15:53:54 RRSAgent has joined #soap-jms 15:53:54 logging to http://www.w3.org/2009/04/28-soap-jms-irc 15:53:56 RRSAgent, make logs public 15:53:56 Zakim has joined #soap-jms 15:53:58 Zakim, this will be SJMS 15:53:58 ok, trackbot; I see WS_SOAP-JM()12:00PM scheduled to start in 7 minutes 15:54:00 Meeting: SOAP-JMS Binding Working Group Teleconference 15:54:02 Date: 28 April 2009 15:54:12 Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2009Apr/0045.html 15:54:18 Chair: Roland 15:54:36 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/04/28-soap-jms-minutes.html Roland 15:57:28 alewis has joined #soap-jms 15:57:58 WS_SOAP-JM()12:00PM has now started 15:58:05 + +1.919.663.aaaa 15:59:34 +Roland 15:59:38 -alewis 15:59:39 +alewis 16:00:10 -Roland 16:00:19 mphillip has joined #soap-jms 16:00:46 +Phil 16:00:49 -alewis 16:00:51 +alewis 16:00:51 +Roland 16:01:08 Phil has joined #soap-jms 16:01:09 Derek has joined #soap-jms 16:01:31 Zakim, who is here? 16:01:32 On the phone I see alewis, Phil, Roland 16:01:33 On IRC I see Derek, Phil, mphillip, alewis, Zakim, RRSAgent, Roland, Yves, trackbot 16:01:38 +Derek 16:02:45 Regrets: Yves 16:02:53 + +0196270aabb 16:03:11 Zakim, aabb is mphillip 16:03:11 +mphillip; got it 16:05:01 Scribe: mphillip 16:05:10 -Phil 16:05:15 +eric 16:05:16 Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2009Apr/0045.html 16:05:21 http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/actions/pendingreview 16:05:32 Topic: Actions 16:05:45 +Phil 16:06:18 eric has joined #soap-jms 16:06:25 Roland: Messages sent to originators for action 83 and responses received confirming that actions are complete 16:06:26 peaston has joined #soap-jms 16:06:29 close action 83 16:06:47 close action-83 16:06:47 ACTION-83 Close email thread on LC comments 7,8,9 closed 16:07:06 +Peter_Easton 16:07:17 http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/actions/open 16:07:55 Derek: Action 68 will be made an FAQ - no progress to date 16:08:41 Roland: On action 73 we still have the question of whether to change the jndi property prefix 16:09:03 Eric: We are still waiting for confirmation from Harald 16:09:35 Roland: Should we go ahead with the change anyway? 16:09:53 Eric: Last note to Harald said that we would make the change, but asked if it clarified anything 16:10:28 Eric: Will send another note to Harald. We will not change anything unless Harald confirms that it would clarify the specification significantly 16:10:44 Eric: Will aim to send note by end of today 16:11:21 Roland: That is the last candidate editorial update which remains 16:12:16 Roland: Would like to be in position to transition to Candidate Recommendation 16:12:34 Roland: Need a spec. which incorporates all last call comments 16:13:44 Roland: We should resolve to go to candidate recommendation at the end of the week 16:14:23 Mark: So we would need a decision on whether we make the prefix change or not before then 16:14:43 Amy: You can make editorial changes once in Candidate Recommendation stage 16:15:30 Roland: Any disagreement on moving to Candidate Recommendation (CR)? 16:15:58 Eric: Agreed, subject to a response from Harald 16:16:20 Eric: ...so we should be in a position to change status next Tuesday 16:17:08 Amy: We can resolve to go to CR once we have answered the last question 16:17:36 Resolution: We will transition to CR regardless of whether the prefix change is made or not the 16:17:54 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/04/28-soap-jms-minutes.html Roland 16:18:22 RESOLUTION: We will transition to CR regardless of whether the prefix change is made or not the 16:18:36 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/04/28-soap-jms-minutes.html Roland 16:19:39 RESOLVED: We will transition to CR regardless of whether the prefix change is made or not 16:19:48 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/04/28-soap-jms-minutes.html Roland 16:21:09 TOPIC: URI Spec 16:21:24 Roland: Eric will chase the prefix change with Harald 16:22:00 Eric: No progress on getting to RFC 16:22:31 Eric: Will send another note asking what we need to do next to get the RFC completed 16:22:35 TOPIC: Testing 16:23:01 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2009Apr/0036.html 16:23:56 Phil: Went through checking the test cases to see whether they matched any other assertions, and found a couple of assertions which were covered already by test cases 16:24:11 Roland: The remaining issues are WSDL coverage 16:25:45 Roland: The wording of the conformance assertions has changed since the test assertions document was generated ( http://dev.w3.org/2008/ws/soapjms/testcases/assertions/assertions.html ) 16:26:01 Phil: We should regen. the document each time the spec. changes 16:27:17 Roland: Need to think about how we satisfy the CR requirements - for each assertion to be covered by at least two implementations 16:27:38 Phil: Could be tricky - an implementation may not cover all the assertions - some are optional 16:28:58 Roland: Right, but there still needs to be two implementations 16:30:17 Eric: If IBM does not implement the WSDL support, how can an alternative implementation interoperate with an IBM hosted service? 16:37:11 Mark: Should the assertions table include a 'prescription' column to say if assertions are mandatory? 16:37:33 Roland: Will look through the assertions to see if wording can be clarified to make this clearer 16:39:25 -Phil 16:39:27 -eric 16:39:27 -Derek 16:39:29 -Peter_Easton 16:39:31 -Roland 16:39:32 -alewis 16:39:32 -mphillip 16:39:34 WS_SOAP-JM()12:00PM has ended 16:39:35 Attendees were +1.919.663.aaaa, alewis, Roland, Phil, Derek, +0196270aabb, mphillip, eric, Peter_Easton 16:39:35 rrsagent, generate minutes 16:39:35 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/04/28-soap-jms-minutes.html mphillip 16:47:17 Roland has left #soap-jms 16:52:29 mphillip has left #soap-jms 18:34:08 Zakim has left #soap-jms