IRC log of rif-prd on 2009-04-21

Timestamps are in UTC.

16:56:58 [RRSAgent]
RRSAgent has joined #rif-prd
16:56:58 [RRSAgent]
logging to http://www.w3.org/2009/04/21-rif-prd-irc
16:57:08 [csma]
rrsagent, make log public
16:57:16 [csma]
rrsagent, make minutes
16:57:16 [RRSAgent]
I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/04/21-rif-prd-minutes.html csma
17:00:27 [AdrianP]
AdrianP has joined #rif-prd
17:00:38 [Zakim]
SW_RIF(PRD)1:00PM has now started
17:00:45 [Zakim]
+??P0
17:00:54 [csma]
zakim, ??P0 is me
17:00:54 [Zakim]
+csma; got it
17:01:36 [johnhall]
johnhall has joined #rif-prd
17:02:42 [Zakim]
+John_Hall
17:03:30 [Zakim]
+??P2
17:03:37 [AdrianP]
Zakim, ??P2 is me
17:03:37 [Zakim]
+AdrianP; got it
17:04:00 [johnhall]
zakim, mute me
17:04:00 [Zakim]
John_Hall should now be muted
17:10:54 [Zakim]
+??P3
17:11:12 [cke]
cke has joined #rif-prd
17:15:45 [csma]
Topic: definition of action builtins
17:16:27 [AdrianP]
set of external schema for PRD including print (and maybe other PRD built-ins)
17:16:31 [csma]
csma to remove definition of Iexecute, and use Iexternal instead (updating the definition of Iexternal in section 2 to refer to section 6 for action builtins)
17:20:57 [PaulVincent]
PaulVincent has joined #rif-prd
17:21:52 [Zakim]
+[IPcaller]
17:22:03 [AdrianP]
And in the conclusion could be completely redefined for the conclusion making it context dependend
17:22:26 [PaulVincent]
Zakim, [IPcaller] is me
17:22:26 [Zakim]
+PaulVincent; got it
17:24:35 [csma]
topic: XML schema
17:25:26 [AdrianP]
what about just not?
17:25:32 [PaulVincent]
Negation: not clauses...
17:25:44 [AdrianP]
neg = classical negation
17:26:19 [cke]
I prefer "not" if it works, otherwise "negate", etc.
17:26:25 [AdrianP]
naf = negation as failure
17:27:02 [cke]
not naf, it means that the reverse of true if not false (ternary logic)
17:27:10 [PaulVincent]
Knowledge-free "not" = knot
17:27:22 [csma]
csma: why is not the And element in the conclusion derived from the And in the condition?
17:29:20 [PaulVincent]
Negation terms: "¬" ... can we use not in the PRD schema but PNot in the spec?
17:31:20 [AdrianP]
what about <Not type="prd:inflatonary">...</Not>?
17:31:50 [cke]
or maybe "bnot" for binary not
17:32:01 [cke]
or bnot for boolean not
17:32:15 [PaulVincent]
I prefer "not" but would accept "Not-p" to discriminate...
17:32:46 [AdrianP]
infNOt, nafNot, classNot, ...
17:35:29 [csma]
Re negation name: Propose to use Not; we will try to find another name if the group objects to Not.
17:35:41 [csma]
rrsagent, make minutes
17:35:41 [RRSAgent]
I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/04/21-rif-prd-minutes.html csma
17:36:16 [Zakim]
-csma
17:36:17 [csma]
csma has left #rif-prd
17:38:38 [AdrianP]
minutes from PRD break-out session are available on the F2F13 web page
17:38:58 [johnhall]
bye
17:38:59 [Zakim]
-AdrianP
17:39:00 [Zakim]
-PaulVincent
17:39:02 [johnhall]
johnhall has left #rif-prd
17:39:03 [Zakim]
-??P3
17:39:05 [AdrianP]
rrsagent, make minutes
17:39:05 [RRSAgent]
I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/04/21-rif-prd-minutes.html AdrianP
17:39:06 [Zakim]
-John_Hall
17:39:07 [Zakim]
SW_RIF(PRD)1:00PM has ended
17:39:08 [Zakim]
Attendees were csma, John_Hall, AdrianP, PaulVincent
19:43:44 [Zakim]
Zakim has left #rif-prd