accumulate 16:37:31 rubys: do we need an issue tracker? 16:37:45 danc: anybody can respond 16:38:04 danc: tracking gets more important when we get to the end 16:38:14 rubys: Hickson is reading all of them 16:38:14 q? 16:38:27 (process calls for timely technical response? really?) 16:38:29 masinter: issues with Ian's process 16:38:41 Shelley's comments 16:38:46 masinter: ...schedule-wise... 16:38:58 rubys: can accelerate for specific issues 16:39:09 "The group SHOULD reply to a reviewer's initial comments in a timely manner." -- http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/policies.html#formal-address 16:39:37 danc: we could do better 16:40:42 Zakim, unmute Mike 16:40:42 Mike should no longer be muted 16:40:44 danc: discussion of "uahtor" stylesheet 16:40:52 s/uathor/author/ 16:42:01 Matt: groups take each other seriously, but disagree on what is important 16:42:13 q- 16:42:16 q+ to say that Hixie's mechanism for displaying author-only view of draft does work as expected (in browsers that support user stylesheet switching) 16:42:39 masinter: need priorization of requirements 16:44:10 ack next 16:44:24 masinter: can agree on technical solutions even when disgagreeing on ther things 16:44:26 ack next 16:44:27 MikeSmith, you wanted to say that Hixie's mechanism for displaying author-only view of draft does work as expected (in browsers that support user stylesheet switching) 16:45:42 http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/Overview.html 16:46:32 MikeSmith: user stylesheet should work in W3C version of the spec as well 16:46:35 i can't get it to work at http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/ 16:47:06 action mike to make author guide user stylesheet work with the W3C version of the spec as well 16:47:07 Created ACTION-122 - Make author guide user stylesheet work with the W3C version of the spec as well [on Michael(tm) Smith - due 2009-05-14]. 16:47:13 it works in Minefield and Opera for me 16:48:03 krijnh has joined #html-wg 16:48:34 works for me in W3C copy 16:48:44 -Mike 16:49:20 close ACTION-118 16:49:20 ACTION-118 Reformat the document on URLs in HTML 5 as an Internet Draft closed 16:50:03 topic: F2F 2009 16:50:16 ACTION-115? 16:50:16 ACTION-115 -- Michael(tm) Smith to set up WBS for HTML WG participants to @@ reTPAC 2009 -- due 2009-05-28 -- OPEN 16:50:16 http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/actions/115 16:51:24 danc: if the meeting is criticial we should make sure administrivia are taken care of 16:51:32 -Masinter 16:51:33 -dsinger 16:51:34 -DanC 16:51:35 -Julian 16:51:36 -Sam 16:51:46 -Cynthia_Shelly 16:51:48 - +1.218.349.aabb 16:51:50 HTML_WG()12:00PM has ended 16:51:51 Attendees were Sam, DanC, +1.218.349.aabb, Julian, Matt_May, Masinter, dsinger, Cynthia_Shelly, Mike 16:52:10 rrsagent, generate minutes 16:52:10 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/05/07-html-wg-minutes.html Julian 16:52:33 billyjackass has joined #html-wg 16:52:39 Laura is 349.aabb 16:53:10 Zakim, call Mike 16:53:10 ok, billyjackass; the call is being made 16:53:11 HTML_WG()12:00PM has now started 16:53:12 +Mike 16:53:27 RRSAgent, make minutes 16:53:27 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/05/07-html-wg-minutes.html billyjackass 16:53:40 s/issigned/assigned/ 16:53:52 dhairya has joined #html-wg 16:53:55 +Laura_Carlson 16:54:27 s/two month/two months/ 16:55:19 action-122 comment: it already works in the W3C version as well 16:55:22 s/will now soon/will know soon/ 16:55:29 comment action-122: it already works in the W3C version as well 16:55:47 s/uahtor/author/ 16:56:01 rrsagent, generate minutes 16:56:01 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/05/07-html-wg-minutes.html Julian 16:56:17 -Mike 16:56:19 HTML_WG()12:00PM has ended 16:56:19 Attendees were Mike 16:57:10 rubys: "Hickson is reading all of them" [presumably mails on public-html-comments] - I believe he's stated that he's been told Bugzilla is the only place he's required to track issues, and there's no such requirement on messages on the HTML WG mailing lists 16:57:45 (though he reads them anyway because they're a useful source of feedback, but not with any obligation to respond) 16:57:53 Julian, what does "can't read "value": no such variable around input line 60" mean? 16:58:06 that's what I get when I submit my .xml to http://xml.resource.org/cgi-bin/xml2rfc.cgi 16:58:40 trackbot, help 16:58:40 See http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/irc for help 16:58:45 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2009May/0005.html 16:58:57 send me the source and I'll check 16:59:33 source is http://www.w3.org/html/wg/href/draft-ietf.xml 16:59:41 and http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2009May/0006.html 16:59:41 trackbot, comment action-122 The author view already works in the W3C version as well. 16:59:41 ACTION-122 Make author guide user stylesheet work with the W3C version of the spec as well notes added 16:59:43 I wonder if it means "href doesn't resolve" 16:59:58 trackbot, close action-122 16:59:58 ACTION-122 Make author guide user stylesheet work with the W3C version of the spec as well closed 16:59:59 when MSM extracted this section from the HTML 5 draft, he didn't deal with all the resulting broken links 17:00:02 xref, potentially 17:00:25 have you seen the warnings from rfc2629.xslt on top of the page? 17:17:31 rubys has joined #html-wg 17:20:58 phenny has joined #html-wg 17:21:52 pimpbot has joined #html-wg 17:45:48 dbaron has joined #html-wg 17:51:48 @changes 17:51:49 MikeSmith: Huh? 17:51:58 @planet 17:51:58 MikeSmith: Huh? 17:52:05 great 17:55:33 pimpbot has joined #html-wg 18:11:32 Sander has joined #html-wg 18:35:06 krijnh has joined #html-wg 18:38:45 krijnh has joined #html-wg 18:46:45 shepazu has joined #html-wg 18:48:06 shepazu has joined #html-wg 18:49:18 krijnh has joined #html-wg 18:54:10 jwatt has joined #html-wg 19:04:32 Zakim has left #html-wg 19:22:14 billmason has left #html-wg 19:39:21 Lachy has joined #html-wg 21:05:38 shepazu has joined #html-wg 21:46:07 Sander has joined #html-wg 23:18:10 LeifHS has left #html-wg 23:32:27 Lachy has joined #html-wg 23:33:25 MikeSmith has joined #html-wg