See also: IRC log
<apaschke> "not" was not accepted
Not-a-fact
<cke> why not just "neg"?
not, neg, naf
those ones are not for consideration
inflationary negation
<apaschke> not_class, not_inf, not_naf
Notnow
<apaschke> maybe we should offer several different proposals and them simply do a straw poll in the next general RIF telecon
Not(Exists ?x P(?x))
<cke> another example: (not (customer.age > 20))
<cke> if the customer's age is 18, then this is true
Nsf
<apaschke> prdNot, bldNot, coreNot, ...
Naf = Negation as failure
Nsf = Not supported by facts
<cke> and "boolean_not"?
<cke> I prefer it not to be an acronym. I like something explicit like "negation"
Notsf
<cke> Can we avoid saying "fact"?
<cke> There can be only test, like (not (customer.age > 20))
<apaschke> I prefer Nsf over Notsf since NsF is like Neg, Naf
<apaschke> a variant could be "No matching facts" = Nmf
<cke> how about "notf"?
<cke> Another example (customer (age not > 20))
<cke> how about "binary_not"?
<apaschke> classical (Boolean) negation
<apaschke> is a two-valued true-false logic
<apaschke> three-valued logic with unknown truth value (Kleene negation)
<cke> And "pnot" for production rule not?
<cke> or maybe "prnot"?
INot
NotI
Not(I)
Inot
INeg
<cke> I find ineg better
<cke> how do we write it?
<cke> ineg, INeg or Ineg?
PROPOSED: INeg (for Inflationary, or immediate, negation)
<cke> +1
<apaschke> subsumption is already an advanced concept to optimize the execution flow
<cke> Subsumption is very advanced, we have to do extensive analysis for this
PROPOSED: drop subsumion from the conflict resolution strategy, and come back to the previous consensus (refraction+priority+recency), maybe with an implementation note.
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.135 of Date: 2009/03/02 03:52:20 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00) No ScribeNick specified. Guessing ScribeNick: csma Inferring Scribes: csma WARNING: No "Topic:" lines found. WARNING: No "Present: ... " found! Possibly Present: PROPOSED apaschke cke csma You can indicate people for the Present list like this: <dbooth> Present: dbooth jonathan mary <dbooth> Present+ amy Regrets: Paul Vincent WARNING: No meeting title found! You should specify the meeting title like this: <dbooth> Meeting: Weekly Baking Club Meeting WARNING: No meeting chair found! You should specify the meeting chair like this: <dbooth> Chair: dbooth Got date from IRC log name: 28 Apr 2009 Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2009/04/28-rif-prd-minutes.html People with action items: WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines. You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option. WARNING: No "Topic: ..." lines found! Resulting HTML may have an empty (invalid) <ol>...</ol>. Explanation: "Topic: ..." lines are used to indicate the start of new discussion topics or agenda items, such as: <dbooth> Topic: Review of Amy's report[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]