13:07:28 RRSAgent has joined #awwsw 13:07:28 logging to http://www.w3.org/2009/04/28-awwsw-irc 13:07:32 zakim, this is awwsw 13:07:32 ok, alanr; that matches TAG_(AWWSW)9:00AM 13:07:33 Zakim, this will be AWWSW 13:07:33 ok, mhausenblas, I see TAG_(AWWSW)9:00AM already started 13:07:38 +??P9 13:07:39 zakim, who is here? 13:07:40 Meeting: W3C AWWSW TF 13:07:41 On the phone I see +1.216.445.aaaa, TimBL, Alan, ??P9 13:07:43 On IRC I see RRSAgent, Zakim, alanr, Stuart, mhausenblas, trackbot 13:07:47 zakim, ?? is me 13:07:47 +Stuart; got it 13:08:07 +??P10 13:08:19 Zakim, ??P10 is me 13:08:19 +mhausenblas; got it 13:08:40 Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-awwsw/2009Apr/0012.html 13:08:45 Previous: 2009-04-14 http://www.w3.org/2009/04/14-awwsw-minutes.html 13:08:49 +alanr 13:08:54 Scribenick: mhausenblas 13:09:00 zakim, alanr is jar 13:09:00 +jar; got it 13:09:10 Chair: Jonathan 13:09:32 Zakim, who is here? 13:09:33 On the phone I see +1.216.445.aaaa, TimBL, Alan, Stuart, mhausenblas, jar 13:09:36 On IRC I see RRSAgent, Zakim, alanr, Stuart, mhausenblas, trackbot 13:10:04 rrsagent, draft minutes 13:10:04 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/04/28-awwsw-minutes.html mhausenblas 13:10:17 rrsagent, make record public 13:10:57 zakim, aaaa is david 13:10:57 +david; got it 13:11:01 jar has joined #awwsw 13:11:09 zakim, david is dbooth 13:11:09 +dbooth; got it 13:11:32 Topic: JAR diagram 5 13:11:34 http://esw.w3.org/topic/AwwswNoodlingDiagrams 13:12:35 view-source:http://www.w3.org/2006/gen/ont#TimeSpecificResource 13:12:45 http://www.w3.org/2006/gen/ont#TimeSpecificResource 13:15:00 tabulator can't view 'ont' 13:16:04 another browser on that ontology: http://owl.cs.manchester.ac.uk/browser/?session=120ecdd6dcf-1284-120ecdd8d27 13:16:58 jar: yes, genont:Version rename to genont:TimeSpecificResource 13:18:09 jar: added some more stuff now in no 5 (see http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-awwsw/2009Apr/0006.html) 13:18:10 timbl has joined #awwsw 13:19:35 New in diagram #5: REST 'resource' and REST 'state' 13:21:06 RRSAgent, pointer? 13:21:06 See http://www.w3.org/2009/04/28-awwsw-irc#T13-21-06 13:21:23 grounding in http://www.w3.org/TR/HTTP-in-RDF/ 13:22:51 Need research: Is a "response" just the bits, or is it an event? Important distinction. 13:23:45 We could have both classes: response as bits (can be sent multiple times), response as event (happens only once). 13:25:55 has part = = dcterms:isPartOf 13:27:27 (Stuart, HATEOS?) 13:31:22 Tim: was there along side it: Hypertext As The Engine Of Application State - one of the so-called REST style architectural principles 13:32:34 http ontology in the manchester browser: http://owl.cs.manchester.ac.uk/browser/classes/?session=120ecdd6dcf-1284-120ececaee7 13:37:44 timbl: There's a limit to the extent to which we have to tie these things [6 spokes] together. 13:37:53 jar: 6 spokes in diagram #5 13:37:56 is there more than a single mention of "network data object" in rfc2616? 13:38:12 using other words.. i think so 13:38:21 what are the other words? 13:38:43 timbl: inclined not to try to handle all these different things 13:39:28 So let's not try t pin down a network data object. We could say it is the same as aw3:IR but to bring the whole discussion itno the HTTP community when REST has left it undefined will be big time-spender. 13:39:34 and not necessary. 13:40:02 +1 13:40:29 do we agree that we will keep terms out of the ontology if we aren't going to pin them down? 13:41:11 "tim doesn't want to get hung up on definitions" is that true? 13:41:23 I think we can work with aw3:IR = gen:GenericResource. 13:42:14 "it's a fallacy to think that you can pin down in english what things mean" 13:42:19 timbl: definitions are a good idea to a certain extent. fallacy to imagine you can pin down anything since english words themselves can be used in different ways. 13:42:35 timbl: show how it works in a protocol 13:43:50 combination of english + mathematics = adequate definition 13:44:08 timbl: crisply define using mathematics. 13:45:10 dbooth: This view is consistent with the goal of contrasting these various models 13:46:13 timbl: aw3:IR is the same as generic resource 13:46:18 aw3:IR owl:sameAs gen:GenericResource. 13:46:18 http://www.w3.org/2006/gen/ont 13:47:00 w3:IR owl:sameAs . 13:47:44 zakim, pointer 13:47:44 I don't understand 'pointer', alanr 13:47:49 rrsagent, pointer 13:47:49 See http://www.w3.org/2009/04/28-awwsw-irc#T13-47-49 13:49:20 http://www.w3.org/2006/gen/ont#ContentTypeGenericResource 13:50:01 alanr_ has joined #awwsw 13:51:54 By design a URI identifies one resource. We do not limit the scope of what might be a resource. The term "resource" is used in a general sense for whatever might be identified by a URI. It is conventional on the hypertext Web to describe Web pages, images, product catalogs, etc. as “resources”. The distinguishing characteristic of these resources is that all of their essential characteristics can be conveyed in a message. We identify this set as “informati 13:52:06 http://www.w3.org/TR/webarch/ 13:52:32 I'd be happy with that :) 13:53:08 Michael: wondering if we should step back and start from http://www.w3.org/2006/gen/ont 13:53:38 is "the bible" an information resource? 13:53:56 I'd volunteer to draw a diagram with nodes and arrows and then cross-check with jar#5 13:54:07 pointer to memo? 13:54:28 http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/Generic.html 13:54:40 http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/Generic 13:55:08 -dbooth 13:55:17 http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/Generic sameAs http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/Generic.html ? 13:55:23 rrsagent, draft minutes 13:55:23 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/04/28-awwsw-minutes.html mhausenblas 13:55:37 +dbooth 13:56:28 "A URI represents a resource" -> "A URI denotes a resource"? 13:59:13 in the memo, there is a list of successively specific resources and dimensions of genericity. What is the dimension of genericity from each to the next? From 2->3 it is language? What is it for 1->2 and 3->4? 14:04:21 timbl: It's absolutely clear, if you ask cwm, that 2 is not a document 14:05:08 FYI: In IAO there is information_artifact class, and is_about relationship. information_artifacts are exactly those things that stand in an is_about relationship to some other entity. We have some subproperties of is_about well defined, but definition of is_about at the top level is not yet pinned down. 14:05:28 What we are missing here, IMO, is the is_about relationship 14:06:16 who has authority to decide that 2 (for example) is not a timbl:information-resource? 14:07:31 hmmm... integers.... as set of equivalence classes under the relation "hasTheSameQuantity"... doesn't seem like an information resource... however, the numerals which stand for particular equivalence class might well be. 14:07:33 David: To what extent is it valid to choose whether something should be considered an IR or not? 14:07:55 and I would ask what is 1 about? 14:08:09 timbl: Out of order. Let's adjourn or continue. 14:08:28 jar is chair 14:08:44 -Alan 14:08:48 whoops 14:08:52 michael is chair. 14:08:54 -TimBL 14:08:54 -dbooth 14:08:55 -Stuart 14:08:55 guess that settles it for me? 14:08:58 adjourned 14:08:59 and all. 14:08:59 [adjourned] 14:09:04 by everybody 14:09:06 -mhausenblas 14:09:07 -jar 14:09:07 s/by/bye/ 14:09:10 zakim, list attendees 14:09:12 TAG_(AWWSW)9:00AM has ended 14:09:13 Attendees were +1.216.445.aaaa, TimBL, Alan, Stuart, mhausenblas, jar, dbooth 14:09:15 sorry, mhausenblas, I don't know what conference this is 14:09:19 rrsagent, please draft minutes 14:09:19 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/04/28-awwsw-minutes.html mhausenblas 14:09:25 zakim, bye 14:09:29 alanr has left #awwsw 14:09:34 Zakim has left #awwsw 14:09:36 rrsagent, bye 14:09:36 I see no action items